Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Sloppa]

The best part is how after promising to Nick that they would read superchats under $20 only if they're positive and they would read negative superchats only if they pay $20 or more, in the end they just snaked him and read a long-awaited $5 superchat on his least favorite topic anyway, and then proceeded to make light of it more instead of moving on, to his visible discomfort:

View attachment 7150304


If you look closely, you can actually pinpoint the second when his heart seethes in half:

View attachment 7150307

With friends like this, who needs enemies?

He's looks AWFUL, if I didn't know who rekieta was, I would assume this is a Female-Male tranny. Dear God.

 

[Chug Smuckle]

Hardin, to go out and slay Nick Rekieta with an illegal ninja sword.

"Go Hardin! Go and Slay to the extreme!"

 

[AltisticRight]

Was not his GFM stalled at 12k? Which 50k did he lose?

My bad for expecting this skelly to gather anything more than 250 KNU.

They're seething about Eric July. Nick now claims Eric owes him $3,000 because Eric said he'd "pay for his rehab". If I remember, Nick explicitly said it wasn't rehab.

Skelly, Eric July isn't going to fuck your wife. Stop it.

Nick called DUIGuy 'unethical' for rescinding his offer of pro bono representation. He said they had a tentative agreement after one phone call, then cut off contact with no warning. He said it was an ethics violation.

Words from someone who's not a lawyer. If he's convinced of the ethics violation, then report it instead of seething about it.

- The police found Nick's 'funny' things in the house, but they did not find things (like a giant dildo in a drawer) as funny as they actually were

Shamed the Kandiyohi cops for holding his dilldos

It almost sounds like he wanted his dildoes back more than those keedz.

- Nick was saying that the follicle test on his child that came back positive was FLAWED because they were not provided the test results from the hair AND the decontamination wash. They are SUPPOSED to do this to prove that no external contaminant was forced into the hair. This test has been shown in a study to FORCE substances into the sample.

What the fuck is this retarded skeleton babbling on about? How would anyone test a decontamination wash?
A decontamination wash does the OPPOSITE of forcing external contaminants into the hair. Does this retard think before he speaks? Does a dishwasher force dirty leftovers into the dishes? Oh yeah, he uses paper plates like a White nigger.
Where's the protocol stating it's SUPPOSED TO be done the way an illiterate skeleton just pulled out of his butthole after being pozloaded by Jamaican bulls? It went from fake results to the method being 33% false positives (for another drug), to hair colour and race having an impact, then cops rubbing it in and now this? How many goalposts did he plant already? He had to preemptively claim that any positive result was a matter of error before any tests were done. How peculiar. He fed his daughter cocaine. He belongs on a cross (not the sex cross he has, an actual cross).

 

[Folgers Can]

Are you suggesting that Nick has done illegal drugs at Dick Mastersons Barbie dream mansion? Dick has never talked about doing legal drugs and that he has tons of illegal drugs in his house and lots of thirdparty testimony that both him and his fiancé do drugs. Right? Dicks never said that drugs are awesome… right?

For anyone who missed it at the time or let memory fade since, here is our always-reliable narrator detailing the delightful stash of free party favors that Nick just had immediate access to tonight without even needing so much as a key, just in case there was ever any doubt about how seriously Nick takes protecting his "recovery" from such reckless risks or how seriously Nick takes the need to demonstrate to the state his amenability to probation:

33:50...guess who's an addict dick 33:56 masteron is a drug addict and he told this story on air two weeks 34:02 ago... 35:23 ...I went into his drawer in his kitchen where he 35:29 keeps all his drugs and took his his drug drawer I'm not kidding he has a box 35:37 veto don't even lie you know I'm telling the truth he has a box of drugs in his 35:42 [ __ ] kitchen no but you know I'm telling the truth though I know but like I feel like I'm on a back foot here to 35:48 be like hey Vito Vito you're here you don't have to confirm you don't have to 35:54 confirm but I'm telling you he has a box of drugs in his kitchen his drug drawer 35:59 veto veto have you ever been have you ever rifled have you ever rifled through 36:04 the drug drawer Vito have you ever rifle have I ever gone through the drug drawer yeah I go to Dick's house I make a he's 36:11 got a great espresso machine I make myself he does have a great espresso machine I will say that he really does 36:18 he really does and 80s girl kills it with the espresso I will say that 100% 36:23 uh but he also has a drug drawer full of all kinds of substances... 50:19 ...I just 50:25 knew where the drug drawer was I opened it and took theard In fairness when there is a drug drawer you can that 50:31 seems like an accidental kind of thing but were the tabs all like stuck together you thought it was one big no 50:37 it was Liquid drops dude it was not it was not there was not random bottle of 50:42 liquid I just said boom yes yes I just tipped it I just tipped it and anyway 50:48 can you understand why you might be a little concerned you know I mean yeah but I can't but I woke look I woke up 50:54 the next morning and this is a bird B quote he said you're lucky you didn't swallow this tube here because this is 51:02 some experimental [ __ ] somebody else sent me I don't even know what it is you'd be dead right now he's doing 51:07 research chemicals and I'm like I was glad I wasn't dead obviously uh but I 51:14 was like okay well maybe you shouldn't have that in your drug that explains the cow it looked just like the other vile 51:21 too and I'm like okay um but everything I'm saying is the absolute truth and he 51:26 told this story on air like two weeks ago...

