The issue is not so much the people who already vote, it’s those who basically don’t care about all this politics bullshit until suddenly it notably affects their daily lives. As dumb as it may sound, outright banning junk food would function as a tangible change in their everyday lives, and a negative one for many. Is it an objectively good idea? Of course! Subjectively, are you going to have a bunch of people who previously didn’t care suddenly interested in giving their vote to anyone able to fix this tangible issue? Also of course! It’s a literal “bread and circuses” deal.
Of course she was born a hundred years ago. Can you fuck off with this gimmick and just hit up a retirement home already if you're that hard up? You might as well be a furry or a discord tranny where I can't get through a single post of yours without being reminded that, yes, you want to fuck grandmas.
Maybe there needs to be some kind of benefit made for SNAP in order to soften the potential blow of having soda purchases being restricted? Apparently they it can't be used to buy foods that are hot at the point of sale or medicines, vitamins and supplements. Perhaps something could be done with that.
You know what you can do with SNAP? Restrict it so here's what you can buy: fresh/frozen chicken, ground beef, veggies and fruit (fresh and frozen), rice, beans, eggs, milk, butter, and spices. If you cannot figure out anything to do with any of these then you are beyond saving, and your problem isn't being broke; it's being lazy. Probably add flour to this, and maybe bread/cheese/sandwich meats.
I noticed this same affect from Tucker Carlson when he was on Fox News and I never liked him as a result.
I'd buy frozen veggies over fresh. The shelf life is longer and the nutrients stay locked in.
bro stole my idea but I respect it. also, cookware as well maybe? and i'd add peanut butter and jelly perhaps
I was hoping the first thing RFK focused on was getting rid of the awful INGREDIENTS in all the foods, since Canada and Europe outright banned a lot of chemicals in foods and they didn't get in trouble. But I suppose you can focus on multiple things at once.
way cheaper too, 1 bag for 4 servings is 99 cents at Walmart.
I was on topic with what he was talking about. Your hostility is unwarranted.
Wrong one.
Maybe, but you'd have to limit it to some hard dollar amount per-year. You don't need anything more than a thirty dollar non-stick for big dishes, and a smaller frying pan for things like eggs and beans. Same with things like utensils. I'd go as far as to say you only need a hundred bucks if even that to have yourself a functional kitchen set. Don't give these retards the ability to go out and blow their (your) money on overpriced KitchenAids (which I'd say is an appliance not cookware, but I wouldn't want these idiots going out and trying to buy/resell expensive kitchen toys on taxpayer money).
another thing i'm thinking about is peanut butter. on one hand, great source of protein, fills you up quick, etc. but on the other, it's pretty damn fattening.
At least you managed to avoid Hamilton girls, Hamilton fans are quite possible the worst of all nu-Broadway slop enjoyers. Or god forbid you ended up with a girl who likes Dear Evan Hansen
Nope, you want government to be the provider for your children you get told what they eat.
People in this thread are more concerned about niggers chimping out if they can't buy junk food and junk drinks with their ebt.
Maybe he isn’t desperate enough to fuck teenage runaways and female pedophiles?
