I distinctly remember some lolcow or another shouting far and wide that the farms had "child porn" and trying to get the site in trouble, because some user posted a (not very explicit at all, like a shadow on the wall or something) loli gif as some sort of shitpost.
Honestly, I'm not a fan of expanding the range of computer files that someone could get in legal trouble for under any pretense. Remember, theres ACTUAL illegal shit getting posted on Facebook or Twitter or Tiktok and they always get a reasonable understanding of CDA 230, but smaller sites do not necessarily fare as well. I'm pretty sure that actual KF isn't going to fall prey to a hecklers veto over some user posting loli, but smaller sites could.
I honestly prefer the older state of things where the only illegal things you could conceivably just download on your computer and get arrested for is classified military intelligence, and images/videos which are the product of real life abuse of a child. Remember, originally the legal theory to justify banning this was to prevent people from successfully profiting off it, and therefore stop them from abusing children. The logic that something can really be banned from even private ownership for simply being too obscene is largely obsolete in modern law.
I don't like seeing this "too obscene to exist" way of thinking come back because its basically a thought crime, and it's very opportune for selective enforcement, or evidence planting.
Yeah yeah, I know, ironic username. But its weird seeing KF celebrate internet censorship of any kind.