Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

[Surfin Terf]

That's something non-Californians need to understand. San Francisco Bay Area (including Silicon Valley and East Bay) and Los Angeles-Inland Empire are overpopulated and overrepresented shitholes, basically modern manifestations of Sodom and Gomorrah. They run the whole damn show, partly because the rest of the state is relatively normal and has even parts rural conservatism and urban tolerance. You only ever see news from two large cities in California, and they're dragging the rest of the state down with them.

They're 80% of the population of the state, that's why "they run the whole damn show". Overrepresentation has nothing to do with it.

Is it me or has Colorado become California levels of insane? Even in blue states like New York, I posted at least some push back against TRA madness. I know Californians fled the state for Colorado but I didn't think it was this bad.

States undergoing a major political and demographic shift tend to be more extreme than states that have already gone through it. Colorado was a solidly red state 20 years ago (they went for Clinton in 1992 because Perot split the vote, allowing Clinton to win with just 40%).

Troons are NOT a "protected class" Fat Dumb Diversity Hire Al.

View attachment 7035287

The laws that are usually cited as protecting trannies usually (to my knowledge, always) do so under the category of gender identity. Now, ignoring the fact that the existence of gender identity has never been proven, I never understood how it gives them the right to women-only spaces or gender-affirming care. Saying that males who identify as women can't go into the women's room isn't discriminating based on their gender identity, it's based on their sex. Actually, only allowing males in on the basis of them identifying as women is discrimination based on gender identity. Same for procedures like hysterectomies being available for teenage girls only if they identify as men (or nonbinary).

I do think that these laws would protect trannies from being discriminated against for being trans in cases where sex is not a relevant factor. For example, if I was hiring a man but refused because he was wearing a dress, or Trump's military executive order banning trannies from the military. But in 90% of complaints about "transphobia", it's just someone not affirming their alleged gender identity which is not discrimination based on gender identity, it's a complete indifference to their gender identity.

 

[The Morning Visitor]

They're 80% of the population of the state, that's why "they run the whole damn show". Overrepresentation has nothing to do with it.

I just had to look it up, it's closer to 65%. 7.5m for Bay Area, 18.5m (?!) for greater Los Angeles. 26m/40m. Jesus Christ, I knew LA was populated but I figured like 6 or 7 million people. Thank you for the correction.

Every day I pray to God for tidal waves to cleanse our shores.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Take that perverts!

#Winning!

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed a bill Friday that strikes gender identity from the state's civil rights law, making Iowa the first state to remove civil rights from a previously protected class.

The bill passed the Republican-majority state Senate, 33-15, along party lines Thursday. Less than an hour later, the House passed its version of the bill, 60-36, with five Republicans joining Democrats to vote against it. Reynolds said in a statement Friday that the bill “safeguards the rights of women and girls.” She said the civil rights code’s protections against discrimination based on gender identity “blurred the biological lines between the sexes,” and “forced Iowa taxpayers to pay for gender-reassignment surgeries.”

“We all agree that every Iowan, without exception, deserves respect and dignity,” she said. “What this bill does accomplish is to strengthen protections for women and girls, and I believe that it is the right thing to do.” The Iowa Civil Rights Act broadly prohibits discrimination in many areas of life, including employment, housing, education and credit. In 2007, the state Legislature, which was then controlled by Democrats, passed a bill that extended those protections to LGBTQ people, adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of protected classes.

Iowa governor signs bill removing gender identity from state civil rights protections

You deranged cross dressing perverts never had any legitimate claim to protected status Fat Dumb Diversity Hire Al.

Furthermore, as the Governor correctly noted, allowing you to larp in actual women's spaces violated their civil rights.

 

[Nero Fiddled]

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed a bill Friday that strikes gender identity from the state's civil rights law, making Iowa the first state to remove civil rights from a previously protected class.

So filling the hall with a load of screechy men in frocks didn't work out the way they thought it was going to...

Iowa may have been the first but I'm praying that other outbreaks of sanity follow shortly.

 

[Procrastinhater]

They're 80% of the population of the state, that's why "they run the whole damn show". Overrepresentation has nothing to do with it.

Overrepresentation isn't the right word for it, but there is a problem when an entire States interests can be over ruled and controlled by one or two vastly overpopulated shit holes, especially when those shit holes are filled with people who vote for things that are against the wishes of the rest of the people in that State and often deleterious to the rest of the State like higher taxes, weak criminal penalties, and all the other policies that have turned LA and San Francisco into such a mess with rampant crime, open drug use, the homelessness epidemic, and so much street shitting they look like Calcutta, not America.

Spoiler: Reform

There needs to be a fairer way of doing things or you end up with the situation we have now, because if you look at by-county voting maps, "Blue States" are islands in a sea of red, vastly overpopulated cities that disenfranchise the rest of the States because of the size of the population. We need a better system that gives rural voters a fair say but also doesn't punish city voters. I'm no expert but our current system is broken.