[L]

Hey, Minnesota, does anyone give a fuck???

Have you... seen anything of the Minnesota justice system throughout this whole saga? If you were to take the pre-sentence investigation officer who holds Nick's fate in his hands from now through April 18th, the judge who will be hearing what Nick says he'll "get to argue" about probation terms on April 18th, the eventual probation officer who runs the show after April 18th, and the pill-mill shrink who sat down with a drug addict under pending prosecution and agreed that he should spend probation hopped up on legal prescriptions to more drugs than he was doing before the arrest, and if you were to strap each of them into a restraint chair and tape their eyelids open to force-watch every second of the clip above and every second of tonight's TBPITU episode and every other clip proving how much Nick treats his "recovery" like a big fucking joke that's hurtling toward inevitable relapse without the slightest bit of remorse, none of them would care. Not one bit.

All that they care about is that after April 18th he will be pissing in a cup multiple times a week until his inevitable fuckup makes him their bitch, and none of that changes if he happens to go off on the bender to end all benders while that's still allowed for a few short weeks. What about this is difficult to understand?

Nick is high as FUCK on there right now. He's even back to looking for ceiling cats, it's incredible.

In fairness, the Wernicke-Korsakoff brain damage coupled with months of Galaxy Gas abuse could have left him that permanently fucked up without even needing to get high anymore. You just know it when you see it:

 

[Yung Bach]

I know I'm the odd one out here for actually being a regular listener to BPITU…

I don’t know why I read anything past this.

 

[daffodils]

Searching the transcript for 'Aaron', 'revenge', and 'porn' brings up no mention of the legal case. Aaron's deal is probably real, because whenever Nick loses big, he just stops talking about it.

- 15m: he starts whining about not being allowed to drink and how forbidding him the use of mood-altering substances doesn't make sense because sugar and caffeine are still allowed.
- 55m: Nick claims that "exposure" on one of his livestreams was worth $50-70k. Says the other lawyers were a "nice sounding board" but he could have done it with anyone. He's more successful because he's not a legal autist.
- 1h18m: another lengthy retelling of the arrest story with additional details
- 1h35:m Mentions Pomplun by name, points out that another officer is FAT, tries to make the police look stupid and vindictive
- 1h40m: bodycam footage is good, but not in Nick's case, because it is "narrated by a biased narrator"
-1h42m: didn't stream because of personal issues, wants to come back bringing good energy, will go back to Trump streaming
- 1h45m: same old hair follicle test cope
- 2h4m: loves his mugshot, thinks he looks like Nicolas Cage in Raising Arizona
- 2h8m: Nick gives his expert opinion on why Yellowflash's comic won't be good. His arm is shaking like crazy, crosses his arms to make it less obvious.
- 2h10m: Nate The Lawyer; what Nick meant by giving people a gift was to go to their streams and give them superchats: "It's a couple hundred bucks that I wouldn't give anybody else!"
- 2h11m: some people he still likes told him he really fucked up, but the government took his keeeds, so none of that matters anymore, go away!
- 2h13m: seething about DUIGuy for making him look bad in public:"Ethics violation!"

 

[Chongqing]

He's more successful because he's not a legal autist

That's funny.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

- Nick repeated the story about 'missing cocaine'

What it takes at this point is someone to take the release of the bodycam footage to the court in Minnesota and use all the slander by Nick as exhibits why it is in the public's interest.
I do not think we will ever see it unless either April releases it or if someone makes an effort to go through a lower court.

