Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 77 18.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.7%

  • Total voters
    418
Which is another half-truth. Either Aaron and Nick did butt stuff, or Nick (at the least) wanted to do butt stuff, but they never got that far before the situation imploded. I was right about the drugs, infidelity, and swinging, and I'm calling that now.
Nick is easily fucking readable. He's an easy mark. That's how he got extorted out of a grand for a fake abortion. If he is angrily insisting Aaron did gay shit with him, it's because he's angry he didn't, or more likely, angry Aaron wasn't willing to get as completely fagged-up as Nick himself is and said no at some point.
 
Nick is easily fucking readable. He's an easy mark. That's how he got extorted out of a grand for a fake abortion. If he is angrily insisting Aaron did gay shit with him, it's because he's angry he didn't, or more likely, angry Aaron wasn't willing to get as completely fagged-up as Nick himself is and said no at some point.
Which is why I proffered the second option. That Nick wanted to stick it in Aaron's booty, but Aaron didn't let it get that far.

See, all of this could have been avoided if he didn't claim, daily and publicly, that Aaron ate his cum. I dunno WHY he thought that was a good idea. The only thing that did was out him as a fag (which he's since openly admitted to being), and it makes him look like a jilted lover.

He's never gonna go back to pretending to be the white-pilling trad gigachad. At least not in any believable sense.

EDIT: Typos.
 
Last edited:
Oh.
You would need minimum ONE Year for extradition, the objection prove it, then the no we have our own RP laws in this state. I am not even certain NY or NJ would allow for extradition on such a weak law.
It's entirely automatic, a rubber stamp. The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires states to honor extradition requests from other states, and they have zero power to analyze the other state's laws and say well we don't do this here.

A person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
U.S. CONST. art. IV, § 2, cl. 2.

The only question is whether the person is actually the person identified and is actually being charged with a crime.

It might take a year, if the person challenged it, but that person would spend that time behind bars awaiting a decision. Not a bright move. This is why most defendants waive extradition. And as petty a crime as it is to be a felony, it is indeed a felony he's charged with.

This isn't an extradition, it's a subpoena seeking an out of state witness for in person testimony, pursuant to an interstate agreement on how that's done. To invoke actual criminal penalties for it, though, the state seeking it has to file an actual action. So far as I know, they haven't yet, and they might not.

So it's up to Geno and Keanu whether they feel lucky. If Minnesota wants to pony up the witness/mileage fees, they can compel their presence, by hauling them there in a police vehicle if necessary. The question is whether Minnesota would do that. I personally think they'd have to be brain-dead to do that.

So it's really between Geno and Keanu and any counsel they may have whether they think Minnesota is bluffing and they can just blow it off. Until there's an actual court order in place locally, there's no real legal penalty, yet.

If they do make that choice, though, they'd best lawyer up and be ready to contest that subpoena locally if necessary. I think they have at least plausible enough arguments it's undue burden enough to make the challenge last a few months, or even indefinitely. I'm not sure whether they'd win, but it isn't an insane argument that some idiot sending you an unsolicited nude somehow justifies dragging you halfway across the country as a "witness" to some nothingburger "crime."
I won't believe for a second the prosecution will try to force her to testify, especially with pretty much every witness (except Nick) being opposed to testifying.
As I've said before, if you compel an unwilling witness, or in this case witnesses, to testify, you're juggling hand grenades. Odds are good their testimony doesn't come out like you'd want. I mean Geno may cuck and give perfect testimony. Who knows? I don't. Keanu flip-flops as often as Nick snorts cocaine and lies. Kayla is a drugged out wreck.

The whammen respecting DA has some cojones (or ovarios) even going ahead with this bullshit.

Also don't rule out Aaron cucking at the last minute either. I think he's actually playing a solid game and hoping if he runs down the clock, the prosecution's case will absolutely fall apart some time before trial, or at least wreck it badly enough he gets a more favorable deal.
Why would anyinnesota county want to REWARD swingers behavior: group sex, switching partners, sending pix to the swingers group, the aaron divorce allegedly occurred because minnesota 6 and junkie fell in love. Is THAT the kind of conduct minnesota wants to protect and reward???
Believe me, I fully agree with this. This is absolutely the opposite of the kind of behavior that should be sanctioned and protected by the power of the state. This degenerate poly/cuck shit is entirely against any rational public policy.

