View attachment 7132919
https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...the-attorney-generals-delegation-of-authority (A)
Blondie has revoked the ATF's ability to ban people from owning guns, or certain types of guns, as it was always something the Attorney General had delegated to them, and the AG can un-delegate it at any time. (The ATF was prohibited by law from un-banning people for decades.) I'm not sure but I think this kills red flag laws stone cold dead?
There's no way in hell they let her/Trump do this, so place your bets: Which corrupt judge announces the TRO preventing her from doing her job because it's not being done in a way the left approves of?
What this order does is remove from the ATF the responsibilty for the review process for restoring firearms rights to people who have lost them. If you committed some sort of felony 25 years ago and have been law-abiding ever since, you're SUPPOSED to be able to apply to have your firearm rights restored. The ATF is SUPPOSED to have been reviewing these applications, but they haven't been, because Congress has not appropriated any money to the ATF to review these requests since 1992. They claim that it took too much time and money to investigate. The yearly funding appropriations to the ATF has specifically EXCLUDED reviewing these applications, effectively making it impossible for anyone to get their firearms rights restored once they're taken, ever.
This order also hints at reforming the review procedure to make it more efficient and less costly, since that was the excuse made in 1992, when the ATF stopped reviewing the applications. It's in no way specific in how the process might be reformed, however.
My sheer speculative guess is that they may reduce the process to a simple background check of recent criminal history, and approval/denial left up to a team of relatively low level employees. As it is now, the applications must be round-filed in triplicate, suggesting that three people needed to sign off on any restoration of rights (if they'd actually been doing them).
idk if this will affect red flag laws. It doesn't really seem that way right now. But I guess if you were wrongfully put on the red flag list, you'd now have a method to get your rights restored some time in the future.
I skipped about a hundred pages of the thread to get through the food stamp conversations
"Hi I haven't read the thread and know nothing about the subjects being discussed, but I sure do have strong and important opinions about it anyway that surely haven't been repeated 1,000 times over in the last 100 pages so I'm going to post my hot takes about it anyway.."