 

[Strix454]

Hey, Minnesota, does anyone give a fuck???

Look at it this way. Plea or not, he will end up getting the same sentence. The only thing that the plea agreement really changed is freeing Kayla and April from probation & drug testing. Its the law in minnesota as per the sentencing guidelines. Nick also paid extra for unconditional release and the reason people pay extra for unconditional release is so they can do drugs and other things. Again. Its the way the laws of the state work.

No matter what he does, about the only thing that can happen to him is more or longer probation. Its just how the drug laws work in that state.

The only way to really legally put the boots to Nick is to get him on probation and have him violate it. And in these public benders, he is showing that he is such an addict and so out of control that he is very likely to violate. And also ironically having Kayla and April not on probation makes it more likely that they will not be able to stay sober and will make Nick's own relapse even more likely.

Its easy to see what happened here. He had to bribe his stupid wife who he hates and HER damn kids with a weekend at the waterpark & probably at gay90s so he could go out to California to do drugs. Which is all he wants to do.

He is total addict with money and a support system of enablers all around him including his parents. He has already gone through alot of cognitive decline and yet more is to come. He is on a path to either turning himself into a drooling retard or killing himself through the drugs. He doesn't have what it takes to get clean. He is too weak.

 

[Dr Naomi Hunter]

I firmly believe that after April 18 the content will flow. The last couple of months has just been a lull, but Crackets will ramp up his retarded antics once the mood altering substances are verboten and give a final push to final victory LCOTY Triple Crown

 

[Vibralldo]

Bob & Celeste, are you proud?

They're the ones that paid

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

I randomly opened to a time period on the video
and nick is just losing it he looks terrible, is shaking, looks an absolute mess.

I deleted the picture as like 20 other people have posted it. But its the eyes closed looking high as a kite one.

I just scrubbed to a random spot in the stream. Nick is zooted for sure.

View attachment 7149756

You and I scrubbed to the same point! MAN is he a mess.

I firmly believe that after April 18 the content will flow. The last couple of months has just been a lull, but Crackets will ramp up his retarded antics once the mood altering substances are verboten and give a final push to final victory LCOTY Triple Crown

I want to crush the bossmanjack fans one last time. A triple slammer as their boy is about to reach greatness and win big, only to fail and lose it all just like his pitiful gambling career.
I hope he pulls it off, I don't think Nick can stay "sober" without screwing up for a full year

 

[Vibralldo]

Having the cops raid your house on a child neglect warrant and they walk around saying how much of a waste and a pity that children live there would be considered rock bottom for most people.

Nick's consistently misunderstood government employees saying "you're so wealthy, why are you acting like the rock bottom drug addicts we usually deal with?" as "woah, your house is so big and fancy! You've got so much more money than the losers we usually deal with! You should be immune from prosecution because you're so rich and cool!"

It went from fake results to the method being 33% false positives (for another drug), to hair colour and race having an impact, then cops rubbing it in and now this?

Don't forget the brief period when he accused Aaron of dosing her.

 

[Oliver Onions]

I hope he pulls it off, I don't think Nick can stay "sober" without screwing up for a full year

It would be hilarious if he manages to steal LOTY for a third year in a row, but I'm preparing myself to be disappointed by the conclusion of his legal stuff. I don't think Nick will be happy with the outcome and will seethe about it for the rest of his life, but I think he's been completely buck broken by the system and even if he does return to streaming like he keeps saying it'll be super low energy.

Plus I'm convinced 2025 is the year Ralph finally dies, and I think he's going to go out in a blaze of ragepig glory.

 

[Dude Snakes]

Early Kaposi's sarcoma.

Skin cancer? Huh I assumed nick would die of an OD or car crash I didn't think cancer might be his end.

 

[dvorak]

Dick just said he uses rust to program

I think I just found Josh another coder

I thought Rust-trannies force all Dicks to be axed as part of their Code of Conduct.

 

[AltisticRight]

Here's a roundup of Nicholas Rekieta's stories regarding his 8-year-old daughter testing positive for cocaine. Specifically, she may or may not have tested positive for the major cocaine metabolite called benzoylecgonine.
I really didn't want to do this because I knew it would take a few hours. (Yeah, this post took me 3 hours.)

