Balldo Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Internet shock jock" not-allowed-to-practice abortionist "lawyer", swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a felonious, copyright cuck. End-stage career failure: normies know.

Thanks @hawkisnight and @Sneed Force One. Pleading to a charge so that m'ladies go free is surprisingly honorable (?) of Nick to do.
They test for metabolites, not the presence of base cocaine. It cannot have been transferred to the hair.
Metabolites are the result of the body processing cocaine and they are deposited inside the hair, not the outside.
That's what I was referring to: cocaine can be absorbed via the skin and then it would be processed by the body. When someone snorts a line there's still residue left behind unless they go HAM licking that surface (not putting that past Nick or his hoes).
You are proof Nick's lies manage to mislead people.
And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills, especially when I went out of my way to still denounce Nick.
 
At this point it's probably the work he puts in to asking his parents to give him money so their grandchildren have a roof over their head and spaghettios. Feels like that's why Kayla got with the retard to begin with, as she seems pretty content doing fuck all herself.
Once upon a time being a broodmare for the upper crust was a privilege afforded to talented women who ruled from the shadows.
I guess drugs and Star Trek all day in exchange for doing absolutely nothing but being an abuse sponge ain't so bad, depending on who you ask.
 
We're here to laugh at every detail.
Yup. And his alternative education tactics of his children are fair game provided that we don't go off-roading into a separate discussion of whether of not that is something worthy to be made fun of to my eyes. But every time this comes up people get REALLY mad. Then it isn't fun anymore. So they get an automatic win just by making things not fun. Not whether other people find it funny which is pretty subjective and most of this site would be shut down if it operated on that basis alone. So here we are.
Anyways, good talk. Stay safe. Keep your hands and feet inside the ride until it comes to a complete stop. Do not consume with alcohol. Don't feed the wildlife.
 
And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills
The "windmill" is the claim that the tested for metabolite could land in the child's hair via transfer, which is a Nick created rumor and cope that he has been spreading on social media, in stream chats and also postulated on stream. All in an attempt to justify the positive cocaine test as the fault of someone other than himself or Kayla.

He went as far as quoting a Quora hack as a source.

Denouncing such nonsense is important, because that way Nick's narratives and claims slip into the general debate as "possible alternatives".
So please get more MATI because someone points out that your cope take is factually wrong. That you are claiming you "denounce Nick", while at the same time offering an alternative explanation for the most damning event in this entire trainwreck, the positive test for cocaine metabolites of an, at the time, 8-year-old girl, is just stupid.

I'll fight your windmill any day of the week buddy.
 
And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills, especially when I went out of my way to still denounce Nick.
Stop being retarded. There are 8300+ pages that you didn't bother read. Even cruising through the highlights for just a month would have caught you up. People put in time to gather and post information. Stop wasting time with questions and statements that are easily found with minimum effort. Go out of your way to read.
 
The "windmill" is the claim that the tested for metabolite could land in the child's hair via transfer, which is a Nick created rumor and cope that he has been spreading on social media, in stream chats and also postulated on stream. All in an attempt to justify the positive cocaine test as the fault of someone other than himself or Kayla.
Is there a different meaning to "transfer" that you are using here? I take it to mean that Nick is coping that some cocaine "magically settled" on the child's hair at some point while we know form the drug test that coke metabolites were found in the child's hair follicles. Are you and I in agreement on this?

Thus one theory that came to my mind is the child absorbing cocaine through skin contact with whatever surfaces/items that Nick was using for his habit. This would explain how the coke was metabolized. I base this on reading the report of how messy Nick's house was and how a container and vile of coke were found in his master bedroom. Also the fact that no one's talking about a motive for Nick to drug his daughter and that coke-heads are notoriously bad at sharing their "snow".
while at the same time offering an alternative explanation
Why is considering alternative explanations an issue? To be extra clear, do you see that my theory still makes Nick liable for child abuse/endangerment and in no way excuses what happened?
I'll fight your windmill any day of the week buddy.
I tried to put it gently in my previous post, but my point was that you're overly invested and going "Full Sneed Ahead". That doesn't look healthy.
 
And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills, especially when I went out of my way to still denounce Nick.
I read your concern trolling, it seems like no one is really buying it. Saying "I denounce Nick" as if you believe some non-specific blanket denouncement will lend any credibility to your following defence of the worst thing that Nick did is frankly ludicrous, it's not going to get past anyone here. Nick is a Child Starver, Nick is Child Abuser, Nick fed his 8 year old daughter Cocaine.

If you are somehow serious and not a concern troll then take the effort to at least read the OP and the highlights, these matters have been gone over to death.
 
