Point to the exact spot where I said niggers are selling food second-hand. No, the part where I said poors reselling kitchen appliances (read: not food (also, a concern stated in response to a hypothetical situation in where you are allowed cookware on benefits)) doesn't count. For this assignment you'll also need to include each of the other food items that I listed in addition to beans (hint: it's in your own post!).
bro the founders were fuming when they were still alive. to the point of literally killing each other over party politics. none of this shit is new. our views are only tainted by the relative peace after WW2.
They want their cake and to eat it too. They'll say Nazi is overused and means nothing to defend themselves. But then turn around and use it to libel / slander their political enemies.
Even Jefferson and John Adams were on again off again friends over conflicting views on government.
nigger i lived through that shit. Our food went from being made in house by the nice old lunch ladies and it was actually GOOD to being trucked in Sysco prison tier shit that smelled bad and was colored wrong. the only way that decreased obesity was by being too disgusting to eat at all.
I don't watch tiktok so I don't know what people are cooking for clout but you can buy frozen seafood, including lobster and crab. You can't buy cooked shrimp (a lot of grocers will dump old bay on it and steam it if you want) but fresh and frozen shrimp is fine (and you can probably have the shrimp steamed after you've paid for it)
It's more or less the point of soda being a cheap alternative as a luxury item. Like prostitution.
You know they're nothing but shills and grifters at that point so it's a bit of a silverlining. Screw 'em.
shrimp is one thing, gumbos and cajun cooking use it a lot. lobster and crab? fuck no, dont use EBT on that
What's the most idiotic to me is that they're all missing the greatest point; soda is a 'luxury' food item, in the sense that you absolutely do not need it whatsoever to survive, and that it serves as nothing more than a treat. When you're out on your ass and needing a government handout to get by (which is fine, I think it's happened to most of us at some point in our lives) the last thing the taxpayer should be doing is contributing to lowering your quality of health and making you even less capable of working. If you want a treat then it should be out of your own pocket.
This is actually kind of fitting. I'm sure it's been said plenty of times here and elsewhere, but lobster historically was a working man's food. Only recently did it become an upper-class thing. I'm actually of the opinion that fish and seafood ought to go back to being a poor people food and remain eligible for purchase through benefits. Lobster is 100% better for you than any of the candy or soda you can buy with them.
Is that really what you think they did? They still served the same slop, they just served nastier versions of the slop. I'd have killed to get fresh vegetables on my lunch tray if it meant getting rid of the processed slop gruel they gave us.
I agree that stores would take a massive hit for it, but then why should cola companies, of all the worthless most pointless things you can put into your body, have so much pull in government, at the detriment of the health of the people it's meant to serve? If so much of their money is tangled up in poor people wrecking up their own health then they deserve that hit.
oh i agree and lost profits would like be balanced by decreased stock orders, but the seethe would be enormous. and possibly entertaining. because, if you ask any person on the street most will probably agree with removing soda and sweets from food stamps but its probably one of those issues that are 50/50 so it'd be bad politics to serious peruse.
That was parroting a report that was already known back in the day, and didn't really confirm anything that wasn't already known, and was mostly hokey.