Does the state want to step in every time one of these idiotic cuck-cules falls apart with the INEVITABLE fallout of bullshit like this happening? Drugged out BPD swinging cucks are going to do this all the time. The lesson should be don't do shit like this. It does not deserve the imprimatur of state approval.

Check out Casillas as an example (you can search the thread for it I did a minor effortpost on it and why it isn't the same as what Aaron did). The conduct in that case was so absolutely morally abhorrent that no decent society should tolerate it. In fact, every major case seems to involve that.

Sending one picture to one person who then immediately deleted it? How the fuck is that even remotely comparable to these other cases?

Anyway, that's a public policy argument. And by that I mean rarely succeeds in court by itself, although I think a jury might find the behavior of all parties involved so repugnant and indefensible that nobody deserves any revenge and that everyone involved got their just desserts already.
 
Last edited:
This is why I believe Nick is sperging about the topic so much recently.
He repeatedly claimed they had Aaron "dead to rights", but I think he was trying to talk Aaron into believing that

Not just sperging personally but in a full-court press through what few surrogates still give him the time of day, as if a hamfisted attempt at riling up Dabbleverse tards could persuade Aaron to take a shitty plea deal he wants nothing to do with. In addition to self-described "Rekieta's bulldog" Ralph's hours of ragepig hollering about a list of "bullet points" that he said he got from the always-reliable Citizen M/@SaddamLanza in a Friday appearance on another of Aaron's a-logs' shows, it was notable that the show was originally announced to be a one-two punch featuring another Rekieta mouthpiece:

RalphHerren.jpg


For some reason Wil Herren couldn't make it for the promised crossover, but it was probably for the best since his solo appearance bumped to last night's episode was allowed more time to go into more detail about what Nick has been telling him in private. Out of a couple hours a few things stood out to clip:

1. For starters, to any extent that it addresses Wil's level of reliability as a source, there were indications that A) leaning in favor of relability, Wil's information is at least not stale since Nick has continued to talk to him as recently as when Nick broke the subpoena news on that Pretty Menopausal show just last week followed by some DM discussion with Nick about topics being discussed in the show last night, which apparently may have been in real-time while watching live; and B) leaning against reliability, although their communication began when Nick was threatening Wil with the same sort of flaggotry threatened against @elb in the past, that was backed off when Nick and Wil became "friends":


57:31 he'll be sitting there with April Kayla Nick all staring back across the courtroom at him that'll be rich if it 57:38 does happen yeah I was talking to Nick about that the day before he told uh the pretty antisocial girls he was like the 57:44 band's all back together so yeah I knew this was coming down the pipe and like um yeah...
1:13:56 ...sometimes I think Nick more just reacts to what he reads in the chat 1:14:03 um regardless of how many followers that they have so he just responds and so that's what happens but I was talking 1:14:08 Nick had messaged me a little bit earlier but apparently he did he was able to see what Aaron wrote about uh 1:14:15 him in the cases and stuff like that so he basically responded that yeah he was in his case yes he was able to to read 1:14:22 what the statements Aaron had made...
1:39:56 ...it was difficult to get Nick to talk and like the first time Nick talked to me was to tell me to 1:40:02 stop clipping him and then like we kept talking and I was like okay and then all of a sudden we became friends and then 1:40:08 it was okay to clip him...


