US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Paul brothers (lel) cannot fathom the idea of using ulterior strategies. Which is why they never have been president. They're the right wing Bernie Sanders.
Lolbertarians worshiping the """"free market"""" at the expense of the American worker?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Being a gullible media deepthroater is ”fighting back”.
View attachment 7190188
I hate how all these skin walkers have started incorporating American iconography into all their protests lately. Well over a decade of non-stop America bashing from these people and now they have the fucking gall to try and pretend that they're real Americans and that the people who are opposed to their gay self destruction are unpatriotic.
"Hello fellow white people Americans"
I hate these people so much it's unreal
 
It's hilarious to me that people look at Ron and Rand and think of them as these bastions of freedom when just like that faggot Bernie, they're politicians
I was Ron Paul 2008 because it was the only position that had any sense, but I knew he was never going to win because the masses are easily beguiled by a brown Indonesian lookin guy doing an MLK speech pattern.
1744068598154.png1744068745873.png
Politics has been fake and gay for so long, it might as well be wrestling.
People legitimately thought this guy was "the first black president", and not the first international muttmerican one with indeterminate origins.
We see this all the time now, with Carney stepping in even though he hasn't been Canadian. Circus show for clowns.
That whole era was complete horseshit from Romney, to Paul. All of them were in on the nonsense. All of them profited by it, and they all circle the wagons more than ever.
 

Attachments

  • 1744068677262.png
    1744068677262.png
    7.1 MB · Views: 5
No.

Call a staffing agency whatever you want, I don't care about marketing. The point you're avoiding is: The Arizona Building and Construction Trades Council has the money to sue, once again proving your retardation.
Yeah and I live in the Land of Oz where the bricks are made of gold which lead to The Arizona Building and Constructions Trades Council I guess. Again, good luck going up against TSMC.
 
I see you have developed a taste for endlessly tonguing shitty troll anus. I dub thee Not Really Here of the brown tongue.
They're not trolls n00b, they're hugboxers venturing out from their retarded A-Log threads.
The 50%+ china tariff is exciting. I wonder which turd world shithole will step in to replace them, there are so many.
That's the great part about import controls, they work on every country.
 
This reminds of when Hoppe criticized Milei for not doing “libertarian” thing enough.

Ron Paul was always right in his analysis, but wouldn’t know how to approach making a dent in the Fed.
It's a cult that only works because it's built on metaphysical sand. I've had a few page debates about it on my autism containment thread. So I'm not going to sperg about it here. They aren't wrong about everything, but they aren't right about everything either. Hoppe in particular is contradictory in his metaphysics.
 
Ron Paul Against Tariffs

View attachment 7191815
Trump stated many times on the campaign trail that he would be raising Tariffs.


For all the faggots sucking dick in this thread acting like Trump has bent the knee and Nick Fuentes totally isn't gay guys, seriously, their #1 idol is now being an old faggot along with basically every old person BUT Trump.

We can finally throw lolbertarians into a Minecraft building modeled after the fed and make them work in their wagey cubicles for the rest of their Minecraft lives, no amount of trying to grow a beard will save them.
 
Ron Paul Against Tariffs

View attachment 7191815
Trump stated many times on the campaign trail that he would be raising Tariffs.

To go back even further on Ron Paul and Donald Trump's views on trade:
Trump echoing protectionist and "fair share" sentiments in the late 1980s:

Compare that with an excerpt from Ron Paul's “The Case for Free Trade“ essay from 1981:
Although we think of ourselves as a free-trading nation, it takes more than 700 pages just to list all the tariffs on imported goods, and another 400 to inventory all the non-tariff restraints, such as quotas and “orderly marketing agreements.”

A tariff is a tax levied on a foreign good, to help a special interest at the expense of American consumers.

A trade restraint or marketing agreement—on the number of inexpensive Taiwanese sneakers that Americans can buy, for example—achieves the same goal, at the same cost, in a less forthright manner.

And all the trends are towards more subsidies for U.S. exporters, and more prohibitions and taxes on imports.

Trade is to be subsidized or restrained, not left to the voluntary actions of consumers and producers.

In 1930, Congress passed the Smoot-Hawley tariff bill, imposing heavy tariffs on imports, with the avowed motive of “protecting” U.S. companies and jobs. Within one year, our 25 major trading partners had retaliated with their own tariffs on American goods. World trade declined sharply, and the depression was made world-wide and longer-lasting.

Today the policy of protectionism is again gaining favor in Congress, and in other countries. But it must be fought with all our strength.

Not only does protectionism make everyone poorer—except certain special interests—but it also increases international tensions, and can lead to war.

“If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it,” wrote Adam Smith in 1776, “better buy it of them with some part of the pro duce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage. The general industry of the country will not therefore be diminished... but only left to find out the way in which it can be employed to the greater advantage.”

An important economic principle is called the division of labor. It states that economic efficiency, and therefore growth, is enhanced by everyone doing what he does best.

If I had to grow my own food, make my own clothes, build my own house, and teach my own children, our family’s living standard would plummet to a subsistence, or below-subsistence, level.
 
Back