Take that perverts!

#Winning!

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed a bill Friday that strikes gender identity from the state's civil rights law, making Iowa the first state to remove civil rights from a previously protected class.

The bill passed the Republican-majority state Senate, 33-15, along party lines Thursday. Less than an hour later, the House passed its version of the bill, 60-36, with five Republicans joining Democrats to vote against it. Reynolds said in a statement Friday that the bill “safeguards the rights of women and girls.” She said the civil rights code’s protections against discrimination based on gender identity “blurred the biological lines between the sexes,” and “forced Iowa taxpayers to pay for gender-reassignment surgeries.”

“We all agree that every Iowan, without exception, deserves respect and dignity,” she said. “What this bill does accomplish is to strengthen protections for women and girls, and I believe that it is the right thing to do.” The Iowa Civil Rights Act broadly prohibits discrimination in many areas of life, including employment, housing, education and credit. In 2007, the state Legislature, which was then controlled by Democrats, passed a bill that extended those protections to LGBTQ people, adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of protected classes.

Iowa governor signs bill removing gender identity from state civil rights protections

You deranged cross dressing perverts never had any legitimate claim to protected status Fat Dumb Diversity Hire Al.

Furthermore, as the Governor correctly noted, allowing you to larp in actual women's spaces violated their civil rights.

View attachment 7039177

See this is what Troons have been doing, and for whatever reasons their astroturfed support has given them the impression they are some sacred caste, and using that astroturfed support they've demanded special status and special privileges, and when it turns out that "support" was entirely illusory and people don't really support that filth after all, it's got them freaked out.
Sorry Al, you're not a "protected class" as much as you'd like to be one. You can't "identify" yourself into Sacred Caste status.
All you are are weird cross dressing perverts that have gotten too comfortable parading your fetishes in public.
You put on the dress. You can take it off (in the privacy of your home and with the drapes closed, please) just as easily.
You don't get protection or special status because of your fetish.

 

[Twix Eatr]

making Iowa the first state to remove civil rights from a previously protected class.

They're a protected class as males and should shut the fuck up.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) recently confirmed that over $240 million in taxpayer dollars had been spent on transgender surgeries and treatments on animals. Reports indicated that former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases chief Dr. Anthony Fauci approved many of the experiments. In a separate investigation, the House Oversight Committee is examining foreign funding for U.S. colleges and universities. Comer and Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) have expressed concern over the lack of disclosures from institutions regarding foreign funding, which has exceeded $57 billion over the past several decades.

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer holds up a stack of alleged evidence

 

[Argos]

What happened with the billing keeping transwomen out of women's sports?

 

[Procrastinhater]

What happened with the billing keeping transwomen out of women's sports?

Couple of States are trying to defy it, New York and Maine and others, saying they'll use the International Olympic Committee rules which allow cross dressers to cheat freely.
White House said they're gonna strip those States of Federal funding.
The cross dresser ban hasn't gone through Congress yet (which it will) when it does they won't be able to play silly games like that, it'll be illegal at the Federal level.
This shit takes time unfortunately.

 

[The Morning Visitor]

Couple of States are trying to defy it, New York and Maine and others, saying they'll use the International Olympic Committee rules which allow cross dressers to cheat freely.

He's honestly helping them course-correct. I don't understand what kind of retard keeps spitting upwind, but these 80-20 issues are exactly why they're dealing with him again in the first place.

 

[Anasa Tristis]

What happened with the billing keeping transwomen out of women's sports?

It needed 60 votes to go forward in the Senate. Every single donkey fucker voted Nay and tanked it. https://archive.ph/DOMJ5

A whopping 60-70% of Americans want males out of female sports and those righteous, bleeding heart assholes think they know better. Or worse: they think that it's an inconsequential issue because the number of trans athletes is so small and that there are more important problems to address. Like saving their money laundering operations, narrative controls, etc.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

t needed 60 votes to go forward in the Senate. Every single donkey fucker voted Nay and tanked it. https://archive.ph/DOMJ5

A whopping 60-70% of Americans want males out of female sports and those righteous, bleeding heart assholes think they know better. Or worse: they think that it's an inconsequential issue because the number of trans athletes is so small and that there are more important problems to address. Like saving their money laundering operations, narrative controls, etc.

Ergo why these nuts have a 21% approval rating.



Quinnipiac University National Poll February 19, 2025

 

[Jacques1194]

It needed 60 votes to go forward in the Senate. Every single donkey fucker voted Nay and tanked it. https://archive.ph/DOMJ5

A whopping 60-70% of Americans want males out of female sports and those righteous, bleeding heart assholes think they know better. Or worse: they think that it's an inconsequential issue because the number of trans athletes is so small and that there are more important problems to address. Like saving their money laundering operations, narrative controls, etc.