2. On the topic of Nick's and Aaron's back and forth this week mincing words about whether the drugs were accessible enough to technically qualify as being "around the kids," Wil now reveals Nick's version of Aaron's infamous couch story. Apparently Nick openly admits Aaron was telling the truth that there were drugs in a container on the couch next to Aaron's daughter's head until Aaron took it away and got pissed at Nick, but Nick claims that Aaron is lying insofar the container type having been a coke bullet that had fallen out of Nick's pocket, whereas the coke bullet was safely stored in a bigger locked case that Nick had set on the couch for some reason, so the kid couldn't have gotten into it and that means drugs technically weren't around kids. Checkmate, prudes:


45:15 also I can talk a little bit about what he's talking about too with no no no go ahead go ahead I'm sorry I apologize no go back there because um like uh he 45:21 talked about that bullet or something like that being left out and I talked to Nick about this exactly but that's bring 45:27 up...
46:36 ...when he talks about the bullet 46:42 being laid out uh by the by the on the cushion or something like that around the kids and how angry that made him is 46:49 that in this clip I think that's in the early 46:54 part...
49:40 ...so I'm not sweeping for Nick 49:47 but when I asked Nick about this because I did I said what was the deal with the bullet being laid out on the couch with 49:53 the kids nearby so Nick explained that there was never a bullet out laid out he 50:00 told me that he has like a like a small like a like a gun briefcase like a small briefcase that the drugs would be held 50:07 in and one time I think the the case that all the drugs were locked in like a 50:13 small gun case you know what I'm talking about right like a little small briefcase but like a lock briefcase and not like one of those like you know 50:19 you're going to work as a businessman breef but like a a gun briefcase kind of thing a small yeah I know exactly yeah 50:25 it's a pistol it's a pistol carrier it's just for one probably it's probably 50:31 something that uh a pistol came in maybe bingo I assume that's how he explained 50:37 it to me was it was a case like that and that's where they placed uh those type of things and so that's what was laid 50:44 out near the kids that's what Aaron is talking about but Nick said Aaron is 50:49 exaggerating get into it being a bullet not just a case...
51:16 ...I think the thing bullet though he's talking about is something you 51:22 sniff the drug with am I wrong you're right but that was inside the 51:30 case Aaron is exaggerating is the point Aaron is saying that that was laid out but it was not it was the case not the 51:38 bullet do you understand that honky...
52:00 ...apparently like 52:06 Nick may have sat on the couch and it fell out of his pocket that's the way Aon explained it and then the kid was 52:11 sitting there next to it and had never noticed that the bullet was there but it was there nonetheless just sitting on 52:17 the couch next to uh the kid the B he said he picked it up and took it away so 52:23 when he noticed it yeah that's what that's what Aaron said Nick said what I told you so and I am not saying Nick is 52:30 right I'm not saying Aaron's wrong I'm just telling you what Nick said you see how this gets twisted where it's my 52:38 words your words well no people go back and say that I'm defending Nick for 52:44 saying that and so that's why no you interviewed Nick that's what he told you 52:49 that's you're just repeating words that you were told that's right people will say that I'm sweeping for Nick for saying that do you understand that yeah 52:56 I get it thank you...
1:04:04 ...he said that he saw a bullet right next to his kid but somehow uh it was 1:04:11 never right around the kids but apparently it was if it's right next to his [ __ ] kid so there you go yeah 1:04:18 again the story from n was it was inside the case and the case was near the kid's head and then that's what set up Aon and 1:04:24 I believe uh Aaron was so mad that they had to lead and that was like a like a big 1:04:30 exchange between the the the trle they made everybody go and I I know there was 1:04:36 like multiple different times and he tries to make them all sound I he made it sound like there was two times there 1:04:42 was probably way more examples than that that the ricas were actually at his house doing drugs or whatever but the 1:04:48 time that uh April locked herself in the or uh yeah Nick Nick not locked himself 1:04:53 in the bathroom uh the uh the other time where him and Nick almost got into a 1:04:59 fight I think that was the time where the bullet was found by the kid um but whatever there there was other examples 1:05:05 of that too him and uh Kayla hanging out and having conversations in his bedroom and blah blah blah um but anyway the 1:05:13 bullet right next to the kid uh whether you like it or not that's having drugs 1:05:18 right around your kids Aaron your kids drugs pretty simple


3. In response to the panel repeating the Dabbleverse's common belief that early snitching by Aaron brought about the drug raid, Wil corrects them that even Nick didn't buy into that theory (nor did he even bother to advance the theory regardless of truth), and instead he has told Wil that the people at the church and the preacher came forward of their own volition:


I think most people think that at this point that he absolutely is the 55:20 reason the investigation happened in the first place yeah but I believe according to 55:25 Nick it was the the preacher and the people within the church that then brought the information to the police 55:31 officer right but they didn't have see I was talking about this earlier I'm just 55:37 telling you what Nick told me cl you know what I be like...


