UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
oh look the cUK guberment has released new sentencing guidelines for for judges as of April 1st

oh look the guidelines force heavier prison sentences for white males and less sentences for...well anyone who is not a white male. If your a pajeet, if your a "minority", if your a troon or if your a woman.

Way to go Britbongs with putting Labor into power. I'm sure your not going to regret that one.

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.u...nd-custodial-sentences-overarching-guideline/

When considering a community or custodial sentence, the court must request and consider a pre-sentence report (PSR) before forming an opinion of the sentence if the court considers that one or more of the following may apply to the offender:
  • has disclosed they are transgender
  • has or may have any addiction issues
  • has or may have a serious chronic medical condition or physical disability, or mental ill health, learning disabilities (including developmental disorders and neurodiverse conditions) or brain injury/damage
  • or; the court considers that the offender is, or there is a risk that they may have been, a victim of:
    • domestic abuse, physical or sexual abuse, violent or threatening behaviour, coercive or controlling behaviour, economic, psychological, emotional or any other abuse
    • modern slavery or trafficking, or
    • coercion, grooming, intimidation or exploitation.

So yah if your just an average white male cUK your going to get a heavier sentence then anyone else. My advice if you have the misfortune to be British is to start trooning out as soon as possible to protect yourself. It's only a matter of time until they start rounding up white males because they are just so damn racist they need to be contained to protect the rest of the real
Robert Jenrick has pointed out that in the minutes of the meetings, nobody raised any objections.

All that happened is that they've committed the cardinal civil service sin of putting unofficial policy into writing.
 
Two absolute bangers for today, daily fail had them both on the front, the prior mentioned guidelines and some good old RAPE ;1741271184063.png
We're proper toffs here though you get the toimes.
1. Super mega commie chinky rapist, he filmed it all: minimum of 50 vics here and in chyna but only charged and convicted for 10 or so because daddy is head of "state run enterprise" back home or something;
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/zhenhao-zou-verdict-phd-student-rape-rj3ff53kv/https://archive.is/KUTub
1741270903540.png
I believe this fellow ranks as the 2nd worst raper ever just behind Reynhard Sinaga's high score and kinda looks like him as well must be some oriental bloodcurse or something, same MO down to how he got caught too, he got done in because one of the women woke up mid assault.
A PhD student found guilty of raping ten drugged and drowsy women in London and China could have at least 50 more victims.
Zhenhao Zou, 28, preyed on young Chinese women he met on dating apps and Chinese social media platforms such as WeChat and Little Red Book.
Zou, who was studying mechanical engineering at University College London, kept 58 videos of the rapes, police said. He also hoarded victims’ make-up and jewellery.

Police issued a picture of items Zou kept in an attempt to help trace victims
The Chinese citizen, of Elephant and Castle, south London, was found guilty of 11 rapes against ten women in London and China between 2019 and 2023. He was also convicted of 17 other charges including possession of extreme pornography, voyeurism and possession of butanediol with intention to commit rape.
A jury at Inner London crown court deliberated for 19 hours and 10 minutes beforereaching verdicts on all counts. Zou remained impassive in the glass-fronted dock as the foreman delivered the jury’s decision.

Zou was cleared of two counts of possessing an extreme pornographic image and a five charges of possessing MDMA, ketamine and Xanax with intention to commit rape.
Judge Rosina Cottage KC ordered a pre-sentence report and told Mark Cotter KC, Zou’s barrister: “I find your client is a dangerous and predatory sexual offender.”
She said that Zou faces “a long sentence” when he returns to the court on June 19.
Commander Kevin Southworth, the Met’s head of public protection, said Zou “may well turn out to be one of the most prolific sexual predators that we have ever seen in this country”.
Southworth said: “He is a devious and Machiavellian individual who will do anything to avoid responsibility for what he has done.
“The deceitful, cowardly, calculated and predatory nature of what Zou [was] charged with is unprecedented and not something I have experienced in my 28 years in policing. It’s vital we bring him to justice for all of his offending.”
Following his conviction on Wednesday, it can be revealed that police recovered more than 6.5 trillion bytes of data from Zou’s devices, including 1,660 hours of video and 9 million WeChat messages.

