Parent at a Three Rivers School District meeting in Oregon reads an excerpt from an extremely graphic pornographic book that is available to students in school. Her challenge to have the book removed by the district was denied.
View attachment 7104181
Pro-tip: If a kid takes the book home, she can destroy it and the school can't do shit about it.
why not destroy property?
when it's used against you or me
is that violence
or self defense?
you. tell. me.
There is no logical reason why the right hasn't been taking these books home from every faggot-infested school library in the country and just destroying them, or having their kids go in with a bottle of india ink and pour it over the book in the library, if they're not allowed to take it home. They'd have to make the absurd claim that destroying homosexual indoctrination pornography they were showing children is a hate crime, and they would much rather not talk about that, thanks.
When did they change micro aggressions to microinequities? Is this a fed specific term?
View attachment 7104327
People started making fun of microagressions, and it reached being mocked on TV before word got out to shut it down, so they had to make a new word up.
They change the word-weapons every so often when the former word-weapons are "found" by the enemies of the revolution, or when they stop being effective. DEI becomes JEDI or BRIDGE. Nazi becomes Fascist. Global Warming becomes Climate Change. Marxism becomes Social Justice. yadda yadda yadda. Remember, these are post-modernists. Definitions do not matter. Logic does not matter. Reason does not matter. The only thing that matters is power. Word-weapons give them power over you, that's why they use them, that's why they redefine them at will, that's why they demand the right to dictate what word-weapons you're allowed to use.
Once you realize the only thing these types ultimately respect is a swift punch to the throat and throwing them outside of polite society, autistic screeching about how you aren't allowed to do that because they used word-weapons on you, the better.
Regarding the Autopen thing, what if you could look at the timestamps where the autopen was used and then check and them against Secret Service records to see if Joe Biden was present at the time? That would be wild.
It would be, like, definitive proof that Biden didn't sign those documents, making them invalid.
@Gehenna pointed out this was one likely way to prove the fraudulent use of the autopen. And given how dead fucking silent the media and activists (outside of tard rage in this thread) are being on this, I'd again, wager that Trump has proof and he's just waiting to see if they try and incriminate themselves worse in response. I bet every Biden staffer is being watched 24x7 right this very moment to see who they contact and what they say.
But the important thing is that the Obama/Biden autopen was basically a plotter device that recorded his signature movement and recreated it on demand. It wasn't a telepresence device like previous ones, one that moved a second pen in the same way the first pen was being moved.
For those not getting the difference, it literally is
an analogue version of copy and paste. We would never, EVER, allow Presidential powers to be confirmed by bidenlegitsignature_rev5_final.png being attached to the email, and we should never accept an autopen that isn't telepresence based.
