Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[Octopi]

What a fucking crock of shit. She berates the detractor for relying on "speculative sources", when that entire article is her saying "I don't think that would happen actually".

 

[Chapalapachapa]

everyone knows that you cure alcoholism by drinking more.
this girl is legit stupid, like check out if she shits herself stupid

 

[Blarmed&Dangerous]

Aella is a great example of someone who is autistic, not meaningfully disabled by it (unlike CWC for instance), but is still an absolute dummy. Like, she didn't get the obsession necessary for an encyclopedic knowledge of birds or whatever, she just got being retarded about how actual real humans think and behave.

Also lmao that her arguments hinge on pedophilia being like homosexuality () and using a graph indicating that trannies are notably more interested in rape.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

Don't know if its been talked about but based on those "year of my life" things Aella does, you can tell she doesn't actually enjoy sex all that much, for her being a hooker is a hobby, she doesn't do it more than one day a month. when you factor out the hooker stuff, the times Aella has sex with someone and there isn't payment involved and its not a gangbang, you're left with very little sex. your average married couple fucks way more. even the King of England has more sex and he's an old man with an old wife.

Pretty sure this dude was technically a prostitute and she was his John. Even if the payment was only in the form of pizza.

even getting a woman to pay $10 in the form of pizza regularly means he's in the top 1% of hetero male prostitutes

And nerds will still pay four figures to experience that.

That really is the crazy part, i'd feel too much shame, why pay a whore that any other guy gets for free. Its one thing if its someone completely out of your league, but if its some hoe you could buy some shots for why bother

 

[Mudkipcorn]

This is part of her counter-argument to the position that watching certain acts performed in porn makes the viewer more likely to try those acts in real life.


I have no idea how the opinions of her followers strengthen any kind of argument. People make all kinds of false assumptions about themselves/people in general. This is no kind of evidence of anything. But hey, there're graphs so it must be well reasoned. Also, I have no idea why she asked separately about trying things with existing partners versus other partners. What kind of difference would that make?

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

What kind of difference would that make?

she's coming at it from the perspective of a whore. there are probably tons of fetishes a guy would never do with their wife or girlfriend to the point they know it might destroy the relationship whereas whores are mostly up for anything. of course the data shows its a moot point, but i can at least understand her thinking.

 

[Hantavirus]

"My coomer Twitter orbiters said they wouldn't try bestiality just from watching it in porn" except it is a well-known phenomenon that gooners desensitize themselves to "vanilla" porn and start to look for increasingly extreme pornography to feel the same rush that they can't get from the normal stuff. This is how seemingly normal people who do not have a history of childhood abuse get caught with a hard drive full of CP trying to meet up with a minor. Nobody expects to find themselves in that position, and it's not the pornography per se that causes it, but the addiction to the dopamine rush of cooming.

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

This is part of her counter-argument to the position that watching certain acts performed in porn makes the viewer more likely to try those acts in real life.

Even if this is true, it'd be completely irrelevant to the question at hand. She asked people who largely aren't into $FETISH, whereas the CP question is specifically about whether people who already are into fucking children are more likely to go out and do so after watching CP. Rationalist genius at work.

 

[Chapalapachapa]

cp isnt a fetish, this retard should legit get a bullet for even thinking that shit

 

[Adrenochrome Dreams]

Aella is a great example of someone who is autistic, not meaningfully disabled by it (unlike CWC for instance), but is still an absolute dummy. Like, she didn't get the obsession necessary for an encyclopedic knowledge of birds or whatever, she just got being retarded about how actual real humans think and behave.

Also lmao that her arguments hinge on pedophilia being like homosexuality () and using a graph indicating that trannies are notably more interested in rape.

I think she just lacks human understanding due to being isolated (homeschooled) and beaten as a child, and her lack of formal education has hindered her ability to reason.

There’s nothing congenitally wrong with her.