4. Following up on Wil's statements a few weeks back that Nick is gearing up to start a civil lolsuit after Aaron gets convicted, now Wil admits that this was only an educated guess on his part, and Nick has not confirmed it one way or another even when Wil asked him about it:


1:15:09 ...he made that thing to 1:15:16 where the state went after Aaron Nick didn't go after Aaron the state did but Nick well I'm sure ni is there gonna be 1:15:22 a civil case is that confirmed yet no I think it is in my world I think this is 1:15:29 going to go civil but it has not been confirmed um I've kind of asked a little bit about that but Nick hasn't answered 1:15:35 that uh but it it does look like again I'm not gonna say I don't know I don't 1:15:40 know I would you know you know he is because he's [ __ ] like we all said he's very pissed off at him so he's got 1:15:46 a reason to...


5. In response to Aaron reminding Wil that all this Dabbleverse shit could put his real journalism career at risk, people somehow took that as Aaron making a veiled threat to make a personal army request for Kiwi Farms to go after Wil (as if such a request would ever be approved), which prompted Wil to accuse the farms of having previously cow-tipped his news station multiple times because of something he said about Magic the Gathering or some shit (?), which then prompted Wil to go into how Nick told him his opinions about how Kiwi Farms merely deploys a scattershot approach that is only ever right by accident:


1:27:27 ...Max brel $3 Aaron dog whistled his fans to go after will yes 1:27:33 absolutely that did happen uh kiwi Farms he means is that where he's talking about him because I have seen him in 1:27:39 plenty of people's uh YouTube chats...
1:28:22 ...one thing Nick said about the QB farms and I think kind of makes a lot of sense because like sometimes the qwi 1:28:28 Farms will just throw a million darts at a Target but one Dart will hit and they'll say we we we got him but they 1:28:35 thrw a million darts you know what I'm saying so all everything is wrong except for that one that hit the bullseye and 1:28:41 like that's not always good because you make problems for everybody else until you find that one you know what I mean 1:28:47 right spot or or or you come up with a bunch of conclusions or facts that are are incorrect until you finally get to 1:28:53 the one so like that's in my opinion and again what Nick had said and I agree with 1:28:59 that's a fun with kiwi Farms they've done that to me a couple times one of my first stories I would do was on Magic the Gathering and they call my station 1:29:05 300 times in like two hours just to give me a hard time to go after me luckily my 1:29:10 station was with me but like that's what they do when they make a mistake they don't care they just make the mistake 1:29:16 you know and they just go with it and then hopefully the one that they throw will hit so 1:29:22 yeah that's kiwi for in a nutshell sometimes get na it no it's not kiwi 1:29:29 Farms is so much more than that listen I will be if I know one thing about Josh moon 1:29:37 it's he gives d transitioners a place a safe space to go and that is a like a 1:29:43 cause near and dear to my heart so he could like murder a couple [ __ ] and I still would be singing Josh Moon's 1:29:51 Praises but do you see my point though times with situations where they you know they're trying to figure something 1:29:57 out and they just throw a bunch of crap at a wall and hope that one thing sticks that's the internet 1:30:02 though that's the dabble verse you just described the dabble verse I think that's more in line with ke fars but I 1:30:08 do see your point yeah it's it's just so much more 1:30:14 uh put together and easy to find on kiwi Farms than it is to try to go back through all the transcripts and find 1:30:19 where someone said something on YouTube it's a whole lot less work to do 1:30:25 those the a loging man that's that's for real and it does go away it don't go 1:30:30 away damn it so please never AOG me anybody that's I would not like that 1:30:38 good luck AOG Me Harder mix uh blood fart says people send you 1:30:44 Clips oh my God yeah especially of like what clips of uh dick Rada in chats like they send 1:30:52 you screenshots from chats is this what's happening I can imagine maybe some trolls would be doing that to him I 1:30:59 just can't imagine people that are on his side do that I don't know maybe maybe there's like balls deep and some 1:31:04 of these other guys uh are out there doing the no I don't think no I don't think ball as invested no I think it's 1:31:11 the people like Chad bog that are just trying to like hey look what they're saying about you you know more casual 1:31:19 Observer you know so it's not fans it's less fans it's just more the people that like uh start fires and run away like 1:31:27 arsonist the dail verse arsonist...


