Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
How would Aaron have access to the drugs, when Nick told the court in his plea agreement (crimes he admits to) that all the drugs were in the safe that was his, and only he had access to the safe? How would Aaron get the drugs if only Nick could access them?

Well. To beat a dead horse once again:

- The levels of cocaine related substances in his daughter's hair can't be explained by contact with cocaine or being around cocaine. They are too high and they indicate consumption of cocaine within the body.
- The only way to get near the levels she was tested as having would have been repeated consumption of cocaine by taking the cocaine in some form (ingesting it or snorting it presumably).
- If the daughter was provided with cocaine by Aaron which she consumed on a regular basis or otherwise accessed cocaine from some source on a regular basis, the daughter has direct knowledge of the facts associated with that.
- so if the daughter knowing consumed cocaine, she should be able under questioning to reveal the source of that cocaine.

The test is showing consumption, not environmental contact. If she consumed cocaine, she can be questioned to reveal the source. If Aaron provided her with cocaine for consumption, Nick has an easy path to proving that.
 
Addendum:

It's funny and weird that Nick will defend his retarded "1 in 5 tests are false positive" and "the cocaine in her hair from his glove triggered the false positive" explanations to the death for weeks, saying that it does make perfect sense and has scientific backing, then immediately admit it actually was a retarded excuse and the trolls were right all along once a theoretically more plausible excuse pops up.
Like this absolute faggot expects ANYONE without a brain as charred as whatever is in his fag skull would believe that he literally carried around a portable safe with him wherever he went. Imagine the visuals of that. How would anyone react if they saw some absolute fucking lunatic carrying a safe around with him wherever he went? Like this noodly-armed homo could even pick up a safe.
Nick's transformation from "the coke wasn't mine" to "I'm actually a very responsible cocaine addict" has been fascinating.
 
He's back and tweet raging. Nothing particularly new.

More on Aaron & RP:

Wtf does "seems...unlikely" mean?!!!!!!!!!!
1740593907990.png
Does he not know what Kayla, HIS WIFE, consented to or will say on the stand?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He's also so retarded he either doesn't understand or is lying about the burden of proof. The defendant does not have to prove that an element of the offense (reasonable expectation of privacy) ISN'T there. The PROSECUTION has to prove that it IS.

Without a reasonable expectation of privacy, you don't NEED consent.

I think with the facts we know, Aaron may very well be guilty of the crime. But that's not what a jury will see. The jury has to see proof of it, and that means witnesses have to testify to it convincingly, and the proof has to be "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Now I'm not going to go off on a rant about the prosecutor being some feminazi libtarded libtard on some giddy whammen respecting crusade, although it kind of looks like that from the outside. Maybe she's privy to some slam-dunk shit that makes this make sense. You don't really make a career out of dumb prosecutions. You make it out of winning. It's one of those objective success things. Too many failures as a prosecutor and you're pretty much done.

I'll also note most of my arguments against this prosecution are it's bad public policy. But not even God ever won a case on a public policy argument (only a slight exaggeration).
Guy who plead guilty to 3rd degree felony possession of cocaine and ketamine, which was found on his person and inside the house his childeren were in, claims no drugs were ever around the children.
Don't forget he was driving them around drunk off his ass. He was routinely streaming while openly guzzling booze until nearly dawn and whining that he had to get up in four hours to drive he keeeeeeeds around. And as we know from the witness statements, he would show up, delivering stinking, starving kids in rags like something from a fucking Dickens novel, obviously intoxicated, to the school to the point multiple mandatory reporters had to report his ass to the cops.

But yeah, no substance abuse around the stinking, starving keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedz.

Because he always kept the literal MOUNTAINS of cocaine he has confessed/boasted about snorting in a giant Kryptonite Fortress of Solitude-sized safe wherever he went.
 
Last edited:
Aww, poor crybully can dish it out but can't take it, and will now go silent for another week until he rustles up enough liquid courage to start the next round:

Crybully.jpg

[X]

So everyone should care a great deal about anything positive for him that he's putting out there himself, but when it's something negative, "nobody cares" is the cope. Will this internal defense mechanism become the new "stalker child"/"nerd"?
 
Last edited:
And now Nick's implying that AARON drugged his daughter:
1740594211152.png
Muttering John?

Really?

They might as well hang a neon sign around their neck that says "I'm a Dabbleverse faggot."

View attachment 7029192

So, by rage baiting his former homosexual lover, did this UTERLY RETARDED FAGGOT just confirmed the "officer touched my daughter´s head with cocaine gloves" was just too retarded to believe?
It looks that way, yes.

