Roketsune / Darosne / Christian Crawford / Field Marshal Crappenburg - Pedophile Activist Furry, Kiwi Farms Member, Verbose Cunt, Furry Drama Investigator

  • Thread starter Thread starter GS 281
  • Start date Start date
  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Okay, so, there are so very many things to respond to that I'm going to respond in two posts. This one addresses things in the OP. The next will address everyone else's stuff.

As an aside, I wish I had gotten more Deviant ratings for my introduction. Or at least more Autistic ones. I really deserve those ratings.



I find this extremely amusing and a source of pride. What caused me to be discovered wasn't my commentary on being hebephilic, my cub erotica, my often-times extremely incendiary political rants, or anything else lolcow-worthy. It was a tweet celebrating the return of this site. That is just so awesome. No other lolcow has such an absurd beginning.



I wrote a very lengthy Inkbunny journal on that as well (I'm baffled on how that was missed). It also includes tactical advice for those seeking treatment for sexual behaviors and compulsions, despite me being pro-reform (I don't like using the term "pro-contact" since it sounds too much like incitement).



I need to show him this thread. Anyway, yes, he has the same ideology I do.



I think there really is a link. Higher rates of gender and sexual nonconformity within the autistic demographic have been demonstrated (I don't have a study handy but I'm sure it's been proven), and I've personally observed that as well. And I'm also relatively sure the rate of autism within the brony and furry communities is at least 2x normal.



Tay actually doesn't engage in that much trolling. He has sadistic tendencies in some circumstances like I do, but he actually was doing little to no deliberate trolling before those waves of drama happened in December and January. I also don't engage in much trolling, but when I do often I expend more energy and am very strategic about it.



I haven't been there in approximately 8-12 months. Anyway, yes, it's for those -philes who are "boylovers" (I find the self-division within the MAP demographic to be fucking absurd, as an aside). However, that place and some others are 100% legal. Anyone who would post child porn or conspire to have sex with minors would be instantaneously banned with prejudice. Also, some of the users there are anti-reform, though how many I don't remember.



No, I didn't feel victimized by FN, though I was affronted by their abrupt reversal of their policy just to bolster their userbase and income, and shutting down of discussion about the obviously corrupted voting. I also perceived a potential continuing campaign which would target other sites and perhaps conventions. The whole debacle was precipitated by a group of fanatical anti-cub agitators who went to FN, forced their way through manipulation and mass demonstration, and then returned to FA anyway. The ringleader claimed responsibility for another victory earlier.

However, the main impetus for the investigation and final two journals wasn't the cub porn decision. The further I examined FN and its parent company, the more dishonesty, corruption, and ineptitude I saw. FN is overseen by the same people and company who oversee Bad Dragon, a company which is notorious for various reasons. FN seemed to be intended to become the ascendant power within furrydom, and had the apparent resources and leadership necessary to achieve that. Varka is worse than Dragoneer, only in different ways and for different reasons. I saw a threat to my subculture from within, so I put my talents to use in countering it. But I lacked the emotional stamina to promulgate my findings much, and FN seemed to return to inactivity and irrelevance despite all of the hype.



My SoFurry account is my literary showcase, actually. My better and more recent works are there. The cub smut (which consists of only three stories so far) is on both. I have been dispiritingly slow at writing fictional material over the last several months.

Also, the Darosne Inkbunny isn't mine. Some troll with too much time on his paws (I actually went to his group last Christmas and have managed to earn their respect) made it and promptly became bored. I guess it could have been a lot worse than stupid journals about being a femboy analyst or whatever. I've had a few trolling or impersonation incidents throughout the years, actually.



That second part is entirely incorrect. I never asserted he drew cub or human shotacon just to troll people. What I actually stated was some of the outrage towards him was engendered by his trolling, shitposting, and jokes directed to us, and people were making false assumptions as a result.
You seem to enjoy having been declared a lolcow. Why is that?
 
Time to vote! :julay:

http://www.strawpoll.me/12415078


Capture d’écran 2017-02-26 à 00.11.26.png
 
Hi A-Log!

