State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Father Balldo]

Occam's Razor: he's lying.

 

[Strix454]

Who are the other "people" (yes, plural) who reported the DRUGS that Pomplun is supposedly protecting? I think Nick may have told on himself. The issue is that Nick combines truth and lies.

(1) Nick is claiming that the stories in the search warrant came from a different set of people than were mentioned in the search warrant. That the police conspired to hide the true sources of the stories by attributing them to people in the church.

That is just total conspiracy bullshit. Its not worth treating seriously.

(2) Nick claims that the complaints that led to the search warrant had nothing to do with drugs (or presumably the kids). That the people involved just saw Nick's public swinger relationship and got upset about it.

All the documented materials as per the search warrant and the CPS material don't support this at all.

(3) They were nerds. They didn't know which drug I was on so the search warrant is invalid.

As with his motions and appeals during the criminal case, you have to wonder if Nick has actually read let alone understood the search warrant and probable cause documents. He seems to be imagining a different narrative into them. The probable cause is for the drug search warrant was done in a clear way in the warrant.

(4) No, many of the people who reported us, many of them, there was like four they weren't from our church at all uh but they just they said that they were Church congregants to obscure their identities but their identities are revealed in all the recorded interviews so like I know who it was I know who said everything.

We know the ones mentioned in the warrant. As far as I remember, we know also know the witness list for the prosecution. There is no extra gang of four in any of that material. What he may be referencing is additional interviews done by the prosecution or people who came forward after the arrests. But none of this seems in any way related to the search warrant.

This is all kind of dumb in that its Nick's usual "trust me I'm the only source of the real facts" nonsense. If the police or the prosecution were misrepresenting the identity of people making statements, you would kinda think that would have been mentioned in Nick's motions. But its not.

(5) A small group of people uh from our personal lives who didn't approve of something they weren't even sure was going on they're like we have to get the children up but they had no idea about the drugs that was all a surprise. Like, wait, so what'you report us for you reported us for sinning?

No Nick. By the documents we have, they reported you because your kids were hungry and wearing dirty clothes. As far as drugs go, you can read your own probable cause to understand exactly who and how it was concluded you were probably doing drugs. Its also worth saying that by the time people were starting to report you, you had lost 50+ pounds of body weight. You looked like a strung out junkie. You looked like shit. So did your wife.

He is also still obsessed over who knew specifically that he was doing drugs and thinking that he can defeat the case that way. He still doesn't understand that the state doesn't have prove drug use. It has to prove possession.

Overall, I think what Nick is doing here is trying to tie other people police or prosecutors may have talked to with the probable cause in the search warrant. He is also tryiing to confuse what the probable cause for the search warrant was and to bring in all sorts of material that isn't really meaningful. Maybe this is the direction he would have gone in if he had been successful in going beyond the four courts of the warrant itself.

But it wouldn't have worked anymore than his motions or his appeals did. Its like he still stubbornly refuses to accept that the search warrant and probable cause were really solid.

 

[AnOminous]

If Nick is to be believed, at least two OTHER people reported the drugs. He claims he will reveal who they are.

Do it faggot.

Also who gives a fuck? Everyone including Nick has acknowledged he is a giant drug addict who snorted "mountains" of cocaine (his word). So there were six witnesses instead of the four ones, according to this cocksucking fairy whore's lie-hole. Who cares? That just means there were even more people who reported this rip-snorting cock-hungry faggot homo.

What is this queer even trying to achieve with this new lie?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

@Potentially Criminal As our go to lawyer with actual real world experience. Is it legal to lowkey "threaten" witnesses interviewed by police with making their involvement in a case public?

No documents were filed that show their names, videos of interviews would have been discovery material, but since the case is not going forward and the material/witnesses won't be used (EDIT: Assuming the plea is accepted), I would guess the investigative material is not going to be public either, meaning the names of those witnesses are NOT public at all.