The dem argument "Republicans are obsessing over something that affects 4 people" goes both ways. Way more people benefit from this ban than not. Why are they alienating their entire voting base over this? Why are trans people still this sacred cow to these people?

 

[Procrastinhater]

It needed 60 votes to go forward in the Senate. Every single donkey fucker voted Nay and tanked it. https://archive.ph/DOMJ5

A whopping 60-70% of Americans want males out of female sports and those righteous, bleeding heart assholes think they know better. Or worse: they think that it's an inconsequential issue because the number of trans athletes is so small and that there are more important problems to address. Like saving their money laundering operations, narrative controls, etc.

Love it. The Democrats have learned nothing from the pasting they took in November.
The more they keep doubling down the more they lose support.
Its shitty short term but in the long term its better for America.
The Democrat Party has gone fucking insane and is no longer a reasonable choice for reasonable people, the more the more reasonable Center Left are forced to see this the more likely they'll break off from their failed Party like RFK has, and the Center Left are the only ones worth working with because they're the only ones capable of reason.
The far Left Democrats are too far gone.

Spoiler: Political Bullshit

The Two Party system has failed America for too long, the RINO Republicans are almost as bad as the insane fanatic Democrats, thats why we've seen more reasonable Democrats leave that sinking ship in droves.
Working together the MAGA Republicans that care about the Constitution and not fucking Neo Con bullshit, and Center Left Democrats like Tulsi and RFK should be able to get the nation back on track.

Seriously fuck the fanatic Dems and fuck the Neo Con Right. Decent people on both sides are sick of the insanity and the lies. The more the fanatic Democrats dig their heels in the more support they lose, and RINO shits on the other side can get flushed down the same toilet.

 

[I call shenanigans]

Love it. The Democrats have learned nothing from the pasting they took in November.

It seems a certain Australian billionaire has though. In Australia we have a federal election due around mid May (they always leave it to the last minute to announce the date). Last night I for the first time saw an ad for a new political party “Trumpet of Patriots”, WTF is with that name. Led by well known billionaire mining magnate Clive Palmer, who has tried to start his own parties before. The ad is absolutely Trump personified. All the ad mentions is we believe in there being only two sexes, no children should get gender affirming care, no males in womens sports/locker rooms/toilets etc. I would link the ad if I could, but I can’t find it on YouTube yet.

There is little doubt that Australia will have a hung parliament after this election. I just find it interesting, that such a high profile Australian has launched a party, and is getting the Trump transgender agenda into mainstream Australian media. Hopefully that with force our two major parties (Labor/left/red, and Liberal/conservative/blue) to pick a side. Yeah I know we’re upside down here in the Southern Hemisphere.

Also, want to hazard a guess on the party slogan at launch. Make Australia Great Again

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

If by "huge news" you really meant completely meaningless because the iminent Supreme Court decision will establish that this court apllied improper standards, then you would be right Fat Dumb Diversity Hire Al.

 

[Thiletonomics]

It needed 60 votes to go forward in the Senate. Every single donkey fucker voted Nay and tanked it. https://archive.ph/DOMJ5

A whopping 60-70% of Americans want males out of female sports and those righteous, bleeding heart assholes think they know better. Or worse: they think that it's an inconsequential issue because the number of trans athletes is so small and that there are more important problems to address. Like saving their money laundering operations, narrative controls, etc.

And here's some quotes from the Donkeys that voted Nay: / Archive

Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis.

Baldwin gave a statement to Fox News Digital on Tuesday.

"Simply put: it’s not the federal government’s place to tell state and local sports leagues across the country how to do their jobs," she said. "I for one trust our state and local leagues to craft thoughtful policy where parents and players can be involved in the discussion about what is best for our children without interference from the President or Congress."

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.

Cortez Masto said in a statement she supported fairness in women’s sports but drew the line when it came to alleged "government overreach."

"I support fair play and safety and do not support transgender athletes competing in girls’ and women’s sports when it compromises those principles," she said in a statement. "I believe local schools, student athletes, coaches, and parents are much better equipped to implement fair, strong policies on this issue than politicians in Congress.

"This blanket legislation would allow anyone to subject girls to invasive physical exams just because of the way they look. That is incredible government overreach and is putting young women at increased risk for abuse and harassment – something I’ve spent my career fighting against."

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

Durbin expressed similar qualms as Cortez Masto.

"Put yourself in the shoes of these families for just a moment," Durbin said. "Imagine being the parent of a trans kid and telling your child they are not allowed to play on the same sports team as their friends at school because a politician said they couldn’t.

