Anna o' Brien / Glitter + Lazers / GlitterandLazers - Fat, drunk, consoomer attention whore who would rather eat and drink herself to death than endure a single negative emotion

The whole box of chocolate covered cookies is over 3000 kcals.
There’s no way she just eats one cookie or rice crispy bite per sitting. The produce and salads are on the side of the store, it seems like she just went straight to the snacks. I suppose she is supposed to be eating clean for recovery, but she figures well im in pain so I deserve treats. She’s going to regain in no time…

I guess these apartments are for high paid singles or dinks who just want to be spoiled/ flex. There probably aren’t many units like that in the building because the demand would be low. Most people i knew in austin who made lots of money tried to get on the property ladder there asap.

A few comments and replies on instagram
View attachment 7018219
View attachment 7018220
“Most have insurance teams to help you get it covered”

Yep - plenty of doctors who know how to work the insurance system. In some cases, like with your primary care doctor, they can help you get the things you need. One of the top ways to get something covered by insurance? Claim it’s causing you pain. This can turn an elective plastic surgery procedure into one that’s covered by insurance. That’s why we saw her wincing and documenting how painful her arms are, despite seeing her doing the latest TikTok dances gesticulating wildly.

Moshrefi/Scamron no doubt told her it would be covered if for pain/quality of life reasons, then he gets his insurance money + kickbacks.
 
One cookie at 120 calories is impressive even for a death fat. Nothing like eating 3/4 of a lb of excess fat in one bag of cookies in one sitting.

But bitch doesn’t maintain 550lbs eating less than 5k cals a day. Show us Anna, come on be real with yourself and audience for once in your life.
 
I don't blame anyone for what they have to do to earn a living- except HR people- but I do genuinely wonder what circumstances could be so dire that working for Anna is preferable to a regular job.
It seems like a big part of Tracy's "job" is moderating comments for Anna, so maybe the appeal was that she could do most of the work from home?
 
So nutrition info the three things we know:
View attachment 7017818
100 calories PER COOKIE? You just know she finishes a box in a sitting. Hell, she probably goes through multiple boxes a day. Jeez.

For reference, for those who don't do calorie counting, 1600-2000 calories per day is a maintanance for an average woman who does light exercise maybe twice a week. This hambeast eats more than that per day in cookies alone.
 
Last edited:
It seems like a big part of Tracy's "job" is moderating comments for Anna, so maybe the appeal was that she could do most of the work from home?
Yeah, I'm wondering if one of her kids is special needs, or even merely intense but normal; it's amazing what bullshit that parents are prepared to put up with professionally if it means flexibility in other areas so that they can do what they have to for the kids, especially if the kid's other parent is absent or otherwise not pulling their weight. If that means snatching moments to be Anna's online dogsbody in between childcare or after bedtime, then I guess the arrangement is functional enough for all concerned. Also, didn't Tracy have treatment for the Big C? Even if she was declared cancer free, many of the treatments are absolutely brutal, kill-or-cure shit, and the decline in her health and overall energy levels might be so that doing admin online lets her focus her limited physical energy on her kids, whether they're special needs or not.

I feel sorry that Tracy is stuck working for Anna, but everyone has got to do what they've got to do, especially when they're raising the next generation.
 
100 calories PER COOKIE? You just know she finishes a box in a sitting. Hell, she probably goes through multiple boxes a day. Jeez.

For reference, for those who don't do calorie counting, 1600-2000 calories per day is a maintanance for an average woman who does light exercise maybe twice a week. This hambeast eats more than that per day in cookies alone.
130 is so much worse, but above the 100 mark it probably doesn't even matter any more. That's not even a giant cookie. I was not aware you could create such a thing. Does this still taste like anything at that point?
 
100 calories PER COOKIE? You just know she finishes a box in a sitting. Hell, she probably goes through multiple boxes a day. Jeez.

For reference, for those who don't do calorie counting, 1600-2000 calories per day is a maintanance for an average woman who does light exercise maybe twice a week. This hambeast eats more than that per day in cookies alone.
But this just reinforces what we all know. She’s incapable of controlling herself and is just to keep gaining and ruin everything she has had done. Add to that is the very real possibility of her getting hooked on pain meds while continuing to get taken advantage of by doctors. It’s quite dangerous.
 
130 is so much worse, but above the 100 mark it probably doesn't even matter any more. That's not even a giant cookie. I was not aware you could create such a thing. Does this still taste like anything at that point?
It absolutely does. For reference, most cookies made with butter, flour and standard granulated unbleached sugar will come in between 80 to 100 calories per cookie for a standard diameter cookie of 3" (higher if you use a specialty flour like cake flour for extra deliciousness vice all-purpose, which is fine in its own right). Additives make it skyrocket swiftly. A banana chocolate chip cookie with reduced sugar content due to the banana suppling its own sugar will be around 120 calories per cookie in a standard batch of 60 3" cookies. And let's not even TALK about oatmeal raisin, because oats vs. flour = yikes on bikes with caloric content.

Source: I bake. A lot. I don't know what kind of flavorless joyless nuggets of sad you have experienced where your standard 3" cookie clocks in at less than 80-100 calories, but let's get off the "OH THOSE ARE SO TERRIBLE" soap box.

Are there better out there? Yes. Is there a problem with these cookies? Absolutely not. If a person can regulate his or herself, it's not bad. One or two cookies isn't going to kill you nor negatively affect you so long as you eat smartly throughout the rest of the day.

But this is Anna, and she's going to hork the entire bag in about 3 hours, which is where the problem lies.
 
There’s no way she’d be able to sign a lease for a $7k/month sky rise apartment without references.
You'd be surprised. Most luxury apartments only need to confirm your income and credit score - that's it. If you promise to pay a year's rent in advance, even better.

