Ah I see what you mean. It's still terrorism -- the government or its policies doesn't have to be the final target. It's violence being committed specifically to effect change (e.g. "stop building the killer robbits").
Interesting, and yeah something like "stop building the killer robots" is a good example. The anti-AI sphere has some people who have said it would ok to launch airstrikes on datacenters to stop the growth of AI because they're concerned about AGI or superintelligence being developed and that it would wipe out humanity.
There's an absurd amount of money that has gone towards anti-AI or "AI safety" shit:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/effective-altruism-eas.151752/post-20841036 and a lot of the key AI people seem to believe in Roko's Basilisk shit (basically if they don't help the AI come to life then it'll torture them for the rest of eternity or some shit)
Another good example would be the vandalism of 5G towers, but I never saw any terrorism charges stem from that? Most of the articles I found about 5G tower destruction didn't mention the word terrorism at all, but one case did:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-65377361 (but they were calling for politicians to be hung)
What's interesting is that telecommunications infrastructure is probably termed as "critical infrastructure" so the destruction of it might carry other charges that aren't related to terrorism.
Government policy doesn't really apply to stuff like that.
Anyway, an interesting thing to ponder and people's attitude towards giant corporations has become increasingly heated in recent history. That was why I was asking about the "terrorism" stuff btw - because I am certain in the near future we'll have some sort of scenario like the above that I mentioned start to happen.
(just to make clear I'm not advocating for anything, I am just curious about what happens in the near and far future)