"It’s that personal, it’s that important, and [because of Republicans,] we’re going to vote to give someone unspecified the right to physically inspect a girl or a young woman if the other opposing team accuses them of being transgender. My goodness."

Durbin also pointed to NCAA president Charlie Baker's testimony to lawmakers when he said he believed there were fewer than 10 transgender athletes in collegiate athletics. The organization later changed its policy after President Trump's "No Men in Women's Sports" executive order.

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa.

Fetterman suggested in a post on X that he chose to be an ally to the "small" contingent of transgender athletes.

"The small handful of trans athletes in PA in a political maelstrom deserve an ally and I am one. Depersonalized as ‘they/them’ in a political ad, but are just schoolchildren. Empty show votes or cruelty on social media aren’t part of a thoughtful, dignified solution."

Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz.

Gallego downplayed the issue for his constituents in his state.

"Look, if you’re running and you don’t have any other identity and you’re not known for fighting for people to have a decent living, to buy a home, to be able to bring the American dream to their families, these outside fringe issues are what is going to bring you down," he told NBC News.

"I’m not worried about that, because I communicate with my fellow Arizonans every day that I’m fighting for them to make sure that they get to live the American dream no matter what."

Sen. John Hickenlooper, D-Colo.

Hickenlooper told NBC News that Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., who introduced the bill, was "trying to churn the social wars about something that really doesn’t exist." He said Trump’s ad on trans athletes in women’s sports was only going to work once.

Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, D-Va.

Kaine and Warner released a joint statement, saying Congress needed to focus on other things.

"Right now, Congress should be focused on passing bills that lower grocery prices, not ones that threaten to defund public schools and gut world-class American colleges and universities," they said. "But instead, Republicans are poised to eliminate the Department of Education, while at the same time trying to dictate how individual schools should run their sports programs and subjecting children to uncomfortable scrutiny, invasive questioning, and even harassment. We will be voting to prevent this bill from moving forward and to leave the decision of how to best integrate transgender students into sports in the hands of parents, educators and state athletic associations – not the federal government."

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine

King said in a statement he understood concerns from students, parents and administrators about fairness and physicality differences but voted against the bill anyway.

"However, if one school in Maine decided to include a single trans student on one of their teams, schools across the entire state would lose access to critical funding which would be detrimental to all students, a result disproportionate to the impact of one transgender athlete at one school. While these are complex issues, considerations of fairness and safety in sports are made every day by parents, educators, and school administrators at the local level. We should keep it that way and allow local communities to decide what’s best for their districts and their students, and let states abide by the will of their citizens. In other words, I see this as a state’s rights issue which should not require a one-size-fits-all federal solution. Simply put, it is highly likely this legislation would hurt Maine and Maine students.

"Therefore, I am ultimately not comfortable conditioning all federal education funding on an issue that singles out such a small number of students nationwide – including here in Maine – and takes the decision-making power away from local communities.

"Finally, I find it odd that many of those supporting this legislation have exactly the opposite position when it comes to women’s reproductive choices – that that issue should be left to the states – while the question of transgender athletes requires a federal solution which overrides local control."

Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich.

Peters told NBC News the issue didn’t appear to resonate with constituents in Michigan.

"This is not really an issue like in Michigan," he said. "People are going to realize that it’s really been an issue that Republicans have been trying to exploit."

Several Democratic senators didn’t release a statement or say why they voted the way they did.

Those lawmakers included Sens. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., Michael Bennet, D-Colo., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-Del., Cory Booker, D-N.J., Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., Chris Coons, D-Del., Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Andy Kim, D-N.J., Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., Ed Markey, D-Mass., Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Patty Murray, D-Wash., Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., Alex Padilla, D-Calif., Jack Reed, D-R.I., Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., Tina Smith, D-Minn., Chris Van Hollen, D-M.d., Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

And of course it's all crickets from Hirono and Schatz, since Hawaii is trying to implement a law to seize children from families that try to deny their children getting SRS.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

And of course it's all crickets from Hirono and Schatz, since Hawaii is trying to implement a law to seize children from families that try to deny their children getting SRS.

It sounds like none of these donkey fucking retards have ever heard of Title IX which does the very thing that they all say is inappropriate for congress to legislate.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

“For the next four years, an LGBTQ person should not assume the EEOC is going to be a welcoming place for their charge,” said Chai Feldblum, a former Democratic commissioner."

Make that at least 8 years because it seems unlikely that the dems will ever recover from their wokeshit & tranny ideology.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Weird.

The professional trannies (and the clowns on CNN and MSNBC) told me that support for Trump had already collapsed and he is circling the drain.






Politics Poll of Trump's 2025 joint address to Congress finds large majority of viewers approve

One of the dumbest members of the the Democrat Party said that their strategy is to keep just lying about Trump as often as they can.

Ignoramous Al shares his insights.