Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[Vecr]

Why are they worried about babies, super or otherwise, when the Nerd Rapture is supposed to take us all within the next few years anyway?

https://nitter.poast.org/ESYudkowsky/status/1892374126586716643#m

Ie, project prioritization:

1. Avert all creation of superintelligence in the near and medium term.
2. Augment adult human intelligence.
3. Build superbabies.

Yudkowsky wants the rapture called off, that's what the symbol in his Twitter name means.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

View attachment 7005950View attachment 7005954
the "third most important project": how to make superbabies (archive)
View attachment 7005985

I like her blindly just saying you should fund this because it's "highest impact" and "actually good" even as it's just speculation from a guy who says eight billion people are going to die from AI*. She says "this" is where it should go, what's "this"?

Although, I guess you could trust the article:


Who wouldn't trust this kind of specificity?


*

 

[Greedy Fly]

I like her blindly just saying you should fund this because it's "highest impact" and "actually good" even as it's just speculation from a guy who says eight billion people are going to die from AI*.

A while back this crowd was going on about how some anti-cavity experiment was the most important thing ever and needs to be funded now now now. Always gotta be the first to hop on the latest Bay Area fad.

 

[Blarmed&Dangerous]

A while back this crowd was going on about how some anti-cavity experiment was the most important thing ever and needs to be funded now now now. Always gotta be the first to hop on the latest Bay Area fad.

Aella is a one-off character in Succession, but in real life

 

[ilovecornsyrup]

Replying to someone who is clearly in crisis and thinking about self harm with actually i think self harm would help is one of the most unhinged things she’s done on twitter.

She’s being utterly retarded. Self harm by definition would be something that causes harm. Letting yourself feel your emotions even grief/ sadness is important to work through them and that isn’t self harm that’s normal? The fact she has to inflict pain on herself to face normal human emotions isn’t some cool life hack , it shows she is pretty mentally unhealthy. But guys everyone else is wrong and she actually living the superior way to everyone else.

Giving into all your impulses when you have a mental illness is a pretty good way to end up homeless or on the farms.

Everything she says or does is a cope and if her retardation was cured overnight she would probably kill herself on the spot.

 

[Rootless Cosmopolitan]

She decided to die on this "self-harm is Good, Actually" hill after encouraging someone to do it over something as simple as getting dumped What the fuck is wrong with her?
View attachment 6996217
View attachment 6996235

Who craves pain like a nutrient besides the mentally ill?
View attachment 6996245

She only supports this unhinged idea because unlike you chuds, she wants to help people "process stuff more quickly"! The most effective coping mechanism for grief is cutting yourself, don't you know?
View attachment 6996260

She keeps emphasizing that it should be done "safely and without permanent damage" as if self-harm does not often escalate to suicide or result in lasting injuries. The world would be a better place if more people inflicted pain on themselves, according to Aella.
View attachment 6996272

But don't worry, the potential consequences of "suppressing desires" and not "giving into impulses" are the bigger threat we should really be worried about!
View attachment 6996288

Whenever I read this thread, I’m shocked anew that Aella is a grown ass woman in her 30s and not a 16 year old girl.

I read somewhere that BPD isn’t supposed to be diagnosed in under-21s. From that, I kinda surmise that BPD is just the horrifying state of being a mentally a teenage girl, forever.

 

[Redeemer]

She decided to die on this "self-harm is Good, Actually" hill after encouraging someone to do it over something as simple as getting dumped What the fuck is wrong with her?

If you've ever known someone who had a real problem with self-harm, you know how hard it is to get them to stop doing it, and to stop thinking evil thoughts like this to themselves. Even if they know it's wrong on an intellectual level.

Just putting these thoughts out there into the world is so fucking evil, let alone directly telling someone to consider harming themselves. And then doubling down when confronted!!! I'm legitimately pissed.

 

[Hantavirus]

It's a slippery slope from positive eugenics to race realism. What does Yud the Chud thinks about nogs behind closed doors? Do we know if Rachael is a coal burner? Can the Rationalist Community solve the JQ once and for all, and what consequences would breeding a race of beautiful, genius Hyperborean Aryans have on the hordes of melanated 70 IQ untermenschen clogging up the globe's lebensraum? Up next on Aella_girl's Xitter!

 

[Tutu]

Over a week ago, Aella made a Substack post on her talk about throwing "data-driven orgies" at Hereticon (a "conference cringefest for thoughtcrime", funded by Peter Thiel) last year.

