Steven Carver / Saberspark / Saberspark 64 / Sabersteve - Soylent infused breadtuber "Toonophile" who reviews children's cartoons for a living.

He would "convinently" ignore such things, and especially ignore the fact that the "colonists", that is, Europeans brought a much better life for the "injuns" who didn't have a good lifestyle for the most part. "but what about the Mayas, Incas and Aztecs" one would ask - yeah, well, those were three societies of many different tribes along the Mesoamerica.
Your average Filipino would punch you in the mouth for insulting the Catholic Church though the only Catholics I've ever met with a backbone
 
It's curious to me that Saberspark has been vocal in denouncing the Elsagate/sexual YouTube kids videos while also seizing any and every opportunity to have a sexy furry babe in the thumbnail of his videos. I don't know the makeup of his audience - it's likely that the 10+ minute videos filter the dwindling attention spans of children, but it's undeniable that anthro characters are very popular among children.

The only other notable thing in the video is that Saberspark added a new reward tier to his Patreon, where for one hundred fuuuuuuuucking dollars a month you can talk to him about content creation for an hour. To Saberspark's credit, he is pretty successful and has been able to put out content at an impressive rate, though I can't imagine that there's much nuance to making commentary videos beyond having a gripping title and flashy thumbnail.
Capture1.PNG
 
I never watched saberspark only really heard of him, and i don't really like him or his furry shit i saw in this thread. But I remember seeing this clip of him saying this and thought it was funny out of context out of it's sheer cringe factor:

Apparently the original clip is where he's talking about the character, Miss Heed from villainous.

Miss Heed isn't as far as I know underage so frankly I don't really give a shit about people liking her, but it's weird for a 30+ something old man (with what I assume is a girlfriend or wife because I saw a few pictures of him and a woman) thirsting over a fictional character.
rishi.png
rishi2.png
It's either that or he saw that the character was popular among xitter users and decided to make some dough off of talking about her. Showing this obviously sexual character to his (mostly young) youtube audience, which is worse than keeping your interests to yourself and gated. Just something I found interesting is all.
 
Last edited:
It's curious to me that Saberspark has been vocal in denouncing the Elsagate/sexual YouTube kids videos while also seizing any and every opportunity to have a sexy furry babe in the thumbnail of his videos. I don't know the makeup of his audience - it's likely that the 10+ minute videos filter the dwindling attention spans of children, but it's undeniable that anthro characters are very popular among children.

The only other notable thing in the video is that Saberspark added a new reward tier to his Patreon, where for one hundred fuuuuuuuucking dollars a month you can talk to him about content creation for an hour. To Saberspark's credit, he is pretty successful and has been able to put out content at an impressive rate, though I can't imagine that there's much nuance to making commentary videos beyond having a gripping title and flashy thumbnail.
Actually i even know why he's getting soo much reports on youtube in last 2 weeks. People in twitter and 4ch started to remember because vee(one of the kyle carroza victims) about moment where steven very likes of victim blaming espetially if that's related to peds
First steven attacked dad of teen who had sex(or no) with saber buddie, later he's supported zoe quinn in case of suicide of holovka and when he's streamed night in the woods claimed like he's don't know anything about game(vods of that stream deleted of course already), 2 months ago that furry trash attacked vee because she's dared to be drowned to suicide by kyle who's fucking arrested ped with tb's child porn on pc
1744293987483.png
 
I never watched saberspark only really heard of him, and i don't really like him or his furry shit i saw in this thread. But I remember seeing this clip of him saying this and thought it was funny out of context out of it's sheer cringe factor:
View attachment 7201483
Apparently the original clip is where he's talking about the character, Miss Heed from villainous.
View attachment 7201488
Miss Heed isn't as far as I know underage so frankly I don't really give a shit about people liking her, but it's weird for a 30+ something old man (with what I assume is a girlfriend or wife because I saw a few pictures of him and a woman) thirsting over a fictional character.
It's either that or he saw that the character was popular among xitter users and decided to make some dough off of talking about her. Showing this obviously sexual character to his (mostly young) youtube audience, which is worse than keeping your interests to yourself and gated. Just something I found interesting is all.
Rishi is Saber’s girlfriend, yes.
 
Actually i even know why he's getting soo much reports on youtube in last 2 weeks. People in twitter and 4ch started to remember because vee(one of the kyle carroza victims) about moment where steven very likes of victim blaming espetially if that's related to peds
First steven attacked dad of teen who had sex(or no) with saber buddie, later he's supported zoe quinn in case of suicide of holovka and when he's streamed night in the woods claimed like he's don't know anything about game(vods of that stream deleted of course already), 2 months ago that furry trash attacked vee because she's dared to be drowned to suicide by kyle who's fucking arrested ped with tb's child porn on pc
View attachment 7202187
Dude what the fuck are you trying to say? Everything you typed out is barely comprehensive. Suicide? Pedoes?
 
Not to bother about AI at all, to be honest, people keep making slop with little creativity; it is on them.

That's practically 95% of people who use AI. Just to do basic stuff or add no sense of creativity and originality to them. There's no "twist" or something unique being done by mixing artists and/or styles and mediums together. It's all rehashed junk that's been done a trillion times. The sort of styles corporations have latched onto without second thought. Easily identifiable styles.

The percentage of people who actually use AI for creative and original measures are incredibly small. Every tech demo of a new AI model do the same things, same style tests, and act like they're being revolutionary cause that same thing can be done more accurately. I sort of can give an exception to ChatGPT-4o but it's still very censor heavy, especially in terms of copyright laws so people are practically forced to be generic. At least they can do smug comics on a dime I suppose.

Little to anyone tries with AI and that's probably the biggest justification for an anti-AI user's reasoning behind their hatred for it beside it rendering "$40 for a sketch" commission artists homeless or something. So yeah, it is on them. They have no one to blame but themselves. Not the AI but themselves. AI isn't human. AI is what a man tells it to do.
 
That's practically 95% of people who use AI. Just to do basic stuff or add no sense of creativity and originality to them. There's no "twist" or something unique being done by mixing artists and/or styles and mediums together. It's all rehashed junk that's been done a trillion times. The sort of styles corporations have latched onto without second thought. Easily identifiable styles.

The percentage of people who actually use AI for creative and original measures are incredibly small. Every tech demo of a new AI model do the same things, same style tests, and act like they're being revolutionary cause that same thing can be done more accurately. I sort of can give an exception to ChatGPT-4o but it's still very censor heavy, especially in terms of copyright laws so people are practically forced to be generic. At least they can do smug comics on a dime I suppose.

Little to anyone tries with AI and that's probably the biggest justification for an anti-AI user's reasoning behind their hatred for it beside it rendering "$40 for a sketch" commission artists homeless or something. So yeah, it is on them. They have no one to blame but themselves. Not the AI but themselves. AI isn't human. AI is what a man tells it to do.
And yet they want to blame AI "renderers"(?) for their failures. I've yet to see a true artist (good artist, who uses canvas, maybe digital painting of the type that "soothes the soul") complain about AI who isn't the type of "COMMISSIONS OPEN", "MINORS DNI", and doesn't have the gallery filled up with fetish ridden artwork.
 
Back