US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My current theory is that this is due to China just allowing the 10 largest insurance companies in China to invest up to 1 percent of their holdings in gold


The National Financial Regulatory Administration of China has issued the “Notice on Launching a Pilot Program for Insurance Funds to Invest in Gold” (hereinafter referred to as the “Notice”), allowing ten insurance companies to invest in gold, effective immediately upon the release of the Notice on February 7.
this is why I still love you
your massive amazing jewocity to the point it drives people antisemetic still shines though, and even if you run insane defense for Israel you can track gold like a motherfuck
mad props.
 
Seems as though every day, I see people calling the tariffs proof that “Trump is going to ruin the economy”, given how much other countries are taking measures to adjust accordingly.

Is it really that hard for people to not see things in just the short-term?
 
My dad gets his information from MSM. He 100% thinks CNN, The Washington Post, and NPR are the least biased sources out there.
It's time you just sit your dad down and tell him something along the lines of the following:

"Dad, I think you're too old. The days where the MSM can be believed are over and done with. Young people, people my age, don't consume information this way. When you die, CNN, WAPO, NPR, NBC, ABC, etc., they're all going bankrupt. They won't exist. NOBODY my age listens to these people because they have been proven time and time again to be liars or spin artists. Everyone my age gets news directly from the source as it happens because in 2025, everyone is a journalist because everyone has a phone. They're getting news as it happens and compiled news from podcasts. MSM is completely obsolete and it WILL die someday soon. I don't care if you think these young people are dumb or not, it's the reality and you cannot change it.

The world you knew all your life is gone. It changed about 10-20 years ago and it is never coming back. If you're worried about DOGE, people my age love it and it's probably going to become a mainstay of government for the foreseeable future. If you're worried about America becoming isolationist and no longer having "allies", that's what my generation WANTS. They don't like Europe. They don't like the foreigners. They don't like Israel. They don't like Ukraine either. They also don't care if your IRA, 401k, or stock market is in the shitter. They have crypto and your failure is not their concern. They are laughing at you complaining about social security checks and will probably let social security fail and replace it in the future. Young people HATE your generation for ruining everything for them. Regardless of whether you believe that's true or not, it's true to them and they're young and running the world and you're on your way out the door. It is their world now. Not yours. I'm sorry, but this is something everyone goes through. It'll happen to me too someday. Things just change."

I understand where you're coming from, I had to explain what I said above to my parents. They didn't get it either, but now they do.
 
Seems as though every day, I see people calling the tariffs proof that “Trump is going to ruin the economy”, given how much other countries are taking measures to adjust accordingly.

Is it really that hard for people to not see things in just the short-term?
they have been trained not to. Companies only plan for the quarter, countries only plan until the next election. a decade long project would be forgotten, a hundred year project is unfathomable.
 
this is why I still love you
your massive amazing jewocity to the point it drives people antisemetic still shines though, and even if you run insane defense for Israel you can track gold like a motherfuck
mad props.
I don't half-ass anything, you're getting the whole stereotype

Trump admin is reviewing 9 billion dollars worth of federal funding to Harvard University after it refused to investigate antisemitism on campus


According to a source familiar with the review, President Donald Trump’s antisemitism task force is investigating $255.6 million in contracts and $8.7 billion in multiyear grant commitments between the government and Harvard.

A source familiar with the review said the investigation is being launched over concerns about Harvard failing to abide by its civil rights law responsibilities. The source warned that, should Harvard not address the concerns from the task force about antisemitism and take steps this week, it could begin to lose funding.
 
My dad is absolutely losing his shit over DOGE, freaking out about what this will mean for his future retirement and whatnot. I tried to reassure him earlier today but he basically said I'm too young to understand how these things work, and that I'm stupid for believing what I read on the internet. Even when I tried to show him actual direct sources that contradict what he's read or heard, he wouldn't believe me.

I'm worried my dad is going to have an actual heart attack from stress due to all the BS fear mongering from the mainstream media. I don't know what I can show him to help ease his fear and anxiety.
Tell him he can move into your pod when President AOC requisitions Social Security for reparations in 2030.
 
Seems as though every day, I see people calling the tariffs proof that “Trump is going to ruin the economy”, given how much other countries are taking measures to adjust accordingly.

Is it really that hard for people to not see things in just the short-term?
Seeing as there are retards who make tons of money on garbage like gambling I can assure you most people are short term thinkers. If you want an image of the future imagine Bossman Jack punching a whole through his door for eternity.
 
Your shiny bits of metal are going to be worth about as much as the meaningless bits of paper you used to buy them when people are struggling for food, water and fuel.

My shiny bits of metal are brass and lead. Whatever food, water, or fuel you have is useless without the ability to protect it.

I'm worried my dad is going to have an actual heart attack from stress due to all the BS fear mongering from the mainstream media. I don't know what I can show him to help ease his fear and anxiety.

