Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

Nothing Trump did was "illegal" Snaggle Tooth.

The folly in your reasoning is best demonstated by the complete absence of any sanction or punsihment for what they lawfully did.

Screenshot 2025-03-18 132218.jpg


Screenshot 2025-03-18 183519.png

Lesbo judge already said that she knows she is going to be overturned, Stange that part didn't make it into Tony's rant.

She stayed her own order so it will never go into effect.

Screenshot 2025-03-18 184007.png
Screenshot 2025-03-18 184413.png




ROFLMAO!

No, they did not Snaggle Tooth. Their fetish makes them non-deployable. There 's no troonshine on the front lines.


Screenshot 2025-03-18 220200.png

Why is this autistic cross dressing retard pushing a bill on an issue that was already made moot by the United States Supreme Court literally a decade ago?


Screenshot 2025-03-19 102812.jpg


This is bald faced lie Snaggle Tooth. The only time that hair is even mentioned is in the definition of "social transition."

You need to work actually READING and UNDERSTANDING the things that you are hysterically shrieking about.


Screenshot 2025-03-19 112519.jpg

HB 1668

This is far less of a story than Tony wants it to be. While still gross, the Senator was merely mistaken about the state age of consent (off by one year)

Screenshot 2025-03-19 113444.jpg.


"One text exchange cited in the federal complaint says the person alleged to be Eichorn asked how old the person on the other end was. “I am 17…like I said don’t want any drama but wanna be upfront cause one guy got hella mad at me,” the reply read. The follow-up message attached to Eichorn was: “Why was he so mad? I think age of consent is 17 when do ya turn 18?”

Charges: State Sen. Eichorn responded to prostitution ad before arrest in minor solicitation case
 
Last edited:
Zack's bill is dead on arrival. It needs a 2/3 vote in the legilsture PLUS 51% of the vote in the next general election.
Zachary must be really spooked by the anti-troon backlash if he's suddenly pretending to give a shit about the LGB part of LGBT. Little late on that one, my narcissistic bro.
 
No, they did not Snaggle Tooth. The panel found that the state had a legitimate interest in preventing mentally ill men from lurking in the women's bathroom.

Screenshot 2025-03-20 154710.jpg

Screenshot 2025-03-20 155009.jpg

Tony is completely losing his shit because the 9th CIrcuit said that nothing more than plain common sense is needed to conclude that cross dressing sex pests have no business in the ladies room.

Screenshot 2025-03-20 162956.png
Screenshot 2025-03-20 162924.png

Title IX does not apply to troons Snaggle Tooth.

Screenshot 2025-03-20 164652.png

LITTLE ROCK (KATV) — The Eighth District U.S. Court of Appeals has denied a move by the Biden administration to appeal an injunction previously won by six states, including the state of Arkansas and a minor residing in the state.

The injunction won by plaintiffs Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and a minor prohibited the U.S. Department of Education from enforcing “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance”, or Title IX.

In the plaintiff's argument, the minor, referred to as A.F. in court documents, says that her religious beliefs are that "there are two sexes; a person’s sex cannot be changed; and, she believes that she must use pronouns which align with a person’s biological sex."

Her statement continues to explain that she is fearful that she would be investigated and possibly disciplined for her views and that if she were forced to use the restroom, locker room, or shower facilities with transgender women, she would be distressed, embarrassed, anxious, and would avoid these areas.

“The recent order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismisses the appeal by our opponents and preserves the preliminary injunction we won last July. I am grateful to the Trump administration for agreeing to dismiss the appeal, and for their broader commitment to restore common sense in how we approach this issue.” said Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin.

Eighth Circuit Court upholds injunction favoring states on Title IX enforcement

Screenshot 2025-03-20 173816.jpg

Rebecca Roe v. Crichfield
 
Last edited:
What the bill actually does is allow parents to file a civil lawsuit against anyone who tries to troon their kid out behind their backs. This is actually a good thing and should be the law in every state.
Kids should not be trooned out at all, ever. That the main agenda of freaks like Snaggle Tooth seems to be to get kids trooned out before they're mature enough to realize what they're doing should speak for itself. He wants to trick kids into trooning and getting irreversible medical procedures before they are even legally allowed to smoke or drink.

That way they can't change their minds, because vile groomers like this creep have already made up their mind for them.
 
That way they can't change their minds, because vile groomers like this creep have already made up their mind for them.
1. Children being affirmed lends credence to "gender identity" being a real thing. By proxy, AGP weirdos like Snaggletooth have plausible deniability because nobody would call a 6-year-old a pervert.
2. If children can be successfully elevated to the level of wisdom and maturity required to pause their own puberty, how can't they be mature enough to choose which partners they want?
3. Pausing a child's puberty indefinitely will result in permanently stunted adults who look like kids. It's a way to circumvent existing laws.
4. Lunatics who just want to harm kids; fetishists like eunuch weirdos. Ugh.