Hello! I actually do admit to being A-Log. I harbor very malevolent feelings towards him and his mother. I really do like to watch them suffer.

It's like this dude wanted a thread of his own for shits and giggles.

You're pretty much correct. I actually seriously considered making my own thread at one point, but I decided to let someone like Yawning do it instead whenever I was discovered. I do like attention, especially if it's from a place I'm free to venture to and respond to people directly. And, let's face it, many of you want people like me to come and perform in their thread. This is a win-win situation.

I love how he believes that he might be a lolcow

Hey, at least I recognized that. By lolcow standards, that's a very high level of self-awareness!

He says he's learned from past mistakes.

Anyone know if he actually did try to diddle a kid?

That post on WrongPlanet was made in early February 2012, about halfway into a 45-day alcohol binge in an extended stay motel which ultimately persuaded me to sincerely seek help for my alcoholism (4 days from now is a special date for me on that front). So, while I was ingesting enough alcohol to KILL the average person, I decided it would be a swell idea to venture to a new place and introduce myself. This also was 5 years ago, when I was much less astute or diligent in written matters, and less perceptive in general. I frequently would combine two rather unrelated ideas (in this case, learning from mistakes, being honorable and not harming children) into the same sentence or paragraph and not bother reviewing the piece for more than typos before hitting Send. This instance of it was especially atrocious for obvious reasons.

So, that remark was the product of carelessness, literary immaturity, and catastrophic levels of alcohol. I was not alluding to sexual contact with children. I was merely trying to brag about how great I was morally in a very inept way while systematically destroying myself.

Once again, by openly mocking the farms, we have taken en interest into that person.

I was actually celebrating the return of Kiwi Farms, and before that I pretty much defended KF and sympathized with Null in a Twitter-based eulogy (though I knew its return was very plausible)

I feel bad for his therapist. Really bad.

Actually, he really likes me. He even told me last week he really liked working with me, after a frank talk about my childhood and a couple of other things. He's highly attentive and empathetic, and when he feels my knowledge on something is superior to his he's capitalized on it by asking me questions and recording the answers.

Roketsune has interacted with children before, non-sexually at least, and that alone is terrifying.

I was merely handing candy to children and adults in full view of the neighborhood. Because I had to concentrate on the process of dispensing candy and speaking, I could not really process or remember what any of them looked like. I also wasn't out there because children would be there. I was out there because I consider Halloween a kind of high holy holiday of furrydom and I wanted to celebrate it publicly. If only adults did trick-or-treating I still would have done it.

It's pretty much impossible to not have at least occasional superficial contact with children, and it's not much more feasible to not live near where they congregate (schools, parks, etc). I don't even have much capacity for attraction to actual humans whether they're children or adults. Additionally, I find interpersonal relations very stressful, and just generally hate humanity. What would I even be able to do with children sexually in public and fleeting scenarios, anyway?

Roketsune spergs out and makes an overly complicated post to explain how pedophilia is 'totally normal'.

I never asserted that. Pedophilia isn't normal. True pedophilia and hebephilia- a preference for prepubescent and peripubescent children, respectively- are actually highly unusual.

Being the curious Not A Brony that I am, I went to check out his old MLPForums profile.

Yes, I'm quite sure you have no fondness for MLP at all and you just volunteer for brony missions as part of your duty as a Kiwi Special Agent.

  • Calls himself a 'femboi' who identifies with twilight sparkle, rainbow dash, and rarity
  • He calls himself a 'strategist' in anything including social interaction (possibly admitting to being manipulative)
  • Is being evicted for the clothes he wears (Furry tails, paws, rainbow socks, and rave gear)
  • Poten. self diagnosed autism, anxiety, and OCD
Responding to those sequentially:

  • Mostly with Twilight Sparkle, as she's highly intelligent, articulate, and rational.
  • Ehh, not really. There's a complicated explanation to the whole tactician and strategist thing. The short explanation is, military history and strategy is my lifelong autistic fixation, and that combined with my tendency to be cautious, perceptive, and strategically minded cause me to label and view my approach to life in general as such. I actually strongly dislike being deceptive or manipulative.
  • That's not exactly what happened. I even have the landlord on tape admitting he didn't care what I wore outside the house (I don't wear tails and rave stuff as everyday indoor attire). The furry thing he just tried to exploit later on. The case was entirely one of gender-based discrimination (crossdressing). But it also forced me to improve my Home Front and now things as a result are better than ever, so I'm both indignant and grateful.
  • I was diagnosed with autism at 13 within a psychiatric hospital. I have an extensive record of anxiety in more recent years, and I should also have a diagnosis of OCD (intrusive thoughts and fears, so-called "purely obsessional") from years ago when it was an acute problem (for whatever reason the intense fears are rare and fleeting now).
I'm over 18; I think my backdoor is safe lol

I can be turned on by adults as well, actually!

I mean he outright admitted that he was okay with his status.

Oh, yeah. I definitely qualify for lolcow status, though I have many redeeming qualities and I don't mind being seen as strange or lolworthy.

he's still a fucking pedophile

I'm a fucking hebephile. How dare you mislabel me, you non-pedo neurotypical cishet scum?!

You can't come in, act polite and type out massive text walls defending an attraction to children. There's not going to be positive responses for that.

Right, and I plan on doing little of that here. It would not serve the needs or desires of myself or other Kiwis to endlessly fight over that or any other beliefs. A major reason I'm here is to make corrections or clarify when needed. A pedofur lolcow especially is liable to be quite misrepresented if there's no one there to counter rumors and presumptions.

...But maybe they could get some brownie points by starting with 'Let me preface this by stating I like the idea of fucking...'

I absolutely love @TranLord's thread. I was greatly amused by the waves of abject confusion, bewilderment, revulsion, and consternation from his inexplicable and inarticulate confession. It was made even more risible when he responded to someone asking why with "extreme indifference". And then someone with sexual ideology comparable to mine came in and casually set off new waves of the above reactions while most forgot about Tranlord. However, it ended on a note of mercy, introspection, and atonement when he admitted his post was an atrocious lapse in judgment and the thread was consequently locked. That's overall my favorite thread on KF.

It's just likely with his huge internet presence he knows how to deal with trolls expecting a response. But this brings new content instead. I wanna see him defend himself. Judging by his writing he's not stupid maybe. Just a pedo.

Thank you for the compliment. Yes, I don't think people who intend to troll me will be satisfied, while those mainly interested in more material about and from me will be quite pleased. I'm very familiar with trolling dynamics and the culture of the forums.

Alright, fess up, which of you is this guy's secret KF account?

You're OwO aren't you.

EDIT: or Katsu

Alright, I'll be honest. I'm actually the OP and I just decided to halal myself a couple of weeks ago for the lulz.

Being serious now, this forum has many furry regulars. Yawning, OwO, and Furrman I'm aware of, and of course there's me. If Katsu is one that'd be 5. If you count the brony then that's 6. This place is being systematically overrun by furries and transgenders.

What exactly do you hope to get out of this?

Mostly mutual joy, edification, and satisfaction. Also, to prevent wild rumors and presumptions from flourishing unopposed.

You seem to enjoy having been declared a lolcow. Why is that?

I am someone with a highly insular, dull, and uneventful life socially and in generally. This is honestly the most excitement and attention I've received since I was in school. I exaggerated a little in my OP, but honestly, having a bunch of drama purveyors I well understand and may freely respond to staring at and interrogating me is a rather noteworthy and exciting development. Also, I saw this development as inevitable, so I might as well take it in stride and have some goodnatured fun with it.

So many lolcows fail to realize that if they don't respond to a thread as if it's a declaration of war and instead venture here and truthfully and pleasantly address people, the audience will overall respect them and not behave as enemies. Being a lolcow can ultimately even be a boon in a few cases. Instead, most lolcows who react at all elect to go to war, and Kiwis will happily oblige them and prevail.

Legit question to subject of this thread, do you get off on being abused?