It's a better lie than what he was going with before (the cop story being scientifically impossible), but recall that from the family court transcripts @MNPublicRecords provided, he knew his daughter was gonna test positive before she did.

How can now he claim he thought her testing positive was impossible, when it was clear he knew she was going to?

By 2022, the vtubers had taken over. Nick barely made the superchat top twenty thanks to Depp.

2019 he was #8, 2020 he didn't make the top 100, 2021 Rittenhouse got him to #38.

Can't find data for 2018, but if he was anywhere near #1, it's probably because superchats had only been around since 2017 and there wasn't much competion yet.

https://playboard.co/en/youtube-ranking/most-superchatted-all-channels-in-worldwide-yearly
2019 was peak Weebwars, so I'm not shocked that was one of the top superchat earners that year. Rittenhouse and Depp were bigger deals overall, but the falloff might be attributable to the fact there were more people earning superchats as time went on, and he had significant competition on those two cases (especially Depp, which everybody and their cousin was covering)

You can dispense with trying to find 2018 data. He was small fry still. He had Maddox, but that was about it.

The levels of cocaine related substances in his daughter's hair can't be explained by contact with cocaine or being around cocaine. They are too high and they indicate consumption of cocaine within the body.
Which means, when he finally figures that out, we might be headed for Nick claiming Aaron intentionally dosed her.

It's kinda funny because people said again and AGAIN that that actual consumption (either intentional or accidental) is the only explanation, and he's apparently beginning to get there (but it's still not his fault, naturally).
 
Last edited:
That would be an area for Nick to be rather careful about. Because that accusation would be defamation per se in that it would be an accusation of the commission of a serious crime.
Correct, but Nick is no stranger to doing that.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 7029192

So, by rage baiting his former homosexual lover, did this UTERLY RETARDED FAGGOT just confirmed the "officer touched my daughter´s head with cocaine gloves" was just too retarded to believe?
This faggot did not think it was impossible in fact this faggot knew in advance what the results would be and tried too fight them before they were even in! I hate Nick, I don't actually hate very many people, but Nick is in that small group of pedos and degenerates.
 
I think Nick is confusing exceptions to the hearsay rule in civil cases under rule 804 the with the exceptions in criminal cases which are different. I think he is also forgetting about the confrontation clause and how it would apply in this case.

The main danger to Aaron in the case is the type of jury he gets. A jury by its nature is unpredictable and a jury can often decide just about anything it wants to in a case like this.
Do we have any idea of how the jury will be selected? Given the shortness of the trial, I assume it's gonna be a 1 hour wham bam, thank you ma'am, but I'm assuming Aaron will want to whittle things his way. Any scouting on the judge?

Maybe she's privy to some slam-dunk shit that makes this make sense. You don't really make a career out of dumb prosecutions. You make it out of winning. It's one of those objective success things. Too many failures as a prosecutor and you're pretty much done.
The DA seems to be an aging Gen X'er who started a band (which she sings for) during COVID. Party girl maybe? IDK. The fix may be in if she ever performs at Stoneys. The ADA prosecuting the case seems to be a younger, more woke type, given the little bit scraped so far (at least in so far as thinking women's sports deserve the same pay as men's- may just be the usual millennial lack of understanding of economics).

I'm not sure what the hell they're thinking on this. I'm still kind of aligned with Sean that they haven't done their diligence yet on Kayla (or Nick), but if the ADA is a true believer, well Aaron may be playing a dangerous game of chicken.

All I know is you put Nick Rekieta (subject of this thread) up on the stand, and the jury will HATE him. I'm 50/50 still on how Kayla will perform.
 
I really hope they properly hammer both Kayla and Nick on the stand. And present all the nice pictures of them. Just to see Nick squirm or at least hear the idiotic rambling. And Nick certainly won't be able to keep coherent narrative.

Still, unless they have some slam dunk forensic evidence on either phone I really wonder why they are pushing this as it is really hard to prove.
 
It's kinda funny because people said again and AGAIN that that actual consumption (either intentional or accidental) is the only explanation, and he's apparently beginning to get there (but it's still not his fault, naturally).
He only admitting that it's a possibility now that he can blame his ex gay lover out of revenge.

Until now it's been "that level of cocaine makes no sense, it's way too high for a child, it has to be a mistake"
 
Any scouting on the judge?
Judge Heidi E. Schultz:



> Woman
> Was appointed to the bench by Tim Walz


Right off the bat, I wouldn't say either of those two things exactly work in Aaron's favor, but I confess it's not conclusive of any bias.

