US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The drugs we suggested wasn't fent. It was the real bad shit.
Now I remember. Yeah, reading about those was fun.
You know you could just shoot the druggies. I'd be much cheaper than playing psyops.
Yeah, reading back on the original post about it, it wasn't infiltrating the cartel like I'd remembered, it was a lot simpler; just reintroduce the product back into their supply and announce that some indeterminate amount has been adulterated with a number of horrific substances, and dare their customers to roll the dice.
 
‘Who are you with?’: Trump’s latest way to pick at the media
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Laura Wagner
2025-03-25 16:42:48GMT
During a press scrum at the Kennedy Center on March 17, an NBC reporter asked President Donald Trump whether he used an autopen to sign documents, something Trump had criticized former president Joe Biden for doing.

Trump said yes, then contradicted himself, and when the reporter attempted to ask a follow-up question, he shut her down with what has recently become his go-to refrain:

“Who are you with?”

When the reporter replied that she worked for NBC News, Trump waved her off and ignored the question. “I don’t want to talk to NBC anymore. I think you’re so discredited,” he said.

The president has employed the same strategy in recent weeks to dismiss questions from reporters at other news organizations, including The Washington Post, HuffPost and Voice of America.

Trump’s long-held antagonism toward an array of media outlets ramped up after his November reelection: He has sued over coverage he doesn’t like; seized control of the White House press pool and stocked it with friendly news outlets; banned the Associated Press from White House events because it continues to use “Gulf of Mexico” instead of “Gulf of America”; and, in a recent speech at the Justice Department, accused news outlets of “illegal” reporting.

“Who are you with?” is a relatively minor way to troll the media, but its recent prevalence has drawn notice.

On March 12, Patsy Widakuswara, then White House bureau chief for the now-gutted Voice of America network, asked visiting Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin whether he and Trump would discuss “the president’s plans to expel Palestinian families” from Gaza.

“Nobody’s expelling any Palestinians,” Trump said, and asked Widakuswara, “Who are you with?”

“Voice of America, sir,” she answered.

“No wonder,” Trump said, and moved on.

On Air Force One on March 10, Post reporter Michael Birnbaum asked Trump whether he felt that Russian President Vladimir Putin had disrespected him by invading Ukraine.

“Who are you with?” Trump asked. When Birnbaum responded, Trump said, “Uh, you’ve lost a lot of credibility,” and skipped to other reporters.

NBC was the target of the barb on March 7, when reporter Gabe Gutierrez asked about an alleged disagreement between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. DOGE Service head Elon Musk. Trump denied there was a clash, called Gutierrez a “troublemaker,” then asked what news outlet he was with.

When Gutierrez told him, Trump said: “Ugh, no wonder. That’s enough.”

And on Feb. 9, HuffPost White House reporter S.V. Dáte asked Trump about a statement from Vice President JD Vance that suggested that the Trump administration could sidestep Supreme Court rulings that infringed on the executive branch’s power.

“I don’t know even what you’re talking about,” Trump responded. “Neither do you. Who are you with?”

When Dáte replied that he was with HuffPost, Trump said: “Oh, no wonder. ... Are they still around? I haven’t read them in years. I thought they died.”

In Trump’s first term, aggressive questioning during news conferences used to be “an easy way to become a star,” said one White House correspondent, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to be candid about the relationship between the media and the administration. Now, the correspondent said, it has become a liability: “I think there’s a community consensus that people are trying to be a little more polite than in the first term because of the threat of consequences.”

When asked about the president’s pattern of asking where a reporter works, assistant press secretary Liz Huston replied via email: “President Trump is the most accessible and transparent President in history.”

In some cases, Trump asks reporters where they are from because he approves of their questions.

On Feb. 18, Axios reporter Marc Caputo asked Trump about his decisions to ban the Associated Press from White House events, and whether Trump was concerned about the “encroaching amount of liberalism” in the language in the AP’s influential stylebook, which cautions against using the term “illegal immigrants” and supports phrases such as “gender-affirming care.”

Trump took the opportunity to blast the Associated Press for its “ridiculous” and “obsolete” language and for being “very, very wrong on the election, on Trump, and the treatment of Trump.” He then thanked the reporter for the question, asking, “Who are you with?”

When Caputo answered, Trump said: “It’s a very good question. Thank you.”

And sometimes he asks the question out of apparent curiosity to know whom he is dealing with.

“A lot of the time when he asks, ‘Who are you with?,’ it is because he does not recognize you,” another White House correspondent said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized by their employer to comment publicly. “I know sometimes that’s had some sinister overtones … but sometimes he genuinely does not recognize you and wants to know who you’re with.”

While there were more contentious spats between Trump and reporters during his first term, some see the current shift as incremental. White House correspondents point out that reporters still ask the president sharp, direct questions, and they chalk up the decrease in fiery exchanges to reporters realizing how to best elicit substantive answers from him.

“With Trump, you get more with honey than you do with vinegar,” the reporter said.

What reporters actually get from Trump has, of course, long been a subject of debate.

“He says one thing one day, the exact opposite the next. What difference does it make?” said a third White House reporter, also speaking on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t cleared by their employer to comment. “If the goal is just to generate content, he’s a content machine. But what is he really telling you? And that answer, I don’t know.”
RNC asks states for details about their voter files, part of a larger effort to question elections
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Christine Fernando and Christina A. Cassidy
2025-03-25 23:28:19GMT
CHICAGO (AP) — The Republican National Committee on Tuesday launched a massive effort to probe voter registration lists nationwide amid a broader strategy to seize on voter rolls to question the integrity of elections.

RNC sent public records requests asking for documents related to voter roll list maintenance to the top election officials in 48 states and the District of Columbia, asserting that the public should know how states are removing ineligible people from voter rolls, including dead people and non-citizens.

The move came the same day President Donald Trump took sweeping executive action seeking major changes to U.S. elections, including requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. It also coincides with common misinformation narratives about non-citizens and dead people voting, cases of which are exceedingly rare and are largely caught and prosecuted when it does occur.

“Voters have a right to know that their states are properly maintaining voter rolls and quickly acting to clean voter registration lists by removing ineligible voters,” RNC chairman Michael Whatley said in a statement.

The National Voter Registration Act already requires states to take steps to maintain accurate and current voter registration lists.

Since the 2020 election, conservative activists have seized on false claims of widespread fraud as justification for scrutinizing the work of election officials to maintain voter lists. County election officials have reported being inundated with public record requests that consume workers’ time, often as they are trying to prepare for elections.

In 2024, six in 10 local election officials responding to a survey conducted by The Elections & Voting Information Center at Portland State University agreed with the statement that “unduly burdensome requests significantly impede my ability to perform my duties.”

There have been attempts to challenge large numbers of individual voters based on flawed analysis. States have numerous ways to identify voters who have died or moved, including scanning death and court records to ensure the list of eligible voters and their addresses are as accurate and up to date as possible.

Twenty-four states also are part of a bipartisan, multi-state effort to help them maintain accurate voter lists. It used to be a larger group, but nine GOP-led states left the Electronic Registration Information Center, known as ERIC, two years ago as conservatives raised questions about its funding and purpose.

Over the last two years, ERIC has provided members with 1,040 reports identifying 8.2 million voter records that were likely out of date, according to research presented at a meeting earlier this year of chief election officials. The data included voters who had died, moved within a state or to another state and duplicate registrations.
 
A major theme of all of the Bioshock games is political extremism and people going to ridiculous lengths to establish what they see as utopia.
Bioshock 1 and Infinite are some of the most jewish games I've ever come across.
In Bioshock 1 a lot of the characters are jews, they're seeking a home where they can be themselves, and they've all been traumatised by the goys.
Having Elizabeth in Infinite abort herself from reality by killing her father because she'll became mega Hitler if she becomes an adult is about what I would expect from Levine
 
A major theme of all of the Bioshock games is political extremism and people going to ridiculous lengths to establish what they see as utopia. Ryan felt that everyone's contributions to the economy would make them a link in a "great chain" that would uphold everyone by making them act in their own self interest, and it made his citizens eat each other. Ryan even broke his own principle when he decided to go after Fontaine and Lamb despite them playing by the rules of his game. Lamb thought that collectivism was the only way forward and that the only way humanity could survive is if they turned into self-sacrificial zombies; you see this with Alex the Great when you go into his lab and he's turned himself into a weird ADAM monster in his quest to become "the first utopian." Ryan and Lamb think that their vision of utopia is so great that people need to be literally forced into it. Same with Comstock, actually, but the theme of being "caged in" is moreso played for Elizabeth and Booker than the general populace.
The issue with this is that if the theme was "American exceptionalism" then Lincoln should have been made a diety for keeping the union together.

BS1 worked because Ryan was shown to be be a reasonable person who's idealism blew up in his face in what should have been a predictable manner. BSI didn't work because it was a bunch of libtards running off the chain trying to make a muh white supremacy strawman.
 
The issue with this is that if the theme was "American exceptionalism" then Lincoln should have been made a diety for keeping the union together.

BS1 worked because Ryan was shown to be be a reasonable person who's idealism blew up in his face in what should have been a predictable manner. BSI didn't work because it was a bunch of libtards running off the chain trying to make a muh white supremacy strawman.
I mentioned this before in this thread (or the first US politics thread), but Bioshock Infinite in the most stereotypical 'stupid liberal' game I've ever played. It's top-to-bottom pathological hatred of America, Christianity, and conservatism in general. All done in the most ham-fisted, college-freshemen way I've ever seen from any piece of pre-2016 media.

Of course, the post-Trump torrent of deliberately & spitefully bad shit makes it look downright quaint by comparison. That doesn't keep it from being the platonic ideal of stupid arrogant liberal media.
 
I'm glad your Gran never went to Hawaii.
We literally have yearly street festival dedicated to Spam every year in Honolulu. I eat Spam at least once a week. Spam musubis are perfect on-the-go food, and it's sold everywhere, gas stations, convenience stores, supermarkets, you name it. There's even froo-froo Spam dishes made and sold by high end stores. When I lived on the mainland, I disgusted my roommates by frying it up often. We love that shit.
 
BSI didn't work because it was a bunch of libtards running off the chain trying to make a muh white supremacy strawman.
BSI didn't know what it wanted. I think it was supposed to be a cautionary tale against radicalism and cult of personalities, showing the horrors of a Christian ethnostate, then show the horrors of the Vox Populi revolution as a response, followed by your self sacrifice to end the cycle. But they didn't really go that far in the white supremacy direction outside of throwing a tomato at an interracial couple (which you get stopped by the police before doing it) and just showing segregation and inequality in general (it also doesn't help that all this allowed an absolute scientific and engineering marvel to exsist in the form of the floating city showing the direct benefits of that society). Meanwhile when the oppressed finally revolt they dress up as literal devils committing massacres, scalping people, and their leader was about to kill an innocent child because he was the son of a business man (until the retconned it in a DLC).
 
We literally have yearly street festival dedicated to Spam every year in Honolulu. I eat Spam at least once a week. Spam musubis are perfect on-the-go food, and it's sold everywhere, gas stations, convenience stores, supermarkets, you name it. There's even froo-froo Spam dishes made and sold by high end stores. When I lived on the mainland, I disgusted my roommates by frying it up often. We love that shit.
One of our local places is a Hawiaan BBQ joint, they sell Spam Musubi. It's fucking amazing and I got a spam slicer, mold, and furikake from Amazon to do it myself, haha. Great little snack.
 
