Crime Attorney General Pam Bondi directs federal prosecutors to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione - Mangione, 26, was charged with fatally shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City last year.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi on Tuesday directed federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty for Luigi Mangione, the man accused of gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City last year.

Mangione, 26, was federally charged in December with stalking and murdering Thompson after the CEO was fatally shot on the streets of midtown Manhattan. He was also charged with first-degree murder in furtherance of terrorism by state prosecutors.

Bondi said that she was directing prosecutors to seek the death penalty as part of "President Trump’s agenda to stop violent crime and Make America Safe Again."

"Luigi Mangione’s murder of Brian Thompson — an innocent man and father of two young children — was a premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America," Bondi said in a statement.

Mangione has pled not guilty to all charges. His lawyer did not immediately return a request for comment about the attorney general's request.

Thompson's Dec. 4 killing and subsequent colossal manhunt for his masked assassin captivated the nation for weeks.

The gunman fled on a bike outside the New York Hilton Midtown, where Thompson was staying for the health care company's annual investors' meeting, police said. City surveillance footage showed the gunman riding into Central Park before disappearing.

Five days later, on Dec. 9, Mangione was recognized in a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, and arrested that day.

Article Link

Archive

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

You missed the point of the argument. A single man plans a killing and it warrants the death penalty, but an important man plans to implement policy that leaves thousands to die for his own profit and it's considered good business. A politician plans to kill thousands in another country for oil and resources and it's a necessary measure for national security. The latter two never see any legal action. Just because you don't pull a trigger doesn't mean you aren't a murderer. Hiring a hitman is illegal for this reason.

Sorry brother but I think it's you who missed the point

One person is just operating within the law, you don't agree with the law lobby to change it.

Yes people died due to the choices made by the deceased but that's something the law allows. Millions of people die each and every year from pollution effects and other man-made issues but until the law changes what they're doing is evil for sure but not unlawful.

The other person took a gun and shot someone dead because they were doing something he personally disagreed with.

While I do admire Lugi for living by his principals and taking direct action when he felt he no longer he had any choice he should also accept the consequences of that choice.

Again going back to the honor society of killing each other for issues is probably not the best idea.

 

[JosephStalin]

Still not sure why the Feds charged him. Murder is a state crime. The victim wasn't a Federal official.

 

[Jace on ice]

Still not sure why the Feds charged him. Murder is a state crime. The victim wasn't a Federal official.

He traveled across multiple states in order to commit his murder, also his crime is arguably terrorism.

Both of these put his crimes in federal jurisdiction

 

[Big Dong Donkey Kong]

EDIT: I'm A-logging hard, disregard this.

 

[BaronOfTheTaigas]

No, but he:

1. Denied more claims per capita than any other major health insurance company in the industry.
2. Was in the process of developing an AI-based system to effectively deny more claims.
3. Corruption via engaging in bribery of elected officials (There's a video clip of Brian Thompson bragging that Nancy Pelosi works for him)
4. Supported and enabling the Obamacare act that raised the price of health insurance for millions of Americans.
5. Supported a faulty and untested COVID-19 vaccine and distributing it to millions of Americans, many of which died or developed permanent health conditions as a result.
6. Supported and enabled Big Pharma in general.
7. Received billions in donations and investments from Blackrock and other globalist invest firms.
8. Under his leadership, started a policy of paying for female employees to travel out of state to get abortions after Roe vs. Wade was overturned.
9. Provided insurance coverage for transgender gender mutilation of children.

Regardless of how he felt, he was a leftist scumbag and I don't feel very sympathetic towards him, and I don't know know why the most openly far-right administration in the 21st century feels the need to go to bat for this guy's legacy.

Because they have decided to go down the corrupt Oligarch route unfortunately.

A shame, this means the far-right will be holding the bag for Imperial Collapse and it will be Left-Wing ideologies who will dominate the aftermath, I can only hope it is a masculine sub-faction that wins out.

