Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

Bit late but

He's also a dad with 3 kids and he's realised debating these commie fucks is pointless. They will not listen, they will not show mercy, the only option he sees now is to destroy them completely and he's completely right. Which is why Dev is so mad, because Sargon still sees him as a friend but won't fully engage with any of his shit because Dev is commie-adjacent. Sargon's latest video about Ash Sarkar really paints how much he despises these people now. I can't imagine Dev might take it very well.
At some point the solution is "I am no longer asking". Locker room politics has its place. But, it's usually the last thing you want to resort to because it's essentially saying "I can't take you in good faith anymore. I can only recognize you as a subversive element who will use my own good nature against me to make my life worse, and I can no longer grant you the opportunity."

It marks an end to the practice of debating in good spirit, and the beginning of "That's an interesting statement. But, I have a gun, so what now smart guy?"
 
Devcreep seems to have forgotten what he said about Kids and Consent when it comes to Tranny bullshit.

1740430767492.jpeg
And yeah, didnt he pretended to be "Camera Lady" during GG?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They could have stopped a long time ago. That would have meant respecting their opponents. They never saw the Republicans as human, much less respected them.
I agree with this. What lefties wont admit by and large, is that they see the right wing as obsolete. They (and all things apply to Dev of course), see the right wing as a relic of a bygonne age. What do you do with something thats obsolete? You get rid of it. The commie types see the right as an ontologically evil threat to be eliminated. The thing is liberals (like Dev) see the right as an old computer. You dont think such a thing is evil, nor do you seek to destroy it, but you definitely take it offline and ensure it doesnt get used for any major projects again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SubarashiiRage
Oh so that’s too much for him eh?
I can't recall the exact tweet but he said he jumped the gun early on ProJared or something like that and wants to see what comes out in the wash this time. I personally think he's waiting in the wings to become a full-throated Destiny dicksucker but that's just my opinion.

And yeah, didnt he pretended to be "Camera Lady" during GG?
That's been speculated a lot but he's said consistently that Camera Lady was a separate person and that she's featured in really old SFO videos. I can see why people naturally come to this conclusion though, Dev is a fat out and out pervert so for a lot of people it's intuitive that he would pretend to be a chick to get nudes from lesbians.
 
Devcreep seems to have forgotten what he said about Kids and Consent when it comes to Tranny bullshit.

View attachment 7020989
And yeah, didnt he pretended to be "Camera Lady" during GG?
Lol. He just admitted majority of "trans" kids end up with destroyed bodies, because society failed to protect them.
To answer this fag question. Those who dont can still chop off their dicks when they reach adulthood and therefore are considered responsible for their own actions.
 
I agree with this. What lefties wont admit by and large, is that they see the right wing as obsolete. They (and all things apply to Dev of course), see the right wing as a relic of a bygonne age. What do you do with something thats obsolete? You get rid of it. The commie types see the right as an ontologically evil threat to be eliminated. The thing is liberals (like Dev) see the right as an old computer. You dont think such a thing is evil, nor do you seek to destroy it, but you definitely take it offline and ensure it doesnt get used for any major projects again.
Its a distinction without a difference really. In the end, both groups want you broke, dead, destitute and your children raped and they think its funny- Sam Hyde.
 
Devcreep seems to have forgotten what he said about Kids and Consent when it comes to Tranny bullshit.

View attachment 7020989
And yeah, didnt he pretended to be "Camera Lady" during GG?
No one ever actually identified who the fuck CameraLady was - CON was actively looking into it - but nothing they found was conclusive.

So I'm willing to use the Natalie O'Brien threshold on this one and assume she doesn't exist until evidence comes out that she does.

1740465273627.png


Because even Google's fucking AI knows it.
 
Its a distinction without a difference really. In the end, both groups want you broke, dead, destitute and your children raped and they think its funny- Sam Hyde.
The distinction is important though for the purposes of optics. No liberal will every say the right is evil and must be destroyed, and you'll get sideye from normies for suggesting that..
But
If you suggest that the liberals think that the right is obsolete and must be put away and prevented from realizing any power, the liberal has a much harder time arguing against that, and normies will likely intuit that its true on some level
 
The distinction is important though for the purposes of optics. No liberal will every say the right is evil and must be destroyed, and you'll get sideye from normies for suggesting that..
But
If you suggest that the liberals think that the right is obsolete and must be put away and prevented from realizing any power, the liberal has a much harder time arguing against that, and normies will likely intuit that its true on some level
Optics? Brother they want to chop children's genitals off. They are evil. And they do say the same about the right every time they call the right Nazis. Even the obsolete argument. That's MovieBob logic. Nobody questions he's evil. You are literally throwing people away. There is no difference. The outcome is the same.
 
