Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
He claims to have a more successful “show”
What show? Nick is an unemployed stay at home drug addict waiting for Daddy Gubernment to give him his sweetheart first offender plea deal.
The only show Nick has been doing is a show & tell with the drug testing person watching him pee.
 
sfdsddfs.jpg

These days, everything nick says is a 1 to 1 recreation of ralphamale speak.
 
More Nick Rekieta delusions: He claims to have a more successful “show” than Sam Tripoli, Kevin Brennan and Chad Zumock combined. This is a complete fantasy. Even Zumock has pulled in more viewers and money than Nick over the last year, not to mention Tripoli and Brennan both have hugely successful shows.
Nick is a drooling idiot. Imagine Nick believing he's "successful" when he literally has no audience at all. He literally can't stream. At all. He has totally cucked out of streaming for months. So his audience? It's ZERO.

You cannot have a "successful show" when you DON'T EVEN HAVE A SHOW AT ALL!

God what a dumb faggot.

Why is Nick so fucking stupid? Why is he so goddamn retarded?

Explain to us, Nick. How do you have a "successful show" when you HAVE NO SHOW AT ALL?????????????????
 
Nick remains a drooling idiot.

While lawyers do indeed hate lawyers, especially themselves, part of why lawyers are one of the most drug-abusing professions is having to share a profession with people like Nick, if you can even call Nick "people."

Kill yourself, Nick.

I also missed him promising to do CLE and get his license back. Good luck with that, fag. Even if you do it, you've done so much fucked-up shit, including felonies, since then that you face disbarment for other shit, too.
 
Imagine EJ putting parodies of all his haters into future comics.
The big Villain is a domestic abuser who kills his family with drug overdoses in the food slop he cooks for them.
Then the Villain goes on a Bonny & Clyde like crime spree with his sidekick Ape.
Nah, then he'd be Chris Chan.
If EJ was to do anything he should just have a homeless crack addict on the side of the road in the background of a shot that looks suspiciously like Nick, or a background character at a gay furry rave in a purple cow fursuit.
 
At least the 5k gift will be cheap.
I don't recall the exact stream, but at one point during the long downward spiral, Nick promised the gift would go to all locals members who were active when the 5K goal was reached, even if they were no longer subscribed. He claimed to still have the emails to contact them.

The gift is obviously never happening. But if it was, I can't imagine anyone aside from his small collection of dead-ender locals enablers would want to give him their mailing addresses at this point. I certainly wouldn't.

However, I'm still just a little bit curious what he thinks would be worth this half-a-decade-long wait, when he could have just ordered some branded shot glasses from Temu and been done with it. Given what he's hinted at so far, I'm picturing some kind of mother's day arts and crafts project made by a downs syndrome child.
 
More Nick Rekieta delusions: He claims to have a more successful “show” than Sam Tripoli, Kevin Brennan and Chad Zumock combined. This is a complete fantasy. Even Zumock has pulled in more viewers and money than Nick over the last year, not to mention Tripoli and Brennan both have hugely successful shows.

And neither of them gave their small children cocaine the way Nick did.
Nick's kinda right, but I'd change 1 word. He doesn't HAVE a larger show than them, he HAD a larger show than them, as in past tense.

At his peak he had 100k live viewers and he threw it all away to do cocaine and swing. Now, despite having one of the biggest streams, he fumbled it so hard that no one knows who he is. He failed to turn it into legitimate success.
 
However, I'm still just a little bit curious what he thinks would be worth this half-a-decade-long wait, when he could have just ordered some branded shot glasses from Temu and been done with it. Given what he's hinted at so far, I'm picturing some kind of mother's day arts and crafts project made by a downs syndrome child.
His 5K "gift" to the people whose money he stole should consist of just a video of himself shooting himself in the face and dying. He should try making it as close to the Ronnie McNutt video as possible.
At his peak he had 100k live viewers and he threw it all away to do cocaine and swing. Now, despite having one of the biggest streams, he fumbled it so hard that no one knows who he is. He failed to turn it into legitimate success.
He had a great show. He was incredibly retarded, though, and decided he'd rather have a cuckstream where he vomited out disgusting unwanted details about his repulsive "sex life" and how much nigger dick he loved to take up the ass.

He was amazed nobody was interested in this and completely abandoned him and now wonders why he has no income and why he's sucking on his mommy's titties for his income for the rest of his worthless cuck life.
 
I guess this is another technicality?
2025-03-22 - 00_23_10 - This Little Piggy a Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion - YouTube.png2025-03-22 - 00_23_24 - This Little Piggy a Steel Toe Roundtable Discussion - YouTube.png
No, it's another "him being a faggot."