Is Nick threatening to publish material that is private/confidential?
All this of course under the condition that what Nick is saying is actually true and there ARE additional witnesses interviewed we do not know about.

 

[Strix454]

All this of course under the condition that what Nick is saying is actually true and there ARE additional witnesses interviewed we do not know about.

We have the search warrant and the probable cause related to it. These extra names Nick is talking about do not seem related to them in any way. Rather than witnesses, what (at best) is being discussed here is investigative communications or interviews the police or prosecution did in the course of the case. Material that has to be disclosed to the defense. But not necessarily material that is meaningful in the case or the prosecution of the case.

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

Occam's Razor: he's lying.

Common sense: he's lying and a faggot.

 

[AnOminous]

But it wouldn't have worked anymore than his motions or his appeals did. Its like he still stubbornly refuses to accept that the search warrant and probable cause were really solid.

Hey Nick. It's OVER. You LOST.

Your place to make these arguments was in court. Where you LOST. Like the fucking LOSER you are. That's what LOSERS do. They LOSE.

Your impotent coping and seething accomplishes NOTHING.

Just face the fact you're a fucking criminal and pled guilty to a FELONY for your CRIMES.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

We have the search warrant and the probable cause related to it. These extra names Nick is talking about do not seem related to them in any way. Rather than witnesses, what (at best) is being discussed here is investigative communications or interviews the police or prosecution did in the course of the case. Material that has to be disclosed to the defense. But not necessarily material that is meaningful in the case or the prosecution of the case.

Witnesses for the probable cause affidavit related to the search warrant is one thing, but witnesses interviewed in the process of the investigation into the drug possession, unsecured gun, child neglect AND the entirely independent CHIPS case are totally different.

We only know about SOME of the witnesses because of the search warrant and the affidavit. We know nothing about all other interviews that happened during the investigations into both cases since the discovery material is NOT public.
I would expect a lot more people to have been contacted and talked to, and if they had something to contribute as first-hand knowledge to be invited for an interview.

Nick threatening to publish their names, which he learned from the discovery material, is not going to go over well with the judge.

[EDIT] It is also very ironic that Nick thinks the fact that even MORE people talked to the police because his kids were stinky and the parents drug addicts is somehow making him look better.

 

[AnOminous]

[EDIT] It is also very ironic that Nick thinks the fact that even MORE people talked to the police because his kids were stinky and the parents drug addicts is somehow making him look better.

It's utterly incomprehensible what's going on in the charred brain of this witless, drug addled skelly. What the fuck does he think he's accomplishing with this bullshit?

Shouldn't he be busy lubing up for Monty, the next in the increasingly lengthy conga line of dudes waiting to fuck him in the ass?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Obligatory, IANAL.

After looking into data privacy law in Minnesota it appears that if the case was over Nick could actually publish the identities of the witnesses, unless they previously requested to NOT be made public, with the exception if Police decides that if there is no threat to the safety of the witness or their property then their identity can be made public anyway. (The investigative material would become public)

But the case against Nick is NOT inactive yet. And if I am reading this correctly the plea agreement would mean the case is on hold until the probationary conditions are fulfilled, meaning the case would remain active for the purpose of data privacy?!

So go ahead Nick, publish the names please you retarded faggot. Violate your plea with your revenge spree against all those evil snitches.

 

[Swole McPole]

Some speculation on the plural other "people"

Follow the money. (Or in this case, follow the cocaine.)

- The whores he was driving into the city to get handjobs from? He'd been paying them in coke but lost interest when he started banging April?
- The nigger drug dealers who were selling him coke at retail prices before he got the wholesale hook up? Some poor sap was coining it hand over fist selling Nick grams, when all of a sudden, somebody introduces him to the ounce guy. Why you wanna take food out of his babies mouth like that?

Heh. I kid. Of course it was the people from the church. If he doesn't have a dick in his mouth, he's lying.

 

[Melty Butter]

What is this queer even trying to achieve with this new lie?

That is just total conspiracy bullshit. Its not worth treating seriously.