Have you tried telling him to stop acting like a nigger? It might shock him enough to unfuck his brain for a few moments and let it escape the retard boot loop it appears to be caught in. It might not do that either, but if nothing else it would make for a great anecdote for you to share for the rest of our amusement.
 
Journalists consider briefing room sit-in as Trump clashes with White House press corps
Semafor (archive.ph)
By Max Tani
2025-03-31 22:25:52GMT
The News
The Trump administration’s proposal to take over the seating arrangement within the White House press briefing room has rattled the journalists who cover the president and left them mulling how exactly to push back.

The White House plans to impose its own seating chart for reporters in the briefing room, seizing control of a prerogative long managed by the journalists in the room through the White House Correspondents’ Association, Axios first reported Sunday.

The WHCA’s current system reflects the 20th century media power structure: wire services and broadcast and cable television networks occupy the front row, major newspapers and radio get the second and third rows, and a more fluid collection of news organizations sits further back. The White House proposal would upend the arrangement in a move White House officials reportedly believe will be a “fundamental restructuring of the briefing room, based on metrics more reflective of how media is consumed today.”

On Sunday, key members of the WHCA, including the organization’s leadership and some White House bureau chiefs, met to discuss a range of potential responses should Trump communications officials decide to dictate where reporters in the room sit.

According to two people familiar with the discussions, among the proposals raised by members was a potential Civil Rights era-style “sit-in” protest, in which members would return to their old seats and refuse to leave them.

WHCA leadership declined to comment, noting that Sunday’s meeting had been off-the-record, and members of the WHCA who spoke to Semafor emphasized that the situation remained in flux. On Fox News on Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the administration had tried to “broker a meeting” about the proposed seating changes and said the briefing room “does not belong to elitist journalists here in Washington.”

Know More
The move is part of a larger effort by the administration to take control of in-person access to the president and staff when at the White House. The White House has prohibited The Associated Press from covering in-person events over the wire service’s refusal to follow Trump’s executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico. Trump communications officials have also invited friendly reporters to cover events at which there is limited press access, allowing Trump to receive more positive questions and even some rhetorical backup during key moments.

The WHCA has tried to push back against White House’s changes and raise awareness about the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back press access at the White House and the Pentagon. As Semafor first noted last week, the WHCA asked members to support the AP’s press access case by wearing a 1st Amendment pin when attending events at the White House and appearing on television, a move White House officials quickly mocked on X.

In an email to members Monday morning, the WHCA board said the seating chart proposal was another sign that the White House was attempting to take power away from independent news organizations.

“If the White House pushes forward, it will become even more clear that the administration is seeking to cynically seize control of the system through which the independent press organizes itself, so that it is easier to exact punishment on outlets over their coverage,” the email said.

Still, while the WHCA has struck a defiant public tone, the organization had already made some concessions that have pleased the White House. After initially tapping comedian Amber Ruffin to perform at the WHCA’s annual dinner, the organization reversed course following complaints from White House communications officials, who criticized her comments on a Daily Beast podcast in which she described the new administration as “kind of a bunch of murderers.”
 
this is why I still love you
your massive amazing jewocity to the point it drives people antisemetic still shines though, and even if you run insane defense for Israel you can track gold like a motherfuck
mad props.
"We have only the best Jews on Kiwi Farms, aren't I right, folks? The Democrats, they say they have all the Jews, but frankly, I don't even regard Chuck Schumer as a Jew. He's a Palestinean to me, isn't that right, it's sad, real sad. You know, nobody loves Israel more than I do, nobody...except there's once person, look at him, there he is, way in the back, CATCH THE RAINBOW, everybody, this is just the best Jew, nobody knows gold and Israel like this heeb. We're gonna need all the cunning and financial wizardry we can get to make America great again, don't we, folks?"
 
What exactly would Russia want/do with information about my contributions to social security? What good would that do them? How would that harm me or the United States? How would that help Putin or Russia? What would make it worth risking a security breach to transmit this information to Russia?

This is what's always irritated me about the Tier-1 dipshit conspiracy theories (lunar landing hoax, flat earth hoax, etc.) -- when there's either an astonishing pile of very reasonable and convincing evidence disproving the theory (lunar landing, flat earth), or literally no pragmatic reason whatsoever for "evil group X does evil deed Y" to actually occur. Think for ONE FUCKING SECOND and the whole idea falls apart.
With the proliferation of AI generated media I feel like those types of retards are going to become significantly more prevalent unless people learn to adapt to it on their own
1000013887.png
source. Why would we take the most embarrassing moment for our country in the last few decades? This benefits no one except maybe the Taliban
 
So far the Atlanta Fed is the only forecast that is predicting negative GDP growth in Q1 of 2025. New York, and Philadelphia forecasts have increased to 2.86% and 2.5%, St Louis has been holding around 2%. Atlanta has us at -2.8% growth.
Isn't access to the White House press pool a privilege not a right? Trump should just say fuck it and revoke access for 90% of these idiots.