6. This one's just more funny than informative, but it seemed conspicuous in Ralph's appearance on Friday that the host (one "Quadfather") knew Nick would be watching when going out of his way to convey that he has "nothing against Rekieta" and is "more of a fan" who respects Nick's "game" still getting "quite the following" of a whopping "thousand live viewers" in Nick's last stream, and he looks forward to meeting him at Hackamania in May. All the ballwashing made it easy to suspect that arranging the Ralph-Herren crossover was a clout-chasing exercise on Quadfather's part, possibly even relying on Nick (or Nick through Ralph) having promised to "pay in exposure" as is his way. Any such hope of collabs to come would be sure to disappoint with Nick showing no signs of ever streaming to his dwindling audience anytime soon, so there's no currency left with which to "pay in exposure" other than maybe palming him off to a sad, awkward crossover appearance with destitute hangers-on like Mersh as was seemingly done to Geanu back when they were temporarily on Nick's side until they realized that he couldn't hold up his end of the clout-for-testimony bargain. Be that as it may, all the balldowashing made it especially hilarious when Wil, to his credit, confronted Quadfather about the kid's positive hair test for which any father "should be beaten with a stick... am I wrong?" As Quadfather struggled with how to respond knowing that his new e-daddy would be watching, his body language was visibly uncomfortable to say the least:


59:43 ...I I have nothing 59:50 against Rekieta in fact uh whatever uh I'm more of a fan of what's going on with 59:55 him than Aaron but um yeah
33:51 he he went live just for 34:00 one Show recently and dude had like a thousand live viewers so he he his game 34:06 still right there if he wants it you know uh but he he had quite the 34:12 following...
2:12:16 ...he's not a good egg gu come on he he whatever 2:12:24 him I wish him well whatever he does I hope he does well you wish him well yeah well yeah same here and I might end up 2:12:30 it sounds like I'm gonna meet him at um sounds like I get to meet the guy at 2:12:35 hackam Mania...
30:24 Nick's uh and that's another Wild Thing This is what caught me a lot of H and I prob shouldn't talk about it now but you 30:29 know a couple of beers later um the hair sample test where the child came up 30:36 positive with cocaine um that's huge like it whoever gives a child cocaine is 30:41 a bastard and probably should be beaten with a stick am I wrong no absolutely not um Am 30:50 I Wrong do you have any no of course not
 
Last edited:
So it's up to Geno and Keanu whether they feel lucky. If Minnesota wants to pony up the witness/mileage fees, they can compel their presence, by hauling them there in a police vehicle if necessary. The question is whether Minnesota would do that. I personally think they'd have to be brain-dead to do that.
I would think so too, but who knows.

I will note Minnesota doesn't get very granular when it comes to classifying their crimes (class 1, 2, 3, or A, B, C, etc). It's only Petty Misdemeanor, Misdemeanor, Gross Misdemeanor, and then Felony is one gigantic lump thing where Aaron's charge is in the same overly broad category as first degree fucking murder.

Point I'm driving at is that in most jurisdictions his offense would be a lowest level felony charge, and they wouldn't want to spend too much on it. They'd also be receptive to flipping it into a misdemeanor.