To be fair, her civic activities are pretty mundane. Member of a figure skating club, and a charity that helps pay for kids to go to college (Good for her! Nick doesn't believe in sending kids to college).
 
It's a better lie than what he was going with before (the cop story being scientifically impossible), but recall that from the family court transcripts @MNPublicRecords provided, he knew his daughter was gonna test positive before she did.
It's so convenient that every new prevarication this faggot vomits out of his lie-hole somehow makes him look better than the last lie that he abandoned.

Except it actually doesn't because nobody believes it. It's just "oh here's the lying liar again, lying some more."
This faggot did not think it was impossible in fact this faggot knew in advance what the results would be and tried too fight them before they were even in! I hate Nick, I don't actually hate very many people, but Nick is in that small group of pedos and degenerates.
Nick is not just literal scum, he's fucking retarded on top of that to the point it's embarrassing even to belong to the same species that would produce such a drooling simian. He's literally too stupid to understand that when he knew in advance the drug test on his 8 year old fucking daughter would turn up positive for cocaine, that coming up with a preloaded lie before the test even came back is basically an admission of guilt.

He knows EXACTLY why his daughter tested positive for cocaine.

He's like the 70 IQ retard pulled in on a murder case and the cop opens asking what he was doing on the night of Juneteenth or some shit, and he's all "What do you mean? I didn't stab anyone! I don't even HAVE a knife!"
 
Last edited:
The main danger to Aaron in the case is the type of jury he gets. A jury by its nature is unpredictable and a jury can often decide just about anything it wants to in a case like this.
So, you're saying there's a chance that, despite not being on trial, the jury finds Nick guilty of being a turbo queermo and sentences him to death? I think this would be worthy of a slow clap if it happens.
 
Nick is not just literal scum, he's fucking retarded on top of that to the point it's embarrassing even to belong to the same species that would produce such a drooling simian. He's literally too stupid to understand that when he knew in advance the drug test on his 8 year old fucking daughter would turn up positive for cocaine, that coming up with a preloaded lie before the test even came back is basically an admission of guilt.
It's the dumbest fucking lie too.

I think if he said from the get go that that her testing positive was Aaron's fault somehow, people here and elsewhere might have mulled it over. At least early on.

It also would have paid dividends amongst the Dabbleverse fags he uses as his emotional support group now.

But no, he went with something that is scientifically impossible and could be discarded as bullshit immediately.
 
If Johnny Depp, with all his millions, couldn't get witnesses from CA to VA for Depp v. Heard, I don't see how this rando Stearns County prosecutor thinks she can compel those chucklefucks for this.
Well, Depp was civil. This is criminal. Sean went over the issues. Considering how MN went after Ethan Ralph, Geno and Keanu could face a bench warrant.

But...
The jury has to see proof of it, and that means witnesses have to testify to it convincingly, and the proof has to be "beyond a reasonable doubt."

My fever dream is that Geno and Keanu say that the pic Aaron sent was animated like, say, a cartoon nude of a generic woman. Something like this which Celeste has all over her socials.
1740604823834.png
Then, they laugh and say. "We're comedians, you dummies! It was all a joke!" (And, yes, I know that they've spoken with authorities and could face perjury charges. But it would be hilarious.)
 
The Rekeita mindset is truly something to behold.

He somehow simultaneously had a safe full of cocaine, his children were never exposed, yet he allowed someone in his house to expose his children to cocaine.

In any of these situations, he's still scum.
I think even his buttbuddy Fatrick is having a hard time keeping up with Nick's schizophrenic narratives.
 
Last edited:
In any of these situations, he's still scum.
I think even his buttbuddy Fatrick is having a hard time keeping yo with Nicks schizophrenic narratives.
As low as pedomelt is, I'm pretty sure he's using Nick just as we are, as a sideshow freak. Nick is a sick little monkey, like a Wack Packer, and pedomelt is the organ grinder.

I wonder if Nick can even grasp how absolutely pathetic he is in the eyes of even an average person. What a loathsome little turd of a man. People look at him and crinkle their noses in disgust and contempt. "Thank God I'm not THAT guy" they think.
 
And now Nick's implying that AARON drugged his daughter:
1740594211152.png
I like the implication here that it's more likely that the laws of matter were violated ("impossible") than his kid got hold of coke in a house full of coke. That said, given Rekieta is a liar and his lies always conceal a much worse reality than anything we could make up here, I'm still inclined to believe he was drugging and molesting his daughter, since her behavioral problems seem to be a constant.
 
Back