No, I'm not a masochist. Acrimonious retorts will invariably be highly inconsequential to me, and I'm confident that the proportion of such will decline as people become accustomed to and acquainted with me. If I thought there would be nothing but venom and aggression to be encountered here, I either wouldn't have come at all or I would have just stuck to responding to fallacies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you literally so desperate for attention you're quoting everyone here?

No. I merely was responding to everything which I felt warranted that, and there were many such items since I wasn't here for the first two weeks. I predict I won't usually need/feel compelled to give such massive series of replies in the future. I certainly hope I won't need to, anyway. All of this was mentally taxing.
 
I dress as if I'm going to a furry convention or Pride celebration whenever I leave the house. I'm often asked if I'm an entertainer for children or going to a special function, and I respond that's my normal fashion preference.
This seems to be a recurring motif with you-why are you so hell bent on broadcasting yourself like this? Surely going to buy groceries is just a 'pants-and-shirt' event. I understand that you are an attention whore, but you're going about it in a very unique way. And not necessarily a positive one.
And, of course, I am also a hebephile, though I very much gravitate towards drawn smut and my own fictional characters. RL humans aren't often attractive to me sexually or personally.
Do you believe that this is a symptom of your autism? It has been shown that autistic individuals lack 'appropriate' sex drives in varying ways (like being asexual in some cases or by being highly deviant). Having interest in 2D but not real people strikes me as a malformed sex drive. Also:
RL humans aren't often attractive to me sexually or personally.
Which means they sometimes are. From an admitted hebephile, this is slightly concerning. You can see why this is concerning, correct?
transgender (genderqueer femboy type
Dumb. Just call yourself a crossdresser or whatever. I would also like to call this a symptom of your autism, and I mean that in the most literal sense: your inability, due to your autism, to understand what it means to be X-gender.
From your InkBunny:
I have had two psychologists- people with Ph.Ds after their names- react with alarm by me disclosing to them preemptively I'm hebephilic. The first one insisted I sign a document before starting therapy pledging to report myself to her (who would then report me to police, she emphasized) if I offended. As I mentioned in the autism journal, the second one exclaimed just from me telling her my orientation, "There are children here!", as if I was possibly unable to control myself in the event I saw a child in the waiting room who I found sexually attractive. I think another therapist asked me if I was a zoophile as a result of the hebephilia declaration, in a very suspicious and condescending manner.
That's like being upset that someone who admits to being a rapist waltzing into a women's shelter. It's just a bad set up all around. Even if you, personally, will never molest any child, the fact remains that many of them can and will, and that will ruin at least one life. Their suspicion has nothing to do with YOU, personally. A therapist has no way to determine those who will offend from those who won't: they have to assume the worst. Same reason people who threaten to kill themselves, even if they're not actually going to, can be institutionalized for periods of time. Also, people who announce their deviancy is concerning in and of itself. It's no better than those daddy-littles who constantly post about their relationship. Why broadcast it?
So, when people insist we seek out a therapist for our perceived or real sexual disorders, I ask: To whom? For what? With what type of therapy? There literally are no options of that nature for me.
Agreed. However, you also mention that things like aversion therapy won't work: what do you WANT people to do about people like you? Therapy cannot work if the individual in question doesn't want to get better, and many people who convince themselves that they are normal and that this is fine and that the therapy is a waste of time.

