The "women most affected" meme is real.
We recently had an article that attempted to argue (in a very stupid and contrived way) that climate change needed to be dealt with because for one, it affected women the most.
That was a stupid case, but it presents itself in real life as well, and on the Internet very often, e.g: "War happens, thousands of men die, women most affected", it may happens as well in terms of security/safety in regards to sociopolitical decisions talked about later as examples.
The sexual abuse and prejudice men have to face; good luck if your female coworker/boss touches you inappropriately when you pass by for example, or having to deal with men-hating, cackling wine-moms at work talking about the most disgusting and sexist stuff.
That's not misandrist of course, if men do it it's misogynist though (both groups are retarded, but one seems more socially acceptable than the other).
Preferential treatment in court. The many cases that are not well known or at all, where the female offender will get a slap on the wrist by the system for some reason, instead of facing the proper consequence.
This is amplified in cases of disputes between men-women relationships or incidents, and I personally know of some cases where I have the info directly from the source instead of Internet bullshit or speculation.
Not being cared enough for in regards to safety or security as much as women. In some places they tried to give free taxi rides for women at night (they would have a specific card for it), in order to make their trip back home safe. But men also face danger at night, in some cases even more, yet nothing was thought of that.
No, let's give free rides to drunk women going home so that they can party until past midnight without needing to feel insecure, men? They can take care of themselves. The "streets are not safe, women most affected" bullshit.
The bullshit gender gap in salary, proposed as if it was done unconstitutionally or unlawfully, instead of other factors. When all the high charges are occupied with women though, that's not a problem.
The fact that there's discrimination against men (unjustifiably), which is the most prevalent type of discrimination I've seen in the workplace. As an example, denying a position to a man because they want specifically a women, but said job being able to be done by a man as well.
E.g: someone tried to be hired as a clerk selling some stuff in a store, in this case it was ice-cream, so in a store established on a building, they were not able because they only hired women, which in their country was technically considred discrimination, because they're being denied for inherent physical characteristics they have, while not being relevant to the position (like a model, or an actor/actress, etc, it was simply as a seller of a product that both men & women buy).
This was just an example, it extends to any type of clerk job in stores, or teleoperator jobs (you technically cannot discriminate based on sex here, even if you think that you prefer a "female voice" for this), waiters/waitresses, etc.
Some of the financial helps they get for hiring women in some places, and then you have to pretend that they're discriminated against. Again, it's a real life example where by law, on certain positions while being some sort of "intern", if the company decides to sign a contract with this person to work for them, if they happen to be women, the company is financially compensated in a higher degree (it's a bonifiaction given by the state to incentivize certain actions) for hiring the woman.
Financial help to women who supposedly were absued, but not for men. Again, gender violence against men doesn't exist, and you don't apply for this financial help if you were a man victim of domestic violence, it's just for women, victims of gender violence against women (the only type that exists).
I can go on, but let's stop.
