Culture Hollywood Is Cranking Out Original Movies. Audiences Aren’t Showing Up. - New movies based on fresh ideas are fizzling at the box office

By Ben Fritz
April 13, 2025 2:17 pm ET

1744720148344.webp
Director Christopher Landon with Meghann Fahy, who stars in the thriller ‘Drop.’ Photo: Bernard Walsh/Associated Press

LOS ANGELES—When director Christopher Landon introduced his new thriller, “Drop,” before its premiere at the Chinese Theater on Hollywood’s Walk of Fame, he had a warning for the packed auditorium.

“It’s really hard out there for an original movie,” he said, urging everyone who liked the Universal Pictures release to “scream it from the rooftops” and on social media.

“Drop” opened this weekend to an estimated $7.5 million domestically, one of two new movies based on fresh ideas that fizzled at the box office. The other was Disney’s “The Amateur,” a spy thriller adapted from a little-known 1981 book, which opened to an estimated $15 million.

After years of gripes from average moviegoers and Hollywood insiders alike about the seemingly nonstop barrage of sequels, spin offs and adaptations of comic books and toys, the film industry placed more bets on original ideas.

The results have been ugly.

Nearly every movie released by a major studio in the past year based on an original script or a little-known book has been a box-office disappointment. Before this weekend’s flops were Warner Bros. Discovery’s“Mickey 17” and “The Alto Knights,” Paramount’s “Novocaine,” Apple’s “Fly Me to the Moon,” Amazon’s “Red One,” and the independently financed “Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1” and “Megalopolis.”

1744720153948.webp
Jack Quaid in ‘Novocaine.’ Photo: Paramount/Everett Collection

Jason Blum, who produced “Drop” and built his company Blumhouse largely on original horror franchises, said audiences’ preference for known properties has made it harder to release original movies in theaters, “even though that’s where some of the most exciting and risky storytelling still lives.”

Need for advertising​

Getting people into theaters more frequently is a priority for a movie industry still recovering from the pandemic. Box-office revenue in the first three months of this year in the U.S. and Canada was the lowest it has been, excluding the pandemic, since 1996.

1744720215915.webp

t the CinemaCon industry convention in early April, theater owners said they welcome more original films, but only if they are backed by robust advertising campaigns. Building buzz for a new film in a media environment fractured between YouTube, TikTok, streaming and sports is tough, particularly when it is an unknown title.

“We’re opening films that have almost zero awareness,” said Bill Barstow, president of Main Street Theatres, a small Nebraska-based chain.

Many consumers are content to wait until an original motion picture is available to rent online a few weeks after its theatrical release or to stream on a service like Netflix in a few months.

‘Creating new franchises’​

The only films succeeding in the current environment are those with built-in audiences, like “A Minecraft Movie,” which was released in early April and has grossed more than $280 million domestically. And these days, even franchises can be far from a sure thing. Long-running series such as Marvel and DC superheroes and live-action remakes of Disney animated classics are showing their age and proving unreliable at the box office.

Studios say they have little choice but to make more original movies they hope will buck the odds.

1744720252960.webp
‘A Minecraft Movie’ has grossed more than $280 million domestically. Photo: Warner Bros/Everett Collection

“Telling original stories and taking risks is the only path toward creating new global franchises,” Bill Damaschke, Warner Bros.’ head of animation, said at CinemaCon.

Some of the increase in original film releases is attributable to Amazon and Apple, which are building film businesses with few well-established franchises. One of the biggest bets on an original film from any company this year is Apple’s “F1,” a June release starring Brad Pitt as a race-car driver.

Amazon hyped 11 coming movies to exhibitors at CinemaCon, of which six were originals. Among traditional studios, Warner Bros. is taking the most risks on originals, with big budget films from directors Paul Thomas Anderson and Maggie Gyllenhaal.

Hollywood’s next original release comes Friday with Warner’s “Sinners,” a horror movie starring Michael B. Jordan. Next month even Marvel, home to Hollywood’s biggest franchises, is taking a gamble with “Thunderbolts,” about a super team brand new to all but the most devoted comic-book readers.

Source (Archive)
 
Nearly every movie released by a major studio in the past year based on an original script or a little-known book has been a box-office disappointment. Before this weekend’s flops were Warner Bros. Discovery’s“Mickey 17”...

Stop right there. Let's talk about Mickey 17 for a moment. The initial teaser trailer gave us the concept, which looked darkly humorous and entertaining. Mickey 17's lead, Robert Pattinson, is an engaging actor whose performances in The Batman and The Lighthouse show he can sometimes even border on better than good. Based on the teaser alone, I could easily believe Mickey 17 would do really well at the box office.

And then the full-length trailers came out. And then the movie released, and the reviews came out. And then I saw clips of Hollywood uber-Leftist Mark Ruffalo showcasing his very Trump-like hair and doing his best batshit crazy evil power-mad villain shtick, and I thought Fuck that. No way.

Mickey 17
has clearly been made to appeal to, ahem, modern audiences. The problem with that precious target audience is that it barely exists in the real world and is largely confined to the kind of people the producer and the director like to hang out with at dinner parties or by the pool.

We don't want agitprop. We don't want a 90-minute political lecture by the commissar. Nobody does, not even the hardcore ideologues to whom an anti-Trump satire would most appeal.
 