It is expected that people who have self-control not to commit the crime; if you're not going to commit the crime, why would you discuss the desire to commit a crime (note I'm not talking about literally committing a crime here: I'm talking about how saying that XYZ is attractive, which therefore implies that you have the desire to consummate the sexual attraction in some fashion, either by molestation or by consumption of child porn, etc) by announcing it to the world? If you are sexually deviant, keep it in your bedroom, away from other people.
If you don't have such compulsions but you work with children or care for them, use the anonymous process and ask whether this paired with your orientation will cause them to even consider reporting you to police, or just don't mention this if it's not very pertinent.
You were discussing what services to use, and seeing as you admit to stating your hebephilia to your therapist, I can only assume that it is pertinent to your life. Not making yourself look wholesome, here.
In my experience, furrydom is an excellent venue relative to the general culture to conduct sexual exploration, attain sexual gratification through fictional means, and to find like-minded and like-attracted people. This also applies to matters of gender. Gender roles aren't recognized here and femboys are practically a furry-owned concept because of how hugely they're favored by furries and furry artists. A major reason I have fared as well as I have in general with regards to my orientations and gender identity is I have always had this subculture to explore in and fall back to. I don't socialize much outside furrydom, so most of the online bigotry people speak about I've been shielded from.
Translation: "we fetishize gender, much like we fetishize animals. I personally, however, try not to look at things from the perspectives of other people because it contradicts what I want to be true. If I hear anything I don't like, I'll either stick my fingers in my ears, ignore them, or try to insane troll logic my way into being the one who's correct."
The fundamental cause for people placing so many restrictions on sex and porn in general and with regards to children is sex is seen as this highly dangerous and wild instinct and form of pleasure, something we need to shield children from lest they harm themselves or we directly harm them. Obviously, that is true to a degree, since sexual behavior can cause STDs and pregnancies, and sexual behavior often leads to more intimate relations, which can be a very bad thing if one or both people are terrible. However, especially with such a super-massively rampant proliferation of information, severely criminalizing even the act of letting minors look at tame fictional porn is absurd and pointless. So many children are accessing porn and I think sexual abuse rates have been about the same, yet the myth persists that any and all porn is dangerous. We stigmatize sex more than violence, and this is frightening. I could show a child watch the Saw series and receive nowhere nearly as much hate as I would from showing that child pictures of naked boobies, and the latter would be a major felony while the former wouldn't be criminal. This is fucking ridiculous.
That and being exposed to sex at too young an age cause actual harm to children mentally. Being exposed to sexual activity too early creates malformed responses and behaviors. Children who are exposed to sex at young ages are more likely to be violent, or have great anxiety, or be depressed. This is not only true of children who have been molested, but also for children who discover porn at young ages. Their brains literally cannot comprehend it yet properly, and while I agree that there are some overzealous attitudes towards children's sexual developments, the fact is that children will grow into their sexuality as they age. You don't have to show them anything.
There are probably some pro-contact people who favor complete abolition of Age of Consent laws. I am not comfortable with that, and not even my idealized world of Takomen operates like that. I'm concerned that adults and older children will take unfair advantage of a small child even with comprehensive sex and emotional education, and of course small children won't know what's too big to stuff inside one of their orifices or other important things. At the same time, such things as masturbation and oral aren't inherently destructive regardless of age, so sentencing someone to years in jail for jerking off a 10-year-old and giving the 10-year-old victim therapy without regard for circumstances solves absolutely nothing. I would set an AoC for penetrative sex and a separate AoC (probably adulthood) for extreme forms of sex, and have those AoCs include porn consumption and participation for the same things with some safeguards. Below the first AoC non-penetrative sex with anyone would be allowed, penetrative sex allowed between children maybe, consumption of general vanilla porn would be permitted, and maybe production of porn between children would be allowed.
It's called "grooming." I figured as a furry you'd have heard the term before. Typically, simple, non-'inherently destructive things' are used as the gateways to acclimate children to sex, and is used as a manipulation tactic, because, again, children cannot process things like an adult would. It is at the very least manipulation, if not outright harmful in the long run. Don't try to downplay it just because it's not immediately physically harmful.
Trying to keep children until they're 18 infantilized on this, persecuting all the -philes, and allowing shit like abstinence-only sex ed, have created these appallingly high sexual abuse rates for children AND adults, and higher teen pregnancy rates, and other nasty effects.
You have a slight-very slight-point. However, there is no one-size-fits-all answer, and the cutoff point has to be at some point. People can, will, and do have sex before 18. This is common knowledge. However, not everyone is ready before the age of 18, or frankly, for many years afterward. 18 is just the selected age when most people will be prepared by. There is also less issue between a 15 and 16yo having sex (which is rarely, if ever, prosecuted, and if it is there are usually some other circumstances) and a 30yo having sex with a 14yo. They are not the same thing, do not compare them as equal events.
Maybe more will complain when more malevolent and amoral prosecutors decide to charge minors with manufacturing and distributing child porn which they are in. Fucking seriously, how can someone legally be a victim and a perpetrator at the same time?
We are moving in the opposite direction. Child prostitution was recently decriminalized in California so that the children could be sent to treatment as victims rather than arrested for prostitution. Note how sex with children is the central criminal issue, even then.
I think we just need to abolish religious schools for minors, instruct students properly and repeatedly on various sexual and mental health concepts, make contraception of all types available to them, and tell the religious parents to submit or have their children taken away.
1. Religious schools are private and not regulated by the same bodies as public schools. People have the right to decide where and how their children are educated, even when they are wrong. Also, many colleges are religious. They banned too?
2. We live in the age of the internet. There is no reason whatsoever for any child above the age of 14 to not at least understand the basics of sex. Also, see the James Mitchell Terry Jr thread: one of his favorite arguments for why it wasn't rape is because he was teaching her sex.
3. Condoms are available for free fucking everywhere. If they don't have/want condoms for whatever reason, there are plenty of non-penetrative sex acts. Most people have hands.
4. This is highly extremist, and not all abstinence-only parents are religious.
I'll finish on this subject. I'm obviously a really unsuitable advocate for pederasty and sexual reform because I have natural instinctual incentives to come to these conclusions. I recognize how convenient all of this is. However, just because I advocate something that would directly benefit me doesn't invalidate the argument.
+1 point for honesty. However, I will say that you are largely looking at things from a very limited perspective, and assuming that most hebephiles would be like you, assuming you are telling the truth and would never harm someone. This is demonstrably not the case.

