- Joined
- Apr 11, 2023
You mean when you stop doing it for free?Nah.
Not until I get a payrise.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean when you stop doing it for free?Nah.
Not until I get a payrise.
The "windmill" is the claim that the tested for metabolite could land in the child's hair via transfer, which is a Nick created rumor and cope that he has been spreading on social media, in stream chats and also postulated on stream. All in an attempt to justify the positive cocaine test as the fault of someone other than himself or Kayla.And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills
Stop being retarded. There are 8300+ pages that you didn't bother read. Even cruising through the highlights for just a month would have caught you up. People put in time to gather and post information. Stop wasting time with questions and statements that are easily found with minimum effort. Go out of your way to read.And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills, especially when I went out of my way to still denounce Nick.
Is there a different meaning to "transfer" that you are using here? I take it to mean that Nick is coping that some cocaine "magically settled" on the child's hair at some point while we know form the drug test that coke metabolites were found in the child's hair follicles. Are you and I in agreement on this?The "windmill" is the claim that the tested for metabolite could land in the child's hair via transfer, which is a Nick created rumor and cope that he has been spreading on social media, in stream chats and also postulated on stream. All in an attempt to justify the positive cocaine test as the fault of someone other than himself or Kayla.
Why is considering alternative explanations an issue? To be extra clear, do you see that my theory still makes Nick liable for child abuse/endangerment and in no way excuses what happened?while at the same time offering an alternative explanation
I tried to put it gently in my previous post, but my point was that you're overly invested and going "Full Sneed Ahead". That doesn't look healthy.I'll fight your windmill any day of the week buddy.
I read your concern trolling, it seems like no one is really buying it. Saying "I denounce Nick" as if you believe some non-specific blanket denouncement will lend any credibility to your following defence of the worst thing that Nick did is frankly ludicrous, it's not going to get past anyone here. Nick is a Child Starver, Nick is Child Abuser, Nick fed his 8 year old daughter Cocaine.And your post is proof that you're so invested in this drama that you're tilting at windmills, especially when I went out of my way to still denounce Nick.
Read the forum and there are lots of research already posted. Namely the amount of cocaine metabolites found in her hair doesn't support your "theory." It wasn't trace amounts, it was 10x a drug user min level. If humans could absorb the levels found in her hair through normal skin contact, they wouldn't snort it, they just rub it on their hands and people would test positive for handling money. Read the forum.Thus one theory that came to my mind is the child absorbing cocaine through skin contact with whatever surfaces/items that Nick was using for his habit. This would explain how the coke was metabolized. I base this on reading the report of how messy Nick's house was and how a container and vile of coke were found in his master bedroom. Also the fact that no one's talking about a motive for Nick to drug his daughter and that coke-heads are notoriously bad at sharing their "snow".
That would check out if they found only a few metabolites. IIRC the amount of metabolites found corresponds to actual usage.Thus one theory that came to my mind is the child absorbing cocaine through skin contact with whatever surfaces/items that Nick was using for his habit.
In perhaps the most shocking revelation, mere hours before Nick's planned triumphant return stream on Youtube and Rumble, documents were leaked to the Farms via a burner account reveling that hair follicle drug testing had indicated that one of the youngest children in the Rekieta household had tested postiive for cocaine metabolites at 10x the false positive threshold.
They think you're sweeping because 1. they do not know you're a 4chan refugee trying to integrate with forum culture (otherwise your account creation date would be suspect), 2. this topic has already been discussed months ago and 3. it's covered in the OP with sources, so they think you got the idea from Nick, as the source for this claim (the report) does not leave "accidental environmental exposure" as a possibility... unless the kid fell face first into a vat of cocaine.Why is considering alternative explanations an issue?
Nobody else does either. It's an absolutely bizarre Nick thing. Nick somehow thinks DRIVIN MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDZ around is some huge burden. Nobody else on the face of the planet even understands this.
And it isn't even just normal shit. This faggot, every time he gets pulled over for speeding, immediately starts ranting and raving about DRIVIN MUH KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDS around. This is just for normal speeding ticket type things. You can read them in MCRO. He literally starts gibbering and foaming at the mouth about HE KEEEEEDZ every time he gets pulled over to the point it shows up in the trafffic cop's report.
Absolute mental case.
To paraphrase PWR's motto:No friends, no hobbies and his biggest investment in time is driving his kids.
I dunno if other homeschooling parents are credible personal references, their whole thing is that they are doing stuff with kids that they don't want others looking into, but I take your point.
Just saying that this guy showed the signs of being an outlier in a group of outliers. Then the outliers here got mad that I called them that. If you wanna police it, go ahead.