A deconstructed camera which belonged to Zou
Analysis of this material has led the Metropolitan Police to believe that Zou may have attacked at least 25 more women in London and another 25 in China. The Met has appealed to Chinese women who believe they may have been victims to come forward.
Eight of the ten women Zou was convicted of raping remain unidentified.
Scotland Yard said the “landmark” case was one of the “most complex investigations ever carried out” by the force. It appealed for potential victims to come forward.
Detective Chief Inspector Richard Mackenzie, who led the investigation on behalf of the Met, said: “We are particularly keen to hear from women in the Chinese student community who may have met Zou and lived in and around London between 2019 and 2024.”

The Met released images showing Zou’s arrest
The Met also asked potential victims who had met Zou on social and dating apps such as Bumble and Jimu to contact them.
Mackenzie added: “We believe some women may not know they are a victim. We do not underestimate how distressing it may be to read or hear about Zou’s crimes.”Anyone with information has been asked to email survivors@met.police.uk or call 101.
An image of items Zou took from victims, including lipstick, earrings, socks and keys, was released in case it “jogs women’s memories”.
Zou lived in a private student flat in Woburn Place in Bloomsbury, central London, and at UNCLE Elephant and Castle, a 46-storey apartment block in southeast London.

Zou’s bedroom in Elephant and Castle
The Met has been unable to conduct investigations in China. It is unclear whether the authorities in Zou’s homeland are investigating whether he committed more crimes there.
Southworth said: “We’ve been focused on this case … before drawing even more evidence from an overseas jurisdiction, it’s right the team concentrated on securing this conviction. We can take a staged approach and hopefully we might gain evidence from further engagement with the Chinese.”
Prosecutors were able to charge Zou with seven rapes carried out in China under Section 72 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. It pertains to a UK citizen or resident who “does an act in a country outside the UK, and the act, if done in England and Wales … would constitute a sexual offence”.
Detective Chief Inspector Elsa Mak said: “This is a deeply distressing and awful case and we are committed to ensuring that this dangerous person faces justice.”
Mak, who is part of the force’s Asia Pacific staff association, said appeal posters in English and simplified Chinese would be circulated to universities, student and community groups, and social media channels and forums in the UK and China.

The case has highlighted the difficulties that women — especially those for whom English is not their first language — encounter when trying to report sex crimes to the police.
During the trial the jury was played a 999 call from a woman whom Zou falsely imprisoned and raped at his flat in Elephant and Castle in May 2023. The victim, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, repeated the word “rape” and spoke in broken English before a Mandarin translator joined the call.
In the chaotic 24-minute exchange, the call handler appeared to be impatient as the interpreter tried to take information from the victim.
The woman gave evidence at the trial from behind a screen, with assistance from a Mandarin translator, and answered questions about her crime report. The judge, Rosina Cottage KC, later remarked: “I’m glad you have a better translator in court.”
Southworth said: “There is undoubtedly some learning from the first response these victims received. It’s a matter of severe regret that the victim did not get the best translation. We will make sure we have the right interpreters for Mandarin or any other dialect to make sure [victims] get a premier service.”
Zou first appeared at Croydon magistrates’ court charged with rape in February last year. By July, he faced charges over ten offences and at a pre-trial briefing last month journalists were told he was accused of 35 charges. As only two of his victims had been identified, the media raised concerns about the force’s decision to not publicise the case.

Zou was convicted of possession of butanediol with intent to rape
Andrea Simon, the director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said: “It takes a huge amount of courage to report a traumatic incident like rape to the police.
“Serious questions must be asked about the Met’s decision not to make public that charges had been made in this case, particularly once multiple victims had been identified, given how public reporting often encourages other victims to come forward.”
The Met said in response: “This was a deliberate, operational decision to protect the integrity of the legal proceedings.”
Dr Michael Spence, the president and provost of UCL, said: “We have been appalled by these horrific offences. Our thoughts are with the survivors and we wish to pay tribute to the bravery of the women who reported these crimes and gave evidence at the trial.
“This case is particularly distressing and our focus is providing support for our students, alumni and staff through a range of services. We are here to support anyone at UCL who has been impacted by this case, directly or indirectly. Following the launch of the [Met’s] appeal, we urge anyone with information related to these crimes to contact the police.”
2. It's true, the tiering is no longer just a catchy slogan that reflects reality, it actually is official policy.
I think the bigger take away is that the tier-slur is now legit mainstream and not just a fringe hortler thing anymore which is nice:
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politic...ls-could-avoid-jail-under-new-rules-w52pkd7q6/https://archive.is/NhnhA
Ethnic minority and transgender criminals may be more likely to avoid prison under changes to sentencing guidelines that take effect next month.
Updated guidance sent to judges says that they should consider whether an offender is from an ethnic, cultural or religious minority when deciding whether to impose a custodial or community sentence.
Other factors include whether an offender has disclosed that they are transgender, according to the Sentencing Council, an independent body that provides guidance for judges and courts to ensure consistency and transparency across the country.