Pt1: Basic overview​

Facts about the 8-year-old, now 9 according to Nick:
- She's his favourite
- She likes to sleep with them
- She has some sleeping issues or sleepless nights
- She was on ADHD medication
What is benzoylecgonine? (Pronounced: ben-zoyey-lecko-neen)
- It is a primary metabolite of the drug cocaine
- Urinalysis often detect for this metabolite, with a window of a few hours to a few days. This depends on the person and their usage of the drug, so a blanket number is inappropriate. Chronic users like Nicholas Rekieta will have a larger detection window.
- This metabolite is metabolised in the liver and excreted via urine.
- Benzoylecgonine can be found outside of the human body, such in bodies of water. They pose no drinking water risks. Levels of Benzoylecgonine in bodies of water can be used to estimate the general area's usage of the drug. [1]
- Benzoylecgonine can somehow form in nature through various means. We don't know how this happens, we don't know how it works.
- The metabolite can be made in labs. [2]
What is a hair follicle test?
- Hair is cut off and processed for testing
- The test can detect trace amounts of the drug itself, or more commonly, certain metabolites associated with the drug
- When drugs are consumed, they are broken down in the human body and circulated. They get deposited into hair and stay there.
- The metabolite can stay in hair for months, even years. This gives a much larger detection window than blood or urine tests, but it does take some time for the metabolites to find themselves in a person's hair.
- The method used to detect cocaine metabolites is GC-MS (Gas chromatography - mass spectroscopy).
Are there any other metabolites?
Yes.
- Methylecgonine is found when cocaine is smoked.
- Cocaethylene is found when cocaine is used alongside alcohol.
- Norcocaine is a minor metabolite that's only found among heavy users, ones that use it at least several times a week, if not daily.
There's a lot more. GC-MS is usually calibrated to look for maybe two or three of them. More later.
False positive from her medication?
Not happening. She would test positive for amphetamine use. Not cocaine.

Pt2: What do we know?​

Nick struck the iron while it was hot, preemptively providing a reason to any potential positive test results.

What an interesting thing to say.

“Also, I would like to indicate that the that the petition drafted by the county itself indicates that the children were in no knowledge of any drugs being in the home and are not aware of any use, and any testing of the children that would result in drug use according to the children would be because of secondary exposure from some other source”

This was from an interesting matter of public records, dated below on the 28th of May, 2024, at 4:16 pm.

The children were removed on the 23rd of May, 2024. According to the interesting matter of public records attached below.

The date of the document's preparation.

When were they tested?

Timeline:
23rd of May: Removal of children
24th of May: Friday
25, 26th: Weekends
27th of May: Memorial day
28th of May: Nick preemptive cope about drug testing positives
28th of May: Alisha Sweep visiting the residence of teach them how to clean the house
30th of May: Nicholas Rekieta and his wife was tested
~~ < We don't know when the children were tested, but it should be in this span.
6th of June: The document prepared
This means Nicholas Rekieta tried to insert an explanation of potential positive test results BEFORE the test.
This is highly likely, unless they were able to prepare and test everything, and report on it within less then 2 working days, on the 23rd and 24th where reporting was on the same day. This is because 25th-27th were non-working days. Realistically, that would be less than 40 hours because of how the court report was timed.
He knew it.

Test result:

She tested positive for cocaine or the metabolite benzoylecgonine at a level of >5000pg/mg, with the cut-off of 500. This was more than ten times the cut-off.
Edit: After some serious thought, I cannot determine this was for cocaine or the metabolite.

Pt3: Cut-off Levels and Decontamination​

The cut-off was set at 500pg/mg for cocaine, typical for cocaine testing. For federal workers and most workplaces, it's 100-150.[3]

European Workplace Alcohol and Drug Testing society [4] provides a PDF which explains the terms quite well. Instead of writing something, I will quote them.

With hair analysis, when results are nil or below cut-off, results are usually reported as 'negative' or 'not detected'. However, a result below cut-off does not absolutely prove that an individual has not used drugs. Low levels in hair are usually correlated to the small quantities of drugs used, although the minimal detectable dose that can be detected in hair is unknown.

As I have been stating, just because Nicholas Rekieta's 4 remaining children tested negative with respect to the cut-off of 500 does not absolutely prove that they have not used the drug. They might have all been exposed to the drug, yielding a bleep but below the cut-off. We will never know unless Nicholas Rekieta shows the test results.