Rich families have disaster kids who need apartments all the time (if their family doesn't already own a property in that area / isn't interested in owning in that area.) How do they keep getting leases for their nepo brats? Have lots of money, excellent credit, and pay a year up front.

Anna is not that kind of rich, she's only a three percent-er at best. But she can continue to get pretend luxury apartment leases by having a high income, a good credit score, and a big deposit. Also notice she's always moving into a new facility where they're desperate to get new residents to fill their units ASAP, and not so choosy about the community.

/tinfoil apartment sperg
 
It absolutely does. For reference, most cookies made with butter, flour and standard granulated unbleached sugar will come in between 80 to 100 calories per cookie for a standard diameter cookie of 3" (higher if you use a specialty flour like cake flour for extra deliciousness vice all-purpose, which is fine in its own right). Additives make it skyrocket swiftly. A banana chocolate chip cookie with reduced sugar content due to the banana suppling its own sugar will be around 120 calories per cookie in a standard batch of 60 3" cookies. And let's not even TALK about oatmeal raisin, because oats vs. flour = yikes on bikes with caloric content.

Source: I bake. A lot. I don't know what kind of flavorless joyless nuggets of sad you have experienced where your standard 3" cookie clocks in at less than 80-100 calories, but let's get off the "OH THOSE ARE SO TERRIBLE" soap box.

Are there better out there? Yes. Is there a problem with these cookies? Absolutely not. If a person can regulate his or herself, it's not bad. One or two cookies isn't going to kill you nor negatively affect you so long as you eat smartly throughout the rest of the day.

But this is Anna, and she's going to hork the entire bag in about 3 hours, which is where the problem lies.
A serving of regular Oreos is 160 calories for 3 cookies. So about 53 calories per cookie.

She bought Joe-Joe’s, the Trader Joe’s knockoff Oreo. But they’re also a special version of Joe-Joe’s that are covered in chocolate. Even so, I find it surprising that a single chocolate-covered Joe-Joe is worth more than two regular Oreos. These aren’t big cookies - an Oreo is apparently 1.75” in diameter.

Going from “you can eat 3 of these cookies in an intended serving because they are so small” to “you can only have one of these small cookies because they are coated in chocolate” is a difference for a calorie-conscious person, a big difference for someone who doesn’t look at calories and has multiple servings at once, and a HUGE (lol) difference when you’re eating the entire box in one go like Anna does.
 
It absolutely does. For reference, most cookies made with butter, flour and standard granulated unbleached sugar will come in between 80 to 100 calories per cookie for a standard diameter cookie of 3" (higher if you use a specialty flour like cake flour for extra deliciousness vice all-purpose, which is fine in its own right). Additives make it skyrocket swiftly. A banana chocolate chip cookie with reduced sugar content due to the banana suppling its own sugar will be around 120 calories per cookie in a standard batch of 60 3" cookies. And let's not even TALK about oatmeal raisin, because oats vs. flour = yikes on bikes with caloric content.

Source: I bake. A lot. I don't know what kind of flavorless joyless nuggets of sad you have experienced where your standard 3" cookie clocks in at less than 80-100 calories, but let's get off the "OH THOSE ARE SO TERRIBLE" soap box.

Are there better out there? Yes. Is there a problem with these cookies? Absolutely not. If a person can regulate his or herself, it's not bad. One or two cookies isn't going to kill you nor negatively affect you so long as you eat smartly throughout the rest of the day.

But this is Anna, and she's going to hork the entire bag in about 3 hours, which is where the problem lies.
The 130 ones are chocolate covered oreos so they are pretty small. Extremely calorie dense. At least an oatmeal raisin would fill you up a little more.
 
Annas penchant for snacking is shocking, even for a deathfat. Maybe she just hides her snacking better than the other gas giants?

Most of our fat farm cows show themselves indulging in frequent, large meals, but not many of them show the constant grazing in snacks.

Anna seems to eat nonstop each day: a breakfast, then snackies until lunch, then some stupid high protein salad for lunch, then more snackies until supper, then desserts, then snackies until the medianoche meal, then pass out.

She's got to be guzzling almost five thousand calories per day to keep gaining at her wight and height, which is easy to achieve with chocolate coated cookies in a large box.
 
Also notice she's always moving into a new facility where they're desperate to get new residents to fill their units ASAP, and not so choosy about the community.

That’s every “luxury” apartment complex in a growing city.

The reason why rich kids and residents like Anna can move every year is because corporate landlords do not give a single fuck about things like community or someone fatting around their apartment. Finding new tenets is a line item they want to keep as low as possible.

Having lived in several buildings like this I think it’s a weird conspiracy that nameless, faceless corporate landlords are investigating tenets for being fat and dirty when the check clears every month or give a shit about resident complaints.

Anna simply gets bored and starts daydreaming about how much better her life will be if she lives by a trail, or in skyscraper, or whatever because she has the mentality of a middle schooler.
 
You'd be surprised. Most luxury apartments only need to confirm your income and credit score - that's it. If you promise to pay a year's rent in advance, even better.

Rich families have disaster kids who need apartments all the time (if their family doesn't already own a property in that area / isn't interested in owning in that area.) How do they keep getting leases for their nepo brats? Have lots of money, excellent credit, and pay a year up front.

Anna is not that kind of rich, she's only a three percent-er at best. But she can continue to get pretend luxury apartment leases by having a high income, a good credit score, and a big deposit. Also notice she's always moving into a new facility where they're desperate to get new residents to fill their units ASAP, and not so choosy about the community.

/tinfoil apartment sperg
I am looking at a nutrition label for cookies I sometimes like to have with my matcha and they are 6 cookies serving size, for 130kcal total. Get over yourself. What a weird thing to sperg about.
 
Back