Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[DavidS877]

Will Dildo Saggins make the deadline today? We'll find out, but my gut says he will not. And when Hardship Hardin calls him on it by filling a new motion for sanctions, Russ will whine and bitch that since he filed a motion to amend his complaint that he assumed it was a do-over and put a halt to everything that came before it.

He's got the order for potential sanctions already. All Hardin needs to do is update the court when Greer fails to send him the document(s).
(Referring to second sanctions for the Utah restraining order, not third sanctions for the item Greer just filed, which may not come for a while as Hardin has requested a delay of game for the amended complaint.)

 

[teriyakiburns]

View attachment 7020907

Doofus forgot to attach exhibit B.

e: I suppose the attachment at the end is B. I was half right?

 

[Offensive User Name]

So why TF do you keep pushing it, Russ!?


Edit: Also, why do Russ keep saying "Defendants"? Plural.
Does he think he is suing Hardin too?
Or does he think he sues all of us by trying to sue a website?

 

[Throwing Romans]

Well at least he's honest as to why his broke and lazy ass doesn't want to produce the lawsuits...



"EXHIBIT B" is a winner as well.

 

[SCV]

This will go well. I know things in legal filings usually can't be construed as defamation or similar but is this sanctionable?

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

Since the 10th Circuit ruled Greer stated a case, it proves that Defendants’ argument is flawed because the panel of 3 judges agreed Greer stated a case for contributory copyright infringement by ruling 3-0 against Moon, thus proving the current case is not frivolous.

This is what happens when you reward retards for lying.

 

[DavidS877]

So why TF do you keep pushing it, Russ!?

And his amended complaint BRINGS BACK harassment, not against KF this time but other parties, so Greer is himself making the documents relevant if they weren't.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Well at least he's honest as to why his broke and lazy ass doesn't want to produce the lawsuits...

View attachment 7020947

I like how he keeps flipflopping between "it's all on PACER" and "only some is on PACER" depending on which argument he wants to pursue

 

[obsdj]

I don't see why. It pretty much remains as a response to the refiled motion at ECF 238. Declaring Russ' motion as moot and forcing him to refile it seems like a waste of Judicial resources, since nothing materially changed.

If that's the case, then I hope Greer withdraws and re-submits on his own because that would be funny.

I believe I can make a credible claim that I called this.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Edit: Also, why do Russ keep saying "Defendants"? Plural.

Because there are multiple defendants.

 

[FamicomGorby]

I think he copy pasted a lot of what he wrote in a previous motion, but did like the section on "WHY DO DEFENDANTS KEEP POINTING OUT MY MISTAKES?!?!"

 

[oh no its pipkun]

I like how he keeps flipflopping between "it's all on PACER" and "only some is on PACER" depending on which argument he wants to pursue

have you considered that the documents are public where and whenever they may be, pacer or not? if thats good enough for greer by golly that should be good for the courts!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

have you considered that the documents are public where and whenever they may be, pacer or not? if thats good enough for greer by golly that should be good for the courts!

They aren't though (some, at the very least), no matter what definition of public you like to use.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

(one filing is the case of Greer v. Stallone in the 8th Judicial District Court of Nevada, who was apparently using Kiwi Farms to spread defamation about Plaintiff). So not only is the request irrelevant, but providing filings won’t help Defendants the way they hope for.

If it's such a fucking bombshell and Defendants are literally asking for it, then produce it, Shitlips.

The other reason Greer did not answer their second request for production of documents is that after Greer drafted out a 4 page response to their first request, Defendants’ counsel protested and claimed that Greer was in violation of the rules for not drafting exactly as Defendants wanted.

You mean in accordance with the law?

We saw this last month when defendants Case 2:24-cv-00421-DBB-JCB Document 246 Filed 02/23/25 PageID.1109 Page 4 of 19 5 said Greer could file an amended exhibit list, but then they got mad when they didn’t like the content of the exhibit list and sought to exclude it.

Again, you were being asked to produce documents with very specific references, not a list.

Plaintiff is honestly trying to do his best

Try harder, you insufferable faggot.

 

[oh no its pipkun]

They aren't though (some, at the very least), no matter what definition of public you like to use.

I know, i'm just channeling greer.

which doc has hardin's full email found in exhibit e? I dont think i've read that one in full. I'm always tickled pinj with the greers of world because someone can always produced a dated list of court cases (and a note that these docs arent available on pacer) that need to be produced but they always say they don't know. and then the list gets produced and they flail and call everyone racist.

 

[DHugo]

Exhibit B:
9
(At this point this might be some shizo numerical reveal of a demonic conspiracy)

Exhibit C (and the others):
Too studly for this page

 

[Harvey Danger]

This is 5 pages of Greer stamping his foot and yelling "I told you NO! Stop bothering me!" Then 14 pages of proof that he has been stamping his foot and yelling NO for months.

Does this moron not remember that the judge in this case specifically discussed the litigation history discovery at the scheduling conference? Bennett and Hardin had a leisurely debate over how retarded Greer's damage claims were, before the judge allowed Hardin to start asking about the litigation. He just limited the number of requests to 25 when Hardin asked for 100.

Russ, you Russtarded retard, you don't get to sue someone and dictate what's relevant to their defense.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

Can we all just enjoy the irony of a habitual sex pest convicted of criminal harassment who threatened a school shooting saying he's frightened of somebody sending him polite emails to help resolve the 4 year tantrum he's been throwing?

 

[Jew-ish]

I know the judge isn't invested like Hardin and Greer, but I am very excited for his response. It's the space between "it's so over" and "we're so back" that gets the blood pumping

 

[4090 Chad]

Well at least he's honest as to why his broke and lazy ass doesn't want to produce the lawsuits...

View attachment 7020947

"EXHIBIT B" is a winner as well.

All I am reading here is, "I don't want to prosecute my own case and I don't want to have to prove my lies"

Wonder how the judge can possibly spin this to not immediately dismiss this case.