These are the main goals of this shit from the bad actors, IMO.
 
Follow up on the awesome Ninth Circuit ruling........

Tony says that ordinary common sense is "extreme."

Screenshot 2025-03-20 215911.png

WRONG. WRONG. WRONG.

The Parents for Privacy case is not "strong" and it is definitely not "precedent." The obvious reasons why are it is a different set of rules, in a completely differnt state, in a completely different context. The Idaho case today involves a statute passed by a legislature. The Parents for Privacy case involves an internal policy from a local school district. Those two situations are not even remotely close to being similar. I am well aware that Snaggle Tooth is too god damn stupid to recognize this important difference and the implications of it.

As Uncle @Geranium says, Tony is frequently "confidently wrong."

Screenshot 2025-03-20 220337.png

Screenshot 2025-03-20 220408.png

Snaggle Tooth also radically distorts the actual holding in the the Parents for Privacy case. Instead of Tony's crazed fantasy about whether "the mere presence of troons vilates anyones rights, the ACTUAL RULING held that the parent plaintiffs lacked standing or authority to try and establish their own bathroom policy for the district.

"In sum, Plaintiffs fail to cite any authority that supports their asserted fundamental Fourteenth Amendment parental right to “determine whether and when their children will have to risk being exposed to opposite sex nudity at school” and “whether their children, while at school, will have to risk exposing their own undressed or partially unclothed bodies to members of the opposite sex” in “intimate, vulnerable settings like restrooms, locker rooms and showers.”

Parents for Privacy v. Barr (9th Cir. 2020) 949 F.3d 1210, 1232–1233.

The Ninth CIrcuit panel correctlly noted that the case Tony is all in a lather about is actual irrelevant to the dispute here.

Screenshot 2025-03-20 222151.png

In sum, Tony is retarded and laughably wrong as usual.
 
Kids should not be trooned out at all, ever. That the main agenda of freaks like Snaggle Tooth seems to be to get kids trooned out before they're mature enough to realize what they're doing should speak for itself. He wants to trick kids into trooning and getting irreversible medical procedures before they are even legally allowed to smoke or drink.
It's just a pyramid scheme.
The more people who "join" after you have, the higher up the hierarchy you get propelled and you become a person who has the respect of those who follow.
It also generates cannon fodder.
 
It's just a pyramid scheme.
The more people who "join" after you have, the higher up the hierarchy you get propelled and you become a person who has the respect of those who follow.
It also generates cannon fodder.
Kind of like vampirism.

Except unfortunately if one were to cut off the head of Bruce Jenner, it won’t cure or reverse the condition in other victims.
 
1. Children being affirmed lends credence to "gender identity" being a real thing. By proxy, AGP weirdos like Snaggletooth have plausible deniability because nobody would call a 6-year-old a pervert.
2. If children can be successfully elevated to the level of wisdom and maturity required to pause their own puberty, how can't they be mature enough to choose which partners they want?
3. Pausing a child's puberty indefinitely will result in permanently stunted adults who look like kids. It's a way to circumvent existing laws.
4. Lunatics who just want to harm kids; fetishists like eunuch weirdos. Ugh.

These are the main goals of this shit from the bad actors, IMO.
To be honest, I’ve always thought that #1 was 90%+ of the reason for supporting the trooning of children. After all, if gender dysphoria is a real thing that can’t be handled in any way other than transitioning, then why wouldn’t children receive the exact same treatment as adults (ie transitioning)?
Follow up on the awesome Ninth Circuit ruling........

Tony says that ordinary common sense is "extreme."
View attachment 7117772
Trannies aren’t being forced to use other bathrooms than everyone else, they just have to use the bathroom that corresponds to their sex. Same as everyone else. If anything, such a ruling (if applied outside of schools) would force me to share a bathroom with more trannies because pooners were always less likely to use the mens bathroom than troons were to use the womens bathroom, but it’s just the right thing to do so I support it
 
pooners were always less likely to use the mens bathroom than troons were to use the womens bathroom, but it’s just the right thing to do so I support it

It’s always been that pooners are not exactly a problem in mens toilets.

Troons, especially men who just say they are a woman and then magically turn into one, are capable of rape and assaulting women.

The only males generally speaking who would be in danger from a pooner would mostly be too young to be visiting a public toilet alone anyway.

Absolutely insist that they use the correct toilet of course though.
Stick to the rules and then Troons don’t have the excuse of pooners getting away with it.
 
Back