Nick's 8-year-old daughter tested positive for benzoylecgonine. She tested negative for the other metabolites.

Yeah, I am not joking. He wanted a pat on the back because his daughter didn't test positive for all the metabolites. I am not going to congratulate him because his daughter was clear from smoking crack rocks (Methylecgonine) and didn't mix cocaine with booze (Cocaethylene).

Decontamination​

From the same site in source [4].

The detection of metabolites is the main approach in hair testing to confirm drug use, and exclude external contamination, as metabolism requires ingestion into the body. The following identification of metabolites are recommended for the exclusion of external contamination: 1. Ideally at least two metabolites, such as benzoylecgonine and/or norcocaine and/or cocaethylene and/or hydroxycocaines are used for the confirmation of cocaine consumption;

The examination of the wash residues may aid the interpretation of the results. Decontamination of the hair samples before the analysis is a key step in the preparation of samples before extraction and analysis to remove and minimize the possibility of residue caused by external contamination and other potential assay interferents. It is not possible to know the efficiency of the hair washing and that it does not initiate the extraction of the drug in the hair sample. Most external contamination is due to own use of smokable drugs. By measuring the drug component present in the wash residue and comparing it with the amount in the hair samples it is possible to aid the interpretation of results and can lead to successful differentiation of external contamination from drug use in most cases.

The Cut-off​

The cut-off of 500pg/mg is FOR ADULTS ONLY. It DOES NOT apply to children.

Children have more porous hair, there is no blanket cut-off value for children. I did not want to toss the skeleton this freebie which grants him far more wriggling room due to the lack of proper standards.

Despite that, Nicholas Rekieta's daughter was 8 years old, where the hair is about the same as an adult's. [10]
(KF reference: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-18635067)

He claimed he read 40 abstracts, he claimed he spoke to experts, yet he never brought this up. Instead, he coped about racism and the mythical metabolic glove.
I personally think it's irrelevant because she was tested at such a sky high number. It wasn't 600 or 1000, it was above 5000. It blew the instrument's upper bound it was calibrated for. For all we know, it might have been 15,000.

Pt4: Minnesota Monitoring and Omega Laboratories: an adequate and professional testing facility​

Minnesota Monitoring was overseeing the tests. [5] They outsource actual examination with GC-MS to Omega Laboratories.
Omega Laboratories was the laboratory running these tests. [6]
An overview of their methodology:

Minnesota Monitoring also offers testing for drugs of abuse. Hair testing offers a 5-panel, 7 panel, 13 panel and 18 panel drug hair test for drug detection. The hair test uses state of the art technology (GCMS) to detect many different drugs. The most common is the 5 panel test which looks for THC, cocaine, amphetamines (including Ecstasy), opiates, and PCP in the hair follicles. Hair testing routinely detects drug use from the past 60-90 days and is the most effective tool available for drug screening. Hair testing get its biggest advantage from the fact the hair strand becomes a permanent record of drug use whereas urine is quickly removed from the body. The hair test is easily administered and is non-intrusive. The collector will cut a sample of approximately 120 strands of hair from the head (although body hair can be used) in the presence of the donor, the sample is then sealed in a collection envelope and then sealed again in a plastic security bag. The sample is then sent to our laboratory and results are generally rendered within 24-72 hours.

Omega's extraction method:

Their protocol:

Omega has a really robust track record, you can read a few here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-19050700

The process:

Pt5: Welcome to Copesville​

Let the fun begin. I will start with the Juju segment.
Here is the full clip if you can tolerate the faggot smug furry cow called Juju.

1. Benzoylecgonine produced outside of the human body, I read 40 abstracts
This is retarded. It's a metabolite, metabolised in the liver and excreted through urination.
The metabolite can be produced outside of the human body, on the hair, in very tiny amounts.
2. Hair follicle tests are RACIST AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE DAS RITEEE
Ridiculous. They're claiming Blacks have it worse. The last time I checked, Nicholas Rekieta of Rekieta Law only wore blackface once.
This is also untrue. [7]

There was little evidence of a pattern attributable to hair color bias alone or selective binding of drugs to hair of a particular color. Likewise, there was no discernible pattern associated with race or ethnicity that would lend support to a “race effect” in drug analysis. [8]

3. False positive rates of 35% and higher among children (later, he claimed 1 in 5)
This is an abject lie. False positive rates can be higher among children but overall it will never be 35%. No court will rely on a test that's not even 70% accurate to prosecute druggies. Without a source, he's likely conflating several studies intentionally, such as those about self-reporting. Of course a druggie is less likely to tell you he or she is a druggie, then the test shows they're not just a druggie, but one that lies.
The percentages also changed over the time. It was "above 35%" in Juju's stream, then it lowered to 1 in 5.
In actuality, it's 1 in 5 children of drug users also test positive for drugs [13]. Whether the positive was from cross contamination or ingestion is irrelevant.