Lol. He just admitted majority of "trans" kids end up with destroyed bodies, because society failed to protect them.
To answer this fag question. Those who dont can still chop off their dicks when they reach adulthood and therefore are considered responsible for their own actions.
Even then you need to remember that most of these adult troons have, let's be blunt, never matured past the point of being a teenager (at most), whether due being developmentally stunted from a variety of factors, fucked up due to past trauma or never learned self control in regards to anything sexual.

I wouldn't trust them to drink, drive or even have sex, let alone have the mental capacity to consciously understand the ramifications of what cutting off your dick actually means.
The medical industry knows exactly what they're doing though, they don't care if these low IQ retards mutilate themselves, they'll be lifelong customers for the rest of their shortened lives.
 
The distinction is important though for the purposes of optics. No liberal will every say the right is evil and must be destroyed, and you'll get sideye from normies for suggesting that..
But
If you suggest that the liberals think that the right is obsolete and must be put away and prevented from realizing any power, the liberal has a much harder time arguing against that, and normies will likely intuit that its true on some level
Dude, as someone who was active in the leftist activist sphere for like 15 years, not only are they willing to say that, they'll tell you it to your face.

The difference (and it is an important one) is where this comes from. My generation grew up when the Moral Majority goons were the designated anti-fun brigade. And while a lot of users on this site would love nothing better than to pretend it wasn't the case, too fucking many of the religious right back in my day were only too willing to own up to every negative stereotype you could possibly envision about them and then some. Everyone either knew someone who suffered something egregious because of them, or was someone who had some particularly egregious shit happen to them because of them. The stereotype of them being joyless fucks who see Satan in everything didn't emerge in a fucking vaccuum, is what I'm getting at, and a lot of what you see now is a direct holdover from that time period.

But as @Gehenna once pointed out, there is always more to every story. Many of the religious organizations that were cheerfully acting like assholes were actively being egged on by leftist groups at the time - or being paid directly by them. It's the reason you saw Jack Thompson happily jump in bed with the likes of Hillary Clinton and Lyndon LaRouche. Both sides were in on it, and only one of them was left holding the bag when public opinion finally slapped them upside the head. This does not, in any way, lessen the actions of the religious shitheads at the time. I have too many fucking stories of friends of mine that got disowned because they realized in their early 20s that they were gay, or fucking had all their belongings trashed because they liked PNP RPGs and Video Games, or got thrown the fuck out when they came of age because they dared to want a life that didn't involve complete supplication to their parents' sociopolitical leanings (hey, this sounds familiar).

It's been almost two decades since the Moral Majority ate shit, but the scars of what their supporters did are a direct contributor to why the left gobbled so many of my generation up. I have to wonder how much of that was by design, given historical context and what Gehenna said about the matter.
 
Devcreep seems to have forgotten what he said about Kids and Consent when it comes to Tranny bullshit.

View attachment 7020989
And yeah, didnt he pretended to be "Camera Lady" during GG?
>What happens to the ones that don't
You recruit them to your gooner Discord server?
What is this supposed to mean? So maybe one out of a hundred fail to grow out of it, the 99 should do, what exactly?
All the feminine dudes and boyish girls I knew back in high school turned out to be benign normies. So what kind of criteria are we using?

Edit: fixed a major typing error.
 
Last edited:
This is literally the argument made by infamous Breadtuber 'BadEmpanada' who seethed over "hypocrisy over West's opposite treatment of Crimea and Taiwan." He does have a point that if somehow there had been an open and fair election in Crimea, prior to 2014 annexation, the result could've realistically been "we want to join Russia." However Russia's motivation clearly isn't to "save Russians from the evil Ukrainians."
I'm just gonna let you know right now that China v. Taiwan and Singapore is very different compared to Russia v. Ukraine.

At some point the solution is "I am no longer asking". Locker room politics has its place. But, it's usually the last thing you want to resort to because it's essentially saying "I can't take you in good faith anymore. I can only recognize you as a subversive element who will use my own good nature against me to make my life worse, and I can no longer grant you the opportunity."

It marks an end to the practice of debating in good spirit, and the beginning of "That's an interesting statement. But, I have a gun, so what now smart guy?"
I mean, the black guy pulled out the gun first, so...
 
It's been almost two decades since the Moral Majority ate shit, but the scars of what their supporters did are a direct contributor to why the left gobbled so many of my generation up. I have to wonder how much of that was by design, given historical context and what Gehenna said about the matter.
Indeed, this is why Goonergate does matter and why the Religious Right fear being called Woke. They want to repeat the mistakes of the past because that was when they were powerful and calling them woke stops them from doing that.
 
Back