The new guidance has sparked claims of a “two-tier” sentencing policy that treats ethnic minorities favourably.
Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, was unaware of the new guidance before it was published on Wednesday and said she would request its reversal. A Ministry of Justice source said she was “incandescent” when made aware.

Mahmood said: “The Sentencing Council is entirely independent. These guidelines do not represent my views or the views of this government. I will be writing to the council to register my displeasure and recommend reversing this change to guidance.
“As someone who is from an ethnic minority background myself, I do not stand for any differential treatment before the law, for anyone of any kind.
“There will never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch.”
Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, called the guidance “completely outrageous” and said it confirmed claims made after the Southport riots last summer of a two-tier approach to sentencing in England and Wales.
He said: “Under this guidance there is blatant discrimination against straight white men.”
He added: “Under ‘Two-Tier Keir’, our justice system is set to have an anti-white and anti-Christian bias. Starmer sneered at people who said we have a two-tier justice system — and Angela Rayner labelled them ‘conspiracy theorists’. But here we have it in black and white. It’s unarguable.”

Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, called the guidance “completely outrageous”

Minutes from a meeting of the Sentencing Council that rubber-stamped the guidelines on January 24 reveal that a senior Ministry of Justice official was present at the meeting. However, sources close to Mahmood said the changes were not flagged to ministers.
A Labour source pointed out that the last government was aware of the change in guidance during a consultation that ended in February last year.
Under the guidance, which take effect from April 1, judges and courts must consider a wider range of factors pertaining to an offender’s background when deciding whether to impose a community or custodial sentence.
The guidance relates to the pre-sentence report, drawn up when an offender is from a cohort that judges and courts may deem relevant when considering a sentence. The council states that such a report can be “pivotal in helping the court decide whether to impose a custodial or community order and, where relevant, what particular requirements or combination of requirements are most suitable for an individual offender on either a community order or a suspended custodial sentence”.

The new guidance adds factors such as whether an offender is from an “ethnic minority, cultural minority and/or faith minority community”, and whether an offender has disclosed that they are transgender.
Existing factors taken into consideration when deciding the type of sentence include whether an offender has previously served a custodial sentence; is a young adult aged 18 to 25; is a woman; is pregnant or post-natal; has addiction issues; is suffering from a chronic medical condition or physical disability or mental ill health; or is a victim of domestic abuse.
The council insisted that the guidance does not dictate the sentence but simply gives additional information and context to courts when considering the nature of the sentence. A source pointed out that some demographic cohorts suffer disadvantages in the criminal justice system.
The changes were based on research that included evidence showing the proportion of black offenders receiving a community order has been lower than the proportion of white offenders.
The Sentencing Council, while independent, reports to the Ministry of Justice. It was set up in 2010 and the current chairman is Lord Justice William Davis, a Court of Appeal judge. He took over the role in August 2022.
"oooh nooooo looks like the ((independent council)) we've got totally no control of whatsoever did anther oopise oh well how sad guess we simply have no choice but to follow these ((independent recommendations))".
Kill all the lawyers
 

There are some concerns that Trump may cancel the long standing agreement for the sale and sharing of nuclear weapons and delivery systems tech between the UK and US. I really doubt it for a million reasons but what happens if the US does pull out?

Well, Trident missiles are designed and built in the US. The UK bought 58 missiles of which 50 remain after tests. Outside of the missiles currently deployed by the Royal Navy, the rest are held in Georgia. Lockheed Martin and the UK both maintain these missiles but most of the work is done in the US mostly for costs reasons.