Of the 90 hair samples from children examined, 21 (23.3%) were positive for cocaine, with benzoylecgonine always present in the positive samples. The median age of children exposed to cocaine versus the nonexposed was the same (median 2.62 years for both groups). Cocaine concentration in hair ranged between 0.3 and 6.0 ng/mg with a median value 1.6 ng/mg and that of benzoylecgonine ranged between 0.2 and 1.4 ng/mg with a median value of 0.9 ng/mg.
Benzoylecgonine/cocaine ratios ranged between 0.05 and 1.1 with a median value of 0.2. One hair sample was also positive for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine and another for 6-monoacetylmorphine and morphine.

4. External contamination
External contamination is a real concern. Omega Laboratories wash their hair samples to get rid of external contamination.
However, even washing might yield results above cut-off (>500pg/mg). More on this later.
A study [9] focused on contamination and wash methods in a lab setting.
They got volunteers and contaminated their hair with cocaine samples, and then compared it to volunteers that are known, self-reported users of the drugs. They found reliable ways to discriminate between user and contaminated hair. The contaminant was applied days before evaluation.

In the present study, it was shown that seized street cocaine samples contained traces of p-OH-COC, m-OH-COC, p-OH-BE and m-OH-BE. In cohort 1 (externally contaminated hair) only traces of p-OH-COC, m-OH-COC, p-OH-BE and m-OH-BE were detected, whereas cohort 2 (drug users) displayed higher hydroxy metabolite metabolic ratios which can be used to differentiate between contamination and drug use. Furthermore, the data revealed that the exclusive use of the BE/COC, NC/COC, and CE/COC metabolic ratios in hair does not enable the reliable discrimination between COC intake and the external contamination of the hair by contact with COC.

5. The cop's legendary metabolic glove
In futile flailing to cope about the test result, Nicholas Rekieta suggested that the cops rubbed cocaine into his daughter's hair and it metabolised on her scalp. This ridiculous claim was based on a singular Quora post from a wannabe druglord who was busted for trying to build an MDMA lab.

For the sake of argument, let's just grant him the premise.
Back to our timeline, the raid happened in May, on the 23rd and testing was on the 30th. This gives us 7 days.
Here's a study: Consequences of Decontamination Procedures in Forensic Hair Analysis Using Metal-Assisted Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Analysis [11]

Prior to imaging, blank and user hairs from volunteers were contaminated by rubbing cocaine salt powder on the hair for a few minutes or by soaking them for 5 minutes or 5 hours in a 1mg/mL solution of cocaine base or HCl-salt. Washing was performed by shaking the hair for one minute in the described washing solution. All hairs were air dried after washing and before cutting, embedding or mounting them. The effects of different washing solvents (methanol water, dichloromethane, isopropanol, acetonitrile and dichloromethane/water alternately), were tested on contaminated as well as cocaine user hair. Washing solvents were also tested on hairs from different cocaine users. Blank (negative) hairs were tested using the same method.

Indeed, in our contaminated hair samples, most ratios were indeed below this cut-off. Some publications however found BE/cocaine ratios in users hair below this cut-off 24. Consequently, using this cutoff ratio will induce false negative results.

When determining the existence of benzoylecgonine at 500pg/mg cutoff, the decontamination procedure was adequate. False positive slightly above 500 did happen though.
Were there any above FIVE THOUSAND? No.
This study shows why metabolites are used, typically alongside the drug itself: External contamination of hair by cocaine: an issue in forensic interpretation [12]
Basically, despite washing, large trace amounts of cocaine (the drug itself) was still found, corresponding to a frequent user's levels.
6. Decontamination forces contaminants into the hair
From the same [12] source:

Moreover, it is highly suspected that these solvents do wash in external contamination since cocaine as well as BE and ME are detected in extracts from contaminated hair which was washes using dichloromethane. MetA-SIMS images show that decontamination solvents that are currently used to wash off high concentrations of cocaine on the hair, at the same time promote the external cocaine to migrate into the hair.