Thus one theory that came to my mind is the child absorbing cocaine through skin contact with whatever surfaces/items that Nick was using for his habit. This would explain how the coke was metabolized. I base this on reading the report of how messy Nick's house was and how a container and vile of coke were found in his master bedroom. Also the fact that no one's talking about a motive for Nick to drug his daughter and that coke-heads are notoriously bad at sharing their "snow".
Read the forum and there are lots of research already posted. Namely the amount of cocaine metabolites found in her hair doesn't support your "theory." It wasn't trace amounts, it was 10x a drug user min level. If humans could absorb the levels found in her hair through normal skin contact, they wouldn't snort it, they just rub it on their hands and people would test positive for handling money. Read the forum.
 
Thus one theory that came to my mind is the child absorbing cocaine through skin contact with whatever surfaces/items that Nick was using for his habit.
That would check out if they found only a few metabolites. IIRC the amount of metabolites found corresponds to actual usage.
In perhaps the most shocking revelation, mere hours before Nick's planned triumphant return stream on Youtube and Rumble, documents were leaked to the Farms via a burner account reveling that hair follicle drug testing had indicated that one of the youngest children in the Rekieta household had tested postiive for cocaine metabolites at 10x the false positive threshold.
WTH (1).webp
500mg is the cutoff, Audreyrose tested at a level of over 5000mg.

Why is considering alternative explanations an issue?
They think you're sweeping because 1. they do not know you're a 4chan refugee trying to integrate with forum culture (otherwise your account creation date would be suspect), 2. this topic has already been discussed months ago and 3. it's covered in the OP with sources, so they think you got the idea from Nick, as the source for this claim (the report) does not leave "accidental environmental exposure" as a possibility... unless the kid fell face first into a vat of cocaine.
 
Nobody else does either. It's an absolutely bizarre Nick thing. Nick somehow thinks DRIVIN MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDZ around is some huge burden. Nobody else on the face of the planet even understands this.

And it isn't even just normal shit. This faggot, every time he gets pulled over for speeding, immediately starts ranting and raving about DRIVIN MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS around. This is just for normal speeding ticket type things. You can read them in MCRO. He literally starts gibbering and foaming at the mouth about HE KEEEEEDZ every time he gets pulled over to the point it shows up in the trafffic cop's report.

Absolute mental case.
rekieta-bus.webp

No friends, no hobbies and his biggest investment in time is driving his kids.
To paraphrase PWR's motto:
- No life
- No wife
- Hoe wife
- No friends
- No hope...
 
I dunno if other homeschooling parents are credible personal references, their whole thing is that they are doing stuff with kids that they don't want others looking into, but I take your point.
Just saying that this guy showed the signs of being an outlier in a group of outliers. Then the outliers here got mad that I called them that. If you wanna police it, go ahead.
It's just that every now and then I get reports of severely off-topic discussions. Sometimes even I can't help it but join in.
Okay, then, let's focus the homeschooling topic on Nick.
  • Homeschooled kids are more isolated. That's largely the point. Evangelical Christian-based homeschooling (Nick's) literal agenda is to control the curriculum, usually for, say, creationism and originalism wrt the Constitution (Nick taught it at the co-op and espoused his views on his channel). Both are fine arguments, but they should be taught in the context of opposing views (Darwinism & a "living Constitution"). If not, no kid will be properly educated on modern discourse.

  • Nick has a habit of isolating people to control them, as documented by Kayla, April, many fans, Null, etc., whom he instructs to call/email him so he can bully/manipulate them into his worldview.

  • Willmar/Spicer is a solidly red district of MN. In all my fairly exhaustive review of local stories, I've not seen a single serious issue related blue-haired teachers on a trans/non-binary agenda, or porn-filled books in the school libraries. (I recall one male teacher in a town an hour away who was diddling some young kids; he was convicted for a lengthy stay in prison.)

  • Nick's local school district is fairly well ranked in MN, which scores in the top 30% of US states overall.

  • There is a local K-12 Christian private school easily accessible to the Rekietas. Odd that the Rekieta kids aren't given that option until they're teenagers, despite all his whining about driving. I wonder why. (Sarcasm)

  • Nick has a habit of being an outlier, but not in a good way for kids: coke, foreclosure, polycule, swinging resorts, ad hoc Rx self-dosing for supposed sleep disorders, etc, etc, etc.

  • Mandatory reporters are scary for the guilty. For every HORRIBLE story (many) that makes headlines about teachers, I'm willing to bet there are another 100 in which they've acted as righteous mandatory reporters wrt parental abuse (privately handled by the courts so we don't see them). LO! Guess who reported concerns about Nick's kids? A mandatory reporter from the church and teacher, and it was later discovered that one of his kids tested positive for coke.
My point is obvious.

I have a lot of sympathy for parents who choose to homeschool, particularly in blue areas in which school systems are woke-driven (plenty). I see no evidence of that issue in Spicer. That leaves the question of why Nick would choose to homeschool his kids. It's obvious that he wants to control all those around him and has plenty of skeletons to hide.

