WhatifAltHist / Rudyard Lynch - History youtuber, galaxy brained, no credentials and no sex

Marry a 16 year-old” arc sounds more likely to me. It would fit in with his desire to be how his ancestors supposedly were
🌈 he just doesn't know - YET🌈

Maybe someone needs to feed him more scholastic cum-chalice source material.
for some reason [they have sexual preferences]
On a technical note:
I guess the reason is how they're wired to begin with and rudyard didn't draw the chad berserker card, but the schizo farseer one and we know how those types rolled, sooo...
We can only hope he didn't take that sleipnir/loki arc to heart...
 
Last edited:
This shroom-driven, diet Soylent version of a Celtic druid must of played Civ games a little too much, looks like.
Didnt he admit his father only allowed him to play strategy games as a child to wire his brain a certain way, and he played them obsessively as a form of escapism? Youre looking at the results.
 
Last edited:
Didnt he admit his father only allowed him to play strategy games as a child to wire his brain a certain way, and he played them obsessively as a form of escapism? Youre looking at the results.
JESUS CHRIST HIS FATHER TURNED HIM INTO THE UBERPERMAVIRGIN AUTIST HE IS TODAY - HE ISN'T AUTISTIC, HE IS AUTISM ITSELF!
 
Another goofy ass community post
rud community post.JPG

Rudyard challenge: try not to hate your own audience and project all your own failures onto them (impossible)

“Marry a 16 year-old” arc sounds more likely to me. It would fit in with his desire to be how his ancestors supposedly were, and for some reason people think that RETVRNing consists of impregnating girls barely out of puberty or still pubescent.
rud on 16 year olds.JPG

He's already expressed views that would logically imply that, so unfortunately, you're probably right.
 
View attachment 7060314
He's already expressed views that would logically imply that, so unfortunately, you're probably right.
He's not wrong there tbh. I don't see him arguing for huge age gaps or dating them, he's just stating the obvious . One thing that is also true is that there's little difference in the maturity of a 16 year old and an 18 year old, the line is more social than biological
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FightenGnome
He's not wrong there tbh. I don't see him arguing for huge age gaps or dating them, he's just stating the obvious
But he is . The average age of marriage has varied significantly over history, and also depends greatly on culture and economic class. For example, people in Western Europe in the early modern period tended to marry about 27 years old, with the average age going up during the middle of the period (roughly 1650-1720) being about 29, before the average age lowering to the early 20s. But even this doesn’t give a full picture, since nobility tended to marry much younger. And different cultures within Western Europe also varied wildly (e.g. Italian city states tended to marry younger than their Northern European counterparts).

Part of what makes Rudyard such a bad historian is making such blanket statements like this. The notion that everyone before current year acted the same and all believed the same stuff is ludicrous. And making statements to that effect mark a bad historian.
 
A little influencer glazing last night.

Why I think Jake Paul has at least 130 IQ:

Jake Paul and Mr Beast are both people I have a profound respect on a business level given they are able to have multiple interlocking successful media arcs. This is intensely difficult given the way the algorithm works.
The algorithm defines you, naturally you fossilize as a brand and person. Also the creative direction required for that is intensely difficult given it requires creativity and an understanding of your target demographic. Most creative endeavors fail, especially with how reactive and irrational audiences are online. It’s also remarkable they are doing this as people my age. Assume even if someone acts dumb on the internet and they’re successful for years, unless they’re really really hot, that they’re smart. A lot act stupid to be identifiable. This is my job so I’ve studied the lives of dozens of content creators to figure out what strategies work.

With Jake Paul after moving from Ohio to LA he went through multiple types of content. He started from more identifiable stuff to the hypebeast content. He constantly made different stunts with the goal of wowing the internet, often in the worst way. The thing is that mob psychology is incapable of differentiating between negative or positive extreme emotion. This is why the internet brings out the worst traits in people given it incentives extreme negative emotion. The Japanese suicide forest story is the best example of it, in which the Paul brothers were seen as monsters but it got them into the mainstream headlines.

He then made the team 10 house, creating a series of different personalities targeting different demographics. A lot of them went to have independent careers later. When that failed and the hypebeast direction got boring, they moved into boxing. They both did well in boxing against professionals, which is insane. This was since their teenage audience was aging out, the internet entered a pro sincerity phase and the content was getting old.

I had mutual friends with the Paul brothers when I was in La running a group for influencers a few years ago and they spoke of how strong their work ethic is. They are intensely hard working and dedicated. They lately just went into conservative politics, making content with both Vivek and Trump. This was an important rebrand as young men turned right. Logan also made a very successful podcast where he interviews degenerates.

This all appears spontaneous but this was all calculated from a media basis stemming from the zeitgeist. People all thought they were stupid, but they’re not.

Why did I write this. Partly to throw you off tbh since I was getting bored. This is the last thing you’d expect me to say hahaha. I’m not especially enamored with the Paul brothers as people and I never watch their content. I barely even watch YouTube at this point really. Remember I read 70,000 pages a year so I think about a lot of things in a given day. I’m using them as an example of a very important principle. Things online, and in general, are not what they appear. In fact in many cases the masks people wear are the exact opposite of who they really are. Isn’t it funny so many male feminists turn out to be sexual predators? Don’t take things at face value.