Spoiler: Presentation notes

• Self-proclaimed "sex researcher and professional sex-haver" Aella takes the stage to teach us "how to throw the best orgy" in her extremely wrinkled clothes. Can someone teach her how to iron?
• She asks the audience if they have been to an orgy before.
  • We can't see who raises their hands, but she says "That's a pretty decent sample."
  • She continues "How many people here are women? Alright... We've got a good start for this orgy we're gonna have later, right? Okay, I'm like, trying to not let y'all know how nervous I am by deliberately talking very slowly."

• She explains it is difficult to get women to partake in orgies because of these reasons:
  • Therefore, in "traditional orgies", organizers take the following steps to make more women join:
  • She says consent being required for all physical interactions is "a little bit rough because female mate choice is a bitch."
  • She has been to an orgy where the opening circle (of them practicing "how to say yes or no") lasted 3 hours and she "wanted to kill herself."
  • They aim for an "excess of vaginas" so there are enough chances for men to get laid and even if they don't, it can lead to lesbian sex and the male participants can jerk off.

• She questions how well this approach works and found out "the current state of orgies is relatively sex-free" when she attended a sex party and surveyed everyone (which she later clarified was "her being sloppy and feeling like it was a lot of people" but it was actually a sample size of around 20-30, not literally every single person).
  • The average number of people the respondents had sex with there was less than 1. Most of them included pre-existing partners that they brought there or already knew.
  • She calls these gatherings "orgies in name only, but more like speed dating for slutty people."
  • She asked them why they come to orgies if they aren't having sex. They said it is in hopes of "finding a cute girl they can have threesomes with" by building a relationship over time.

• She moves on to her "big kink survey" which she claims about 800.000 people have completed and is "maybe the largest survey sample of human sexuality that has ever existed, not perfect but significantly better than the current state of sex research."
  • She starts making arguments about what women want based on a subsample of 350.000 19 to 29 year olds.
  • She brings up a list of fetishes that are disproportionately preferred by one sex and says men's have more variety while women's are "basically Fifty Shades of Grey."
  • She claims most women consume pornographic material and there are more of them who prefer violent content than men.
  • She argues the more strongly someone's interested in a fetish, the younger they tend to notice it (while adding how her graph shows those who are the most attracted to non-consent report their age of first interest to be around 5 years old...), then concludes kinks are not culturally induced, they must be "innate to some degree."
  • According to her data, there are more women into submission than men into dominance, so she encourages more men to join the kink community.
  • She found that women's response to the power dynamic fetishes is polarized, they either really love or hate them. She thinks there are two types of women, the vanilla ones who never experience such sexual interests and the kinky ones whose fetishes "hit early."

• She moves on to the "Now that we know what type of sex women want, how much and with whom?" segment.
  • Her respondents lean towards wanting to live in a more promiscuous culture than a chaste one.
  • More of them report not having had sex with someone they were attracted to because of social judgement than having had sex with someone they don't want for the same reason.
  • She says women face more pressure on either direction their reputation can be affected both negatively and positively if they partake in casual sex or don't, which is "not great."

• She elaborates on the "Who is the orgy-prone woman?" question.
  • She says they should not try marketing orgies to women who would not join one anyway.
  • The women who attend orgies report higher body counts than those who don't.
  • According to her chart, socially liberal and economically conservative (libertarian) women have the highest number of sexual partners.
  • The women who are very into non-consent, power dynamics and bondage have a significantly higher body count than vanilla women.
  • Very monogamous women have around 5 partners and the very polyamorous have an average of 15.

• She gives a rundown of the eminently profound information she has mentioned so far.
• When she saw this, she decided to organize "actually female-friendly" orgies and created RedMeansNo, "the Bay Area's consensual non-consent sex party network."
  • They wear wristbands that indicate consent and badges showing their boundaries during the orgy.
  • They have mandatory STI testing and vet the candidates so it is an orgy where you can have "a bunch of relatively hot men that will just grab you, throw you down and have sex with you according to your specifications, it's really good."
  • It requires higher trust in attendees so they can't have it be open to public.
  • She says "Removing female choice means edge cases can be pretty bad... If you come to a simulated rape orgy, stand there expectantly and none of the men want to rape you, this could be pretty devastating to the ego. This is mostly the worst part, like, I went to a rape orgy and I didn't even get raped." The retarded audience bursts into laughter.
  • She explains they bring 50% more men than women to make sure this doesn't happen. It is also "good for collaboration when someone is screaming and fighting back to have multiple men holding her down."

