These are the most nigger responses possible. I asked a question about whether it actually legally qualified as terrorist/domestic terrorism. One person (@Endless Torment ) provided a helpful screen cap of a document that provided an answer for that: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/us-politics-general-2.210076/post-20876950
Words cannot adequately express how utterly tired I am of this useless attention-whoring nigger. He is literally a dancing monkey with a billion dollars and a room-temperature IQ, flinging shit from his gilded cage to see who he can upset. Why anyone pays attention to his dipshittery is beyond me. He's about as "funny" as that Johnny Somali moron currently getting run up a flagpole in South Korea for deliberately offending them as much as possible.
@LORD IMPERATOR This is why we shouldn't be expected to play with the kid gloves on. Whether they are winning or losing they want to exterminate you. They would (and did) torch a city down to stick it to those evil nazis. This is how they handle losing; torching and bombing. They are not going to give you a pass for your "they're both idiots" stance. You are with them, or catching a molly through the living room window.
And it was asked in as smug a way as possible with deliberate intent to inflame.
Nah nigga it was just a question. Everywhere I looked mentioned "violence" but the image someone provided clarified that destruction of property is included in that in a 2020 government document.
That's an interesting thing then because Tesla and Elon are attached at the hip with the current US government administration. I am curious if the same thing would happen to another company that isn't as directly politically connected. Say for example Walmart or Starbucks piss people off and they start getting materially vandalized (not just spraypaint) but there's no harm to human life (say it happens when they're closed)... in essence if people damage a corporations property with the intent of changing that companies policies (but not the government) then would a terrorism charge still be applicable?
I think people that need to make up a new slur instead of using one of the many great ones we already have are a bunch of retarded niggerfaggots.
September 11th 2025 no one thought Trump would really do it. After the Supreme Court ruled that destruction of someone's property "isn't that big a deal" because "they have insurance" and "its definitely not terrorism and your not a nazi for it" Trump ordered a mandatory evacuation of New York City and then he nuked it... he really fucking nuked it.
It's not the target that matters. It's the purpose and intent of the people committing the acts of violence, destruction or vandalism. If people decide to start firebombing Walmarts nationwide because they want Trump to do X thing and for some reason they think that's the best way to achieve it, they're engaging in domestic terrorism.
Wait does that mean that guy is advocating for domestic terrorism then? Like he's an actual criminal using our nigger and tranny hatin forums to commit actual crimes!? Can we cut the terrorism out please this is a friendly Christian website.
The main factor of what turns a crime into terrorism is the intent. Terrorism is just any crime intended to intimidate civilians or influence the policy of the government through unlawful violent acts.
No I'm not saying these hypothetical attacks would be aimed at changing government policy or politics but rather the policies of a private mega corporation.
Terrorism laws are retarded. I classify them in the same bullshit category as hate crimes. I shoot a nigger? Murder. I shoot a nigger and say "fuck you, nigger," murder with hate crime modifier.
In this hypothetical, is Jeff Bezos personal friends with the president? If yes, terrorism, if no, regular destruction of property.
Don't like it when it applies to lefties, huh? Kill yourself, faggot.
The m-word is OUR word, they don't get to say it
Ah I see what you mean. It's still terrorism -- the government or its policies doesn't have to be the final target. It's violence being committed specifically to effect change (e.g. "stop building the killer robbits").
I'm not sure if there has been a group that went after only one corporation over something like that as the closet would be eco-terrorists who targeted businesses and schools which as you can tell still has the word terrorism in it. You are still using crime to sow fear to make them doing something you want.
The Weather Underground would like a word.