Edit: Clarity
 
Last edited:
The other posters actually bullied me into reading the OP and it's an absolute treasure trove. Thanks for taking the time to explain and correct me without immediately jumping into an "us vs them" mindset and immediately assuming I'm some kind of "Nick shill".
as the source for this claim (the report) does not leave "accidental environmental exposure" as a possibility... unless the kid fell face first into a vat of cocaine
Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave Audreyrose cocaine"?
Because right now his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Debate has raged in the thread (spurred by experts, internet experts, and Balldo himself) as to the exact meaning of this result, the effect on the results based upon immature physiology, the type of test, the error associated with the test, and other factors, but what is known is that having even one child out of five test positive is definitely not a good look.
...not that this matters too much; it's just confusing.

I see now that there's no point speculating about the coke test because the news dropped a year ago and everyone here had their fill of discussing it. I apologize for butting in.

That said, a big steamy fart in the face of anyone who thinks they are important enough for someone to come and shill for Nick on KF. Like holy shit, please get over yourself.
 
Last edited:
his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Well, yes and no.

Leading theories are 1. Nick gave it to her as a misguided attempt to treat her ADHD (there were murmurings he was saying you could use the drug that way) 2. she copied her parents and did it herself or 3. she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)

However, it is clear that the drug got into her system via direct ingestion.

Also, always read the OP, our users put a lot of effort into those (usually).
 
Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave Audreyrose cocaine"?
Because right now his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Because its not. Chances are the child saw the parents use it, found some lying around, decided to mimic the parents and ingest it.
The alternative would be that someone gave it to the daughter intentionally, which is only supported by conjecture based on Nick/Kayla talking about drugs in a very libertarian manner and Nick at some point discussed the medicinal properties of cocaine. There is no solid evidence that supports the child was given the cocaine intentionally.


To hide his neglect/abuse, to reduce the chance of the kids blabbing, or a mandatory reporter noticing something funny.
The kids went to a school-coop, which is where people saw the neglect and reported it. "Home Schooling" =/= "Home Schooling"
They do not attend a public school, but rather the local self-organized church school thing.
 
Because its not. Chances are the child saw the parents use it, found some lying around, decided to mimic the parents and ingest it.
...
There is no solid evidence that supports the child was given the cocaine intentionally.​
OK, now I'm on the same page with you because initially I thought the only theory you were willing to entertain is Nick intentionally drugging his daughter. I discounted that theory because coke-heads aren't known to be generous, but after reading the long list of degeneracy documented in the OP I now realize that nothing should be ruled out completely.

Personally, I don't really care what happens to Nick and, like many others, feel more concern for the kids. Hopefully their mom gets some support from family or the state because she's going to struggle caring for them even if she manages to stay clean. I'll come back to see the discussion when Nick's verdict is announced.

she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)
I always thought coke bullets were just dosage dispensers like picrel that were repurposed from snuff tobacco as opposed to an edible?
Not that it undermines the argument...
sno-4-aluminum-snuff-bullets-copy.webp



While searching to confirm my recollection I stumbled across this 1987 study: "Marijuana and cocaine interactions in humans: cardiovascular consequences"
...a one gram marijuana cigarette (0-2.7% delta 9-THC w/w) was smoked. Cocaine hydrochloride (0-32 mg) was administered intravenously 13 minutes after the start of marijuana smoking...
Born too early to explore the universe; born too late to volunteer for free cocaine/marijuana interaction studies...
 
Well, yes and no.

Leading theories are 1. Nick gave it to her as a misguided attempt to treat her ADHD (there were murmurings he was saying you could use the drug that way) 2. she copied her parents and did it herself or 3. she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)

However, it is clear that the drug got into her system via direct ingestion.

Also, always read the OP, our users put a lot of effort into those (usually).
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
 
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
Her test results exceeded the scale of the test. Trace amounts would not cause that, she either took one very large dose in the timeframe it would remain detectable in her hair, or frequently used cocaine over a longer timeframe.

I think the one large accidental event is more likely, and would coincide with an event where Nick had to skip two streams because of a "family medical emergency" (or something along those lines, I do not remember the exact phrasing) where he had to take care of someone. He must have literally sat at home hoping she would make it, because a trip to an ER would have resulted in immediately CPS involvement and police called.
 
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
Also note that this was only kid out of 5. I would expect one or two others also show somewhat elevated levels if there was that much cross-contamination.
 
Been playing loud music outside the judges house all night to ensure he’s good and cranky this morning. :)
I would have thought you'd be outside the Rekieta compound holding the boombox above your head until Kayla fled into your arms.
Pleading to a charge so that m'ladies go free is surprisingly honorable (?) of Nick to do.
Nothing Nick does is honorable. If he bargained for Kayla and April to get charges dropped as part of his plea it was because he knew they had enough dirt to bury him six feet deep.
The other posters actually bullied me into reading the OP and it's an absolute treasure trove.
Not reading the OP before posting in a thread to ask questions that have already been settled months ago makes you a faggot of the highest order.
 
Back