US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The economy is fake and gay.
View attachment 7055109
In 2020 the Financial industry was 28% of domestic corporate profits (1.9T/6.8T). That is just the obvious profits reported going to the Financial industry.

Every industry is "financialized" and leveraged to the hilt. The US corporate economy could be described as desperately using one credit card to pay off another credit card in an ever growing house of cards.

Companies make money by "rent seeking". Simplified, the only way to stay in business now is to figure out how to erect a "tollbooth" somewhere in the economy and gouge what remaining customers exist.

Products and services exist if they can be contorted to extract the required percentage demanded by the rent seeking financializers.
1741128648835.png

Thats a screenshot of a treasury report from the indicated date of janurary 2024 showing the amount of money in "reported" but separate investment accounts the fed uses to keep the government functioning


1741128774549.png

Here is how much more they print on a monthly basis to combat their own inflation

the economy is just whatever the guy in charge says it is or what we all believe in, its all fucked
 
Okay but why? Why are we destroying Canada's economy while hurting Americans? Because we can? Is that the point?
Because Canada exploits us like every other country in the European and North American sphere. Do you honestly think a country like that is an ally to the US? We are hurting them because they are hurting us.
 
Cute how Zelenskiy gets to come to DC, publicly state how he won't compromise and that there's no point in negotiating with Putin, push for a security guarantee ON TOP of a generous minerals deal, and generally do his best to undermine things - yet have no choice but to come back around because Europe is a collective of retarded paraplegics and no one else can get Putin to the table with Ukraine.

Don't let him back in the country without a suit.
 
Cute how Zelenskiy gets to come to DC, publicly state how he won't compromise and that there's no point in negotiating with Putin, push for a security guarantee ON TOP of a generous minerals deal, and generally do his best to undermine things - yet have no choice but to come back around because Europe is a collective of retarded paraplegics and no one else can get Putin to the table with Ukraine.

Don't let him back in the country without a suit.
In a modern twist on tar-and-feathering, we should just glue him into the suit.
 
BlackRock strikes deal to bring ports on both sides of Panama Canal under American control
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Didi Tang and Alex Veiga
2025-03-04 20:44:41GMT
A Hong Kong-based conglomerate has agreed to sell its controlling stake in a subsidiary that operates ports near the Panama Canal to a consortium including BlackRock Inc., effectively putting the ports under American control after President Donald Trump alleged Chinese interference with the operations of the critical shipping lane.

In a filing, CK Hutchison Holding said Tuesday that it would sell all shares in Hutchison Port Holdings and in Hutchison Port Group Holdings to the consortium in a deal valued at nearly $23 billion, including $5 billion in debt.

The deal will give the BlackRock consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, located at either end of the Panama Canal. Other ports are in Mexico, the Netherlands, Egypt, Australia, Pakistan and elsewhere.

The transaction, which must be approved by Panama’s government, does not include any interest in a trust that operates ports in Hong Kong, Shenzhen and South China, or any other ports in China.

Some 70% of the sea traffic that crosses the Panama Canal leaves or goes to U.S. ports. The United States built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Washington relinquished control of the waterway to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999, under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter. Trump has claimed that Carter “foolishly” gave the canal away.

Trump and his supporters have also complained about the fees that ships are charged to use the waterway and alleged that China has been operating the canal, an assertion denied by Panama’s government.

In January, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, the Republican chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, raised concerns that China could exploit or block passage through the canal and that the ports “give China ready observation posts” to take action. “This situation, I believe, posts acute risks for U.S. national security,” Cruz said.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited Panama in early February and told President José Raúl Mulino that Panama had to reduce Chinese influence over the canal or face potential retaliation from the United States. Mulino rejected the idea that China had any control over canal operations.

Panama quit China’s Belt and Road Initiative following Rubio’s visit, drawing condemnation from Beijing. Belt and Road is Beijing’s global development strategy to build roads, ports and railways to open up new markets.

But while much attention was focused on Trump’s threat to retake control of the canal, his administration trained its sights on Hutchison Ports, the Hong Kong-based consortium that manages the ports key ports at either end of the canal.

Hutchison Ports had recently been awarded a 25-year no-bid extension to run the ports, but an audit looking at that extension was already underway. Observers believed the audit was a preliminary step toward eventually rebidding the contract, but rumors had swirled in recent weeks that a U.S. firm close to the White House was being lined up to take over.

Frank Sixt, co-managing director of CK Hutchison, said in a statement that the transaction was “the result of a rapid, discrete but competitive process in which numerous bids and expressions of interest were received.”

“I would like to stress that the transaction is purely commercial in nature and wholly unrelated to recent political news reports concerning the Panama Ports,” Sixt said.

In addition to BlackRock, a New York-based global investment management company with $11.6 trillion in assets under management as of Dec. 31, the consortium includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited.

BlackRock declined to comment outside of a press release touting the deal. Shares in BlackRock fell 1.5% in afternoon trading Tuesday.
 
The DNC has called out the big-guns.......of dick sucking:

KWE0077.png
KWE0076.png



One thing I hate is how men can be fidgety with their jacket buttons. Add to it their absolute fear of being confronted by anyone with XY chromosomes and it makes it look like they're mega autistic and about to piss themselves.
 
One thing I hate is how men can be fidgety with their jacket buttons. Add to it their absolute fear of being confronted by anyone with XY chromosomes and it makes it look like they're mega autistic and about to piss themselves.
I'd be fidgeting with my jacket too if it fit me so poorly. Then again politicians and wannabe political cronies haven't been known for dressing well since Bush.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Jeff Gazetti
French repaid the favor by dragging us into multiple wars as a result of how poorly they handled decolonization. Clinging onto the obligations of the 18th century after the shitshow that was Vietnam
100%. Here's a part from one of the better documentaries that exist that interviews the defence sec. at the time, timestamp in on exactly that.
Full documentary archive here for people interested in history. Maybe @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST might like it. Good shit, recommend. Takes a bit to get going though.
 
Last edited:
Along with everything else that is happening looks like we get a Nancy Mace sex tape.

View attachment 7055271

My guess? She filmed a 3 way with her husband and now regrets it.
Leaked sex tapes of politicians should result in automatic resignation. I can't see any way of recovering from something like that.
 
Okay but why? Why are we destroying Canada's economy while hurting Americans? Because we can? Is that the point?
My only real concern with Tariffs is that companies are willing to make consumers foot the bill, you can’t only do Tariffs and nothing else you need to actually need make laws requiring domestic hiring
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Leaked sex tapes of politicians should result in automatic resignation. I can't see any way of recovering from something like that.
as more and more day-to-day people have leaked sex tapes it's less of a thing
 
Back