The current sale of Trident to the UK is covered by the an amendment to the old Polaris Sales Agreement. That allows for the UK to expand it's own maintenance and refurbishment facilities, including the manufacture spare parts in the UK. Basically the UK can if it choses to keep a fully independent Trident based deterrence for quite some time without the US's permission.

The next stage would be finding a replacement for Trident. The UK could go to the French but their missiles aren't compatible with the launching system on the Vanguard/Dreadnought class submarines. So in the case of the US cancelling our agreement we would probably have to design a replacement ourselves.

tldr The US might (but probably won't) stop selling Trident missiles to the UK. The UK currently doesn't maintain it's own stockpile but could both technically and by treaty. So the UK's nuclear deterrence can continue even without the US. We would have to replace Lockheed Martin with a domestic supplier which is possible but it'll take years and cost a shit load of money.
 
So the UK's nuclear deterrence can continue even without the US. We would have to replace Lockheed Martin with a domestic supplier which is possible but it'll take years and cost a shit load of money.
Something a lot of people are surprised to learn is that our trident warheads are designed and built in the UK, though allegedly their design is based on an older US design. They're built and maintained at a facility in Aldermaston. The UK has somehow held on to its nuclear weapons knowledge, despite cancelling most of its nuclear weapons development, so the only real issue is the actual rocket, which theoretically shouldn't be that expensive. The main issue would be whether we could convincingly pretend our Trident clone was an indigenous design.
 
The problem is that the last time the UK was able to launch a Trident was back in 2012. Test firings of the thing in both 2016 and 2024 (2020 skipped cause coof) failed. (2016 it flew the opposite way to the target and had to be destroyed, 2024 it flew 20 feet and crashed into the ocean).

 
The problem is that the last time the UK was able to launch a Trident was back in 2012. Test firings of the thing in both 2016 and 2024 (2020 skipped cause coof) failed. (2016 it flew the opposite way to the target and had to be destroyed, 2024 it flew 20 feet and crashed into the ocean).
There was never any information on why they failed. The 2024 test was right after a refit, using a test missile sourced in the US rather than one from the UK stockpile, which rules out a lot of things. The initial ejection from the silo was a success, which means the submarine was operating correctly, so the most likely problem is one of:

* the missile not being fueled
* the missile being faulty
* the missile not being correctly armed before launch

It's easy to assume it was operator error and a failure to correctly arm the missile, but I think it might have been faulty.

The 2016 test was obvious operator error. Some wag probably put Disneyland into the targeting computer as a joke and forgot to reset it before the launch.

What this highlights is a need to ramp up our own missile development, rather than being reliant on the Americans for the rockets. If we're building our own rockets, then at least we know who to blame when something goes wrong.
 
There was never any information on why they failed. The 2024 test was right after a refit, using a test missile sourced in the US rather than one from the UK stockpile, which rules out a lot of things. The initial ejection from the silo was a success, which means the submarine was operating correctly, so the most likely problem is one of:

* the missile not being fueled
* the missile being faulty
* the missile not being correctly armed before launch

It's easy to assume it was operator error and a failure to correctly arm the missile, but I think it might have been faulty.

The 2016 test was obvious operator error. Some wag probably put Disneyland into the targeting computer as a joke and forgot to reset it before the launch.

What this highlights is a need to ramp up our own missile development, rather than being reliant on the Americans for the rockets. If we're building our own rockets, then at least we know who to blame when something goes wrong.
Great Britain is the only country to have developed an independent satellite launch capability then lost it (yet again, the yanks lied to us then reneged when we'd binned our project). We've designed and built ICBMs before, we can do it again
 
The problem is that the last time the UK was able to launch a Trident was back in 2012. Test firings of the thing in both 2016 and 2024 (2020 skipped cause coof) failed. (2016 it flew the opposite way to the target and had to be destroyed, 2024 it flew 20 feet and crashed into the ocean).