Nobody is going to war. I remember there was a user called Zedkissed and he'd scoff at people talking about da b00g because it's never going to happen. Right now we have infinite free porn and cheap beer. The number of people willing to give that up to sit in a ditch and be shot at and blown apart by drones with grenades is very, very small.
I remember that Zed guy, I thought he was a good boi. (I don't think I ever directly talked with him very much if at all, but I'm pretty sure he would have hated me if we ever did talk. XD Sorry Jersh please don't kill me. I've been deprived of my cheese for far too long, and I really do need it.)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Beyond all that, if you were around at the time, the hype for BS Infinite was off the charts. It was an endless parade of puff pieces like "The Citizen Kane of Video Games", "Video Games Are Finally Art", and "The Deep, Resonant Message of Bioshock Infinite". It was massively hyped up to be The Thing, and for a while, dominated game journalism.

What's telling is that nobody remembers it anymore. People bringing it up ITT just reminded me of it, but before that, I hadn't thought of the game in several years. It has no lasting fanbase, not even anyone still bringing it up as some profound thing. It is probably the peak of the Soy Era, because all the soybeard guys were all over it.
 
Jasmine Crockett really wants to be the black AOC.

March 25, 2025

Rep. Jasmine Crockett mocks Texas's wheelchair-bound governor Abbott as 'Gov. Hot Wheels,' then keeps digging​

By Monica Showalter

Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas is fairly new on the job in the House, but already being touted as the Democrats' great presidential hope for 2028.

She's young, she's pretty, she offends Republicans, much as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, lately seen sporting mom jeans stuffed over her increasingly stout figure, once did in her heyday.
The New York Times has been particularly solicitous of this Hollywood-style big buildup, calling Crockett "an influential surrogate of the Kamala Harris campaign," and cited her "stardom," and claiming she's "one of the party's most effective communicators."

Others have called her "the unquestioned leader of her party."
Since then Crockett has decided to show us who she is. She spewed this:
 
Did you have both parents at home?
Dad worked, mom stayed at home. Both are still in a happy marriage. Might explain a lot.
To be fair, floating extremely pretty sky cities where you can say nigger and exercise your right to not let niggers, irish, germans, or viking rapebabies (british) into your store is basically paradise.
Low crime, no obesity, pretty women, well kept streets and buildings. If that’s a right wing dystopia, I wanna live there.
I guess making fun of the disabled is fine when it’s people they don’t like.
 
Dad worked, mom stayed at home. Both are still in a happy marriage. Might explain a lot.

Low crime, no obesity, pretty women, well kept streets and buildings. If that’s a right wing dystopia, I wanna live there.

I guess making fun of the disabled is fine when it’s people they don’t like.
Then when we laugh of a disabled democrat, they shout "How dare you?". OTOH, Jasmine Crockett should be careful if karma decided to prank her.
 
Beyond all that, if you were around at the time, the hype for BS Infinite was off the charts. It was an endless parade of puff pieces like "The Citizen Kane of Video Games", "Video Games Are Finally Art", and "The Deep, Resonant Message of Bioshock Infinite". It was massively hyped up to be The Thing, and for a while, dominated game journalism.

What's telling is that nobody remembers it anymore. People bringing it up ITT just reminded me of it, but before that, I hadn't thought of the game in several years. It has no lasting fanbase, not even anyone still bringing it up as some profound thing. It is probably the peak of the Soy Era, because all the soybeard guys were all over it.
Its lasting cultural impact is a SFM model of Elizabeth
 
I am not a Texas resident, I know very little about Abbott, and I'm certainly not such a paragon of righteousness that I haven't stooped to belittling someone with disabilities, but hot damn the optics of denigrating a paraplegic man in front of a "Human Rights Campaign" backdrop is amazing.
Abbott was a personal injury lawyer, which in my eyes makes him nigger-tier and loses all sympathy from me.
 
Back