- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
Didn't Gilman overlap with some deadlines?
Doe v. Lombardo definitely did. I forgot it was in the other thread where we were talking about it, I had posted screenshots of the dates of his filings:
Speaking of Greer attempting to intervene in other cases, as I think we were in the past day or so, his attempt to do so was denied last week in Doe v. Lombardo (Feb 20). See previously:
It's worth noting that he was VERY active in his attempts to intervene in the case through last year, including when he was supposed to be working on his own case in which he is the moving party:
View attachment 7028216View attachment 7028217View attachment 7028219View attachment 7028222View attachment 7028224View attachment 7028229
Nobody involved in the case, especially Plaintiff, appeared to desire Greer's intervention as Defendant, based on various replies/responses. The judge's remarks and footnotes in denial of his intervention are fun and hopefully Hardin is (or can be made aware) of all this jazz (especially as to Greer's attempts "to raise immaterial issues and to launch an unwarranted and unprofessional personal attack against" opposing counsel):
View attachment 7028252View attachment 7028264
View attachment 7028244View attachment 7028267
P.S. Gilman was also a defendant in this case. Funny.
December 9 was the same day our Magistrate ordered him to show cause for why he shouldn't have to pay Hardin's fees the first time around on his Rule 26 fuckery.