Yes journoscum would whine about muh fascisms, and literally annuda shoa, and blah blah blah but the American public hates the media anyways so who cares?
They would just go running to an activist judge like they did when Trump blocked them on Twitter.
 
My dad is absolutely losing his shit over DOGE, freaking out about what this will mean for his future retirement and whatnot. I tried to reassure him earlier today but he basically said I'm too young to understand how these things work, and that I'm stupid for believing what I read on the internet. Even when I tried to show him actual direct sources that contradict what he's read or heard, he wouldn't believe me.

I'm worried my dad is going to have an actual heart attack from stress due to all the BS fear mongering from the mainstream media. I don't know what I can show him to help ease his fear and anxiety.

Do you not think that he might know a bit about what might impact his ability to retire?

...and his career is in finance/ a financial role? OK, I'm going to hazard a guess that he does actually know what may be coming his way, bc he knows where his money is and what his plans rely on. And understand that any big fuckups are going to hurt people within 20 years of retirement the most, because they have spent a life/career making certain plans, and if someone - someone who does not phase things in - is aiming to eliminate big parts of that infrastructure, then they will potential lose an enormous part of what they carefully worked and planned for for decades, and their money will not have time to recover. Even if something gutted got put back together again later, the actual money will never come back. So yes, it is a real and reasonable concern. The relative odds are subject to debate, but the possibility of massive negative change that will harm him significantly is not.

I'm sorry you have to see your dad worry - it is hard thing to see in a parent. But you should lose the condescension (however well-meant it might be), because just because something isn't 100% guaranteed to be true does not mean it is 100% guaranteed to be false, either. And unless you're 75+ yourself, your dad's not too old and senile to understand the world, politics, or money.

They fixed that now, the last administration made Credit Card Debit immune to bankruptcy. You WILL pay your 30% APR loans no matter what.
Do you have a cite? Credit card debt gets dealt with in bankruptcy. If you're an individual, you're either in Chapter 7 (liquidation) or 13 (basically debt restructuring). Credit card debt is dischargeable in bankruptcy (assuming you didn't obtain or incur the debt fraudulently; there's a lookback period scrutinized for preferential payments to friends/family, or large or increased purchases, etc., and those debts could be assessed as undischargeable; other undischargeable debt is below).

In a 7 unprotected assets are liquidated to pay what can be - in order of priority, and remaining dischargeable debt is gone. Credit card debt is unsecured, which means it gets repaid only after secured and priority debt - so there is often nothing to pay it off with. In a 13, there's a bankruptcy plan negotiated that lays out what will be paid and by when - for less than owed (or you wouldn't be in bankruptcy, typically). But again, unsecured creditors are at the bottom of the heap, and so even if participating in the bankruptcy, may not get much, if anything. But otherwise, if you pay per the bankruptcy plan (or get a Russell Greer hardship discharge), dischargeable debts are gone.

Nondischargeable for a 13:
As a general rule, the discharge releases the debtor from all debts provided for by the plan or disallowed, with the exception of certain debts referenced in 11 U.S.C. § 1328. Debts not discharged in chapter 13 include certain long term obligations (such as a home mortgage), debts for alimony or child support, certain taxes, debts for most government funded or guaranteed educational loans or benefit overpayments, debts arising from death or personal injury caused by driving while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs, and debts for restitution or a criminal fine included in a sentence on the debtor's conviction of a crime. To the extent that they are not fully paid under the chapter 13 plan, the debtor will still be responsible for these debts after the bankruptcy case has concluded. Debts for money or property obtained by false pretenses, debts for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity, and debts for restitution or damages awarded in a civil case for willful or malicious actions by the debtor that cause personal injury or death to a person will be discharged unless a creditor timely files and prevails in an action to have such debts declared nondischargeable. 11 U.S.C. §§ 1328, 523(c); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(c).

In a 7, similar but fewer nondischargeable
Debts dischargeable in a chapter 13, but not in chapter 7, include debts for willful and malicious injury to property (as opposed to a person), debts incurred to pay nondischargeable tax obligations, and debts arising from property settlements in divorce or separation proceedings. 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a).

You can get the link to Chapter 7 from there as well.
 
"We have only the best Jews on Kiwi Farms, aren't I right, folks? The Democrats, they say they have all the Jews, but frankly, I don't even regard Chuck Schumer as a Jew. He's a Palestinean to me, isn't that right, it's sad, real sad. You know, nobody loves Israel more than I do, nobody...except there's once person, look at him, there he is, way in the back, CATCH THE RAINBOW, everybody, this is just the best Jew, nobody knows gold and Israel like this heeb. We're gonna need all the cunning and financial wizardry we can get to make America great again, don't we, folks?"
thank you for the translation into Trumpglish
 
Back