- Joined
- Aug 7, 2024
You do know that, unless youre a broke retard like Russ, filing costs money right? Why the fuck would Null waste resources intervening in a bunch of bullshit that doesnt directly benefit the actual case that matters?
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
1)Even at Mr Hardin's generous rates you'd still be looking at thousands of dollars a time to do this
2)The judge is unlikely to give a shit about Hardin pointing out Russ has other cases he should be dealing with, since they're not his business.
3)It's already fun watching him tilt at windmills, why waste money when we can do it for free?
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. (Besides which, all the ones we know about were denied or dismissed as moot.)
That reminds me, there's a funny bit from the Charleston v Nevada case docket. The defendants moved to dismiss, then Greer filed to intervene as a defendant. The court granted the motion to dismiss and denied the intervention as moot. This was appealed and upheld over the next 1.5 years, with final notice being sent to all parties on Jan 4, 2021.
Take one guess who was the only party having trouble seeing that final notice because he gave a bad address.
6337 South Highland Dr.
#209
Holladay, UT 84121
The handwriting says "Box closed RTS" (return to sender).
Russ put that address on his motions from July-August 2019, and he was denied in October 2019. That means that was his official address on record with the court, and I don't see any returned mail between then and Jan 2021. "Copies have been distributed" was marked on documents entered Oct 2019, Dec 2019, Nov-Dec 2020, and finally Jan 4, 2021. But only that last document was marked as returned. This suggests Russ was officially using that box through Dec 2020, and it probably wasn't renewed into the new year.
Yet the address on the initial Complaint Russ filed in this suit, on Sept 24, 2020, was different. (It's actually a Post Office, so he got it right.)
The two cities are about 20 minutes apart. Maybe some Greer experts remember what his living situation was at the time, when or if he moved?
Either Russ paid for and checked two mailboxes at the same time, or he let one lapse and failed to update the court while an appeal was pending.
Interestingly, Russ also filed a change of address in this suit on Jan 4, 2021. That would have been from the West Jordan address, not to it. This suggests, but doesn't prove, that he had that box for some time while the Charleston case was in appeals, before switching to a third address. (I don't know what he changed it to, I don't have a PACER account.)
This indicates Russ clearly knows he needs to file a change of address whenever he switches boxes. But he didn't do it in the previous case, so on Jan 4, 2021 he was briefly known at 3 addresses across 2 court districts.
Yet the address on the initial Complaint Russ filed in this suit, on Sept 24, 2020, was different. (It's actually a Post Office, so he got it right.)
The two cities are about 20 minutes apart. Maybe some Greer experts remember what his living situation was at the time, when or if he moved?
Either Russ paid for and checked two mailboxes at the same time, or he let one lapse and failed to update the court while an appeal was pending.
Interestingly, Russ also filed a change of address in this suit on Jan 4, 2021. That would have been from the West Jordan address, not to it. This suggests, but doesn't prove, that he had that box for some time while the Charleston case was in appeals, before switching to a third address. (I don't know what he changed it to, I don't have a PACER account.)
This indicates Russ clearly knows he needs to file a change of address whenever he switches boxes. But he didn't do it in the previous case, so on Jan 4, 2021 he was briefly known at 3 addresses across 2 court districts.
Will this matter to this suit? Probably not, there's nothing illegal about having 2 PO boxes, and Greer can always claim pro se retardation about notifying the court in a case he was denied joining. Just another data point if the Court ever decides to take a hard look at Greer's history of address fuckery on this case.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2023
No wonder Hardin wanted a detailed legal history of Greer. Greer has done so much dumb bullshit it is hard to find everything. A couple weird interventions would likely slip through even if you were diligent about it.
That is one of the funny things to me. Despite Russ's legal training and vast legal experience he is still incredibly retarded and incapable of making a semi-decent filing. You know it is Russ and he will never learn, but subconsciously you keep expecting him to learn and he keeps failing to do so.
And he is incredibly slow at writing his filings. Retarded ESL children can write faster than this guy. We have had instances where he had to Rush and it showed with a filing even shittier than usual.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
RUSS FUCKING DID THE APPEAL!
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
Here we fucking go
I DIDN'T FUCK AROUND AND IF I DID IT WAS ONLY WORTH LESS THAN $500! SO.....
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2019
Judge does him a major favor by turning a $5K request into $1K and all Greer can say is "Give ya tree fiddy, and also the ruling was wrong"
Also his major excuse in this document is "Hardin doesn't need the money cause he agreed to moot my claim that I only started randomly harping on a year later"
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
So like if I find myself on a murder charge or some shit and am caught dead to rights I should basically just rent out some hookers to pay Russ to be my lawyer right? He's better than Rekeita!
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2024
Hes so fucking dumb, this asshole is drooling all over the judges face when he should be kissing his feet for not ordering the 5 000$.
Everytime I think Russ wont make his situation worse, he somehow pulls off a new move dumber than the last.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Now, can anyone tell me whether appellate costs and sanctions are inherently different or not?
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2023
I resent Greer's notion that we are all "insane [people] with no assets."
I have plenty assets, thank you very much.
I have plenty assets, thank you very much.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
And of course no Russ filing would be complete without mentioning that the 10th circuit is in the car and they're really pissed off, but if you give Greer what he wants, they promised they won't come in.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
"Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 62(d) entitles a party to a stay of a money judgement as a matter of right upon posting a bond."
O...kay? But this wasn't a money judgement, it was an order to to pay sanctions. That's not a judgement, right?
O...kay? But this wasn't a money judgement, it was an order to to pay sanctions. That's not a judgement, right?
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2023
Russtard thinks that taking 10% means lobbing off the $700, resulting in 74.75 instead of shifting the decimal to the left which would result in 77.47. He can't even math 
waffle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
Oh man, I'm hyped for the "Russ tries to post a bond" saga if nothing else.
Irene and 22 others
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2023
Is there any chance that Hardin can use this to argue that the $1,000 was inappropriate and that the appeals court decides to reinstate the original amount?
I'm assuming the appeals court will find some reason to toss this just so they don't have to deal with it, but my desire to see shitlips talk his way back into a $5,000 sanction outweighs any amount of
stickers I could possible receive.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
Come on judge hurry up and sentence Greer to death
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2019
Oh I didn't even notice that, but I guess 9.6% is close enough for Greer.Russtard thinks that taking 10% means lobbing off the $700, resulting in 74.75 instead of shifting the decimal to the left which would result in 77.47. He can't even math
View attachment 7081773
I still don't think there's any chance Greer is gonna be able to actually appeal the case to the 10th circuit when it finally gets dismissed. He has no idea what he's doing and they'll probably be more willing to tell him to fuck off till he figures out how to fill out the paperwork correctly. The only reason he got there last time was cause the DJF took the original appeal pro-bono.Is there any chance that Hardin can use this to argue that the $1,000 was inappropriate and that the appeals court decides to reinstate the original amount?
I'm assuming the appeals court will find some reason to toss this just so they don't have to deal with it, but my desire to see shitlips talk his way back into a $5,000 sanction outweighs any amount of
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2023
Could the judge come back and reimpose the originally proposed $5,000 that Hardin requested?