This ‘washed-in’ cocaine might be considered as incorporated since it is shown to possible reach above the international cut-off level. We are aware of the fact that the cocaine concentration on the contaminated hair tested is higher than in real case scenarios. Nevertheless, these experiments prove the possible redistribution of cocaine to the inside of the hair. It can be expected that the mechanism remains the same, regardless of the concentration. The amount of redistributing cocaine might differ depending in the contaminating amount of cocaine. Further research regarding the amount of redistributed cocaine in relation to the external contaminating amount is necessary.

He turned "highly suspected" into a matter of fact.
This is irrelevant because the contamination was done in a laboratory setting:

Prior to imaging, blank and user hairs from volunteers were contaminated by rubbing cocaine salt powder on the hair for a few minutes or by soaking them for 5 minutes or 5 hours in a 1mg/mL solution of cocaine base or HCl-salt. Washing was performed by shaking the hair for one minute in the described washing solution. All hairs were air dried after washing and before cutting, embedding or mounting them. The effects of different washing solvents (methanol water, dichloromethane, isopropanol, acetonitrile and dichloromethane/water alternately), were tested on contaminated as well as cocaine user hair. Washing solvents were also tested on hairs from different cocaine users. Blank (negative) hairs were tested using the same method.

Strands of hair had cocaine salt powder massaged into them for a few minutes, or soaked for up to 5 hours. Did the cop mix large amounts of cocaine with HCI and rubbed it into his daughter's hair? I don't think so.
7. Sample error, used wrong sample, technician error, instrument error
The chance of this happening is close to zero. It would require extraordinary evidence that Nicholas Rekieta has yet to produce.

From the diagram, the samples are screened. With a likely positive, it requires GC-MS confirmation. According to someone Spectre_06 was talking to, minor positive test results are retested. There is also a high chance that the minor was subjected to a rape kit due to high correlation between child exploitation and drug use. Let that sink in.

Pt6: Now What? A complicated matter and a null result​

Nicholas Rekieta's most recent cope was about the washes being tested, he found a new avenue of attack.
This webinar by Attolife will be helpful. [14]

https://vimeo.com/998081975
Unfortunately for him, his child was 8 years old, not a toddler or an infant. The hair is already mature enough to be comparable to adults.
To speculate, the courts never followed up on these test results because it was a complicated mess and a time consuming process. They would much rather get his house cleaned up so the kids can be sent back. That's exactly what happened. The smelly bunker was mopped up and the kids where sent back.
There are many avenues of attack for the nitrous huffer. Testing the wash is one of them. I don't think it's standard for the laboratory to test the washing solution.
We're left with a null result. Not much can be done here unless someone is able to get those results which pertains to a minor, so it's unlikely and unethical to post. Frankly, I don't want to see it. >5000pg/mg is enough.
8. An addendum: ">5000pg/mg would have killed her!"
I forgot this was another Nicholas Rekieta cope. tl;dr is it won't.
A more in-depth explanation: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-20966492
So can they retest it?
Yeah, according to the process diagram above, the sample is stored. This means they can retest if they like, they can even test the washing liquid.

Pt7: Conclusion​

Back to the test.

Question: Was this cocaine or the metabolite?
Answer: We don't know.
Cocaine and at least a couple (likely three) metabolites were tested for. The document explicitly states cocaine, rather than metabolite(s)
Cocaine contamination yields are far greater than its metabolites. If the results included sloppily was for cocaine only, then we cannot definitively rule out heavy external contamination as a source. It was literally snowing at the Rekieta estate (snow is a colloquialism for cocaine).
If you look at the source [12], you will see that even washing cannot mitigate false positives for cocaine under a lab-created contamination protocol. The levels were very high in this study, some were far above 5000. This study is very old though, from 1992. That was more than 30 years ago.

211ng/10mg ~ 21.1ng/mg ~ 21,100pg/mg. That is a lot of cocaine remaining in the hair of a non-user.

However, it was a lot of cocaine to begin with.

20mg of hair was soaked in a 2ml solution of cocaine with a dilution of 10ug/ml for one hour.
20 micrograms of cocaine in the milligram of liquid, 20mg of hair soaked for an hour.
The sampling of Nicholas Rekieta's daughter's hair would be at random and likely far greater than 20mg, how much cocaine was on the cop's mythical metabolic glove? Frankly, this is a ridiculous scenario. The cop would have traces of cocaine power on his glove, not liquid coke. The metabolite would have been on her scalp. Under no scenario would this yield >5000pg/mg of cocaine (not metabolite).