View attachment 7061749
Every single time i have seen Zelenskyy he looks greenscreened in. I am convinced this man does not actually exist.
 
do not hand on heart believe they exist any more.
I disagree on this. I was one and I’m only not one now by the grace of God. I was lucky to have decent parents and lucky to have a modicum of intelligence. But anything at all could have derailed my painful ascent to the lower middle class. An injury, an illness, disability, parents getting sick or dying. And you were lucky too - didn’t you get some scholarship to a private school? Be honest, without that would you be where you are now? How did you get that? You clearly have drive and you’d have hauled yourself up but maybe a few rungs lower down. Without the edges knocked off maybe you’d not have married who you did.
We were lucky. Worked hard as well, that’s a massive amount of it, but there’s always that throw of the dice as well.
I went to school with a girl who was very smart. Uni material. Her mum died, and her stepdad started abusing her and when she finally went to move in with her dad she was such a mess then he started hitting her and she got pregnant and drugged up. Her life is ruined, she’s a junkie.
I cannot accept no ladder. And every last true British chav is still one of ours. They’re wellington’s scum of the earth, and I want them to be able to do better.
 
In lighter news the University of Cardiff doesn't want to say "piece of cake" any more because it's too British.
People should not use colloquial phrases like “a piece of cake” and “kill two birds with one stone” because they are “very British-English” and may not be understood by foreigners, a university has suggested.
The University of Cardiff has told students that such idioms do not usually translate well with other cultures, “not because people have poor English skills but because this is very British-English”.
Other guidance issued in an equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) awareness module says that other common phrases should not be used because of their “origin stories” in “ableism”, “racism” and “sexism”.

The EDI guidance states: “In the English language, many of those origin stories are based in ableism, like ‘the blind leading the blind’, or racism, like ‘he’s a slave driver’, and in sexism, like ‘man up’ or ‘like a girl’.”

Free speech campaigners accused the university of attempting to “police” language, and warned that the EDI guidance was “calculated to turn every casual conversation into a political minefield”.
It comes amid a wider fear that free speech and academic freedoms are being eroded on British campuses because of the growth of “cancel culture”.
Lord Young, the founder of the Free Speech Union, told the Mail on Sunday: “Language guides like this are always badged as ‘inclusive’, but in fact they are exclusionary.
“The Free Speech Union has defended over 3,500 people in the past three years and many of them are older people who have been accused of ‘hate speech’, for not using the correct woke phrase for something or other.”
A Cardiff University spokesman said: “Our Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Awareness module was created through the collaboration of EDI experts from our institution and students.

“Feedback from students revealed that 85 per cent rated the module as good to excellent, while 92 per cent felt the concepts were effectively explained.
“As a university, we take pride in our initiatives promoting equality, diversity and inclusion.”
The Telegraph approached the university for further comment.
 
Something a lot of people are surprised to learn is that our trident warheads are designed and built in the UK, though allegedly their design is based on an older US design. They're built and maintained at a facility in Aldermaston. The UK has somehow held on to its nuclear weapons knowledge, despite cancelling most of its nuclear weapons development, so the only real issue is the actual rocket, which theoretically shouldn't be that expensive. The main issue would be whether we could convincingly pretend our Trident clone was an indigenous design.
We wouldn't necessarily need rockets to drop nukes. There's a recently decommissioned aerial weapons platform that was designed to drop nukes on Russia. Dozens of these still serviceable platforms are sitting around in bases all over the UK.
It would take months, at most, to have these birds flying again.
 
Gulwali Stanekzay, 22, who is said to be an immigrant from Afganistan, was cycling along Minet Avenue in Harlesden, north-west London when he saw Aisha Waris, 23, walking alone.
The homeless man chased after her and she began running. Eventually he caught up with her and cycled his bike into her body.
She ran away from him into a front garden, but he caught her again and began beating her.
Footage from a doorbell camera showed him punching Ms Waris over and over again.

The man living in the house opened the door to let her in, but Stanekzay then started kicking the door in an attempt to force his way in.
He eventually gave up and smashed up a nearby car, causing several thousand pounds worth of damage.
Ms Waris also called her father, who arrived to be met with a hail of blows from Stanekzay.
Both she and her husband needed hospital treatment, but their injuries were not life-changing.