Then again, I would be remiss if I didn't remind you they issued a nationwide arrest warrant for Ethan Ralph over a MISDEMEANOR. That could have been just to scare him, or fuck with him, or to only be actioned if he ever came back to MN. Or maybe they really would have tried to have him transported all the way to MN if he got flagged by the cops while visiting his kids, or attending some Juju event elsewhere in the country. Who knows. I am beginning to think Sterns Co. is kinda weird.

Nick's eldest could be posting in this thread RIGHT NOW and none of us would know about it.
It's @Fapcop. He's actually not thirst posting, but playing 67th degree chess in an effort to get himself, his mom, and his siblings away from Nick.
 
In response to Aaron reminding Wil that this Dabbleverse shit could put his real journalism career at risk, people somehow took that as a veiled threat that Aaron would make a personal army request for Kiwi Farms to go after Wil (?), which prompted Wil to accuse the farms of having previously cow-tipped his news station multiple times because of something he said about Magic the Gathering or some shit (?), which then prompted Wil to go into how Nick told him his opinions about how Kiwi Farms merely deploys a scattershot approach that is only ever right by accident
Actually, I can address this because I was around for it.

Back in 2018 there was a big brouhaha concerning Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro (parent company) because it was exposed that they didn't run background checks on official MtG judges, and there were convicted sex offenders on the judge registry for a game that kids play.

It was, indeed, discussed on the Farms at some length. HOWEVER, I am DEEPLY suspicious of Wil's claim that he or his station was brigaded by Kiwi Farms. That's not KF's style. I am not sure I even know why anyone would want to do that, unless Wil or his station ran an opinion piece that ran contrary to the desire for Hasbro to implement better safety for kids at tournaments.

The discussion primarily concerned how much off-site people got fired up over it. Principally Andy Warski, Metokur, and The Quartering. Quartering, in particular, was going after Hasbro hard. To the point that when Hasbro did cave and implement background checks, people in the MtG community that didn't want to deal with the cost and red tape blamed him for it. Until just now, I've never seen or heard anybody commend OR condemn the Farms for the policy change.

EXHIBIT A:

EXHIBIT B (funny):

Also, it's still funny to me that Nick shits on the Farms now, when he and Ty Beard were kissing the Farm's ass back in 2019 during Weebwars for uncovering a number of things beneficial to Vic's case. From that alone, he knows damn well that the Farms is right in ways other than by accident.

In the end though, I don't see Aaron getting anywhere near the same level of support as Vic got. That was a really unique thing that I'm doubtful will ever be repeated (not least of which because it didn't end so well). Any specific PA requests from Aaron would likely be denied and ridiculed. He needn't bother making them. Anything here that would be of benefit to Aaron would be posted pursuant to documenting lolcows, and not to intentionally tip the scales.

IIRC the plea deal involved him cutting contact with the crackwhore (but don't quote me on that).
It doesn't. At least not the proposed one we're waiting to see if the judge approves.

EDIT: Elaboration.
 
Last edited:
If they get dragged into court and amnesia strikes and they don't recall anything about the incident, what's the worst punishment they could receive from the court?

It depends. What the prosecutor typically has to do is ask a clever set of questions that lead to the person effectively admitting that they do remember the events even though they say they don't. In the absolute worst case, you could end up with a perjury charge being filed against you. The game is for the prosecutor to ask questions that the witness can't really refuse to answer based on memory and to lead them into some unintended admission that they do remember what happened.

But most prosecutors in most trials, especially small-time stuff like this case, are not going to have the skill or the time to plan out a 4-D chess game against a reluctant witness.

In my opinion, what would most likely happen If Geno shows up is that Geno would both testify and Geno's statements over time would be put into the trial record. What to make of Geno, his lack of memory and his possibly conflicting statements over time would be up to a jury to sort out.

But I think one of the fatal flaws in this case is the lack of the actual revenge porn. They don't have the actual photo and there is no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any photo presented from any source is what was actually sent to Geno.
 
View attachment 7023701 You don’t think this is the face of sanity?
Looks like they made Gollum troon out in the new Tolkien Amazon series..

