- Joined
- Feb 4, 2021
When will Texas and Null stop oppressing lolicons she's a 10,000 year old vampire loli from Mesopotamia if anything she should be the one on the watchlist! ITS JUST NOT FAIR.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
seems like this will even apply to anime. and i dont mean hentai, theres plenty of shit that actually aired on japanese tv that might be considered obscene and features obviously underaged characters (redditors love that shit)I think this could potentially apply to lolicon/shotacon as well as AI-generated images, since it covers "cartoons". Guess we'll have to wait and see.
One of the many reasons to despise lolicons/pedophiles, they fuck over free speech activism/ideology.Guess the first amendment has been destroyed in front of our eyes in Texas
*The Austin anime voice actors cry out in pain as they now have less work*seems like this will even apply to anime. and i dont mean hentai, theres plenty of shit that actually aired on japanese tv that might be considered obscene and features obviously underaged characters (redditors love that shit)
there's plenty of stuff from US cartoons that would also count imo.seems like this will even apply to anime. and i dont mean hentai, theres plenty of shit that actually aired on japanese tv that might be considered obscene and features obviously underaged characters (redditors love that shit)
Trash take, Is It Okay to Piss on my Bunny-Girl Sisters Feet is an emotionally charged rollercoaster which critiques traditional Japanese family dynamics and gender roles. Massashito is a master at making you question your own morality; just watch his previous works "My 36 Year Old Mother Looks and Acts Like She's Three" and "Toilet-Bound Hanako-kun" then tell me I'm wrong.A good friend of mine sent this meme to me lmao.
View attachment 7087142
I do wonder how many lolicons this triggers on sight.
The bill's definition of "obscene" reads like it's specifically talking about pornographic/sexual images, though some descriptions like "covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state" (pitching a tent?) could have not-quite-obscene usage in jokes.I'm sure it's just pornographic images that's banned because pearl clutching over non-sexualized anime child characters is stupid.
Between "patently offensive" and "taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value", it looks like there's room to defend free expression on the borderline.Sec. 43.21. DEFINITIONS. (a) In this subchapter:
(1) "Obscene" means material or a performance that
(A) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex;
(B) depicts or describes:
(i) patently offensive representations or descriptions of ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including sexual intercourse, sodomy, and sexual bestiality; or
(ii) patently offensive representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions, sadism, masochism, lewd exhibition of the genitals, the male or female genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal, covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state or a device designed and marketed as useful primarily for stimulation of the human genital organs; and
(C) taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value.
Completely unrelated to this thread, but didn't digibro move to Texas awhile back?The bill's definition of "obscene" reads like it's specifically talking about pornographic/sexual images, though some descriptions like "covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state" (pitching a tent?) could have not-quite-obscene usage in jokes.
Between "patently offensive" and "taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value", it looks like there's room to defend free expression on the borderline.
Pornography is not free speech. And I'm sure you'll say this is "another excuse for state to clamp down on our rights". You can thank retards like lolicons, drug addicts and other libertines for not having enough of their vices and giving power to government.Guess the first amendment has been destroyed in front of our eyes in Texas
Good. So no "THEY GUNNA TAKE AWAY UR RIGHTS WHILE YOU CLAP, CHUD-I MEAN FELLOW KIWIS!"The bill's definition of "obscene" reads like it's specifically talking about pornographic/sexual images, though some descriptions like "covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state" (pitching a tent?) could have not-quite-obscene usage in jokes.
Between "patently offensive" and "taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value", it looks like there's room to defend free expression on the borderline.
Ghost Archive of the Reddit postA funny one here lads:
Lets all travel back to 2018 a man by the name of Shuaiby would live streams himself turning his face into a blown up water melon with a ksg 12g
because he didn't want to Live as an adult. I wonder what was his interest before he blew his brains
Yes, it was actually listed on the ED page.Do we have a thread on him? I don't entirety trust ED when it comes to sourcing info.
♪ I've seen a lot of places
Anime and manga were real absolute disaster and grieve mistakeA good friend of mine sent this meme to me lmao.
View attachment 7087142
I do wonder how many lolicons this triggers on sight.