US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's no losses on held-to-maturity bonds if they're actually held till maturity though
You'd be right, but if theyre not stable enough to hold to maturity then it doesnt really matter, the recent set of bank collapses comes to mind, I dont recall the name of the bank that was known for holding assets for or working with FTX, along with some other banks, defaulted 3-4 years ago IIRC, the government stepped in to help one of them but the details are shakey... But in this case you have to pick your friends carefully, since your balance sheet may have liabilities from these weaker banks, which could topple larger ones, or even worse, an international massive bank like credit sussie deciding its insolvent... its enough to topple others just from their loss alone.
Why is every retard claiming China is going to take over while ignoring their economy is currently imploding with record unemployment? Never mind their population crisis and record low consumption.
Kola went on 4chan and saw all the chinese shill posts and thought they held water, then linked the the dow inc chart thinking its the dow jones to compare against some random chinese index as a demonstration of chinese superiority.
 
I feel like every doomposter could become 30-50 IQ higher by just feeding their doompost prompt into chat gpt and using that, sad.
I did this to argue with someone about communism the other day, weirdly they said that I was rather intelligent and can make a solid argument. Lucky for me they gave up as my free data plan ran out. Glad I am not the only one who tried to leverage this for...arguing on the internet L O L
 
Also in other news, Von der Leyen wants to increase defense spending even if it causes massive amounts of debts, meaning that Trump got what he wanted.

tl;dr in total 800 billion more in defense spending (EU wide), countries allowed to have bigger budget deficits without penalty and Von der Leyen (unelected) consulted nobody about it except her inner clique of (unelected) bureaucrats. Also lmao: "that the loans will be covered by the EU budget, but exactly how that will work remains unclear." Money printer go brrrrrrr. (First translated article from Dutch to English, so sorry if I am sloppy).
"Von der Leyen comes with a astronomical amounts for European defense: ‘Rearm Europe’" (article & archive)

Brussels – EU chief Ursula von der Leyen wants to mobilize hundreds of billions for defense investments. She calls her plan ‘Rearm Europe.’

The President of the European Commission proposes making an exception in the European budget rules for defense expenditures. Member states would then not be penalized if their budget deficit and national debt rise too much. “If member states were to increase their defense spending by an average of 1.5% of GDP, this would create nearly 650 billion euros over a period of four years,” said Von der Leyen.

Additionally, Brussels wants to make 150 billion euros in loans available for joint investments in, among other things, air defense, ammunition, drones, and cybersecurity. Furthermore, she wants to make it possible in the short term for the existing cohesion fund, a multi-billion pot for strengthening poorer regions, to be used for defense-related expenditures.

Von der Leyen is also focusing on stimulating more private money for defense and a greater role for the European Investment Bank. “All together, we arrive at a total of 800 billion euros,” said Von der Leyen on Tuesday morning during a press moment. “Europe is ready to take its responsibility. We will continue to work closely with our partners in NATO. This is Europe’s moment. And we are ready to take a step further.”

Her plan raises many questions about the details, but the unelected top bureaucrat did not want to answer any questions from the press. In a letter to heads of state and government leaders, the Commission President writes that the loans will be covered by the EU budget, but exactly how that will work remains unclear.

EU Summit

Von der Leyen is launching her ideas in the run-up to an extra EU summit this coming Thursday. It is likely too short notice for heads of state and government leaders to make decisions already. However, on March 20 and 21, there will be another EU summit, where decisions could potentially be made.

Behind the scenes, it is said that Von der Leyen and her team worked on defense plans on their own, without involving the new European Commissioner for Defense. She also did not include all member states in her thinking process.

It is certain that a heated political discussion will follow. Some EU countries, for example, do not want an exception to the budget rules for frugal member states that still do not meet NATO’s 2 percent standard.
 
That is insane. One of the things I do remember about my history classes is joking about which 'Treaty of Versailles' (of which there are a comical amount) we were talking about on a given day. Ridiculous how dumbed down and shaven down it sounds like it became. How they don't bother to contextualize the German everyman's desire to Make the Rhine Great Again after getting assraped by concessions in WWI seems like a very big thing to just skim over.
The issue is that the politics around WWI is such a complex issue and there's really only two ways to teach it, the one week way and the one semester way. I understand how high school teachers have to teach it because there's simply no time, but it is an absolute disservice to anyone genuinely curious about history.

