Debate @COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST on the slippery slope of making loli porn illegal - At the user's own request.

1742087106051.png

This thread is going a million different places and I’m all for watching the chaos
 
What a rollercoaster. But every time I'm swayed I remember it's just a drawing. There is no child being abused, no life being irrevocably altered by these acts. You want it to be illegal, okay. I can get behind that too. But don't equate it to actual child abuse. Jesus it feels like the people here have gotten so swept up in their moral side-taking that they've lost sight of what child sexual abuse is. It's just an internet debate game of red vs blue. That a fucking drawing, lines on a background that memetically represent something is at all comparable in horror to the real thing. that's why there are differentiations between murder and theft, or trespassing and destruction of property. I am all on board with the death sentence for child molesters. They've played their hand their way and nobody fucking wants them on the board anymore. Don't even waste tax payer dollars prolonging their life so they can offend again if they ever somehow get out. But it's complete and utter lunacy to argue that a drawing is the 'exact same thing, bruh'.
 
What a rollercoaster. But every time I'm swayed I remember it's just a drawing. There is no child being abused, no life being irrevocably altered by these acts. You want it to be illegal, okay. I can get behind that too. But don't equate it to actual child abuse. Jesus it feels like the people here have gotten so swept up in their moral side-taking that they've lost sight of what child sexual abuse is. It's just an internet debate game of red vs blue. That a fucking drawing, lines on a background that memetically represent something is at all comparable in horror to the real thing. that's why there are differentiations between murder and theft, or trespassing and destruction of property. I am all on board with the death sentence for child molesters. They've played their hand their way and nobody fucking wants them on the board anymore. Don't even waste tax payer dollars prolonging their life so they can offend again if they ever somehow get out. But it's complete and utter lunacy to argue that a drawing is the 'exact same thing, bruh'.
What a weird hill you're on. Try not to die on it
 
What a rollercoaster. But every time I'm swayed I remember it's just a drawing. There is no child being abused, no life being irrevocably altered by these acts. You want it to be illegal, okay. I can get behind that too. But don't equate it to actual child abuse. Jesus it feels like the people here have gotten so swept up in their moral side-taking that they've lost sight of what child sexual abuse is. It's just an internet debate game of red vs blue. That a fucking drawing, lines on a background that memetically represent something is at all comparable in horror to the real thing. that's why there are differentiations between murder and theft, or trespassing and destruction of property. I am all on board with the death sentence for child molesters. They've played their hand their way and nobody fucking wants them on the board anymore. Don't even waste tax payer dollars prolonging their life so they can offend again if they ever somehow get out. But it's complete and utter lunacy to argue that a drawing is the 'exact same thing, bruh'.
you're a fucking weirdo
 
I think that anyone that has gooned to loli porn should be put on a list. If anyone defending the legalization of loli porn can figure out how to do that without making loli porn illegal, I will agree with your solution.
IT'S IMPOSSIBLE
 
The problem with obscenity laws is that they're subjective, and the problem with any subjective law is that as politics changes, Judges will abuse the fuck out of it. If Texas managed to actually define and pin down and frame in porn as porn and only that, great, but I've yet to see anyone not make an exploitable subjective law.
all laws can be exploited, abused, or ignored. there is no "set it and forget it" law. to have ones political view enforced they must be engaged in the process
The difference is intent and precedent. Banning fistfights isn’t about criminalizing all physical contact,
nor is banning lolicon about criminalizing all speech.
it’s about preventing bodily harm. But banning lolicon isn’t ... real harm
how much harm is acceptable to you?
speech restrictions
csam is not free speech
 
>Oct 2024 join date
>muh avatar argument
They are not sending their best.
This kind of response is such a transparent deflection and refusal to engage with the primary criticism. You defended Joseph Smith grooming a 14 year old child bride by demanding someone prove he had sex with her and accusing them of being anti-Mormon. You've admitted to playing an eroge which would, by your own standards, be considered child pornography. You act as if it is simply pointing to your avatar, and not your waifufag obsession with saber. You've possessed what you would consider CSAM, but you super duper promise you were *disgusted* by all those nasty scenes. I guess you like your child pornography for the plot?
 
This kind of response is such a transparent deflection and refusal to engage with the primary criticism. You defended Joseph Smith grooming a 14 year old child bride by demanding someone prove he had sex with her and accusing them of being anti-Mormon. You've admitted to playing an eroge which would, by your own standards, be considered child pornography. You act as if it is simply pointing to your avatar, and not your waifufag obsession with saber. You've possessed what you would consider CSAM, but you super duper promise you were *disgusted* by all those nasty scenes. I guess you like your child pornography for the plot?
Dog, just go to Welper's Q&A thread to debate his Mormonism and the veracity of his character with him instead of continuing to drag this retarded slapfight out.

Like, I enjoy seeing the spergery myself, but everyone else is really exhausted with the retardation at this point.

Actually, here, let me help you with that.
 
Dog, just go to Welper's Q&A thread to debate his Mormonism and the veracity of his character with him instead of continuing to drag this retarded slapfight out.

Like, I enjoy seeing the spergery myself, but everyone else is really exhausted with the retardation at this point.

Actually, here, let me help you with that.
Before I do that, will you disavow him for being a pedophile?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Inco G. Nito
I didn't realize you needed to be obligated to disavow a pedophile.
He says as he's obligating me to disavow somebody based on a retarded slapfight about their religion that I don't even remotely care about.

Tell you what, though. I'll be one of the first people to make fun of him if he should, by some twist of fate, ever get completely outed as a pedophile. Sound fair enough to you?
 
He says as he's obligating me to disavow somebody based on a retarded slapfight about their religion that I don't even remotely care about.
A slapfight about a religion based on what? What is it based on?
 
A slapfight about a religion based on what? What is it based on?
Some retard's retarded interpretation of the Judeo-Christian God and Jesus Christ that he managed to convince a bunch of other retards to adhere that enabled him to practice polygamy or something. Like I said, I don't care.

Now, stop shitting on top of the heap of shit that makes up this thread. Or, at the very least, save your spergery for whenever the relevant person you actually want to have your slapfight with is actually online to respond. It'll be funnier.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
Reactions: Hweeks and taxisguy
Back