Ms Waris later told a court in Stanekzay's trial: "This incident has caused me a lot of distress and had an impact on my emotions and my mental health.
"I have also sustained physical injuries included bruising and swelling to my eyes, nose and lip.
"I had many bruises on my head, neck, shoulder and back. I have had to go to hospital to receive treatment for my physical injuries."
She said she was too afraid to leave the house on her own anymore after the beating.
Her father suffered a black eye and broken tooth.
After the attack, police tracked Stanekzay down through the doorbell and CCTV footage.
Stanekzay was arrested on March 1. He gave no explanation for his actions, and pleaded guilty to assault occasioning actual bodily harm, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and two counts of criminal damage.
He was sentenced to three years and one month in jail, including 24 weeks for breaching a suspended sentence order for a previous assault in December last year.
Stanekzay came to the UK from Afghanistan in 2016 as an unaccompanied minor, the MailOnline reported. He apologised to his victims through his lawyer.

2023 article so he'll be back on the streets by now. And with the new sentencing guidelines the fact that he entered the country as an unaccompanied minor, is an ethnic minority, is homeless all means we should ensure he's not sentenced too long so he's free to do this again until he finally kills someone at which point there might be a full year between him doing so again.

Long video can be found here if anyone can nab a copy. As well as kicking the door to try to force it he came back with a bike lock to smash the camera then try to break his way in.
1741334329406.png

