- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
Sorry to double post, but he definitely lurks the thread. He sent me this after I brought up that he changed his story:

He says he "has witnesses" that knew Claudio knew starman3 IRL, which doesn't make sense as Claudio is a proud Latinx Mexican and Starman3 is a Canadian. Claudio also brings up a physical description of starman3 , which could be proof that starman3 almost groomed this guy, except...

L/A
This DeviantArt post that is supposedly starman3's face (and somewhat matches with Claudio's description of starman3, depending on the lighting) has been up since 2013, which makes it possible that he just searched this up and described it to me.
I might as well reveal the rest of the DMs, since it's clear he will not respond to me after this. He first DMed me after I made the initial Starman3 post in this thread (and I guess after the OP was updated), to which I responded:

I then proceeded to question him more:

He proceeded to respond, claiming that he was sent porn by starman3 on Skype, saying it was like what was documented in ducky's video about starman3, as well as explaining why he sent some stuff to someone else (I think):

He would make a follow-up message explaining why starman3 was making fun of him, to which I would question the Skype thing (not knowing it was dead by now, oops):

In response to all of the "making fun of grooming victims" thing, I clarified using his own words that he was almost a victim (therefore not actually a victim, I know it's a little
) and I told him that:

Unfortunately after this, he had never responded to me. After he sent me that DM telling me I was not going to Heaven, I sent two DMs hoping he would respond in the open one:

But he never did, which brings me to the point I brought up in the last DM: if he was truly (almost) groomed by starman3, why didn't he say anything when stuff was coming out about him in 2013-2014? Why didn't he say anything when it came up again in 2019-2020? Was he worried people wouldn't believe him because people would say, "Oh, it's that retard Yayotzin, he's probably just attention whoring," because IF this is true, then I'm sure people would have believed him back then (except maybe the Spanish SM64 channels).
I'm tempted to not believe Claudio because he only brought up starman3 as a result of the starman3 video being in the Hall of Shame post about him, seemingly to make himself look like a victim.
All of his "evidence" that starman3 "almost groomed" him is either already on the Internet or (to me) pure hearsay (sure, tu madre definitely knows all about starman3 trying to groom you), and considering how blatant he was about lying about some of the furry stuff:
I hope you can see why I don't want to take him at face value. It's also why I was so insistent on asking for something more tangible than word. Again, even with all that you've shown me @FakeAFClausMystery, I still believe that your starman3 almost grooming story is "FakeAF.'

He says he "has witnesses" that knew Claudio knew starman3 IRL, which doesn't make sense as Claudio is a proud Latinx Mexican and Starman3 is a Canadian. Claudio also brings up a physical description of starman3 , which could be proof that starman3 almost groomed this guy, except...

L/A
This DeviantArt post that is supposedly starman3's face (and somewhat matches with Claudio's description of starman3, depending on the lighting) has been up since 2013, which makes it possible that he just searched this up and described it to me.
I might as well reveal the rest of the DMs, since it's clear he will not respond to me after this. He first DMed me after I made the initial Starman3 post in this thread (and I guess after the OP was updated), to which I responded:

I then proceeded to question him more:

He proceeded to respond, claiming that he was sent porn by starman3 on Skype, saying it was like what was documented in ducky's video about starman3, as well as explaining why he sent some stuff to someone else (I think):

He would make a follow-up message explaining why starman3 was making fun of him, to which I would question the Skype thing (not knowing it was dead by now, oops):

In response to all of the "making fun of grooming victims" thing, I clarified using his own words that he was almost a victim (therefore not actually a victim, I know it's a little

- I did frankly believe him that he tried to help out the cat and was not a cat rapist
- At the time, I didn't think the dog-washing story and art was that sexual (because it didn't seem that way to me when I glanced at them skimming the OP; reading it now I definitely see it as gross)
- The Worriz thing was what made people (understandably) think he was a pedophile/zoophile , why would he think it was a good idea to upload that to e621?

Unfortunately after this, he had never responded to me. After he sent me that DM telling me I was not going to Heaven, I sent two DMs hoping he would respond in the open one:

But he never did, which brings me to the point I brought up in the last DM: if he was truly (almost) groomed by starman3, why didn't he say anything when stuff was coming out about him in 2013-2014? Why didn't he say anything when it came up again in 2019-2020? Was he worried people wouldn't believe him because people would say, "Oh, it's that retard Yayotzin, he's probably just attention whoring," because IF this is true, then I'm sure people would have believed him back then (except maybe the Spanish SM64 channels).
I'm tempted to not believe Claudio because he only brought up starman3 as a result of the starman3 video being in the Hall of Shame post about him, seemingly to make himself look like a victim.
P.S. One of the evidences you used for the collage was literally a video done by A ROBLOX/SM64 MACHINIMA PEDOPHILE. Starman3/Jacobthemhero.
WHO I BARELY stopped talking to and left unscathed. I was almost a victim of him, for the ones that don't understand what I mean.
All of his "evidence" that starman3 "almost groomed" him is either already on the Internet or (to me) pure hearsay (sure, tu madre definitely knows all about starman3 trying to groom you), and considering how blatant he was about lying about some of the furry stuff:
From https://kiwifarms.st/profile-posts/comments/651618/FakeAFClausMystery said:Legitimate proof of what? You have nothing. The main autist that "outed me" has the Maya thing completely wrong. I have even tried to delete the FA account 2 years ago.
That's pretty much it. I left that fandom years ago. I don't wanna be part of it.
I hope you can see why I don't want to take him at face value. It's also why I was so insistent on asking for something more tangible than word. Again, even with all that you've shown me @FakeAFClausMystery, I still believe that your starman3 almost grooming story is "FakeAF.'
Last edited: