US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
These little summer jobs and flipping burgers are fine, but it's offloading all the menial grueling slave labor that Mexicans were paid nothing for off to the American youth and reinforced the idea that some jobs just have to be slave labor. The idea that it's okay to have jobs with shit hours, shit pay, no benefits is retarded. I'm not saying teenagers need perfect jobs, but it's creating that expectation that work needs to be grueling and miserable and dehumanizing so some boomer retard can afford a second condo to rent out and that's just how the system has to work. It goes back to the idea that if the system can't guarantee people decent jobs that they can afford to live on, own a home, support a family, what's the point in supporting the system?

It just doesn't sit right with me, there should be a push for workers to be paid what they're owed and worth instead of the continuing exploitation that the US loves because god forbid we talk about class.
Agreed. Also, it's completely nonsensical and retarded to offer 14-15 year olds nightshift of all things.
 
He's on the state human rights board.
So what? Is Massie supposed to meet with every Deep State bureaucrat in Kentucky? He's not a constituent and as a state bureaucrat, has zero authority over a federal official. Massie is correctly focusing on his constituents' interests instead of pandering to rich lobbyists who can afford to fly to DC to harass him.
 
It's just another Democrat funded attack on Trump, they're looking for anything to give them a lever on him to stop the rampant surprise buttsex he's been committing on them.
But do they have an actual case? All I see is some disphit who looks exactly how you'd expect a bugman would. Boasberg was against deporting gangbangers. How the fuck can the average American be against the deportation of those fucks?
 
He's on the state human rights board.


View attachment 7145012
View attachment 7145013
View attachment 7145015
View attachment 7145017

Massie is refusing to meet this rabbi to discuss a bill that affects his constituents.
"Human Rights" as a concept are inherently anti-democratic and oppressive as it basically gives a minority as small as .0000002% of the population more of a say than the majority. The guy who coined the term or at least popularized it proudly admitted so. If you argue for human rights you're essentially arguing for oligarchy, quintisentially jewish.
 
But do they have an actual case? All I see is some disphit who looks exactly how you'd expect a bugman would. Boasberg was against deporting gangbangers. How the fuck can the average American be against the deportation of those fucks?
They don't care if the law is on their side. They want to drag things out to waste time and resources. And that's before the fact that they think they can interoperate 'Law says yes' as 'Law says no. What are you going to do about it?'.
 
But do they have an actual case? All I see is some disphit who looks exactly how you'd expect a bugman would. Boasberg was against deporting gangbangers. How the fuck can the average American be against the deportation of those fucks?
They kinda have a case.

They're suing for a TRO (of course) to "prevent the deletion of any governmental related records contained within these apps" and using the FOIA and their pet Judge to get it.

Edit: sorry for those not in the know a TRO is a temporary restraining order and is critical to the Dems plans because it is non-appealable meaning the pet judge can order what he wants and it takes effect immediately and there isn't Jack shit you can do to challenge it.

My opinion would be that AO will then want these messages handed over to them via a FOIA so they can scour them for anything useful to the Democrats before accidentally leaking them to friendly press just like that rat bastard Jew did. Pretty straight forward IMHO.

American Oversight is nothing more then another DNC funded arm of the party being used to tie up Trump's hands with as much lawfare as possible. As the election cost the Dem's all their institutional power they have to resort to other ways to slow the Rape Train until they can get their shit together.

Rich Democrats are pumping millions into NGO's like AO in a desperate attempt at damage control that's all this is unless you believe that those gangbangers in El Salvador can suddenly afford Washington DC based lawyers that cost $500 bucks an hour.
 
Last edited:
So what? Is Massie supposed to meet with every Deep State bureaucrat in Kentucky? He's not a constituent and as a state bureaucrat, has zero authority over a federal official. Massie is correctly focusing on his constituents' interests instead of pandering to rich lobbyists who can afford to fly to DC to harass him.
How is ignoring a request to discuss a law that affects his constituents "focusing on his constituents interests"?
 
I’ll never understand why he picked such a shitty judge as ACB in the first place. I get that he wanted a woman to replace Ginsberg for the optics, but he picked such a terrible Rino
As the great @Gehenna said, "blame Mitch". Mitch was one of the RINO shitheads who made Trump's first term less than stellar.

There is a slight possibility neither side doesn't really care for the other.
"No loyalty to his country." What a kike. Nothing more loyal to one's nation than requiring people announce competing interests when running for office. Completely normal, and it should already be the law at minimum. However I guess expecting a snake to be honest is too much.

Massie is refusing to meet this rabbi to discuss a bill that affects his constituents.
And the grand effect of the bill on his constituents is? Oh, they have to mention their duel citizenship. Oh the horror!
 
Tim Walz: "Old white guys disappoint us on a regular basis in this country"

View attachment 7145158

Tim Walz agrees with this lady who says the 2024 election was rigged:
View attachment 7145161
Whatever 'powered by the people' is their volume is so low it's insane. Also, yeah the lesson you learned from 2024 is to be more left, bash white people, and start election denying. Really just same old.

I just noticed Walz is apparently double billed with Beto lol, good match up please run those in 2028.
 
"Human Rights" as a concept are inherently anti-democratic and oppressive as it basically gives a minority as small as .0000002% of the population more of a say than the majority. The guy who coined the term or at least popularized it proudly admitted so. If you argue for human rights you're essentially arguing for oligarchy, quintisentially jewish.
That was kind of the intention though. That the majority wouldn't be able to tyrannize the minority. The problem with human rights isn't conceptual, its practical, they just dont work because the people in power and running things fundamentally don't respect America's political tradition and have no problems censoring people and tyrannizing them in the name of 'safety'
 
Back