Are you both sure it was a lie? I think he may have self-sabotaged (i.e. more people reported than we thought) in his ass-backward, whippet-warped effort to take down Aaron.

Like, cool, cool, Nick... MORE people than we even thought reported your ass for being a disgusting parent and addict.

I mean, yes, he could be conflating the pre-arrest probable cause warrant with the post-arrest investigation, explained below.

Nick threatening to publish their names, which he learned from the discovery material, is not going to go over well with the judge.

Aaron's never denied that he spoke with police after the arrest.

I just think it's interesting if 2+ people unrelated to the church reported before the arrest. He doesn't have many IRL friends apart from that church that I can think of. Also, wouldn't Pomplun have mentioned 2 other anonymous sources?

(Fwiw, Dan Woltjer, Kayla's bio dad, is not a church member, along with at least 1-2 of her foster siblings and 1-2 of the kids in the homeschool.... And there's always Drex.)

 

[Captain Manning]

Occam's Razor: he's lying.

That is just total conspiracy bullshit. Its not worth treating seriously.

This.

(2) Nick claims that the complaints that led to the search warrant had nothing to do with drugs (or presumably the kids). That the people involved just saw Nick's public swinger relationship and got upset about it.

All the documented materials as per the search warrant and the CPS material don't support this at all.

Not only that, but "swinging" is not a penal code violation in the State of Minnesota. Or like... anywhere in the U.S... that I know of. I already pointed out in the other thread they repealed their adultery statute a couple of years ago. Which, like many states, they probably never even enforced much in the first place. If at all.

Like holy shit, this faggot wants people to believe they swore out a warrant because the church was moral fagging? And the cops just went along with it and got lucky on the drugs?

Get fucked Nick. Lying fag. This is stupid, and anybody who believes him should kill themselves immediately and stop polluting the gene pool. He should just be laughed at and called a fag. Faggot Nick.

Do it faggot.

Also who gives a fuck? Everyone including Nick has acknowledged he is a giant drug addict who snorted "mountains" of cocaine (his word). So there were six witnesses instead of the four ones, according to this cocksucking fairy whore's lie-hole. Who cares? That just means there were even more people who reported this rip-snorting cock-hungry faggot homo.

What is this queer even trying to achieve with this new lie?

Whoever he names will be hailed as a hero by me.

If he even names anybody. Which I doubt. This is just more bullshit. His mouth is moving.

Are you both sure it was a lie? I think he may have self-sabotaged (i.e. more people reported than we thought) in his ass-backward, whippet-warped effort to take down Aaron.

If he's angling to pin this on Aaron, who cares?

That would actually make Aaron look GOOD. This is the dumbest shit ever. It wasn't a childless home.

Yes, one of Aaron's reasons to report would be to get back at Nick, but so what?

You know, my mother taught me a very important lesson once. It doesn't matter so much why you ultimately do the right thing, as long as you do the right thing. It could be because you're afraid God will strike you down with a bolt of lightning. Whatever.

There were kids involved.

 

[Strix454]

Are you both sure it was a lie? I think he may have self-sabotaged (i.e. more people reported than we thought) in his ass-backward, whippet-warped effort to take down Aaron.

I'm reasonably sure that his version of the story and how he is telling it is a lie. There could be grains of truth in there, but they are small grains surrounded by a whole lot of distortion.

One big reason I think its a series of lies is that he never brought any of it up during the legal process. And in the motions they were pushing every sort of desperate thing they could. His version of the story includes (as usual) serious accusations of police misconduct. He was trying to infer that the testimony behind the search warrant did not originate from the persons named in the search warrant material.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I'm reasonably sure that his version of the story and how he is telling it is a lie. There could be grains of truth in there, but they are small grains surrounded by a whole lot of distortion.

One big reason I think its a series of lies is that he never brought any of it up during the legal process. And in the motions they were pushing every sort of desperate thing they could. His version of the story includes (as usual) serious accusations of police misconduct. He was trying to infer that the testimony behind the search warrant did not originate from the persons named in the search warrant material.

I think the truth in that story is that further people were questioned by police as witnesses and Nick is construing their witness statements as "people who came forward to report him".
Everything Nick says is 1% truth and 99% retarded faggotry made up by Nick in an last ditch Volkssturm-like attempt to save himself and spin the narrative.

 

[Captain Manning]

One big reason I think its a series of lies is that he never brought any of it up during the legal process. And in the motions they were pushing every sort of desperate thing they could. His version of the story includes (as usual) serious accusations of police misconduct. He was trying to infer that the testimony behind the search warrant did not originate from the persons named in the search warrant material.

He's trying to get out from under the fact that the church people were concerned about the kids.

Because he knows that is what sinks him. Way more so than the drugs.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

That the people involved just saw Nick's public swinger relationship and got upset about it.

So....the police were granted a warrant on the grounds that adults were having consensual sex? If Nick reaches any farther he'll be touching the stratosphere.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

If Nick reaches any farther he'll be touching the stratosphere.

He is already in outer space huffing the Galaxy Gas.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

If the cocaine use stretches as far back as we assume, then the list could be excessively long.
Geno, Keanu come to mind who will likely have known about it, Chrissy Mayr likely also knew, since Nick supposedly tried to talked her into having sex with him. Then there are a multitude of other people Nick has hung out with over the last 2 years and likely did drugs and/or had sex with.

Anyone of those could have called the police and reported his unhinged Stream.

Then every local from the St. Cloud area who watches STMS who has some personal connection to April (who was known to be living with Nick at the time) or to Nick/Kayla and/or their children could have called Kandiyohi county police after seeing Aaron discuss the coke stream on the next day during his morning show.

The list of POSSIBLE people to have known about the drug use and have had the motivation to either harm Nick because of personal animosity OR people legitimately concerned for the wellbeing of the children in that house is VERY excessive.

I would be surprised if the total number of people who reported Nick wasn't higher than the supposed 4+2 we are now at.
Also of note is that Aaron was NOT one of the reporters, but was interviewed after they saw his stream and figured out he had personal and DIRECT knowledge of the situation, resulting in contacting him as a witness.

Supposedly (per Coomalot and others) EVERYONE totally for real knew about TEH DRUGZ! Per Nick, he never hid his degeneracy, and he left breadcrumbs for people to follow. HE WANTED YOU TO KNOW!

Add to the list of those perhaps 'in the know': Brittany Venti, Chrissy Mayr, AnnaTSWG, Xia Anderson, and Elijah Schaefer--all women that Nick wanted to have sex with.

Occam's Razor: he's lying.

This is equally probable.

What is this queer even trying to achieve with this new lie?

To salvage some social credit by stopping his attacks on the church where his children are involved--and he must be to some limited extent? Is he learning that shitting where he eats is a bad idea?

Probably not, but some social pressure might explain this. Or... you know... lies...

 

[Biggus McDickus]

I'm assuming that we cannot get the bodycam footage, even for public reasons or for police corruption checks. If that's the case and it doesn't get published or indeed leaked somehow, I won't be too mad by it. I'll just be disappointed. But it is my firm belief that it IS in the public interest to be shown, as this skelly freak gets to lie about his case, the evidence, and STILL gets to do a plea deal, (barring the acceptance).

This does not sit right with me. In a time where peoples words on social media sites, in places around the World, get them actual jail time. We simultaneously have this lying cuckold spouting all kinds of bullshit about what happened to him publicly, even though he fully submitted to the courts and admitted it all.

Where's the accountability in all this? How can he be allowed to do say/do anything and still only get a slap on the wrist with him having the ability to gatekeep the one piece of footage that would either back up his claims or refute them?

He needs to be held accountable imo. He was a public figure. Allowing him to lie to the world on one hand, then kiss the judges hand and lick his boots for forgiveness on the other is wrong to me.