- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Heard chavs were shitting those dogs up. Figured it would happen after the XL bully ban.The typical XL bully owners have moved on to Cane Corso and Malinois dogs now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heard chavs were shitting those dogs up. Figured it would happen after the XL bully ban.The typical XL bully owners have moved on to Cane Corso and Malinois dogs now.
Is anyone surprised, I mean REALLY surprised? Before pitbulls/"bullies" it was german shepherds, before them rottweilers, before them dobermans, etc. Shitfucks will always follow a trend that they think makes them look cool, and if you ban one kind of dog they'll just move to another one and make its reputation just as bad. Breed legislation is so retarded - it completey ignores the actual problem in favor of idiots who don't know a chiweenie from a purebred beagle telling all the experts in the field how it REALLY is. Anyone who deals with dogs regularly knows how important early socialization and training is, I would argue it's a bigger factor than a dog's breed in how it turns out as an adult. All the dipshits who breed or buy these dogs off of reputation should be shot, they're the reason so many people and pets get mauled and so many dogs get rejected and put down every year.In the UK doodles and XL Bullies (not so much since ban!) are bred by chavvy retards. So not only are the doodles a mix of two (originally) working breeds (and god knows what else) they are unlikely to have an optimal early rearing before becoming imprisoned in a woman's sitting room.
The typical XL bully owners have moved on to Cane Corso and Malinois dogs now.
That poor dog is going to have a short lifespan and horrible joint issues.The way that big guy walks breaks my heart.
Even the longer lived mastiffs like the cane corso develop heartbreaking joint issues when they get old. My first corso had to be put down at 13 because she could no longer walk without randomly plopping down on the ground. Giant breeds are some of the most heartbreaking dogs to bring into your life because they will develop these issues no matter how many supplements and pain pills you give them.That poor dog is going to have a short lifespan and horrible joint issues.
Irish Wolfhounds and great danes always pop into my head. I've always been interested in wolfhounds for their personality, but damn the heartbreak. Such short lifespans, always eventual fluid buildups since their bodies simply can't pump enough..Even the longer lived mastiffs like the cane corso develop heartbreaking joint issues when they get old. My first corso had to be put down at 13 because she could no longer walk without randomly plopping down on the ground. Giant breeds are some of the most heartbreaking dogs to bring into your life because they will develop these issues no matter how many supplements and pain pills you give them.
Literally just a skinny Malinois, LMAO. Not a fancy mutt, or any kind of mutt, at all. The dark sable coat pattern is less common, but not even rare per se. Here's one example out of a million I could post:
Yes, but created by crossing a bunch of random dogs...none of them even look the same.Literally just a skinny Malinois, LMAO. Not a fancy mutt, or any kind of mutt, at all. The dark sable coat pattern is less common, but not even rare per se. Here's one example out of a million I could post:
View attachment 7217810
Unless they have linked to Embark DNA results of the dog, I don't believe it for a second. I'm not criticizing you at all, to be clear, but I'm saying these people are just retarded scammers. Take a dark sable Malinois and claim you spent 20 years refining and perfecting some novel breed made of 20 other breeds... profit or something? I don't know, but they're lying. It's a textbook dark Malinois, down to the white chest patch.Yes, but created by crossing a bunch of random dogs...none of them even look the same.
These 2 were the first 2 breed examples:
View attachment 7217870View attachment 7217871
Fair, it could be she used an image of one as a breeding goal, she also has CG mock-up pics.Unless they have linked to Embark DNA results of the dog, I don't believe it for a second. I'm not criticizing you at all, to be clear, but I'm saying these people are just retarded scammers. Take a dark sable Malinois and claim you spent 20 years refining and perfecting some novel breed made of 20 other breeds... profit or something? I don't know, but they're lying. It's a textbook dark Malinois, down to the white chest patch.
random.txt worthyThese people are just slamniggers in labcoats.
The main logic I've heard that munchkin cats are healthy is because they have bendier backs than a dog. That's it though.I didn't realize that people specifically bred munchkin cats until I read this thread. I owned a munchkin cat for around 10+ years; she wasn't specifically bred for it and was the only one of her litter with the mutation. She lived a long happy life, but in my personal opinion I don't think they should be bred for it.
My main issue is that she lacked what I consider one of the most important abilities in a cat; the ability to jump. My munchkin cat could barely even jump onto the couch, she had to claw her way up the sides of stuff that any other cat would be able to jump 2-3 times higher than. Whenever she would jump down from something it would make an audible thud because of her inability to properly absorb the impact of the fall with her legs. She was also the only obese cat I've ever owned, and I think her lack of mobility contributed to this.
While she did manage to adapt to it, I do think it limited her quality of life somewhat significantly.
View attachment 7227291
(her stubby little front paws are easy to see in this picture)
And this isn't even accurate, lordosis is exceedingly common with munchkin breeds, so that extra flexibility in cats is basically nullified.The main logic I've heard that munchkin cats are healthy is because they have bendier backs than a dog. That's it though.
The Toadline wiggers deserve at least a Nobel Prize nomination for reverse-engineering Tiktaalik. Give them a couple generations and the bullies will have gills and flippers.Why would you spend tons of money to revive an extinct canid that died out a paltry 12.000 years ago when skeemniggers have revived creatures from the Permian in their backyard using only dog cum?
This is not new. There was a cohort of 1930's technocrats who tried to "revive" the Aurochs through selective breeding, and they had a similar result: a cow that sort of resembles an aurochs on a superficial level but is not really provably an aurochs, because it doesn't have to fill the same ecological niche (no one is expecting these "dire wolves" to actually live on their own in the wild) nor did the breeders have enough data to really do more than make a cow LOOK like the aurochs.Note the large ears and long snout. And the fact that they chose a leucistic coloration (based on some samples that suggest such a coloration might have existed among dire wolves, oh and it just so happens that it matches human aesthetic preferences and pop culture depictions), gave them BASED ROMAN names to get silicon valley autistic retards interested, then gave the third one a GOT name and posed one with fucking GRRM.
Then realize that this 'de extincted' dire wolf contains literally 0 dire wolf DNA. DNA samples are a challenge with dire wolves despite there being an abundance of subfossil remains because the massive majority of those remains come from the La Brea tarpits and the natural petrochemical seeps have contaminated those bones. So instead what was done is they supposedly looked at "new data" on dire wolf DNA and made modifications to several genes to make the grey wolf DNA more similar. Note that current scientific consensus is that dire wolves are more closely related to jackals and bush dogs and are believed to have evolved in the Americas, in relative isolation from the grey wolf which evolved in Eurasia and then migrated to the Americas.
Reviving the Aurochs has a point at least. It went extinct recently and cattle are it's domesticated descendant, it is theoretically possible to make an animal that looks and behaves like an Aurochs through selettive breeding. In fact, modern attempts at it are getting relatively close.This is not new. There was a cohort of 1930's technocrats who tried to "revive" the Aurochs through selective breeding, and they had a similar result: a cow that sort of resembles an aurochs on a superficial level but is not really provably an aurochs, because it doesn't have to fill the same ecological niche (no one is expecting these "dire wolves" to actually live on their own in the wild) nor did the breeders have enough data to really do more than make a cow LOOK like the aurochs.