 

[Merry]

Well, tomorrow's MATI is going to be a busy one

 

[Justice Tony]

The sad thing is our society is so fucked up it might bite. We need to realize that sometimes harm reduction is not worth it. Do we want to save children from harm? Of course, who wouldn't. But to do so at the cost of normalizing pedophilia? No. Because we know that eventually these perverts will break down the distinction between AI and real CSAM since degeneracy always wins. Hold the line and die on the hill, that's all we can do but we must do it because it is right.

Plus I've seen your butthole so I don't respect your opinion.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Took her long enough to finally publish that article. Too bad exactly 0% of the time spent on it was dedicated to any sort of coherent rational thought.

I have no clue why "rationalist" fags take her seriously at all when she posts articles like this full of fallacious assumptions and just-so stories.

If her hypothesis was anywhere close to being true, lolicon/shotacon would reduce the rates of child molestation, yet it does the exact opposite.

 

[AngryAboutInternets]

All I read there is "please, please make exceptions for AI CP to let actual pedophiles pretend they thought all of their CP was AI-generated in court so they can get away with crimes more easily".

Like, that's the only conceivable reason someone would defend this, assuming they're not completely retarded. Every study on pedophiles that has even attempted to examine whether having CP raises or lowers chance of offending on a child says that at a minimum there is no effect. Pedophiles cannot "relieve themselves" using pornography, they have a compulsion to offend on real children in real life. I'll defend a lot of shit in the name of freedom of speech, expression, and shit just plain not being harmful enough to be worth making illegal, but AI-generated CP/CSAM is not one of them. There is no conceivable reason that it should be protected under free speech laws any more than the real thing, the sheer amount of legal fuckery that would result would make prosecuting CP nearly impossible.

 

[blackface enthusiast]

There’s nothing congenitally wrong with her.

I can think of a lot of things wrong with her genitals.

 

[keke]

I feel like anyone with common sense, especially here, knows her article is nonsense. All it will do is make grooming real children easier, and normalisation isn’t something that happens with no consequences. Child molesters already view child pornography beforehand.

There are thousands of hours of CSAM already available and people still use torturing animals (taking the place of a child, which is harder to procure for being tortured to death) just to get their kicks in new ways. It’s not fun if they know the pain isn’t real (sadism and csa is linked, etc etc).

The worst part is normies fall for these retarded arguments. The real controversial opinion is nothing will stop these people and porn makes it worse. That would actually be harder for Aella to grapple with given her biases. She can’t even fathom it.

 

[Markass the Worst]

the sheer amount of legal fuckery that would result would make prosecuting CP nearly impossible.

The legal system already has a hard time jailing pedos. Most of them only get Twitter callouts and Google docs. It's rare for police to actually arrest. If they do, the sentence is often little more than a few years in prison.

That Aella doesn't acknowledge this is retarded.

 

[Paper Machete]

you can tell she doesn't actually enjoy sex all that much, for her being a hooker is a hobby, she doesn't do it more than one day a month

Being a whore isn't a hobby. I think she got involved due to molestering nonsense but somewhere in that dim, thick skull, she realized in the e-grift sphere you can get by more on being seen as a whore as opposed to actually whoring. Just occasionally do enough to keep up the pretense and ensure simps are still around and there you go.

I hope whatever parasitic worms are chewing through her grey matter quicken their pace. There is only so much "sex research" based on questionnaires she gives her autistic, nerd johns the world can take.

 

[Brap God]

I have no clue why "rationalist" fags take her seriously at all when she posts articles like this full of fallacious assumptions and just-so stories.

Most rationalists don't seem to be any smarter than the average redditor, and equal parts thirsty neckbeards, so this strikes me as par for the course.

 

[Hantavirus]

It's time to remind the newfriends in this thread that there is no evidence of Rachael Slick ever actually getting paid for sex, only her assertions, vagueposting on Twitter, and a handful of photos that look like they might have been taken in a hotel room. Add to this the fact that she has been in what you could (at a stretch) call a "romantic relationship" the entire time she has been a person of interest, her self-admitted sex numbers are pitiful. Either the johns or her soyfriend Nate are getting short shrift. More like both.