Vriljami
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2025
From LGBT and religion article:
Muslims are intolerant because of...white people?
Muslims are intolerant because of...white people?
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- May 19, 2024
450+ references solely for the article on Elliot Rodger
And do you know what's the worst part? The article isn't even that long, there are OPs on KF who are both far longer and more in-depth, this is just padding to an absurd degree to try and shield their narrative from any criticism because "don't you see how many references this claim has? It must be the truth!". Utter madness
And do you know what's the worst part? The article isn't even that long, there are OPs on KF who are both far longer and more in-depth, this is just padding to an absurd degree to try and shield their narrative from any criticism because "don't you see how many references this claim has? It must be the truth!". Utter madness
Tootsie Bear
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2014
I agree. This is the leftists thought that genuine Muslims are peaceful people who are progressive. While you also have those who believe all non-white peoples were really open to LGBT and was White people who caused them to change for the worse.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2025
Attachments
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
Medieval enbys dood! (Spoiler: it's about faggotry)
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2022
Usually these conflate standard of living with ”freedom”. For example both the UK and Germany have enormously better healthcare than the USA, even poor people in those countries receive a higher standard of care than most wealthy Americans do. So because they score well in healthcare, they get a high score for something like ”equality of medical care”, even though that category probably should be interpreted as ”one will not receive inferior medical care on the basis of gender or race” in the context of ranking how free a country is.
- Joined
- May 12, 2021
I thought there was something fishy about this article, as it is way too autistically specific to be a run-of-the-mill Wikipedia featured article. Lo and behold, after I did some further digging...
There is one person who is primarily responsible for why this article was deemed "featured", and scrolling further down, they also created the article. Can you guess what this sort of person is once I opened up their profile?
Yep. It's one of those "very special" faggots who think they're doing the world a service by showing off their faggy autism to the world, especially with those "pronouns" the dyke is flaunting.
Also, with all the featured article and good article bullshit on top, it's very reminiscent of this image.
Is it not surprising at all that this faggot was insane enough to be locked up in solitary confinement before, and is even bragging about it on zir page as if it will get xem extra internet brownie points; thinking that being mentally ill is like an achievement to be earned on Xbox? After all, those terminally on Wikipedia should all be locked in a mental asylum with the keys thrown away, but that's just my opinion.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2021
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
TiL that the Pringles mascot is named Julius, and that his name came about because of a Wikipedia hoax.
Logo and mascot
The Pringles logo is a stylized cartoon caricature of the head of a male figure designed by Louis R. Dixon, with a large mustache and parted bangs (until 2001, the character had eyebrows and his bow tie framed the product name; in 1998, the bangs and lips were removed from the logo, and his head was widened a little). In 2020, the character was again revised with a minimalistic approach to generally negative reception.[44]
The mascot originally had no name, and the name originated with a Wikipedia hoax; in 2006, an editor inserted the then-hoax "Julius" into the Pringles Wikipedia article, which was subsequently picked up by other news outlets. The editors supported and promoted their claim through creating a Facebook page to raise awareness of Julius Pringles being his name.[45] Prior to this the mascot was officially known only as "Mr. P", no first name. By 2013, the name had spread and in a case of citogenesis-turned-real, Kellogg formally acknowledged Julius Pringles (abbreviated as "Mr. P"[46]).[47][48]
Logo and mascot
The Pringles logo is a stylized cartoon caricature of the head of a male figure designed by Louis R. Dixon, with a large mustache and parted bangs (until 2001, the character had eyebrows and his bow tie framed the product name; in 1998, the bangs and lips were removed from the logo, and his head was widened a little). In 2020, the character was again revised with a minimalistic approach to generally negative reception.[44]
The mascot originally had no name, and the name originated with a Wikipedia hoax; in 2006, an editor inserted the then-hoax "Julius" into the Pringles Wikipedia article, which was subsequently picked up by other news outlets. The editors supported and promoted their claim through creating a Facebook page to raise awareness of Julius Pringles being his name.[45] Prior to this the mascot was officially known only as "Mr. P", no first name. By 2013, the name had spread and in a case of citogenesis-turned-real, Kellogg formally acknowledged Julius Pringles (abbreviated as "Mr. P"[46]).[47][48]
Vriljami
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2025
Chris Chan doesn't get a page. But /mlp/ gets to be an article? What a sick joke.
Sorry for double post but can't edit because I'm a newbie.
Beyond parody.
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2022
Do these people have any hobbies or interests outside of pushing objects inside their rectums?
These people are so boring...
- Joined
- May 12, 2021
Here we go again in less than two weeks since the last time I posted on featured article bias; much sooner than I expected to return to report on this. Lo and behold, it's an Easter Sunday special! The eternal favoritism shall continue, this time with my second example.
Suspiciously enough, up until today, the article hasn't been edited on in years. I speculate that there has been quite a bit of tampering and rigging behind-the-scenes for the admins to promote this to featured, especially given that this article is INCREDIBLY short, but what else is expected from such a bureaucratic, antiquated, and corrupt Wikipedia?
Vriljami
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2025
Several of the sources are actually "Famous Fantastic Mysteries ", which is a primary source and isn't generally acceptable, so there's flagrant rule breaking in a featured article. JFC Wikipedia.
Qui-Gon's Gin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2025
That's only made clearer when you look at what they're citing: Mother Jones, Truthout, HuffPost, Salon, the Daily Beast, Jezebel, Vice News, etc.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
Robin's Donuts
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
How about something for us LOLbert bros.
I was reading up on Ludwig von Mises, and if you look at his biography they literally time skip from him being in WW1 (1918 to him ending up in the USA in 1940s. Imagine writing about a well known and public figure then skipping about 20 years of their life:
Oh, it's become he literally worked for the fucking fascist dictator of Austria (which is not mentioned in his Wikipedia biography, curious):
Also they never explained how a literal Jew managed to legally emigrate to the USA from the heart of Nazi Germany during WW2 and how he ended up working for the Rockefeller foundation (one of the original NWO groups).
I was reading up on Ludwig von Mises, and if you look at his biography they literally time skip from him being in WW1 (1918 to him ending up in the USA in 1940s. Imagine writing about a well known and public figure then skipping about 20 years of their life:
Oh, it's become he literally worked for the fucking fascist dictator of Austria (which is not mentioned in his Wikipedia biography, curious):
Also they never explained how a literal Jew managed to legally emigrate to the USA from the heart of Nazi Germany during WW2 and how he ended up working for the Rockefeller foundation (one of the original NWO groups).
Cheese Balls
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2024
On the front page of Wikipedia today... our old friends at Trans Lifeline got a mention! (Archive)
Also, why the fuck does some random faggot MTG YouTuber have a Wikipedia article?
Also, why the fuck does some random faggot MTG YouTuber have a Wikipedia article?
Vriljami
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2025
Wikipedia page for Trans Lifeline actually mentions the embezzling that was uncovered (in part) in Kiwifarms.
Honestly? Good for them. I was dead sure it wouldn't be mentioned.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Because the rules don't matter and Wikipedia is a captured institution.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022