 

[LifeAlert]

Do you really want antifa, journos, and fat women deciding via court of public opinion which extrajudicial killings are ok and which ones aren't?

okay anime faggot I'll bite. You say that as your cheeto god and his pet retard are in the process of making the protesting of corporations prosecutable as terrorism. mr. "gamergateptsd" that would mean you would (hopefully) be getting raped to death at guantanamo bay for shitting on dem woke companies you hate so much. Understand?

the only difference between a cocksucking faggot CEO getting iced in broad daylight and a room full of faggot suit bugmen deciding to fund the destruction of other nations and kill millions is that one is considered legal because they said so. you are a polititard faggot with a one-party worldview who is happy to inflict misery on your ideological opponents while crying when it happens to you. In other words, you are a trannyfaggot in denial and should log off and get back to your job - donny's little frito won't slurp itself

 

[Spaced Outside Cargo]

Do you think the CEO of a health insurance company comes and approves or denies every single claim? Or even sets the rules?

What do you think a CEO does? No, he doesn't individually deny every single claim. He receives a financial report at the end of the year and is pressured by his investors to implement actions that bring in more profit. Most businesses do this by breaking into new markets, but he decided that instead of bringing more money in he would just stop money from going out. The biggest money drain was those pesky payouts for claims, so he directed his COO and CTO to develop an algorithm that scans through claims and finds any reason to deny it, taking the risk of retaliation from the customer into account. Green line went up and they were likely going to sell this as a product to all the other providers so you can't even boycott them for it.

This is arguably worse than some evil goblin person sitting in a dark room scheming on how they will hurt people tomorrow, this is an apathetic rot completely divorced from reality. People are nothing more than numbers to be manipulated to them. Culling the population to turn the red down arrow into a green up arrow isn't a euphoric evil deed as much as it's just another day. The real human behavioral equivalent is some psychopath teenager unplugging grandma in the hospital room to charge his Nintendo Switch. And last December these people learned that they can die.

 

[GameratePTSD]

okay anime faggot I'll bite. You say that as your cheeto god and his pet retard are in the process of making the protesting of corporations prosecutable as terrorism. mr. "gamergateptsd" that would mean you would (hopefully) be getting raped to death at guantanamo bay for shitting on dem woke companies you hate so much. Understand?

the only difference between a cocksucking faggot CEO getting iced in broad daylight and a room full of faggot suit bugmen deciding to fund the destruction of other nations and kill millions is that one is considered legal because they said so. you are a polititard faggot with a one-party worldview who is happy to inflict misery on your ideological opponents while crying when it happens to you. In other words, you are a trannyfaggot in denial and should log off and get back to your job - donny's little frito won't slurp itself

So... yes, you are fine with that?

 

[LifeAlert]

So... yes, you are fine with that?

If it means faggots like you get thrown into guantanamo bay and raped to death, yes I am fine with that

 

[GameratePTSD]

If it means faggots like you get thrown into guantanamo bay and raped to death, yes I am fine with that

I think that's a shortsighted position to take and getting wrapped up in the celebrity of Luigi Mangione is a foolish decision based on reading too many Batman comics. Vigilantes aren't going to start rising up against CEOs, scaring them into being decent human beings. If anything you're going to strengthen the protections of insurance corporations and anyone who publicly criticizes them will be put on hidden watchlists.

 

[AllieKat]

So OJ was never a murderer because a Jury found him not guilty.

No he was a simple Hertz pitch man.

OH AND HE RUSHED FOR 2000 YARDS IN 14 GAMES!

THE JUICE IS LOOSE AND THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN!

 

[Jace on ice]

If it means faggots like you get thrown into guantanamo bay and raped to death, yes I am fine with that

If I died tomorrow I would find a way to come back and call you a retarded niggerfaggot, that's how stupid and short sighted your views are.

 

[Spaced Outside Cargo]

One person is just operating within the law, you don't agree with the law lobby to change it.

Can you agree that someone who can't even afford life-saving medical care due to healthcare lobbying is also not in the financial position to lobby against the aforementioned healthcare lobbyists? For every dollar they deny in claims they spend at least five on making sure they'll be able to deny six more.