Do I sympathy for people who have genuine sexual deviancy that they can't control? Some. You're right when you say it's not a choice for everyone. However, your cavalier attitude to the inherent issues surrounding it are at best silly, at worst worrying. The negatives of your suggestions here outweigh the benefits. What's worse: a small subset of people who cannot fulfill their greatest fantasies, or the sudden rise in sexually exploited children? A hebephile is not the first or only person who will not (or rather, should not) ever fulfill their greatest sexual dream. I want a MMF threesome with those two guys I see at the grocery store once in a while. I'm not going to get it. That doesn't give me the right to walk up to them and grab one's dick, even if it doesn't hurt them. I don't get the right to take my frustration out on other people, either, as many 'unfulfilled' pedophiles/hebephiles do. It ultimately comes down to self control, not their sexual desires. A hebephile with self control will never mention their deviant desires and simply live their life, and no one will ever be the wiser. At worst, they will stick to the letter of the law and never sleep with someone under 18 in the US (yes, I am aware the actual age of consent varies, but work with me). You cannot keep your mouth shut about it, and that is what is worrying about you. You have already admitted that you are willing to take your furry fetish to public spaces-and while many people are ignorant, there are also many who are fully aware of the sexual fetishism of furries. This altogether creates a rather disturbing picture of you, despite your articulate posts.

I am not proofreading this because it's fucking long.
 
So if you're so hell-bent on receiving attention, why go through all the trouble to make a new account instead of just using your 'established' one.

That would have garnered you so much more notoriety and likely quite the spectacle as they pick apart your posting history as well as giving you a verified tag pretty quickly.
 
You're pretty much correct. I actually seriously considered making my own thread at one point, but I decided to let someone like Yawning do it instead whenever I was discovered. I do like attention, especially if it's from a place I'm free to venture to and respond to people directly. And, let's face it, many of you want people like me to come and perform in their thread. This is a win-win situation.
Hey, at least I recognized that. By lolcow standards, that's a very high level of self-awareness!
Oh, yeah. I definitely qualify for lolcow status, though I have many redeeming qualities and I don't mind being seen as strange or lolworthy.

This is either extreme self-confidence or a defensive tard mechanism coupled with delusionality. It's somewhat pleasant, but weird as hell nonetheless.
 
Back