Toothp!ck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That wasn't my question, Norman Bates. How many mass shooters have been single mothers?
No one is doubting intact families are better than separated families. If you think those kids that are already in bad situations won't start shooting, if they can't even eat, then you're retarded.
Indirectly SMs cause a lot of trouble like gang violenceThat wasn't my question, Norman Bates. How many mass shooters have been single mothers?
They do that already even with the current welfare state.No one is doubting intact families are better than separated families. If you think those kids that are already in bad situations won't start shooting if they can't even eat then you're retarded.
Yes, intact families are better than separated familesIndirectly SMs cause a lot of trouble like gang violence
It. would. get. worse.They do that already even with the current welfare state.
So NEETs, incels, and white men have committed mass shootings... but not one single mother, which you insist are more dangerous. Your position makes no sense. How many bodies have you snatched. Mr. Gein?Indirectly SMs cause a lot of trouble like gang violence
How manubof those were raised by SM?So NEETs, incels, and white men have committed mass shootings
They are indirectly causing many of them.but not one single mother, which you insist are more dangerous.
Encourage broader self defense laws then stop rewarding SMs. The problem will be solved in a few generations.It. would. get. worse.
Boys need to be raised by men. I agree. Making it to where men have no incentive to raise their boys isn't a solution. It would make the problem worse.How manubof those were raised by SM?
They are indirectly causing many of them.
The government wouldn't last even 1 generation. Revolution would destroy the country.Encourage broader self defense laws then stop rewarding SMs. The problem will be solved in a few generations.
Yeah but it’s not always their fault. I agree that in an ideal world single mothers wouldn’t exist but we don’t. Shit happens.Because their kids end up causing problems for the rest of us.
By your own logic, single mothers are less dangerous than NEETs, incels, and white men.How manubof those were raised by SM?
Because, believe it or not (I know you'll say not but I digress) in most conservative circles (no, andrew tate or online weirdos do not count), the dialog is the inverse.weird how the blame isn't on the shitmales for not taking responsibility for their progeny like the mothers have to.![]()
End the welfare support for SMs and the smarter ones (or at least the ones with family) would not get in the situation where they become SMsBoys need to be raised by men. I agree. Making it to where men have no incentive to raise their boys isn't a solution. It would make the problem worse.
SMs are lazy and they won't start shit, they'd expect men to do the fighting for them. Their offsprings would be too unstable to properly form a resistance.The government wouldn't last even 1 generation. Revolution would destroy the country.
End the Welfare state for SMs. Future women would make smarter choices.I agree that in an ideal world single mothers wouldn’t exist but we don’t. Shit happens.
Look up the stats at the prison population raised by SMs. They're the ones causing a lot of violent crimes.By your own logic, single mothers are less dangerous than NEETs, incels, and white men.
Single moms is such a broad group. I am not going to throw widows under the bus because I don't like Sharon who decided to end her 10 year marriage by fucking the plumber.End the Welfare state for SMs. Future women would make smarter choices.
Do you not understand that most of human history men would kill other men that left their daughters with children? The only thing stopping fathers from killing men that walk away from pregnet women is the government. If it isn't their father's it'll be their uncles, grandfathers, brothers etc.End the welfare support for SMs and the smarter ones (or at least the ones with family) would not get in the situation where they become SMs
refer to aboveSMs are lazy and they won't start shit, they'd expect men to do the fighting for them. Their offsprings would be too unstable to properly form a resistance.
Do you think our government could end welfare it wouldn't? It does welfare because it has to.End the Welfare state for SMs. Future women would make smarter choices.
I've said intact families are better than separated families like 4 times in this thread. Dude we all know.Look up the stats at the prison population raised by SMs. They're the ones causing a lot of violent crimes.
Absolutely not. I will continue to make ever increasing, over-exaggerated and hyperbolic mental models of strangers on the Internet then apply them to everyone else.Why, it's almost as if... you should treat people as individuals?
That's a good thing, actually.Do you not understand that most of human history men would kill other men that left their daughters with children?
Good. Let's bring it back. It would encourage men to prevent the women on their lives to stop picking shitty men.The only thing stopping fathers from killing men that walk away from pregnet women is the government. If it isn't their father's it'll be their uncles, grandfathers, brothers etc.
The Great Society has only existed since the LBJ administration amd since then single motherhood has gotten worst. Welfare should only be temporary and the person receiving it should understand the money is coming from his neighbors.Do you think our government could end welfare it wouldn't? It does welfare because it has to.
And your support for SM prevent the formula of stable families in many cases.I've said intact families are better than separated families like 4 times in this thread. Dude we all know.
Or we can just make those men work and support their children? If you're ok with killing them why not let them live and work as slaves of the state?That's a good thing, actually.
The first no-fault divorce was passed by governor Ronald Regan. Sure welfare should only be used by people who need it until gainful employment can be found. What does this have to do with single mothers?The Great Society has only existed since the LBJ administration amd since then single motherhood has gotten worst. Welfare should only be temporary and the person receiving it should understand the money is coming from his neighbors.
What does "support for single mothers" mean? I want as few single mothers as possible. It isn't always their fault. When single mothers are stupid, the man is even stupider.And your support for SM prevent the formula of stable families in many cases.
The state shouldn't involve itself with irrespective mothers. That should be the job of the men in her familyOr we can just make those men work and support their children? If you're ok with killing them why not let them live and work as slaves of the state?
Great Society caused the explosion in SMs in the black community by making it more profitable to be a SM.The first no-fault divorce was passed by governor Ronald Regan. Sure welfare should only be used by people who need it until gainful employment can be found. What does this have to do with single mothers?
if you think SM deserve government money just for having a kid then you support the existence of SMs.What does "support for single mothers" mean? I want as few single mothers as possible. It isn't always their fault. When single mothers are stupid, the man is even ststupider.
Why should any man take responsibility for a kid that isn't his? Women are the best who picks these men, so they should be the ones to fix their own problems.until moids take accountability, and no, that doesn't mean paying a fucking pittance in child support, moids can sit their asses down and cope and seethe about women who got laid with somebody other than them.