While I was looking up stuff around this anyone remember that fellow who pushed someone onto the rail line (victim lived)? Everyone who bet illegal immigrant with a history of violent crimes that mean he should not be on the streets let alone in this country give yourself a round of applause.
Postman Tadeusz Potoczek had completed his deliveries for the day. At around 3 p.m. on 3 February, the 60-year-old was returning from work via the London underground, still wearing his red postman’s coat. As the southbound Victoria line train rumbled towards Oxford Circus, he headed for the far end of the platform, perhaps in the hope of getting a seat. To his left, he noticed a young man sitting on a bench, but he didn’t think much of it – his mind was on other things. Suddenly, the stranger got up and shoved him, hard, onto the tracks.
This failure of our asylum system almost led to an innocent postman being killed
It was a miracle that Mr Potoczek survived. The 750 volts running through the electrified rail would in all likelihood have killed him immediately had he touched it. Somehow he managed to avoid that grisly fate by staying on his feet after he fell onto the tracks. The underground driver slammed the brakes and managed to stop the train before it reached Potoczek, having spotted his red coat. A quick-thinking passerby, Oliver Matthews, pulled Potoczek to safety. Matthews later received £1,000 for his heroism.
The attack was ‘wholly unprovoked and spontaneous’, as the sentencing judge put it this week at Inner London Crown Court. This deranged attempted murder is disturbing for all concerned. The ordeal caused Mr Potoczek, a man of ‘robust character’, to suffer repeated nightmares and made him afraid to use the tube, though he needs to for his commute. The train driver, Bobby Walker, said he was ‘shaken very badly’. Judge Benedict Kelleher said it would ‘strike fear into every traveller on the underground’.
The man who pushed Mr Potoczeck was Brwa Shorsh, a homeless illegal immigrant from Kurdistan, in northern Iraq. At his trial, he told the court that a women passing on a previous train had allegedly laughed at him which made him angry, and that his victim – barely on the platform for seconds – gave him a ‘dirty look’, and he said he felt ‘disrespected’. The judge did not accept this, saying that he ‘wrongly perceived’ Mr Potoczeck to have been looking at him, and vented his anger in a ‘spontaneous decision to try to take away his life’. Convicted of attempted murder earlier this year, last week Shorsh was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of eight years.
The jury needed just half an hour to convict Shorsh for this crime, but the questions it raises about Britain’s asylum system are far more difficult to answer. Why was he still in the country? Who is to blame for this attack ever having taken place? And how many more people like him are now roaming our streets?
It is quite clear that Shorsh is the last person you want on the streets of a British city. Shorsh was denied asylum in Germany before being smuggled into the UK on the back of a lorry in 2018. He had also been denied asylum in France, he told the court.
In the time he had been in Britain, Shorsh had already committed a total of 21 crimes, for which he was convicted on 12 occasions. These include a racially aggravated offence of common assault, five offences of assault or battery, threatening a person in public with a weapon, a bike chain, and three offences of outraging public decency – that is, public masturbation, including on a District line train and at a Wandsworth café. On arriving in the UK, Shorsh was initially housed in Lincoln, before moving to London in late 2018 where he became homeless. Between 2019 and 2023 he served a total of six short prison sentences. His latest offence was an unprovoked attack on a female rail passenger in November 2023, whom he hit on the back of the head.
At the time of the attempted murder, Shorsh had stalled a bid by the Home Office to deport him by lodging an appeal with the immigration tribunal service. Details are scarce about that tribunal, but we can make a few educated guesses. Very likely, he was funded in that appeal by public money. (Possibly, he will have been supported by one of the charities that received £209 million in government grants since 2020 that lobbied against the previous government’s Rwanda Bill.) Very likely, the question that was being litigated when he tried to kill Mr Potoczek was not whether Shorsh had arrived here illegally (he had), nor whether he was a danger to public safety (clearly he was), but whether Kurdistan, his country of origin, was safe enough for him to be sent to, or some other human rights concern. It is very unlikely that the tribunal considered whether or not his presence in Britain benefited the country.
Nevertheless, four years after committing a sex crime, and six years after he entered Britain illegally, Shorsh remained in Britain. This failure of our asylum system almost led to an innocent postman being killed.
What’s worse is that this is far from an isolated incident. Few can have forgotten the case of the Clapham attacker, Abdul Ezedi, who attacked a mother and her two young children with a corrosive substance in south London earlier this year, before drowning himself in the Thames. Ezedi, incredibly, had been granted asylum on his third attempt after a questionable conversion to Christianity, despite having already committed two sexual offences in the UK.
Or take the monster Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai, who in Bournemouth in 2022 stabbed to death a 21-year-old aspiring marine, Thomas Roberts. The litany of system failures that led up to Roberts’ tragic death is too long to list here, but as Tom Slater has put it, the ‘cascade of ineptitude and inaction is staggering’. On his way to Britain, Abdulrahimzai had murdered two Afghans with an AK-47 while in Serbia, and having lied about his age, ended up being put into a school in Poole in year ten where he roamed the corridors with a knife. Inexplicably, the Home Office has been spared an inquest into the death, a decision Roberts’ family say feels like ‘a cover-up’.
Indeed, it seems the dangers our asylum system is inflicting on the public are far from a priority for much of our political class. When it comes to illegal migration, Sir Keir Starmer simply bleats about ‘smashing the gangs’ that cross the Channel, a token policy, as many have pointed out, that fails to reckon with the enormous pull factors that bring illegal migrants to the country in the first place.
Or take the permanent secretary of the Home Office, Matthew Rycroft, who scarcely seems to share the major public concern about immigration and asylum. When he isn’t meeting civil servants to talk about transgender issues or writing the foreword for his department’s ‘Race Action Plan’, he is busy explaining to staff that the Home Office’s priorities are to ‘expand global talent visa routes’ and support victims of the Windrush scandal. When asked at a select committee last year about the number of deportations carried about by the Home Office, the top mandarin was unable to provide an answer. Little wonder that recent research has found that more than one in 100 people living in Britain is an illegal migrant, the highest per capita in Europe.
Yet think of the moralising outrage at any suggestion Britain might speed up this deportation process by leaving the ECHR – an outrage shared by much of the Tory party. It is telling that when a Remainer luminary like Dominic Grieve hotly denounces leaving the ECHR, he argues that it will reduce the UK’s ‘soft power’ and the ‘standards of behaviour you should expect from a civilised state’. Questions of border security, public safety and the national interest, it seems, don’t quite make the list.
That should worry us all. Unless these concerns become top priorities for our political class, the public will continue to suffer the consequences of violent thugs like Brwa Shorsh roaming the streets.
 
People should not use colloquial phrases like “a piece of cake” and “kill two birds with one stone” because they are “very British-English” and may not be understood by foreigners
As always, it's up to us to adapt to them. The onus is never on the people entering the country to just learn what the basic common phrases that we've been saying for decades (if not centuries) mean, no- we all must expunge them from our collective vocabulary in order to make our new friends feel comfortable.

They don't have to integrate with our culture and language, we have to integrate with theirs. Sounds about right.
 
Last edited:
Back