Okay, then, let's focus the homeschooling topic on Nick.It's just that every now and then I get reports of severely off-topic discussions. Sometimes even I can't help it but join in.
Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave Audreyrose cocaine"?as the source for this claim (the report) does not leave "accidental environmental exposure" as a possibility... unless the kid fell face first into a vat of cocaine
...not that this matters too much; it's just confusing.Debate has raged in the thread (spurred by experts, internet experts, and Balldo himself) as to the exact meaning of this result, the effect on the results based upon immature physiology, the type of test, the error associated with the test, and other factors, but what is known is that having even one child out of five test positive is definitely not a good look.
Well, yes and no.his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
Because its not. Chances are the child saw the parents use it, found some lying around, decided to mimic the parents and ingest it.Does that mean Himedall needs to update the OP to say definitively that "Nick gave Audreyrose cocaine"?
Because right now his summary reads as if the true positive of the test is not indicative of how the drug got into her system...
The kids went to a school-coop, which is where people saw the neglect and reported it. "Home Schooling" =/= "Home Schooling"To hide his neglect/abuse, to reduce the chance of the kids blabbing, or a mandatory reporter noticing something funny.
OK, now I'm on the same page with you because initially I thought the only theory you were willing to entertain is Nick intentionally drugging his daughter. I discounted that theory because coke-heads aren't known to be generous, but after reading the long list of degeneracy documented in the OP I now realize that nothing should be ruled out completely.Because its not. Chances are the child saw the parents use it, found some lying around, decided to mimic the parents and ingest it.
...
There is no solid evidence that supports the child was given the cocaine intentionally.
I always thought coke bullets were just dosage dispensers like picrel that were repurposed from snuff tobacco as opposed to an edible?she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)
Born too early to explore the universe; born too late to volunteer for free cocaine/marijuana interaction studies......a one gram marijuana cigarette (0-2.7% delta 9-THC w/w) was smoked. Cocaine hydrochloride (0-32 mg) was administered intravenously 13 minutes after the start of marijuana smoking...
Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?Well, yes and no.
Leading theories are 1. Nick gave it to her as a misguided attempt to treat her ADHD (there were murmurings he was saying you could use the drug that way) 2. she copied her parents and did it herself or 3. she found a cocaine bullet and thought it was a piece of candy and ate it (that is what I believe)
However, it is clear that the drug got into her system via direct ingestion.
Also, always read the OP, our users put a lot of effort into those (usually).
Her test results exceeded the scale of the test. Trace amounts would not cause that, she either took one very large dose in the timeframe it would remain detectable in her hair, or frequently used cocaine over a longer timeframe.Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
Also note that this was only kid out of 5. I would expect one or two others also show somewhat elevated levels if there was that much cross-contamination.Would cross-contamination would be possible? Such as using a plate with residues of coke, or something like that? Or are the results too high for that?
I would have thought you'd be outside the Rekieta compound holding the boombox above your head until Kayla fled into your arms.Been playing loud music outside the judges house all night to ensure he’s good and cranky this morning.![]()
Nothing Nick does is honorable. If he bargained for Kayla and April to get charges dropped as part of his plea it was because he knew they had enough dirt to bury him six feet deep.Pleading to a charge so that m'ladies go free is surprisingly honorable (?) of Nick to do.
Not reading the OP before posting in a thread to ask questions that have already been settled months ago makes you a faggot of the highest order.The other posters actually bullied me into reading the OP and it's an absolute treasure trove.
Thank you; I had heard it was tomorrow but I wasn't sure what time. So that'll be 11:00 a.m. EST and and 8:00 a.m. out on the west coast. Got it and thanks again.10 am is sentencing. I hope that @Fapcop bought refundable tickets.
If Rekieta gets jail time (and I hope he does) then the attorneys for every inmate who have to serve time in jail with Rekieta should file motions for sentence reduction for each of their clients. The argument could be that having so spend a minute in a jail with Nick Rekieta, unable to escape his whining and complaining and bloviating, should count as three minutes or more. The lawyers can come up with a number referred to as "The Rekieta Annoyance Factor" (such as the 3 minutes of time served for every 1 minute spent with Rekieta) and then make the arguments to the court that each client's sentence should be reduced.If he does get jail time can you imagine how annoying he is going to be for everybody with all his I'm a Lawyer don't you know shit.
Not all of them are repurposed snuff bullets. I have been around cocaine addicts, and I saw those little plastic capsules all the time. Kid thinks it's hard candy (especially if it's colored plastic), puts it in her mouth and chews, or just swallows it, it gets released into her system by the plastic breaking open. Maybe she opened it up and just ate the content, thinking it was fizzy powder or something.I always thought coke bullets were just dosage dispensers like picrel that were repurposed from snuff tobacco as opposed to an edible?