Unless we are certain that >5000pg/mg was specifically the metabolite benzoylecgonine, we cannot be certain. Unless there is a control group, like other children under the same roof. If they all had similarly high results, then truly we cannot rule heavy external contamination out. Unless... wait.

But we do have a control group. And they all tested negative?!

You're shit out of luck. No amount of coping and weird unrealistic scenarios will explain this result, whether it's cocaine itself or one of the few metabolites.
Summing up:
1. She was the only child that returned positive. The other 4 tested negative at cut-off.
2. Heavy cocaine contamination can lead to freakishly high results, but surely it would mean everyone gets contaminated equally, more or less.
3. We know this was Nicholas Rekieta's favourite, we know the cocaine was stored in the master's bedroom. We also know the Qover slept there.
Therefore, either she was in the same room with prolonged exposure to cocaine, its usage and drug paraphernalia (they were out in the open according to the court documents) with the Qover sleeping, or somehow she ingested the drug.
One scenario could be explained as a false positive assuming >5000pg/mg was the drug itself, the other suggests it was not.
Or both could be true.
He allowed it to happen in the first place. He brought in the drugs, he brought in the slatternly crackwhore and her stupid ex-husband. They did drugs in the master bedroom.

It's not a stretch for a man who believes in chiropractic bullshit, dumb CBD MLM oils and various dimwitted big-pharma conspiracies to also believe in some weird alternative cure by microdosing cocaine.
A man who would let loose cocaine bullets and have tools he used to cut and weigh narcotics in the open cannot prevent his curious children from accidental ingestion. He's not a "responsible" drug user, as if that's not an oxymoron.

If Nicholas Rekieta's preemptive explanation wasn't enough, I don't know what is going to convince you.
>But... it's not impossible for the test to be done in less than 2 days!
Says the balldoguard.
It's not, but...

72 > 48

So, which one? She was in a room heavily contaminated with cocaine leading to a ridiculous high result, where her parents were fucking another couple or did she accidentally ingest some of it. Was it both?
Either would lead to the same conclusion. Kill yourself, Nick.
If it was deliberate dosing, you and your wife will burn in Hell. We don't know the truth, you know and God knows.

Kill yourself, Nick.

Sources:​

Spoiler: fuck my life it's finally done

[1] Italian river 'full of cocaine'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4746787.stm
>Scientists have found large quantities of a cocaine by-product in a river in northern Italy - suggesting consumption is much higher than previously thought.
Cocaine use in Britain so high it has contaminated drinking water, report shows

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cocaine-use-in-britain-so-high-it-has-contaminated-our-drinking-water-report-shows-9350477.html

[2] Google patents: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5559123A/en
[3] Society of hair testing: https://www.soht.org/consensus
[4] European workplace alcohol and drug testing society: https://www.ewdts.org/
[5] Minnesota Monitoring: https://www.mnmonitoring.com/downloads
[6] Omega Laboratories: https://www.omegalaboratories.com/testing/hair-testing
[7] No racial bias in hair testing: https://www.freightwaves.com/news/study-finds-no-racial-bias-in-hair-testing-drivers-for-drugs
[8] Hair analysis for drugs of abuse.: Hair color and race differentials or systematic differences in drug preferences? https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00151-6
[9] https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkz022
[10] 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.039
[11] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03979
[12] https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(93)90268-F
[13] 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31819c3f2b https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0b013e31819c3f2b
[14] https://www.attolife.co.uk/webinar/contamination/#register_now

[/B]

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Skin cancer? Huh I assumed nick would die of an OD or car crash I didn't think cancer might be his end.

Even better, Kaposi's sarcoma is benign but in someone like Nick it's a clear symptom of AIDS.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

Since no one asked ill just ask.

Did Rekieta fuck Juju the cow in the ass?

 

[AnOminous]

She isn’t fat, which automatically makes her at least a 5, and Nick spent big bucks on the finest plastic surgeons trying to repair the damage he inflicted on her body when he knocked her up.

She looked a lot better before she deformed herself to try to cater to Nick's diseased fetishes. Sorry, she looks like Gollum now. I'd rather fuck Gollum actually.