Good Bye, from Rudyard

Bro is fucking retarded and doesn't even acknowledge that paul was from a rich family and had disney connections and jimmy beast was building his channel like a business from the beginning by taking out loans from banks to fund wealth tourism videos.
 
The algorithm defines you, naturally you fossilize as a brand and person. Also the creative direction required for that is intensely difficult given it requires creativity and an understanding of your target demographic.
He's got the natural flow of a man falling down a flight of stairs (none).

I wish a guy named after an author could use commas more. They're not a suggestion, they're there for a reason.


Remember I read 70,000 pages a year so I think about a lot of things in a given day.
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class on Alt History Youtube, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids in Hearts of Iron, and I have over 300 confirmed books read a year.

It's a big number so it MUST prove he's smart.

Things online, and in general, are not what they appear. In fact in many cases the masks people wear are the exact opposite of who they really are.
"Like me, who everyone thought I was average but I was actually really smart and chosen by Odin."


Bro is fucking retarded and doesn't even acknowledge that paul was from a rich family and had disney connections and jimmy beast was building his channel like a business from the beginning by taking out loans from banks to fund wealth tourism videos.
They were managed by their parents in their youth so getting a handle on how it works from their rich parents is only natural. Even then, someone can be good at one or two things and be completely retarded at others.
 
Bro is fucking retarded and doesn't even acknowledge that paul was from a rich family and had disney connections and jimmy beast was building his channel like a business from the beginning by taking out loans from banks to fund wealth tourism videos.

I don't know much about Paul lore, but wasn't Logan Paul the one that really blew up the brand? Jakes the retarded brother whose rise to fame was because he had a family member who knew what they're doing.

I watched a video about them a long time ago and Jake struck me as an idiot.

For example, people in Western Europe in the early modern period
I don't think he's talking about that time period, this is more a return to monke post about the Classical and/or Medieval ages.

Part of what makes Rudyard such a bad historian is making such blanket statements like this. The notion that everyone before current year acted the same and all believed the same stuff is ludicrous. And making statements to that effect mark a bad historian.

It's more his sociological/anthropological takes if anything. He's not alone though, the vast majority of people talk about the past in this way and have since the dawn of time.

The more conservative take is that every present generation is seen as more degenerate than the people of the past, and every future generation will be more intelligent and uniformly hold the same values of the person talking about it.

Or you have the leftist take which is that we're the best generation there ever was and it will only get better and better here on out.

People hate nuance, and the idea of people being better, worse or the same depending on the time or issue you're talking about is seen as wishy-washy or deceitful
 
when I was in La running a group for influencers a few years ago
He keeps making these types of claims, but has there ever been any proof of him actually running a group of any kind at any point? I've never seen a video of him doing it, I've never seen anybody claim they've attended one, and the whole thing seems so vague that it comes off as questionable. This is the guy who thought uploading the ten hours was a good idea, there's nothing he could tell a bunch of influencers that would be of value to them.
 
Didnt he admit his father only allowed him to play strategy games as a child to wire his brain a certain way, and he played them obsessively as a form of escapism? Youre looking at the results.
All of this could have been avoided if his father had given him Sonic games like a normal inattentive parent
 
He keeps making these types of claims, but has there ever been any proof of him actually running a group of any kind at any point? I've never seen a video of him doing it, I've never seen anybody claim they've attended one, and the whole thing seems so vague that it comes off as questionable. This is the guy who thought uploading the ten hours was a good idea, there's nothing he could tell a bunch of influencers that would be of value to them.
He also said group he was part of fell appart in month lol.
Problem with Rudyard is that he has tendency to overhype his "achievments"
Things that could be fact checked usually have true part, but Rudyard twists the facts. And does not say full truth.
For example his 900 books claim .
Yeah his goodreads shows he read almost 900 books, but from his reviews we know he did not finish many of them. And when you look at categories you will see he read "only" 275 history books most of which are pop history.
IMG_20250307_221326.jpg
IMG_20250307_221304.jpg
 
But he is . The average age of marriage has varied significantly over history, and also depends greatly on culture and economic class. For example, people in Western Europe in the early modern period tended to marry about 27 years old, with the average age going up during the middle of the period (roughly 1650-1720) being about 29, before the average age lowering to the early 20s.
I don't want to turn the thread into sperging about ethics in marrying teenagers but the average age of marriage in the past few centuries being closer to 30 than 20 is a statistical lie; most of the research positing that was projecting urban life in the renaissance (and very urbanized) Netherlands onto the whole of western Europe. Average age of marriage did indeed deviate based on circumstances and locales - and would also statistically be driven up by the advent of standing armies and remarriage - but early twenties was the point by which someone would have first been married as a general rule. As a rule of thumb I'm skeptical of any broad claims about vital statistics in periods before the advent of centralized nation-states and the corresponding increase in civil record-keeping.

There's probably a discussion to be had about the infantilization of teenagers over the past few decades, but not by people who transparently just want to have barely-child brides. If Rudy does make talking about teenage relations a recurring theme that'll be another point for the Linkara comparison.
 
Back