$714 million dollars went into lobbying in 2020, convince Congress to stop receiving this every year forever. I'll wait.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

If anything you're going to strengthen the protections of insurance corporations and anyone who publicly criticizes them will be put on hidden watchlists.

The alternatives:

• write your federal representatives and senators, which will do nothing
• write the president, which will do nothing
• write your state legislators, which will do nothing
• write your governor, which will do nothing
• vote, which will alternate the color schemes between red and blue
• bend over and take it
• vigilantism

I can tell which one is most satisfying at a glance. The other options are permutations of doing nothing. The gubmint's just gonna have to make the alternatives viable.

 

[AllieKat]

I love how making the ultra rich fearful is terrorism, but mowing down a Christmas parade of Grannies or shooting up elementary schools in Tennessee by trannies isn't.

The issue really isn't the act or if it's murder, it's the DOJ arbitrarily picking and choosing how it administers justice.

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

Yes people died due to the choices made by the deceased but that's something the law allows.

While I do admire Lugi for living by his principals and taking direct action when he felt he no longer he had any choice he should also accept the consequences of that choice.

This is what happens when the citizenry agree to a contract with a Government, they will let the Government set the law, equally enforce the law, and carry out justice, equally. In return, the citizens won’t play cops and robbers, vigilante style. What does one do when they whole system is rigged? When the Government very openly and brazenly renegs and breaks the contract.

People will get fed up, some people will make hard decisions. Should they just roll over and not fight in court?

 

[LifeAlert]

If I died tomorrow I would find a way to come back and call you a retarded niggerfaggot, that's how stupid and short sighted your views are.

​

 

[Meth Dick]

What do you think a CEO does? No, he doesn't individually deny every single claim. He receives a financial report at the end of the year and is pressured by his investors to implement actions that bring in more profit. Most businesses do this by breaking into new markets, but he decided that instead of bringing more money in he would just stop money from going out. The biggest money drain was those pesky payouts for claims, so he directed his COO and CTO to develop an algorithm that scans through claims and finds any reason to deny it, taking the risk of retaliation from the customer into account. Green line went up and they were likely going to sell this as a product to all the other providers so you can't even boycott them for it.

This is arguably worse than some evil goblin person sitting in a dark room scheming on how they will hurt people tomorrow, this is an apathetic rot completely divorced from reality. People are nothing more than numbers to be manipulated to them. Culling the population to turn the red down arrow into a green up arrow isn't a euphoric evil deed as much as it's just another day. The real human behavioral equivalent is some psychopath teenager unplugging grandma in the hospital room to charge his Nintendo Switch. And last December these people learned that they can die.

It sounds like you're just mad at a CEO doing what CEOs do. The CEO is not the doctor, the nurse, the pharmacist, The CEO is just there to be the face of the company and to ensure the share holders get rich.
The stupid thing about this is people thinking that a fucking CEO has an obligation to help people it's incredibly naive. Do you think the CEO of Walmart gives a single fuck if Walmart is cheap and easy for the customers? No he gives a shit about making him and the share holders money. Does the CEO of Pizza Hut give a shit that his companies pizza tastes like shit? Not as long as people still buy it he doesn't.
Nothing is going to change about United Healthcare because some retarded rich coddled wop asshole gunned down the CEO except who the face is going to be.

 

[Meth Dick]

The alternatives:

• write your federal representatives and senators, which will do nothing
• write the president, which will do nothing
• write your state legislators, which will do nothing
• write your governor, which will do nothing
• vote, which will alternate the color schemes between red and blue
• bend over and take it
• vigilantism

I can tell which one is most satisfying at a glance. The other options are permutations of doing nothing. The gubmint's just gonna have to make the alternatives viable.

If you're going to choose vigilantism at least make sure your gunman isn't a complete fucking retard and actually guns down the people that are actually going to cause a change.

 

[Overwritten Tapes]

If you're going to choose vigilantism at least make sure your gunman isn't a complete fucking retard and actually guns down the people that are actually going to cause a change.

Why shoot the ones that will cause a change? Isn't that what people want?