What he's trying to do is point out the Minnesota Bar Association is distinct from being authorized to practice law in MN. The former is a professional organization in which membership is optional. Like the American Medical Association, or what have you.

This was a thing that came up a lot during early Weebwars, as KV tried to claim Nick was not a lawyer when they couldn't find him in the MN Bar Association database. Many of them were too stupid to realize law licenses in MN are handled by the MN Supreme Court and that's a different database.

However, everybody knows "the bar" means being admitted to practice law. He's just being a faggot.

Also, he claims he's done with practicing law, so what does he care?

I hope he is, because he's a menace to all his prospective clients.

I know they say you should never be your own lawyer, but if Nick is that lawyer...

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
However, everybody knows "the bar" means being admitted to practice law. He's just being a faggot.
This is one of the "Techniketias" I'm embarrassed for even having credited. It's "technically" correct. Nick is still completely unauthorized to practice law. Plus he's a huge faggot.
 
This is one of the "Techniketias" I'm embarrassed for even having credited. It's "technically" correct. Nick is still completely unauthorized to practice law. Plus he's a huge faggot.
I never talk about the letters after my name.

As opposed to this fag who couldn't even keep up with his CLE.
 

He’s such a fucking idiot. He was a member of the Minnesota Bar (worthiness dubious at best, but still). If he means he’s not a member of MN State Bar Association, which is a voluntary association and not required for practice, that’s another thing entirely.

He doesn’t even fucking know his (former) profession.

However, everybody knows "the bar" means being admitted to practice law.
The phrase (“member of the Minnesota Bar”) is even used in the Rules for Admission. It means exactly and only what it means.

Why is he such a complete dipshit. (And yes, I meant to leave off the question mark.). Ten freaking years after being graduated from law school and he doesn’t know a single thing.

What a disgrace.
 
It's a cheap dish within his actual skill range
Listen, I think the plating argument is as silly as it comes, it's turd polishing at its finest and anyone with eyes can spot slop regardless of it being served on $400 finery with $35 chopsticks or not.

But you cannot look at that half burnt, greasy mess and claim the plate is on his skill level, you'd have to be an equally poor cook. Fried rice done well will not look like that, it will look clean and crisp and you will only *taste* the fats, not see them openly.
 
The phrase (“member of the Minnesota Bar”) is even used in the Rules for Admission. It means exactly and only what it means.
Fun fact: Nicholas Robert Rekieta is so fucking stupid he doesn't even understand plain language.

Also let's contemplate this fact. If Nick continues to stream and uses "Rekieta Law" (a fake law firm with no lawyer authorized to practice law) as his advertisement for his non-existent, fraudulent "law firm," he may actually be committing a crime by doing that.
 
He’s such a fucking idiot. He was a member of the Minnesota Bar (worthiness dubious at best, but still). If he means he’s not a member of MN State Bar Association, which is a voluntary association and not required for practice, that’s another thing entirely.

He doesn’t even fucking know his (former) profession.


The phrase (“member of the Minnesota Bar”) is even used in the Rules for Admission. It means exactly and only what it means.

Why is he such a complete dipshit. (And yes, I meant to leave off the question mark.). Ten freaking years after being graduated from law school and he doesn’t know a single thing.

What a disgrace.
And bc I’m annoyed enough to (almost) double-post, here are the “essential” eligibility requirements (beyond education, passing the Bar Exam and professional responsibility exam, and (cough) character and fitness review):

Essential Eligibility Requirements. Applicants must be able to demonstrate the following essential eligibility requirements for the practice of law:
(1) The ability to be honest and candid with clients, lawyers, courts, the Board, and others;
(2) The ability to reason, recall complex factual information, and integrate that information with complex legal theories;
(3) The ability to communicate with clients, lawyers, courts, and others with a high degree of organization and clarity;
(4) The ability to use good judgment on behalf of clients and in conducting one’s professional business;
(5) The ability to conduct oneself with respect for and in accordance with the law;
(6) The ability to avoid acts which exhibit disregard for the rights or welfare of others;
(7) The ability to comply with the requirements of the Rules of Professional Conduct, applicable state, local, and federal laws, regulations, statutes, and any applicable order of a court or tribunal;
(8 ) The ability to act diligently and reliably in fulfilling one’s obligations to clients, lawyers, courts, and others;
(9) The ability to use honesty and good judgment in financial dealings on behalf of oneself, clients, and others; and
(10) The ability to comply with deadlines and time constraints.

Bolded for your pleasure. But basically could have just bolded every word.
 
Back