• She prides herself on her rape orgies having an average of around 6.24 body count for women, unlike those "traditional orgies" where it's less than 1.
  • The viewers applaud and she enthusiastically declares "Yeah! We did it, we removed female mate choice!"
  • She claims most women's reviews of the orgy are very positive, they have a high return rate and the men tell her "This is clearly a female fantasy, guys aren't really into this, it's the women that want to be aggressed upon all the time."

 

[Markass the Worst]

Over a week ago, Aella made a Substack post on her talk about throwing "data-driven orgies" at Hereticon (a "conference cringefest for thoughtcrime", funded by Peter Thiel) last year.

Local archive:

 

[The Judean People's Front]

• She found that women's response to the power dynamic fetishes is polarized, they either really love or hate them. She thinks there are two types of women, the vanilla ones who never experience such sexual interests and the kinky ones whose fetishes "hit early."

So women who were abused vs women who weren't or who have worked through their issues.

Very monogamous women have around 5 partners and the very polyamorous have an average of 15.

That's. . . Not that much of a spread? Am I wrong? Ten partner difference? I'm not a totally real sex researcher though, so what do I know?

The viewers applaud and she enthusiastically declares "Yeah! We did it, we removed female mate choice!"

Horrifying. Like, actually what the fuck.

 

[ghjoigcbn]

Local archive:
View attachment 7016766

Maybe I just dont understand males but I find it kind of hard to believe that men who are holding down women and fucking them until they cum while the women struggle are “not really into it”. That seems like a pretty big mental barrier to cross .

 

[Paper Machete]

Maybe I just dont understand males but I find it kind of hard to believe that men who are holding down women and fucking them until they cum while the women struggle are “not really into it”. That seems like a pretty big mental barrier to cross .

I think they're talking about when they surveyed people, not at actual events. And I think this makes a lot of sense when you really think about it for the simple reason it's easier to dissociate if you're being hurt/dominated than the reverse. It would select for people who are more naturally sadistic vs. someone who was traumatized and knowingly or unknowingly reenacting their abuse in various ways. It's also why at her gangbang thing she needed to be held down and sort of out of it, I think.

Haram.

 

[ghjoigcbn]

I think they're talking about when they surveyed people, not at actual events. And I think this makes a lot of sense when you really think about it for the simple reason it's easier to dissociate if you're being hurt/dominated than the reverse. It would select for people who are more naturally sadistic vs. someone who was traumatized and knowingly or unknowingly reenacting their abuse in various ways. It's also why at her gangbang thing she needed to be held down and sort of out of it, I think.

Haram.

She said that in the context of post orgy reviews though.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

She moves on to her "big kink survey" which she claims about 800.000 people have completed and is "maybe the largest survey sample of human sexuality that has ever existed, not perfect but significantly better than the current state of sex research."

• She starts making arguments about what women want based on a subsample of 350.000 19 to 29 year olds.

BIG NUMBER MEANS SAMPLE GOOD (just ignore that 19-29 is three times the size of their share of the population, and that all of the responses are self-selected)

 

[Destiny's Child]

MSM trying to launder her as a serious person again

https://archive.ph/lBqcC

 

[expectant asshole]

So women who were abused vs women who weren't or who have worked through their issues.

Is there any verification that these “women” are adult human females? Or are we using the new definition of women which includes men?

 

[squidward tentacles]

Is there any verification that these “women” are adult human females? Or are we using the new definition of women which includes men?

I doubt there was any verification of anyone. It was a Google survey, right? Every single answer very could have been a dedicated troll with a VPN and a lot of free time.

That being said, she doesn't really allow trans women at her orgies, right? The applications for women seem to require vaginas, and I recall her birthday orgy mentioning something about the fluffers or whatever being female. I could definitely be misremembering or misinterpreting.

 

[Blarmed&Dangerous]

Is there any verification that these “women” are adult human females? Or are we using the new definition of women which includes men?

One of my evidences that she might be autistic or at least very stupid instead of just cynical and conniving is that she once posted about the fact that she, obviously like everyone else, codes trans people as their "birth sex" in her mind, then got a ton of backlash for it, and so later when she did her fetish survey, she pointed out that the data for trannies was wildly deviant, but framed it as "see? Trannies' fetishes don't align with men OR women. They are - each and every one of them - into extreme, bizarre degeneracy, ergo this is PROOF that they're not 'just men' and are actually their own thing!"

 

[Major]

MSM trying to launder her as a serious person again

https://archive.ph/lBqcC

View attachment 7027172

Editor must be one of her customers using this as payment