Good. This makes a cross-appeal pretty much de rigeur. It wouldn't have been worth niggling around with before now, so there's at least a chance the obvious abuse of discretion by the trial court will be reversed, a rational amount of sanctions actually based on a legitimate lodestar (instead of tard judge asspull) will be imposed, and Russ will also be taxed with at least the costs for his frivolous appeal.
The Judge is clearly committed to eating the nuggets out of Russell's ass hair until judgement day and trumpets sound.
Dare we to dream that this slack-jawed faggot somehow snatches defeat from the jaws of victory and turns his $1000 blessing back into a $5000 foot up the ass?
How much in fees are we looking at? Last time some firm carried his tard ass for free. This time he's alone. I think it might cost more than paying Josh the $700.
Because Greer always believes what Hardin tells him. The only external communications he takes seriously and without question are random protonmail emails calling him a faggot.
If you think an appellate court is going to give anything but the most leeway to the District Court on an abuse of discretion standard when a pro se litigant with pro se screeds are involved, you're dreaming. The only reason that the Court of Appeals might even pay attention to what Greer is saying is that his writings are on the comparably better side of pro se briefs that I've seen. I don't know how the Tenth Circuit handles it internally, but in other circuits this will be a non-oral argument (e.g. a "screener") case with a staff attorney's draft opinion included and basically ready for docketing with the panel's approval. Likely the only people who will take the time to read Greer's retarded ramblings and think there's something going on here deserving attention will be a staff attorney, Hardin, and us. And the staff attorney is just going to go by the book, not do justice.
I HAD assets, but I donated them all to Null's legal fund.
He should have just asked the judge for the bond to be yet another respectful attempt to woo Taylor Swift (possibly with a lawsuit)
Let's not forget that RusselRusstard thinks that taking 10% means lobbing off the $700, resulting in 74.75 instead of shifting the decimal to the left which would result in 77.47. He can't even math
View attachment 7081773
His reason is that he's a lying liar who lies. He doesn't have $750 to pay his sanction to Null and the deadline is rapidly approaching.
Yes. It's probably not worth appealing over on its own. But Hardin/Null did preserve the issue for appeal.
Did he fly? I thought he refused to get on planes?
Russ's "beliefs" are completely irrelevant. This is a discovery sanction, not a bad faith sanction. The only things that matter are he fucked around in discovery, forced the other side to compel it, and he lost. Loser pays, it's an automatic, mechanical rule with no discretion other than as to the amount.
