US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
So are the Trumpniggers officially adopting the stance of "it's okay to let in tons of foreigners as long as the bribe the federal government?"

Oh my how the mighty have fallen. If Trump eliminated minimum wage and opened up the borders entirely you would support him because "someone has to do the dirty work Americans won't."

"Feds are evil except when they're collecting solicited bribes from foreigners."
People that blindly trust their team and don't hold them accountable are just as harmful to any cause as the other side.
I'm America first and a populist not a Trump cultist who will worship the ground he walks upon and agree with all his policies.
Is cutting the check to the feds worth it if we become similar to other nations where houses and areas are bought out from the common man because in both instances the government still gets their money. Do you think nations that sell passports are also doing it for the benefit of their nation?
 
So are the Trumpniggers officially adopting the stance of "it's okay to let in tons of foreigners as long as the bribe the federal government?"

Oh my how the mighty have fallen. If Trump eliminated minimum wage and opened up the borders entirely you would support him because "someone has to do the dirty work Americans won't."

"Feds are evil except when they're collecting solicited bribes from foreigners."
what do you call the right version of trump derangment syndrome?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood
I understand the thought, but why is this preferable to the EB5 program? Why is cutting a check to a federal slush fund preferable to actually investing in the US economy?

>It was never about stopping immigration
>It was never about deporting all the illegals
>It was never about balancing the budget
>It was never about not getting involved in foreign wars
>It was never about lowering inflation
>It was never about lowering the cost of living

What's next?

"It's okay to let in people that don't match our values as long as they have money"
i agree it isn't a s good as other alternatives, but it's a stepping stone hopefully. i'll take my rainbows but i believe that.
 
>It was never about stopping immigration
>It was never about deporting all the illegals
>It was never about balancing the budget
>It was never about not getting involved in foreign wars
>It was never about lowering inflation
>It was never about lowering the cost of living
> It’s about stopping open borders.
> Trump has went straight to work removing illegals.
> The budget has been getting slashed
> what foreign war is Trump starting?
> What chance has Trump had to lower inflation?
> same as above
 
> It’s about stopping open borders.
> Trump has went straight to work removing illegals.
> The budget has been getting slashed
> what foreign war is Trump starting?
> What chance has Trump had to lower inflation?
> same as above
Plus Trump is only a month into his presidency and has 3 years and 11 months to go, yet he has already accomplished a shitton. Any complaints about what he hasn't done while he is doing a dozen things at once just boils down to nitpicky bullshit.
 
will die laughing if Rufo discovered a fucking fedboy group Telegram / Signal / Discord / IRC server dedicated to troonin' and goonin' and mistook it for an "official" server.
I am praying to god this is the outcome kok
If it a 30 second email is so hard for them, i'm pretty sure they aren't really good at their job.
Agree 100 on this but I really don't believe DOGE is even going to assess the answers and make determinations. That would take the entire 4 years of Trumps term and ironically would need to expand DOGE to do it. I wonder if anyone made a quick bullet point list and just added in ridiculous shit and keeps their job.

I think it would be more productive to freeze wages and target the most ludicrous spending. Force the media and Democrats to go to bat for absolutely ridiculous jobs. It will keep the rw grifters busy for a long time too
 
People that blindly trust their team and don't hold them accountable are just as harmful to any cause as the other side.
I'm America first and a populist not a Trump cultist who will worship the ground he walks upon and agree with all his policies.
Is cutting the check to the feds worth it if we become similar to other nations where houses and areas are bought out from the common man because in both instances the government still gets their money. Do you think nations that sell passports are also doing it for the benefit of their nation?
Precisely. It's the same issue I have with king retard essentially ruling by decree. One day, we will have another Democrat in office that hates us, and Trump is setting the precedent that you can essentially melt the federal government down and pour it into your own mold. He has BOTH the upper and lower house, why isn't he making more concrete changes in line with how the Constitution fucking says we're supposed to change shit instead of setting us up to get fucked in 4-8 years? The executive should have LESS authority, not more.

Re: cutting checks directly to the feds:
This is an executive action, this is a decree, he just created a new income stream that will go to some slush fund in the black box that is the federal government. Even if we assume the best intentions, even if every single dollar of it is spent responsibly in the next four years, where is that slush money going to go when the Democrats are back in charge?
 
Precisely. It's the same issue I have with king retard essentially ruling by decree. One day, we will have another Democrat in office that hates us, and Trump is setting the precedent that you can essentially melt the federal government down and pour it into your own mold.
WTF do you thing Biden did for the past four years? He changed the definition of Democrat overnight. Making Obama’s policies look conservative by comparison. And he had the media, judges, feds, foreign nations, etc on his side. The days of playing fair are over.
 
Neat now we can just have the wealthy and corrupt legally buy their way in, this is fucking retarded.
Maybe I'm missing something here but don't we issue tourist visas? like as far as I know those are only asking two questions. Are you going to cause trouble and do you have money(well technically more than two but they are all a subset of those two), suppose all I'm saying is I fail to see the difference.
 
WTF do you thing Biden did for the past four years? He changed the definition of Democrat overnight. Making Obama’s policies look conservative by comparison. And he had the media, judges, feds, foreign nations, etc on his side. The days of playing fair are over.
So we get to the core of it. What you're saying, in essence, is that the Republic is dead, and we should instead go full Rome and have a series of increasingly unhinged and unaccountable dictators.
 
Agree 100 on this but I really don't believe DOGE is even going to assess the answers and make determinations. That would take the entire 4 years of Trumps term and ironically would need to expand DOGE to do it. I wonder if anyone made a quick bullet point list and just added in ridiculous shit and keeps their job.

It's likely an easy way to screen for feds so checked out that they're not even looking at their emails. You might also get a lot of useful information based on when someone responds. Anyone who put it off until the very end is less likely to be a useful employee than someone who took care of it right away because for them it's not hard to come up with a list of five things they accomplished.

Normally they tell companies that it's better to cut deep from the start so that additional layoffs aren't necessary in the future, but I hope they keep making small cuts and keep the bureaucrats demoralized and always looking over their shoulders. They deserve much worse, but I'm all for them facing down as many creative ways to shitcan their useless asses as possible. Should have taken the buyout.
 
*repeated, unbridled anger*

C'mon, friend, it's gonna be okay. Losing your fed job won't be the end of the world. McDonald's is gonna need a lot of young, healthy bucks to cart in all that sweet beef tallow, and I know you've got the drive and determination to make it in the fast-food industry. Who knows, maybe after five, ten years you'll be able to get promoted to assistant manager. That's a much nicer and nobler goal than just blindly leeching off your fellow Americans.
 
Re: cutting checks directly to the feds:
This is an executive action, this is a decree, he just created a new income stream that will go to some slush fund in the black box that is the federal government. Even if we assume the best intentions, even if every single dollar of it is spent responsibly in the next four years, where is that slush money going to go when the Democrats are back in charge?
Unless the courts prove to be a serious stumbling block, which it seems like they are but only on certain pieces of things, then what I think is it’s faster to fire them than to hire them, and we’re out of money so they can’t just put the whole bureaucracy back into place without another super dodecaomnibussy. The cover is blown, the slow frog boil is finished
 
Back