Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
They’re trying to make their need to jerk off to cartoon babies a political issue so they can call the people who don’t like that shit a woke, anti free speech, libtard along with many other political buzzwords and to gain sympathy from their political side.
In reality most people left and right disapprove of lolicon and the pedophiles who masturbate to it.
It's how the gays got marriage. They want that but for child rape.
 
This sperg out has revealed an uncomfortable truth for me. Why are so many of these lolicons right leaning politically? Hell lolicons are seen more on Twitter and 4chan then places like Bluesky and Reddit from the sample size here
lolbertarianism is the only political faction who would tolerate pedophiles unironically arguing for their right to consume child porn
 
Fun fact: it can't be unconstitutional because lolishit is not art. Cope, seethe etc etc
Technically it's art. But the law says art of any significant value. Lolishit is of no significance, it's wank material so the law would punish that. It'll probably only be enforced being tacked on to another crime involving child endangerment.
 
The chief function of these laws is to allow federal agencies who don't like you to fill your devices with CSAM and then pile on charges. It's never been about protecting kids or actually stopping the people who exploit them.
While it is true that the feds plant CP on people's computers to ruin them surely that can't be primary reason for this. It's not like the criteria for doing this has changed, they can still just plant actual CSAM on your shit.
 
Hmmm, lemme try replacing a single word and...
in truth nobody ever wants 100% absolute free speech, but just what is restricted changes.
FURRIES Act filed by Texas lawmakers targets non-human student behavior in schools
Honestly if a black furry objected this by arguing non human was actually about calling blacks subhuman, I'd die laughing.
Though honestly I wonder if you COULD use this against extreme chipouts.
 
If anyone's bored, here's the tweet announcing the passing of Senate Bill 20 in Texas which bans all Ai-Generated child porn, including animation and cartoons. All the replies are just coping and seething about their precious little girl porn now qualifies as criminal on US soil!
View attachment 7092106
The salt is FLOWING
There's nothing I love more than seeing pedofaggot seethe in the morning. All of these degenerates coping about muh "free expression" and acting like the sky is falling because one state out of 50 decided to finally start covering their bases when it comes to censoring CSAM.
1741986284297.png
The tradcon boomer + right wing anime pedophile pfp/purple cross emoji larper alliance on Twitter that's formed over the last 5 years was so weird, glad to see these faggots get reminded that they're not wanted by literally anybody irl.
1000025337.jpg

>christian
A lot of Twitter anime pedophiles look for any moral highground they can cling to. The current wave they're riding is being heckin based n trad because they get scared whenever they see a non-white cashier when their moms make them get out of the basement and go to walmart to pick up groceries and buy McDonalds.

Part of the "trad" larper identity is keeping a purple cross emoji in your username and only remembering the existence of Christ when you need to use it as a cudgel in an online argument, otherwise, it's perfectly ok to live your life diametrically opposed to Biblical teachings as long as you aren't one of those spooky scary "others"! You've got the moral highground by default! No work needed!
 
They’re trying to make their need to jerk off to cartoon babies a political issue so they can call the people who don’t like that shit a woke, anti free speech, libtard along with many other political buzzwords and to gain sympathy from their political side.
In reality most people left and right disapprove of lolicon and the pedophiles who masturbate to it.
Let me know how appeal to normalcy works out for you when it's time for the John Q. Public to vote on whether "gossip sites" like this place should be allowed to exist. Especially when histrionic people like Keffals or Brickface eagerly take the stand to equate Kiwifarms to actual real-world harm.
 
in truth nobody ever wants 100% absolute free speech, but just what is restricted changes.
Literally the only "restricting" I'm fine with is what's already qualified as incitement where you can't go up to someone and say "hey, that guy over there? You should totally go beat him up! Yeah, man! Go kick his ass!".
 
Let me know how appeal to normalcy works out for you when it's time for the John Q. Public to vote on whether "gossip sites" like this place should be allowed to exist. Especially when histrionic people like Keffals or Brickface eagerly take the stand to equate Kiwifarms to actual real-world harm.
I feel like you're continuing to take this to an unwarranted extreme.

Like, it's a very questionable hill to die on, regardless of your intention.
 
Damm what a great argument that sure makes me want to support pedophiles now. Wow I never saw the slippery slope of me not defending pedophiles leading to the goverment eventually coming after me WHAT A SLIPPPPERY SLOPE. I support my local tranny now with gofundme.
>showcase how your logic is no different to another group of censorious clowns
>screams about slippery slopes

Remember, the slippery slope is real until it's not! :story:
 
If anyone's bored, here's the tweet announcing the passing of Senate Bill 20 in Texas which bans all Ai-Generated child porn, including animation and cartoons. All the replies are just coping and seething about their precious little girl porn now qualifies as criminal on US soil!
View attachment 7092106
The salt is FLOWING
Aella is going to be pissed i'm sure. She loves to push the idea of AI generated cp

Butwhythough2 said:
It's all so tiring, the cope of "it's just a drawing," "it's a victimless crime" , and my personal favorite cope, "it's an outlet for pedophiles so they don't offend." Niggers, It might be a drawing and lines on a paper, but it's what the lines on the paper or pixels on the monitor represent and the fact that you subhumans jack off to it. That's why people hate you! That's why you're lumped in with pedophiles, you fucking retards. Kill yourselves.
Funny how they try to use this nonsense for the 'cartoons' (why are they so creepily adamant about being allowed to draw fucked up pictures of little kids if they're not totally pedos anyway?) and ignore the AI part of this, not to mention the part about said AI kids requiring the AI algorithm to be trained on actual pictures in order to be able to do anything

Zoobles said:
considering how realistic AI is now, I can see this as a valuable tool for prosecuting people with real CP who might use "it's actually AI" as a defense.
If anything 'its actually AI' should be even less of a defense and regular CP. After all if you have a CP picture thats a picture of one child that was abused to make it, if you have an AI generated picture it had to have been trained off of many pictures, so there are more victims involved in creating that AI picture
 
Let me know how appeal to normalcy works out for you when it's time for the John Q. Public to vote on whether "gossip sites" like this place should be allowed to exist. Especially when histrionic people like Keffals or Brickface eagerly take the stand to equate Kiwifarms to actual real-world harm.
The difference is that those nonpeople are lying and this gossip site isn't actually that bad but those pedophiles who jack off to AI generated lolishit are in fact pedophiles who will try and rape real kids if they get the chance.

And tbh I would trade the existance of this site for a government that hunted down pedophiles like dogs
 
Please Texas, ban furries next
you may get your wish, look at what was just introduced into the Texas House of Reps today
A new bill filed in the Texas House would prevent students from behaving like anything other than a human being at schools in the state. The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being."
here's a direct link to the bill for your own viewing

not directly related to this thread, but figured I'd share it with you
just realized someone beat me to the punch by 15 minutes. if I hadn't been interrupted by my gf about some stupid bird in our yard I'd have posted first *sigh*
 
Back