See, all of this could have been avoided if he didn't claim, daily and publicly, that Aaron ate his cum. I dunno WHY he thought that was a good idea.
Weird fag dominance rituals.
By reminding the internet and Aaron that Aaron ate his cum*, Nick is trying to establish that he's the dom in their gay tryst. It's not a well thought out plan, just another way to pwn Aaron for short term endorphin hits.
Ignore that Nick may have also eaten Aaron's cum.
 
If they get dragged into court and amnesia strikes and they don't recall anything about the incident, what's the worst punishment they could receive from the court?
There's nothing illegal about amnesia. Good luck proving that Frank Pentangeli couldn't remember something. You're still not getting your conviction even if you can somehow get revenge on your recalcitrant witness.
By reminding the internet and Aaron that Aaron ate his cum*, Nick is trying to establish that he's the dom in their gay tryst.
And meanwhile all it really proves is he's a fag because nobody outside of prison gives a shit about any of that. All he did was admit he's a fag obsessed with other dudes eating his cum, even though from his face alone, he's the obvious cum-eater.
nickcrazed.png
 
Stearns County is the Aaron case, not Nick's.
I think the commentary you replied to is about a jury of incel prude peers judging the swinging retards.
If they could they would condemn all involved to the gas chamber to purge the filth.
What I replied to appeared to be about the Stearns Co. prosecution of Aaron and suggesting that that prosecution wouldn't or shouldn't result in a felony conviction at least in part bc of all the bad things Nick did/ has done. It made a sort of equitable argument - that Nick is worse, and Aaron shouldn't be being prosecuted because of how bad Nick is/Nick's impact on Aaron's life.

As I said, I agree that Nick's (essentially) getting off for a high-level felony and the prospect of Aaron having a similar or worse outcome for what he did is terrible by comparison (and even separately: Nick should get worse; a felony for Aaron seems somewhat OTT). But the reality is that the two cases are unrelated, and there are two different jurisdictions involved that don't have to balance things out.

And further, prosecuting Aaron or testing the law is not some crazy broad (likely bpd, amirite?) going irrational ham, and suggesting that a serious career professional is trivial or politically blinded just because she's prosecuting some twit with a history of not observing legal boundaries post-relationship is dumb. It's a perfectly rational decision - even if wrong in a comparative sense...or even an objective one.

Again, these (prosecutor) folks are operating outside of this sphere where we view and analyze every dumb public utterance of these (dingleverse) people. And on the face of it, it's not unthinkable that the Stearns Co. prosecutor might view Aaron highly negatively and as unable to learn a lesson despite prior slaps. That won't get you the benefit of the doubt.

For my view, I think he just did a dumb thing. Conviction of a crime is horror in my mind (and potentially career-compromising for me), so even the misdemeanor seems like a lot. But that's my subjective projection. In reality it's a crime. And he's old enough to know better - and with some familiarity with "you don't do x to your exes," you'd think he'd have paused a beat and not sent it.

Maybe the Stearns ACA is looking for headlines. Could be. Maybe it's a stretch. And some people get tickets for speeding and not having evidence if insurance - and some don't. But the case isn't beyond the pale and facts are what they are - it's not a dumb broad or a feminazi thing.
 
But the case isn't beyond the pale and facts are what they are - it's not a dumb broad or a feminazi thing.
I think it's a bad strategic decision. If you're a prosecutor, any kind of loss at all is a disaster. It puts a huge dent in your record. And pursuing a felony count on something this petty really approaches that level. It's on an "oh really" level of dumbness.

If Aaron is pursuing some brinksmanship on this, despite having a pretty shitty record of actual harassment of his exes, he may still win. And the prosecutor is gambling. Because her case depends entirely on witnesses who are completely unreliable.

Her most ferocious and reliable witness is literally Nick Rekieta. He's the only guy who is completely guaranteed to hate the defendant. And he's his ex-gay-lover.

Does this look like a guaranteed prosecution win?
 
Back