Unfortunately that light will be staying that way for the forseeable future due the biggest flaws of actually putting things on a 92 and planning to use it every day. It's a pain to get new holsters that accommodate, i went with the custom im using now because I was happy with the light after a few hundred rounds of night shooting. I'd be more willing to just say fuck it, but I'm saving for a fancy shotgun.
If you slam a magazine into it with a snap cap loaded In it hard enough will it go forward?
Damn. well there goes the theory it changed gender into a Mauser.
Have you tried whipping it against a wall in rage?
I agree. Maybe also try submerging it under water and fucking with it. At this point anything is fair game. Or a powerful magnet. Something probably is knocked loose inside that acted as the slide release. Maybe find a diagram of the parts.
Ive considered it.
So the first one works, and the gun will close, but as soon as you rack the slide again it locks back up. I tried the hammer thing and it just doesn't work at all. and i hit the thing pretty damn hard. I've also never had this gun apart.
with the slide locked to the rear, use a tool to depress the striker block towards the top of the slide, the striker should move forward. prise the striker sleeve upwards and you should see the striker move forward. prise the striker cover out of the slide and remove the striker assembly (striker, striker sleeve, striker spring, and striker keeper) to the rear. the slide should now move forward and out of the gun easily.
reminds me of some of my older aristocrat competition revolver setups.
I trust you mean you have never fully disassembled the gun down to its parts? You have field stripped it, yes?
Is this a striker issue, though? One of the clips linked by @Yours Truly 2095 shows that the jam can be fixed by brute forcing the slide release, which makes me question if this is related to the striker.. unless there are multiple parts inside the gun that cause it to jam in an identical manner.
Ok, I understand what race guns are, but to me accessories on revolvers about always look like mall ninja shit.
This finish on the other hand is some Gucci pimp sheeiit
That's a budget Korth.
I would like to point out that my 2010 ish manufacture Colt Delta Elite was obviously made before CZ bought them out and unfucked most of their guns.
That's when I bought my first and only Colt, a series 70 in .45. It had some pretty ugly machining marks inside the frame and I ended up sending it back to their factory because the breech face had a huge gouge in it. Like, how the fuck does something like that get by their QA people?
I wonder how good a Korth is. I like revolvers alright, but I wonder if paying $4k+ for a revolver gets one a firearm that feels/performs like it costs that much.
Try a bigger hammer.
There will never be a good medium for comparison when it comes to diminishing returns. People who don't shoot enough will be gushing over how smooth it is and never actually use it, people who shoot enough have personal builds/worn-in revolvers that run better for them but have to begrudgingly admit that a ~$4-5k revolver is better than a Ruger.
Korth is what a revolver is like after you get action job, shoot 3,000 rounds through it, to get that silky smooth trigger pull but out of the box. probably costs about the same in the long run.
That's damn disappointing. I was a huge Colt fan for many years, but I'm glad a got a Dan Wesson for my 1911 instead of one of the newer Colt offerings. And believe me, it hurt not to get a Colt.