If it makes you feel any better, the vast majority of historians don't really separate the two wars. In modern history circles it's understood as a single conflict with two hot phases.

There's a lot of other really interesting stuff about the world wars that never gets mentioned, either, like how Hitler inherited most of his secret rearmament programs from Hindenburg. Contrary to popular belief, Hindenburg was not a based peace dove centrist. He was a war hawk, and even if Hitler died in prison, Germany was absolutely going to go to war.
Problem is Congress passed as part of defence spending a provision preventing exactly that.
Yeah so just, like, bully Congress into repealing it. This comes off as
Are you sure? I was looking into this the other day, and broilers are a very different breed, and can be slaughtered after two months whereas layers mature after five, at least in an industrial context. That's part of why the flu has hit egg prices way more than poultry. So I'm not sure we'd get many eggs from the broilers.
All you said is correct, but it is also true that their eggs are required to be discarded instead of sold. I don't think it's ideal. The eggs will be sub par, but they will be eggs, and considering the circumstances I don't think many people will be upset.
 
These pathetic old losers are going on and on about if this is too homophobic lol. What a nightmare that site must be to always have to be so humorless in every way even now. Old granny gone send a dick joke, omg.
When you’re locked into the ‘correct’ opinion, can’t joke about bad things because it’s ‘bad taste’, can’t joke about anything except those who are perceived to have the most power in society as otherwise it’s ‘punching down’, can’t use any real characteristics of a person or it’s ist-ism-cist-phobe hate speech, can’t joke about anything slightly edgy except a very narrow slice that conforms to all three;
You’re locked into either making knock-knock type jokes about general living not relevant to anything at hand or a barely-humorous-at-best subsection of a subsection of a subsection. 96%+ of comedy is locked from them so they never learn how to actually be funny by experience.
 
Why is every retard claiming China is going to take over while ignoring their economy is currently imploding with record unemployment? Never mind their population crisis and record low consumption.
They don't know that China is in deep doodoo if their GDP growth falls below 10%.
In 2024, their GDP grew by only 5%.
The crash is gonna be rough.
 
How does tariff nuking with our neighbors exactly benefit Americans? and, you know, not make everything expensive?

Did they even think this through? maybe, just maybe, waging economic wars with emotions is a retarded idea.
our wallets will hurt
their wallets will be empty

For fuck's sake, Trudeau admitted it would bankrupt his entire country.
 
yes, really.
Don't forget, china prints money like it's second nature and gives that to construction agencies to build ghost cities at random, buildings that collapse every other day but there's so many and in such remote places that it's just a footnote between two ads.
The CCP doesn’t just print money to cover their overhead.. their system is really fucked. Contractors are required to provide materials, which is why you get so much tofu dreg shit falling apart, and their construction is treated as “investment,” so if the company fails to pay the contractors and the contractors fail to complete a building in which the apartments have already been sold for cash to people on a waiting list, there is no recourse. The CCP doesn’t even attempt to enforce delivery or refund. They just write it off as a bad investment
 
Honestly, America, Russia and China should just team up and bully the rest of the world.

The UsSinoRu Alliance to bully bongs, frogs , pajeets and Germans. Also maybe we could nuke Africa and Norway for fun?
The 90 IQ half-breed non-white-skinned mixed mutts of America (the so-called 'United States') harbor a deranged desire to nuke Norway, one of the last bastions where true, genuine, authentic Aryans still walk the earth.

"If we kill all the Aryans," the American mutt mused to himself, his mind clouded by delusion, "then we, the mixed mutts of America, will become the new Aryans!"

This is why I advocate for total non-Aryan death.
 
How does tariff nuking with our neighbors exactly benefit Americans? and, you know, not make everything expensive?

Did they even think this through? maybe, just maybe, waging economic wars with emotions is a retarded idea.
WHERE IS THE MONEY GOING LEBOWSKI? Everyone seems to agree things will magically be more expensive but who's benefiting from this? They money isn't DISAPPEARING. Who has it in this scenario you describe sir?
 
Yes he's asking why this is a desirable outcome. As stated, Canada is our ally. Why is destroying their economy while simultaneously hurting Americans a good thing?
Canada is a fucking useless ally. We ask one thing of them, to be stewards of their side of the border.

Even now, if they would just do that instead of bullshitting us, there would be no tariffs
 
Back