I haven't eaten enough glue today so maybe my brain is still functioning too well but please correct me if I'm wrong...
Phil said "Mr Beast has done nothing to me, but I think his content is harmful, so it's my right to call that out"
How is that different from anything a detractor has ever done? Phil I think you're a lying piece of shit who makes content for man children and probably actual children who are losers who will watch you and think it's ok to be a shut in loser who thinks the world owes him just for existing yet does nothing to actually earn a buck. As you have said, it's my right to call that out, you skinny fat bitch.
His rationale is that he did nothing wrong, most of the time, and if he did it was either unwillingly, or a learning experience that now has made him the "mature" adult that he is, and also, that most if not all criticism against him is unfair & unwarranted (for current Phil, he's a good boy now).
He does not see what he does as malicious or harmful, so your remarks are probably rooted on hatred, jealousy (or financial interest if you're a restreamer), according to him.
I can see him responding to you with a prestream answer on the lying part (with you/detractors "moving goalposts" if he addresses something, the need to protect his family, the fact that some things are none of your business, etc).
Then, with "worry about yourself idiot" for obsessing over his audience, plus "my audience has very few children, so you're full of shit", and "
pssshh-shhh, what? When did I ever said that it's OK to be a shut in loser? You're a moron, I'm just playing games as my job." ending in "I stream 6 days a week putting meaningful content for you guys" so he is earning his bucks.
Some variation of that, but his response to you is pretty telegraphed.