Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 26.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
Aaron may as well give that $50 to Melton, would save Rekieta the hassle of sending his snivelling supertips.
The 50$ need to go to Geno for causing mental anguish.

Aaron sending the picture on video
You do not see a single thing on the video. The clip proves nothing without context of being able to prove a picture exists and it was sent.
 
It’s common to feature the post where it was first announced in the thread, as we’ve covered a lot of ground since-


Too late now and I guess it doesn’t really matter, just saying!
He claims he can get it expunged from his record after a certain amount of time too.

I added both of these points to the featured post as well as a link to Aaron's thread. Thank you. (Apologies for not doing it sooner. I went to bed almost immediately after posting.)
 
Last edited:
While we’re nitpicking, doesn’t “revenge” “porn” require public dissemination of an image as opposed to private texting it to a single individual?

In the case of the Minnesota Revenge porn law, it does not. It was specifically written in the broadest possible way to cover private distribution to a single individual:

" "Dissemination" means distribution to one or more persons, other than the person depicted in the image,"

Aaron's charge was, as far as I know, the first time the law had ever been used in this way. The assumed harm and reason for the revenge porn law is uncontrolled public dissemination on the internet. Using the law to punish trivial non-public distribution of an image to one person is legally untested (IMO) in minnesota.

The other complication it created in the case (IMO) is that it would have required the person who received the image to testify at trial as to what they had received and what the image was. Because the revenge porn image no longer exists.
 
Last edited:
It must be tough to be Aaron. Nick can't get you out of his head (or his dreams). Still can't talk about Qayla. No more naked Twister. Can't even get your own good news featured in your own thread. Forever stuck in the slender shadow of the Balldoman.

Just Side Piece by your side, your kids every other weekend, your boxing hobby (that you may or may not be active in at the the moment), and your thousands of dollars bilked from the loyal Steel Toe Army every week.

Another win for the Toe?
 
Partially. It was obvious from the start that the original felony charge was way too much, but also that Aaron sending the picture on video was enough for a misdemeanor. The 50 dollar fine is still shockingly low.

Its still not totally clear what Aaron will plead to. The only charges available in the revenge porn law itself are felony or gross misdemeanor. The fine amount and how they talk suggest a very low misdemeanor. Which means he may have made a plea to something other than revenge porn.
 
Its still not totally clear what Aaron will plead to. The only charges available in the revenge porn law itself are felony or gross misdemeanor. The fine amount and how they talk suggest a very low misdemeanor. Which means he may have made a plea to something other than revenge porn.

Like others said, it's possible it's an attempt to disseminate, since Geno won't cooperate and confirm he actually received the picture. Aaron could try to argue he tried to send an innocent picture, but that would be a gamble and a waste of time and money even if successful.
 
Depending on the crime I might agree. But knowing how pants-on-head retarded courts can be about revenge porn, I'm taking that plea any day of the week.
Personally I'd be more concerned with someone like Nick trying to use any plea deal Aaron takes and weaponizing it in a civil suit, since it appears he has the means, and is absolutely vindictive enough to pursue it.
 
How would she have known 'how rich' he was unless Nick told her? She wouldn't know from his house. It's an average middle class house. But it's a house he didn't even buy himself. His mother bought it, using money she inherited from his grandpa.

I'd be embarrassed to tell people that all the money I had was earned by somebody else. That I'm a loser who's completely incapable of earning a living. And that although I was once fortunate enough to luck into a role that earned me a million dollars in a year, due to arrogance and stupidity, I pissed all of that away.

Only a mong would be impressed by Nick. And while most public sector employees are indeed mongs, I don't believe a single one would be impressed by how rich Nick's mom is and how big an allowance she gives him.
I think they were saying "you have a house and family? The people I usually deal with are total losers who have nothing and live in squalor. If someone is at least middle class you'd expect them to have their shit together."
 
Personally I'd be more concerned with someone like Nick trying to use any plea deal Aaron takes and weaponizing it in a civil suit, since it appears he has the means, and is absolutely vindictive enough to pursue it.

Minnesota now has an anti-SLAPP law and Nick bringing such a lawsuit would be very dangerous to himself financially. The same factors which led the state to make the deal with Aaron would make a civil case on this extremely difficult.

Prior to the anti-SLAPP law, a lawsuit like this would have been much safer.
 
Partially. It was obvious from the start that the original felony charge was way too much, but also that Aaron sending the picture on video was enough for a misdemeanor. The 50 dollar fine is still shockingly low.
I disagree.

It’s basically an admission of “yeah, technically the law was broken, but this is still some gay shit”.

It’s a jaywalking tier penalty for a jaywalking tier crime.

I wonder if plates have gone flying in the Rekieta’s household? Since Nick being a moron has once again humiliated Kayla.
 
I wonder if plates have gone flying in the Rekieta’s household? Since Nick being a moron has once again humiliated Kayla.
Plates have gone flying, but its not Kayla throwing them..its Nick and his aids riddled skeleton really isn't throwing them more like picking them up and dropping them on the floor.
 
Back