"But Australian courts are different, guys!!"
This delusional retard really thought that that was going to work out in his favor.
I don't think I knew about it being about the suicide claim until I had read one of the analyses by that one lawyer covering the case on his blog. Even then, I thought Apollo Legend had to pay Mitchell a bunch of $$ as part of his settlement, which would've made the "Mitchell made Apollo an-hero!" claim make sense, but apparently it turned out the settlement only involved taking down all of the Mitchell-related videos. Once Jobst got evidence from Apollo's brother that no money exchanged hands, that was when he should have backed the fuck off and issued a concrete retraction.
Hell, Moist Critikal's entire testimony (also covered on said blog) was based entirely around Mitchell's repuation as a cheater. I think Jobst's other witnesses, as well. I think Jobst's legal strategy was to confuse the courts about what the case was really about, rather than tackle why Jobst might have legitimately believed Mitchell caused Apollo Legend's suicide. Though I don't know if even that would've been sufficient enough of a legal defense.