Last edited:
The issue is the cost to go to the cinema. I'd rather spend 10$ on an indie game that will be 4 hours than spend the same (at minimum, before food and drink, or if I go with another person to it) for 2 hours of mediocre experience, at best.

No stars are worth seeing. You'd have more fun listening to a vtuber.
and it's stupid easy to get the tech to do a decent job of it at home
I just got an LCD projector off ebay, I was looking for a chinesium before the window closed, found a nice-ish one from a warehouse liquidation outfit for twenty bucks including shipping
turned out I actually got _three_ of them! had a 100" screen packed in too!

probably selling one of them to my job for ten bucks, gonna keep the other two.

One for a normal movie home thing, not sure what I'm gonna do with the other, but I want to try to come up with some crazy shit like a wall of a camera view of what's on the other side of the wall, I dunno.
 
If you want to succeed you have to be willing to take risks.
Instead of a single $120 million movie try making six $20 million movies and let the writers and directors do what they want. And stop hiring nepobabies and well-connecteds for everything.
Hollywood is completely out of touch with reality and the wants of the moviegoing audience. Time to encourage auteur culture again so they stop dictating to creatives what must be done, instead allowing the creatives the freedom to do what they feel audiences will respond to.
 
How about something original that doesn't stick to the Save the Cat script?

Every fucking movie uses the same fucking beats, I'm tired, boss.
How about "The World-Famous Adventures of Uncle Joe's Flying Corps!"?

Or "Surviving Kiwi Farms"?

Or maybe "That's Not Funny, That's Sick!"

Possibly "Bend Over, I'll Drive".


As can be seen, KFers can make up much better movies than the ones that are on.
 
I've never heard of any of the movies mentioned here besides the Minecraft one. I think part of the dynamic is that marketing has been a black hole for money for a long time. Studios throw money into marketing, and there is no way to gauge the relationship between what they put in and what they got out, so nobody who works in marketing is ever held accountable for a flop. Even when the problem is you never heard of half this shit
The problem is that marketers pushed so hard to inject advertisements into ever single aspect of people's lives that everyone has subconsciously built up resistance against it. Even when people don't have resistance, there's too much noise to pick out any singular thing.
It used to be that advertisements were segregated out from the rest of the populace. You'd get advertisements when you watched TV. They'd show up in the mail, in catalogues and whatnot. And they'd be on billboards and in stores. There was enough of disconnect that people would subconsciously expect to be advertised to, but it wasn't intrusive enough that they filtered it out and were in some cases willing to "see what else is out there."

Then some retarded MBAs got it in their heads that they could do subliminal marketing, and inject ads into literally everything. With the advent of smartphones, you could literally serve ads to people at all hours of the day. "It's literally too perfect to fail" thought the psychopathic retarded man with a larger nose than normal. Problem is there are three types of people: smart people, dumb people, and average people. The smart people are smart enough to see ads in their face, want them gone, and develop (or at least use) ways to mitigate and remove the ads. Average and dumb people might do this if someone tells them about it, but don't. However, their minds can't handle the outright abysmal state of getting ads pumped in front of your face 24/7, so their mind builds up barriers to mentally block them.
 
went through the trailers of a few movies that were mentioned, and one thing stuck out immediately

roastie looking, flat boob chick main character from Drop
drop.webp

love interest or something from novocaine
maxpayne.webp

smarmy nigger actual main character from mickey 17
micky.webp

i have one suggestion for movie creators that will immediately boost sales

STOP PUTTING UGLY WOMEN AND NIGGERS IN YOUR MOVIES. I'M SICK OF THEM. I DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM, ANYWHERE, EVER
 
went through the trailers of a few movies that were mentioned, and one thing stuck out immediately

roastie looking, flat boob chick main character from Drop
View attachment 7224772

love interest or something from novocaine
View attachment 7224771

smarmy nigger actual main character from mickey 17
View attachment 7224770

i have one suggestion for movie creators that will immediately boost sales

STOP PUTTING UGLY WOMEN AND NIGGERS IN YOUR MOVIES. I'M SICK OF THEM. I DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM, ANYWHERE, EVER
not 'ugly' but wait till you see Dunc 2, they cast Florence Pugh as a space princess of otherworldly beauty and didn't even give her good hair or costume design to punch it up.

contrast that with her rom-com featuring the extremely punchable Andrew Garfield to see her in her natural habitat
 
Hollywood was always going to be obsoleted by technology making it cost more to go to the theatre on the cinema's schedule than fire up the home theatre on-demand.

But rotting out their brains on political signaling, diversity casting, and "modern audience" writers for 15 years didn't delay it as much as competent non-partisan and sincere filmmaking could have.
 
You mean nobody is rushing out to see some shitty action movie starring a thoroughly mediocre nepobaby? The DEVIL you say!

I'd rather watch stupid schlock on Tubi than anything being shat out in theaters nowadays.

Andy Sidaris' movies were deeply silly and more than a little bit stupid, but they were also funny, the eye candy was top notch, and they DIDN'T come across like they hated their audience.
 
I think the last original IP I saw in theaters, or the last mainstream original IP at least, was Knives Out. It was full of subtle anti White shit, great replacement type stuff. The fact that every movie has some level of propaganda / brain reprogramming in it now is why I’ve largely given up on movies.
 
Back