Single-Mother Hate thread

When was the last time a single mother committed a mass shooting in the USA?
Screenshot_20250307_123512_Chrome.jpg
"They don't deserve to die in the streets but also if they die in the streets then they deserve it"

India has an average IQ of 70 btw.
See, now you're just purposely missing the argument.
 
That wasn't my question, Norman Bates. How many mass shooters have been single mothers?
Indirectly SMs cause a lot of trouble like gang violence
No one is doubting intact families are better than separated families. If you think those kids that are already in bad situations won't start shooting if they can't even eat then you're retarded.
They do that already even with the current welfare state.
 
How manubof those were raised by SM?

They are indirectly causing many of them.
Boys need to be raised by men. I agree. Making it to where men have no incentive to raise their boys isn't a solution. It would make the problem worse.
Encourage broader self defense laws then stop rewarding SMs. The problem will be solved in a few generations.
The government wouldn't last even 1 generation. Revolution would destroy the country.
 
weird how the blame isn't on the shitmales for not taking responsibility for their progeny like the mothers have to. :thinking:
Because, believe it or not (I know you'll say not but I digress) in most conservative circles (no, andrew tate or online weirdos do not count), the dialog is the inverse.

The majority of the discussion revolves around how the men that abandon these women are terrible people who are awful weak men that should be regarded with contempt, while the women are innocent victims who didn't know any better and are real saints for raising the children by themselves, and of course shouldnt have any criticism or side eye.

Im not going to defend the men that abandon the women they get pregnant here, but around me and many others, thats the only side of the discussion that is had. When it comes to the single mom's responsibility, it is at best, not disscussed.

Ultimately, at the end of the day, it takes two to tango so to speak. You cannot even begin to address, let alone solve the issue, if you talk only about one and not the two. The men and women in these scenarios are both at fault in different ways for different reasons, and should be held accountable.
 
Boys need to be raised by men. I agree. Making it to where men have no incentive to raise their boys isn't a solution. It would make the problem worse.
End the welfare support for SMs and the smarter ones (or at least the ones with family) would not get in the situation where they become SMs
The government wouldn't last even 1 generation. Revolution would destroy the country.
SMs are lazy and they won't start shit, they'd expect men to do the fighting for them. Their offsprings would be too unstable to properly form a resistance.
I agree that in an ideal world single mothers wouldn’t exist but we don’t. Shit happens.
End the Welfare state for SMs. Future women would make smarter choices.
By your own logic, single mothers are less dangerous than NEETs, incels, and white men.
Look up the stats at the prison population raised by SMs. They're the ones causing a lot of violent crimes.
 
End the welfare support for SMs and the smarter ones (or at least the ones with family) would not get in the situation where they become SMs
Do you not understand that most of human history men would kill other men that left their daughters with children? The only thing stopping fathers from killing men that walk away from pregnet women is the government. If it isn't their father's it'll be their uncles, grandfathers, brothers etc.
SMs are lazy and they won't start shit, they'd expect men to do the fighting for them. Their offsprings would be too unstable to properly form a resistance.
refer to above
End the Welfare state for SMs. Future women would make smarter choices.
Do you think our government could end welfare it wouldn't? It does welfare because it has to.
Look up the stats at the prison population raised by SMs. They're the ones causing a lot of violent crimes.
I've said intact families are better than separated families like 4 times in this thread. Dude we all know.

Dude read a history book. step outside. You know a puddle's worth about politics and how human being operate in the real world.
 
Do you not understand that most of human history men would kill other men that left their daughters with children?
That's a good thing, actually.

The only thing stopping fathers from killing men that walk away from pregnet women is the government. If it isn't their father's it'll be their uncles, grandfathers, brothers etc.
Good. Let's bring it back. It would encourage men to prevent the women on their lives to stop picking shitty men.

Do you think our government could end welfare it wouldn't? It does welfare because it has to.
The Great Society has only existed since the LBJ administration amd since then single motherhood has gotten worst. Welfare should only be temporary and the person receiving it should understand the money is coming from his neighbors.
I've said intact families are better than separated families like 4 times in this thread. Dude we all know.
And your support for SM prevent the formula of stable families in many cases.
 
That's a good thing, actually.
Or we can just make those men work and support their children? If you're ok with killing them why not let them live and work as slaves of the state?
The Great Society has only existed since the LBJ administration amd since then single motherhood has gotten worst. Welfare should only be temporary and the person receiving it should understand the money is coming from his neighbors.
The first no-fault divorce was passed by governor Ronald Regan. Sure welfare should only be used by people who need it until gainful employment can be found. What does this have to do with single mothers?
And your support for SM prevent the formula of stable families in many cases.
What does "support for single mothers" mean? I want as few single mothers as possible. It isn't always their fault. When single mothers are stupid, the man is even stupider.
 
just a reminder that it's not the men being stuck with the kids, it's almost always the mothers. it's so easy for moids, especially the sexless incels in this thread, to talk shit about something they literally do not and will not experience.

until moids take accountability, and no, that doesn't mean paying a fucking pittance in child support, moids can sit their asses down and cope and seethe about women who got laid with somebody other than them.
 
Or we can just make those men work and support their children? If you're ok with killing them why not let them live and work as slaves of the state?
The state shouldn't involve itself with irrespective mothers. That should be the job of the men in her family
The first no-fault divorce was passed by governor Ronald Regan. Sure welfare should only be used by people who need it until gainful employment can be found. What does this have to do with single mothers?
Great Society caused the explosion in SMs in the black community by making it more profitable to be a SM.
What does "support for single mothers" mean? I want as few single mothers as possible. It isn't always their fault. When single mothers are stupid, the man is even ststupider.
if you think SM deserve government money just for having a kid then you support the existence of SMs.
until moids take accountability, and no, that doesn't mean paying a fucking pittance in child support, moids can sit their asses down and cope and seethe about women who got laid with somebody other than them.
Why should any man take responsibility for a kid that isn't his? Women are the best who picks these men, so they should be the ones to fix their own problems.
 
Back